Alchemy 1

 I believe that there is some legitimacy, to the general concept of "alchemy."

In a nutshell, most reductional speaking, alchemy seeks to form physical attributes, from their eminently corroborative thought attributes. 

As an introduction, the tendency to this, to my current perspective, is the following vague manner, as to how to convert a given arbitrary thought attribute, into its eminently associated physical attribute:

-(i)*(The eminently associated thought attribute times its path integral) = 

       (The eminently associated physical attribute). -- Where "(i)" is the square root of a negative one. 

I will continue to develop my idea as to the nature of alchemy, at a later time! To Be Continued! 

Here is some more of the development, of my ideas about alchemy:

01 — The Higgs Boson — Care For Love.

02 — Free-Flowing Neutrinos — Care For Imagination. 

03 — Absorbed Neutrinos — Care For Free-Will.

04 — Electrons — Drive Of Eminently Associated Mentalist Characterization. 

05 — Protons — Restraint Of Eminently Associated Mentalist Characterization. 

06 — Neutrons — Permeability Of Eminently Associated Mentalist Characterization. 

07 — Gluons — Binding Of Eminently Associated Mentalist Characterization. 

08 — Electromagnetic Energy — Covariance Of Eminently Associated Mentalist Characterization. 

09 — Zero-Point-Energy — Independence Of Eminently Associated Mentalist Characterization. 

010 — Gravity — Push Of Eminently Associated Mentalist Characterization. 

011 — Anti Gravity — Pull Of Eminently Associated Mentalist Characterization. 

012 — Metric — Resolution Of Eminently Associated Mentalist Characterization. 

013 — Time — Succinctness Of Eminently Associated Mentalist Characterization. 

I’ve got a lot more alchemy ideas, coming soon!

1 — Hydrogen — Care For Truth. 

2 — Helium — Care For Bravery.

3 — Lithium — Care For Resonation. 

4 — Barium — Care For Vengeance. 

5 — Boron — Care For Repetition. 

6 — Carbon — Care For Life. 

7 — Nitrogen — Care For Fortitude. 

8 — Oxygen — Care For Wisdom. 

9 — Florine — Care For Purity. 

10 — Neon — Care For Attention. 

11 — Sodium — Care For Brevity. 

12 — Magnesium — Care For Depth. 

13 — Aluminum — Care For Pliability. 

14 — Silicon — Care For Structure. 

15 — Phosphorus — Care For Rejuvenation. 

16 — Sulfur — Care For Hate. 

17 — Chlorine — Care For Laughter. 

18 — Argon — Care For Clarity. 

19 — Potassium — Care For Perception. 

20 — Calcium — Care For Size. 

I will continue with MORE of the mental attributes, to the analogous correlative elements, with Alchemy Pt. 2, Later!

The phrase — “Abracadabra,” may often tend to mean — From Thought Into Thing. 

Here is a pretty neat addition, even though it is a little off topic:

When the net wave-tug, that is of the holonomic substrate, of the eminently corroborative Fourier-Related-Progression, of a metric-gauged Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, is to spontaneously couple, with the homotopic perturbation of the resonant pitch, that is here to eminently appertain to the isomorphic-related drive, of which is here to be geometrically plotted at the locus of pseudo pressure, which is here to inextricably facilitate the incursion, of the directly associated pulsation, of such an implicit team of mass-bearing discrete energy quanta, this general implicit operational mechanism, will often tend to work to help allow, for the consequentially generative induction, of viable physical entropy. Furthermore; When the net wave-tug, that is of the holonomic substrate, of the eminently corroborative Fourier-Related-Progression, of a heuristic-gauged Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, is to spontaneously couple, with the homotopic perturbation of the resonant pitch, that is here to eminently appertain to the isomorphic-related drive, of which is here to be geometrically plotted at the locus of pseudo pressure, which is here to inextricably facilitate the incursion, of the directly associated pulsation, of such an implicit team of mass-bearing discrete energy quanta, this general implicit operational mechanism, will often tend to work to help allow, for the consequentially generative induction of viable physical charge.  

