Mini Stringular segmentation must exist, because the fields that guide and direct super strings, must be at least some kind of an actual phenomenon. Mini String-Related Segmentation (Mini Stringular segmentation), that is not coalesced from within the Neumann bounds of super Stringular fabric, primarily functions, as a gauged phenomenon, that facilitates the prompting, of the motion of discrete energy. Now; Consider a strand-like increment, of such mini Stringular segmentation. Take the phenomenology, of the span of its cross sectional physical attribute. The kinematic interplay of this respective phenomenology, is such a topological substrate, in which THIS is eminently tantamount, to the phenomenology of Zero-Point Energy. Now think, for a moment; The span of the cross section of a strand, does not go discreetly into the span, of the volume of a sphere-like entity. The sphere-like entity, here, is implicitly what I consider to be, the phenomenology, of first order point particles. (As to what I am referring to, in this particular case.) Next; First order point particles, as I describe them, are Not Exactly of the same condensity. So; Neither Zero Point energy Nor First order point particles, are energy again, taken at a lower level. Next; The segmentation working to bind the immense number of first order point particles, that come together, to form a super string, ( of which is tantamount, to the smallest increment of discrete energy), is Also Not consistently, of the same scalar amplitude of span-like sub-metric, to where, the stuff that’s smaller than super strings, is Not energy again, taken a lower level, yet, since it is actually stuff, and not just empty vacuum, as most scientists happen to seem to perceive of it now, that this can bring one to a viable conclusion, that it is very probable, that one can conceivably convert zero point energy into actual energy, and vice versa! Yet; The total amount of zero point energy potential — the net scalar magnitude, as to how much mini Stringular cross-sectional phenomena, is to be latently proximal local, to the phenomenology of one discrete super string of discrete energy, will always tend to be of the same scalar magnitude, to where the Planck Phenomenon, is the smallest thing, that we would normally conceive of as being energy — because everything that we call energy, consists of integer amounts of Planck-Related energy. (Whole Number Amounts , as compared to fractional amounts.)
Here's something, that I may have touched upon in the past, yet, I just thought that I would reiterate this particular concept. Take the frequency of a neutrino. Square this. Next -- multiply this, by the mass of the lightest neutrino. Now; Take this whole thing. Cube this. This will give one a scalar magnitude, that is here to be tantamount, to the amount of a Joule Second, that works to comprise the general phenomenology, of what may be termed of, as being "zero-point-energy." Next; To see how much smaller, that zero-point-energy is to be, when in viable comparison, to the phenomenology of a Planck Phenomenon, -- Divide the particular respective amount, of a Joule Second, that works to comprise the general phenomenology, of zero-point-energy, by the Planck Constant. (The Planck Constant, if I recall right, is about 6.6260400735*10^(-34)Joule Seconds). Once one has divided the scalar magnitude of zero-point-energy, by the scalar magnitude of the Planck Constant, this will give one the proportionality, as to how much smaller that zero-point-energy is, than the Planck Phenomenon. As indicated by implicit reasoning, by the means communicated to one by the previous paragraph of discussion, the phenomenology of zero-point-energy IS NOT just a relationship between the transversal Planck Energy And the Radial Planck Energy, as some scientists seem to think. It is an actual phenomenology. Nothingness is incapable of doing anything, yet alone being able to guide and direct superstring-related fields. If this doesn't make an adequate amount of sense to you, carefully read Both of these paragraphs, of this particular blog post. If you have any comments or questions, please, don't hesitate to respond to me. I don't bite! Together, we are capable of performing dialogue! Dialogue indicates the humility to listen to others, in spite of how right you think that you are. You can learn from Anyone!!!