My Premise, As To An Occasional Potential Inter-Meshing Amongst Different Universes

"Segments" that are of a given arbitrary "dimensional-train," that are here to work to represent part of one directly corresponding given arbitrary universal setting, in one set of parallel universes -- may occasionally potentially partially inter-mesh with "segments" that are of another given arbitrary "dimensional-train," that are here to work to represent part of another directly corresponding given arbitrary universal setting, in the same earlier stated set of parallel universes, and still Potentially maintain their initial tense of a universal setting -- under the course of the following two potentially feasible general stipulations:  P.S. What I mean by "universal setting," is as being of one type of universe.

1)  If the potentially resultant symmetry-related Ward-Cauchy boundary conditions, are to be physically obeyed -- to where such a potential partial inter-meshing would Not work to be prevented, -- by one tense or another, of something on the order of the Pauli Exclusion Principle (which could thence, otherwise work to prevent such a general inferred type of a potential partial inter-meshing).

AND;

2)  If the Ward-Cauchy norm-related conditions of the two different potentially partially inter-meshing "segments," that are here appertaining to small parts of two different inferred universal settings, are here to work to allow for both of such potentially inter-meshing "dimensional-trains," to consequently work to bear such a general tense of an orthogonal delineation -- to where these inferred segments, that are here to work to represent two different individually taken sets of Hamiltonian Operators, -- are then to be able to tend to bear a tense of a super string-related wobble, that would consequently work to signify the general type of a physical condition, to where both of these segments, that are here to be appertaining to small parts of two different respective universal settings, to still maintain the condition, as to continue to be of their originally respective inferred tense of two individually taken universal settings.

Otherwise; the initially eluded-to potential inter-meshing of two segments -- that are here to be appertaining to small parts of two different respective types of universal settings, would consequently more than likely Not be able to happen then!

I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Inter-Connective Mini-Stringular Segmentation

What I am about to talk about first, is most related to substringular impedance -- so read carefully -- and  "hold onto your hats!"  The higher that the scalar amplitude of the Polyakov Action eigenstate is, the more mini-stringular segmentation that there will tend to be -- that is fed into the proximal locus of the directly corresponding first-order light-cone-gauge eigenstate.  The more mini-stringular segmentation that there will be, that is fed into the proximal locus of the directly corresponding first-order light-cone-gauge eigenstate -- the more mini-stringular segmentation that there will tend to be, that is fed into the correlative proximal local second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that are here to have worked to comprise the earlier mentioned first-order light-cone-gauge eigenstate.  This relative insurgence of mini-stringular segmentation, will then tend to work at causing a relative insurgence of impedance-based interconenctive mini-stringular eigenindices -- of which will then tend to work to cause a relative increase in the scalar amplitude of the proximal local impedance-based covariant field eigenindices -- that will then tend to be proximal at the here relatively adjacent substringular neighborhood.  Here is an example, in so as to work to elaborate at what I mean by this.  Mini-Stringular segmentation is what works to inter-connect Ward-Cauchy-based substringular phenomenology, as well as the condition that mini-stringular segmentation is what works to form both substringular fields and the general basis of homotopy.  Such said segmentation is what works to hold the unfrayed quanta of energy in the space-time-continuum together, per each successive iteration of group-related instanton.  The more of a "Hodge-Index" that one is to relatively bear, as to the scalar magnitude of the degree of the mini-stringular segmentation, that is then to be present -- the more likely that there is to be a higher scalar magnitude as to both the number of mini-stringular inter-connections, as well as the number of inter-connective field eigenindices -- that may exist here, to be utilized in so as to then to work to bear a Yukawa Coupling with that general stratum, that is here to be most directly associated with such an increase in mini-stringular segmentation.  Thence -- when the Lorentz-Four-Contraction that is most directly associated with a phenomenon is low, and its consequent Polyakov Action, is then to be high -- then, its consequent light-cone-gauge eigenstate, and thus the directly corresponding wave-related tense of substringular impedance, will then tend to bear a higher stability of homotopic residue.  This will then tend to be the inverse as to what will happen to the correlative discrete quantum of energy permittivity.  This will then tend to, instead, to work to decrease the field-interconnection-based eigenindices, in so as to work to bear a lower stability of homotopic residue  -- that would otherwise work for superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.  "Superstrings," in my model, may be generally typified as being superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.