The i*PI(Del)Action, is a compensation reaction to mass-related acceleration, that tends to work to assist the general processes, that are eminently affiliated, with local homotopic conservation. So; Metric-Gauge homotopic perturbation, that is physically honed in upon the resonant pitch, of the covariant pulsation, of the eminently corroborative implicit team of mass-bearing energy so conjectured, will often tend to facilitate the formation of entropy.  — Since this tends to equivocally couple the i*PI(Del)Action with angular momentum. This tends to equivocally relate to anharmonic re-calibration in pertinent Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-actions. Whereas; Heuristic-Gauge homotopic perturbation, that is physically honed in upon the resonant pitch, of the covariant pulsation, of the eminently corroborative implicit team of mass-bearing energy so conjectured, will often tend to facilitate the formation of charge.  — Since this tends to equivocally couple the i*PI(Del)Action with angular frequency. This tends to equivocally relate to harmonic re-calibration in pertinent Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-actions. 

 

A Clarification, In Lieu Of The Grassman Constant

 The Grassman Constant, is a universal constant in physics. Superstrings tend to behave in such a manner, to where these appear to "want" to maintain the Grassman Constant, by keeping a Noether-Based Flow, by retaining a relatively orientable nature, when this is here to be taken, in terms of their general Ward-Cauchy-Related behavior. In the process of a superstring maintaining a sense or oientability, by my particular model of string theory, the field that is here to be latent in covariance, between the said superstring and its counter string, is to be of a heuristically homeomorphic nature. When this is to occur, the implicit discrete quantum of energy in question, is to remain of a Noether-Related nature, to where it will thereby spontaneously continue to move in a heuristically relativistic manner. This is to happen, when the eminently corroborative general tense of Betti Action involved here, is to work to involve either an even Imaginary ordering, when going into the eminently implicitly involved increment of BRST AND/Or when the eminently corroborative general tense of Betti Action involved here, is to work to involve an even Imaginary ordering, when going into the eminently implicitly involved increment of an ensuing Regge Action. If the Betti number involving the Betti Action, over the course of both of the two implicit incremental duration-related processes, is to only be odd, then, the eminently corroborative field that is latent in covariance, between the here involved super string and its directly associated counter string, may not be homeomorphic, if such a superstring is to spontaneously remain of a Noether-Based flow, to where the Grassman Constant is not able to be maintained, IF the superstring is here to spontaneously remain of a Noether-Based nature. Yet; The Grassman Constant is a Universal Constant, so it WANTS to be maintained. So; What happens, is that, instead of the said involved superstring remaining Noether-Based, it will then ensue, in so as to spontaneously become tachyonic, instead. So, Yes, the Grassman Constant is always to tend to be maintained, yet, if the Ward-Cauchy-Related Field is to threaten otherwise, the directly related discrete quantum or quanta of energy, will consequently spontaneously go, from being of a Noether-Based nature, to then subsequently becoming, instead, of an eminent taciyonic-related nature. 

When different interacting thought frequencies co-mingle, in a hermitian manner, this often tends to form agreement. Furthermore; When different interacting thought frequencies co-mingle, in a spurious manner, this often tends to form disagreement. 

Everyone, with their head adequately squared away on their shoulders, knows, that if variable one times one equals variable two, that variable two times one will thence equal variable one. Yet; If variable one times i equals variable two, it will actually be -i times variable two to equal variable one. This is because i*[-i] equals one.

A circle spinning around, in eminent association with a line going back and forth, distinctively represents the geometric motion, that complex numerical de notation works to impart. So; a holomorphic driven line, that is here to be eminently corroborative, in geometric covariance, with a spinning circle, may be said to work to represent, the gist of the general venue, of forward moving time. Furthermore; an anti holomorphic driven line, that is here to be eminently corroborative, in geometric covariance, with a spinning circle, may be said to work to represent, the gist of the general venue, of backward moving time. The NOW, is the balance, between forward and backward moving time. The purpose of a clock, in part, is to eminently extrapolate some sort of a sense, of a configuration of the NOW. So, understanding the general geometric implications of complex numbers, may viably facilitate, an improved understanding, of the nature of time. (Antikythera).

A material that is basically a non conductor, that behaves like a strong dialectic capacitor, that is capable here of bearing the internal flow, of at least some viable tense of electromotive transmission, may often tend to be of the general prior mentioned genus of materials, of which is a good candidate, for a material that is here to successfully store information, of which is later to be induced into tangential generation, in so as to have a sufficient net externally flowing energy output. Protected Knowledge. 

Flying saucers that are spinning at an enormous rate, tend to move in the net holomorphic direction, particularly when in lieu of the least resistive Nijenhuis direction of delineation, as the craft is here to move in the path of least time/distance. Her. Picture the craft, when spinning vivaciously, to be acting like a giant Calabi-Yau Manifold. There are, say, six spatial dimensions to this, Plus time. One of these added dimensions we don’t see, is elongated, while two of these are curled up. The craft will tend to move, in the Riemann direction, that is positioned as such, resultantly, due to the peak in the pulsation of the holomorphic delineated swipe, that is here to be spontaneously incurred by the immediately prior Lagrangian-Based motion of this said elongated dimensional interface. Where this spatial dimension had maxed out, in the permittivity of its tangential pulsation, tends to work to form a recursive flow of cohomology-based thrust, that is facilitated into action by a matter anti matter reaction. This thence works to drive the motion of the said flying saucer, in so as to be stringent in efficiency. 

The eminently corroborative net mass-bearing component, that is here to be viably associated, with a kinetically flowing tense, of electromotive-based energy, will generally tend to move in the direction of least distance. In a way, the just mentioned case scenario, is most aptly associated, with the general relationship, that may be depicted of, by the multiplicity of the magnetic field.Whereas; The eminently corroborative net photosensitive-bearing component, that is here to be viably associated, with a kinetically flowing tense, of electromotive-based energy, will generally tend to move in the direction of least time. In a way the just mentioned case scenario, is most aptly associated, with the general relationship, that may be depicted of, by the multiplicity of the electric field. Such differences in directional delineation “agenda,” is part of, as to why the electric field & the magnetic field are to curl upon each other, as is in accordance to the right hand rule, in the general process of the kinematic propagation, of those eminently corroborative waves, that work to help allow for a potentially smooth set of transitions in Fourier-Related-Progression, of which are necessary, in order for the implicit compact d field, to be able to be effectively projected through its eminently associated trajectory, in order to facilitate the harmonic flow, of hermitian driven electromotive energy. 

Physical magnetism basically tends to amount to being, a recursively ebbing to and fro, of sheaving/un-sheaving cohomology-related eigenstates, that tend to be brought into such a general situation, by the likings of the proximal local net field, working to bear cohomology-related eigenstates that have opposite parity, of which reverse fractals, into charges of opposite chirality. This generates the proximal local conditions of electromotive attraction, of which tends to facilitate the formation of magnetism, over the span of time. 

A tense of Fourier-Related-Progression, that is predominantly endowed, by the eminent spontaneous incursion, of anti gravitational force, will often tend to be expressive, as heuristic pulse per energy. Whereas; A tense of Fourier-Related-Progression, that is predominantly endowed, by the eminent spontaneous incursion, of gravitational force, will often tend to be expressive, as metric pulse per energy. 

Part 1; How The Stated Trinomial Eigenstates Apply

 Grand Unified Field Theory: (See the post, Enhancement Of The Kahler-Metric, from March of 2023).

Introductory Explanation:

What The given arbitrary equation, of which utilizes, what I term of as being, trinomial eigenstates, is to be acting to describe, Are the attributes of physical nature, of a given region in time and space, as heuristically contingent, upon its environment. 

For any region of Stoke’s-Based field, in which 1<N<= 26; ( where N is an integer) — To where this is to be the case, for the mathematical situation of SERIES, that I have provided; (Yet; When in lieu of, as to what the “knot” of trinomial eigenstates happens to be, for that particular region, (that is, when working to determine the knot of trinomial eigenstate), the value of N, refers to a Cotangent Bundle, that will be anywhere from 3 to 96 (since this utilizes Chern Simons Theory)). Furthermore; Although, as everyone in math tends to know, in Euclidean use, the natural log of one is zero; Yet, with a Cartesian utilization of mathematics, the natural log of one may often tend to be 2PIin. When the eluded potential application of such a case is to occur, small n is to be simply 1.  So, depending upon where in the “ equation “ you are looking at, N may be anywhere from 2 to 26; N may be anywhere from 3 to 96; Or, N may be simply 1. In the “knotting equation “ of trinomial eigenstate, N is a single integer per layering, that is anywhere from 3 to 96. In the potential Cartesian case, where there is no viably present Planck Energy, small n is one. Whereas; In the summation (series),that is in the math that I did, N is recursively altered, from equaling one to equaling anywhere from 2 to 26 — depending upon the pertinent magnitude of Stoke’s-Based spatial dimensionality. So: Each centralized knot, (of which is eluded to, with the idea, as to the mentioned implicit trinomial eigenstates), is delineated in a twined configuration, that is anywhere from 3 to 96 spatial dimensional. The Stoke’s -based region itself, per potentially layered region, is comprised, in anywhere, from 2 to 26 spatial dimensions plus time. And the Cartesian implicit idea that I have eluded to earlier, is here to be considered, in a heuristically reductional case, in which small n is 1. I hope that this is clear now! If not, please ask any pertinent questions!

Use the hereupon Grand Unified Field Theory Equation, to determine, with at least some sort of viable expectation value, what the corroborative holonomic substrate of localized covariant space-time-fabric, is to be expressed of as. I just Started to indicate how the eminently corroborative equation in consideration is to be utilized. I will continue with this explanation, a little bit more, in a future encounter. Till next time, Later! SAM ROACH from PINCKNEY MICHIGAN!

Hello.  I’m back! 

To get back to what I was saying about the attempted grand unified field theory equation:

There are 112 reductional “gamma knot of the field” general tenses to consider — simply for cotangent bundle R(sub N) alone, to consider. Depending upon the eminently associated Stoke’s-Based region, that one may have involved in such an implicit situation, one may often thereby, be potentially put into a situation, in which one is to find a resultant R(sub N), that can be formed, or formulated, by finding an intersection of such reductional fields. The more of a selection of co-deterministic interdependently interactive fields that are to be hereby considered, as being or acting upon the given arbitrary focused upon region, the greater that the expectation value is to consequently tend to be, as to what the determined holonomic substrate is to be tabulated as. Understanding what the holonomic substrate of localized covariant space-time-fabric is to be, for a given arbitrary region in time and space, with a relatively high expectation value, may often work to help facilitate an increased knowledge, as to how such an implicit place in time and space is to behave. One is thereby, to have the viable potential, of any possible combination of the 112 implied "gamma knot of the field" trinomial eigenstate-related templates, when in conjunction with the viable potential, of any possible combination of regions, that may be tantamount to working to involve anywhere from 2 to 26 spatial dimensions plus time, when in conjunction, with the viable potential, of working to consider, any of the shapes and energy-related magnitudes, that may here to eminently corroborative, with the multiplicity of the general multi-considerate Stoke's-Based field of this.

In theory, if one were to consider a very large number of such co-deterministic interdependently interactive fields, one could potentially have a spontaneously immense predicated knowledge, of the viably possible behavior, that one could respectively gander to surmise, within reason, as to a relatively educated guess, as to how the region and its component parts, is relatively likely to act, in such a case.

I will continue with a furthered explanation, LATER!!! (Such as a set of pictures, showing 56 pairs of my 112 reductional "gamma knot of the field" general tendencies, for cotangent bundle R(sub N), when in terms of, here, the trinomial eigenstates, of which are here to be determined, to help to be able to solve, in lieu of the "equation" that I have provided, in, "Enhancement Of The Kahler-Metric," in so as to be able to facilitate the general process, of having the capability, of working to refine a knowledge, as to what the holonomic substrate of localized covariant space-time-fabric is to be, for any Stoke's-Based region in time and space.)

PS: (Certain highly conductive materials, that inherently have the natural capacity of strong magnetic resonance, may at times, be potentially capable of being chimed by an overt lever, even if just the eminently associated Van Der Waals field, is here to be struck by an externalized source. )

Sincerely, Sam Roach!