The mini-string segments that work to comprise the substringular field general basis that works to interconnect gauge-bosons to their directly corresponding light-cone-gauge eigenstates so that the said gauge-bosons may be able to "pluck" the second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates so that the necessary Schwinger-Indices may be formed -- so that the Rarita Structure may function in so as to indirectly allow for both gravity and Gaussian Transformations -- comes from the opposite general side of the mentioned gauge-bosons in relation to the general directoralization as to where the said E(6)XE(6) strings pluck the mentioned second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates in the manner that I have stated in prior posts. So, gauge-bosons pluck light-cone-gauge eigenstates so that the light-cone-gauge may operate in the manner that it must function. From the other general side of such a Gliossi-based interaction, there is substringular field substrate in the form of mini-string that works -- via the operations that happen through their corresponding operands -- to pull and push the said E(6)XE(6) strings in such a manner in so that the essential plucking that I have mentioned may occur. The mini-string segments that move the gauge-bosons, in order that these may perform their functional operations, is not compactified to any viable extent, while, the mini-string segment-like links that work to comprise second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates is relatively quite compactified. This is on account of the condition that the light-cone-gauge -- on account of the stress modulae that is applied to it -- must bear a significantly higher fractal modulus than what would ordinarily be expected from segments of holonomic stratum indices of substringular field eigenstates that exist in the form of mini-string segments.
Abelian light-cone-gauge topology is purely supplemental over the Laplacian-based mapping of its trajectory in-between a corelative given arbitrary Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate and its corresponding superstring of discrete energy permittvity, while non-abelian light-cone-gauge topology bears a sinusoidal-based Laplacian-based mapping of its field in-between a given arbitrary Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate and its corresponding superstring of discrete energy permittivity.
There is more of an explaination of corelation that I will continue with later!
Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment