A Little Bit Of Additioinal Help

Fock Space has numerous pseudal spatial dimensions associated with it.  This is possible because of the function of unit shells that act like unit spheres that are codifferentiable with unit spheres that act like unit shells -- this happening in such a manner so as to allow for a numerous quantum of dimensional trains.  Yet, this does not disqualify the condition that there are negative-norm-states.  You see, if there were no negative-norm-states, there could be no point commutators, since these two types of norm-states work to an extent to recycle into each other  This happens in so that the topology of the   substringular may be able to flow during the sequential series of instantons that work to form the kinematic activity of the reality of physical energy.  This is also because point commutators need a corresponding orientation in terms of a pseudal-field-trajectory.  If there were no point commutators, then, there would be no superstrings, since the point particles that comprise any given arbitrary set of superstrings must be in a constant state of conformal invariance.  And, heck, if there were no superstrings, there would be no material phenomena at all.  So, how does one solve this seeming incongruity?  It may be said that a positive vacuum has a large number of pseudal dimensions -- since these so-called dimensions bear a large number of "tenses of imagination" which form countless pseudo-dimensional trains.  This is because, in Fock Space, this type of assortment appears to be even more large on account of the condition that the here related wave-propagations  -- being more truly outside of the corresponding point particles' commutative Gliossi field -- form a relatively large number of "dimensional-trains."  Here is a description that may help one to pictorially see what I have just described.:  Take four given arbitrary metaphorical kinematically-based-meshed gears.  Imagine the four prior mentioned gears rotating in their respective oscillatorial loci as phenomena that may be interchangeably either shells or spheres.  The oscillations, as extended from the "unit shells" that act like "unit spheres" in this case scenario, here, have a common thickness -- as may be extrapolated by a relatively simple variations of parameters.  Therefore, when one is to consider the fractal conditions of actual first-ordered-point-particles, all of the point commutators that are here from all of their neighborhoods, you will then find countless potential oscillations that are linear, and also, whose point particles neighborhoods then form what may be described as an exact differential association. (These point particles here are divisible by a minimum-sized point particle, or, in other words, have a Laplacian mapping that has a scalar that is divisible by a discrete number of minimal third-ordered-point-particle neighborhood radian).  It takes three or more point particle neighborhoods to form any viable global trait, or, in other words, it takes at least three point particle neighborhoods to form the simplest norm-state -- unless one is dealing with a zero-norm-state.  Yet, zero-norm-states always exist in projections that involve a minimum of three or more first-ordered-point-particles.  Something is said to be both exact and nonlinear if  only two point particles of the related norm-state have outer surfaces that are the minimal point-particle-neighborhood diameters apart (the diameter of one neighborhood of a second-ordered-point-particle) in one fashion or another, while the corresponding first-ordered-point-particles here must also each have a radius that is discretely divisible by a minimal point-paricle's radius.  So, Fock Space shares the same 96 spatial dimensions as Real Reimmanian-based space, yet, the said Fock Space shares a fractal of "covalent/ionic" wave-propagation in terms of this here being a tense of bonding that exists among relatively decompactified first-ordered-point- particles as one may derive from the related conditions of Real Reimmanian Space.     
Sincerely, Sam Roach. 

Course 4 On The Substringular Vs. The Globally Distinguishable, Session 16, Last Test

1) What is the substringular?

2) What is the gloabally distinguishable?

3) How does phenomena differentiate relative to make the substringular appear as the globally distinguishable?

4) How fast does phenomena "circle" the ultimon?

5) Why is most physical phenomena a vacuum at any given moment?

6) When is a string a string? Describe an instanton.

7) How do point particles find heir way back to form a specific string?

8) How does spin effect the relationship between the subsringular and the globally distinguishable?

9) How does roll effect the relationship between the substringular and the globally distinguishable?

10) Describe point reformation.

11) How does point reformation effect he relationship between the substringular and the globally distinguishable?

12) Describe how point particles may form a vacuum when altered.

13) Describe how a vacuum may change into strings.

14) How does the multiaxial codifferentiation of a supersting effect its relationship to light.

15) Why must the multiaxial codifferentiation of a string be fully normalized in order for the associated superstring to be tachyonic?

16) When may a particle "catch up" with light?

17) Is the multiaxial codifferentiation of a "normal" superstring normal to or parallel with the general flow of point particles? Why?

Course 4 On The Substringular Vs. The Globally Distinguishable, Session 15, Part 2 (Two)

If the set of points will "bounce out" of the vacuum, then it will form a new string that will be of a different kind than before unless the initial conditions forming the string are the same. If the conditions are the same, then an identical string may be formed by the same set of points. If the vacuum is kept, then the design of this vacuum will be kept by the Lorentz-Four-Contractions of the given set of points. These contractions will be determined by the roll, spin, transformational motion, and pointal iteration of these given points relative to the basis of light. This is done since there is a lot of pointal motion of surrounding all of the strings. The pointal motion includes all of the points of the given set that we have discussed. As this set of points contains waves which interconnect with all waves and thence related strands of points, the differentiation of any set of points work on all other points. If something works on all other points, then it works on all light eigenstates. If something works on all light eigenstates, then its differentiation is done relative to light as a unit. Not only do these factors influence how a set of points or a string differentiates relative to light, yet also the axes of the strings and points relative to the ultimon influences this. Strings have a tensoric axis that goes in the direction of the width of the ultimon under normal conditions when the given superstring is in a completely holomorphic mode. The "axis" here is normal to point flow. When a tachyon is formed, the axis here is renormalized to go in the "length" direction of the ultimon -- majorized as it is. When a string has such an "axis," it may differentiate as a unit in a compactive manner at the speed of light, since the string is now nonabelian and may now flow in the direction of light eigenflow. (Singularized photon eigenbases flow 90 degrees to normal strings.) If a string had an axial that was in-between its basic axials in orientation, it may move faster than light, yet it would not be able to catch up with light when slower. This is since only by a stringular flow at the speed of light and in the direction of the flow of light may a string, which is constantly moving around the ultimon anyways, may a phenomenon move "toward" light. The ability or inability of a string to move toward light influences the appearance and detectability of the phenomenology of that string. This ability has a lot to do with the axes of the given strings. Such axes are controlled by the gravitational indices of the strings as these are propagated in space. This set of gravitational indices may be altered by swaying the region surrounding the strings. Such sway may be controlled via an electromagnetic/magnetic field delineation altered on a given superstring by changing the topological bases of the field through each layer that the given superstring is distributed within.