Metaphorical Thoughts

 Let’s say, that one were to figuratively liken, the multiplicity of space time fabric, to the multiplicity of language. One could then metaphorically consider: the nouns to be likened to the Hamiltonians, the verbs to be likened to the Lagrangians, the adjectives to be somewhat likened to the metric gauge, the adverbs to be somewhat likened to the heuristic gauge, and the prepositions to be likened to the re-calibration of Chern-Simons singularities. 

I will certainly continue with the suspense Later! ‘Till then, I hope you are having a good day, and make today the most phenomenal day of your life! Sincerely, Sam Roach (1989).

String theory is the metaphorical language of energy, and Fourier-Analysis is the metaphorical language of waves. Energy is both wave and particle based. This gives one an idea, as to Why Fourier-Analysis is so crucial to string theory. 

Entropy is energy of heat transfer per Kelvin Mole. Entropy that is conveyed in a De Rham manner, often tends to bear a benevolent physical nature. Whereas; Entropy that is conveyed in a Dolbeault manner, often tends to bear a malignant physical nature. Although at least some entropy is necessary, for various changes in physical states to occur, it is my theory, that even though it goes against the second “law” of thermodynamics, that it is possible, to be able to viably decrease, at least some of the scalar effectual presence, of the multiplicity, of malignant entropy. 

Harmonically propagated sound, often tends to work to bear a tense of consonant vibration. Whereas; Anharmonic associated propagated sound, often tends to bear a tense of dissonant vibration. Consonant vibration may often tend to facilitate, the generation of resonant pulsation. Whereas; Dissonant vibration may often tend to facilitate, the degeneration of resonant pulsation. One may think of resonant pulsation, in a way, as being the physical manifestation, of the inverse of isotropically stable thought frequency. 

Whenever a physical phenomenon is kinematically propagated and/or transferred through space (over a duration of time), this will inevitably work to involve a system of waves. Therefore; Whenever a time-related physical occurrence is to take place, such an occurrence will inextricably tend to work to involve, at least some sort of Fourier-Related System, since waves are thus involved. 

When one is dealing with a system of waves, that is taking place in Less than one discrete increment of time, one may, perchance, call this, a Laplacian-Related "activity," as taken from within the scope of a tightly-knit Fourier-Related situation. Remember: Fourier-Related Analysis, is the language of waves. 

Consider the following: Take a theoretical snapshot of a wave-based delineation, of a given arbitrary proscribed system of waves, over the course of one Planck-Related instance. Next; Take a theoretical snapshot of the wave-based delineation of the same system of waves, yet over the ensuing course of the proceeding Planck-Related instance. Keep going as such. Now; recursively display the respective sequential series, of the integrative set, that is of such theoretical snapshots, in the proscribed order that these were taken. This will give one a viable indication, as to the wave-related progression, if taken in the insinuated piecewise continuous manner eluded to, to where, this general procedure, will work to facilitate a knowledge, as to the eminently corroborative, given arbitrary Fourier-Related-Progression, that is here to be, of such a particular genus of a case scenario. When given in lieu of its Lagrangian-Based Drive, this will tend to work to refine, such a facilitation, as to understanding how such a wave-based system enfolds, to where the metaphorical artifacts of knowing how such a system is to proceed, is thus enhanced. 

Here is a procedural hint, in so as to facilitate being able to determine Chern-Simon’s Invariant gauge-actions, in general, for the arbitrary genus of case scenario, involving co-tangent bundle R3.:

1) Consider the trace depiction of the motion, that is of the eminently corroborative Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, being mathematically worked with here, as taken at a snapshot of its delineation, in terms of the mathematical physics description, that is here to describe the way that the minimal surface, that is implicitly mentioned here is to be mapped out — as a generic pattern of mappable oscillation.

2) Consider the given arbitrary, eminently involved mathematical physics expression, of kinematically propagational-related import, that is most relevant to the suitings, of such a respectively proscribed case scenario. 

3) Take both the first order integral, and, the second order integral, of the just mentioned expression of kinematically propagational-related import, in respect to a durational parameter of variable. 

4) Take the last three implicit values of kinematically propagational-related import, and add them together. 

5) Consider the just mentioned summation, as one whole group. 

6) Consider the directional attributes, that the gauge-action being considered, is inextricably to be taken in. 

7) Multiply the initially mentioned trace, by the latter mentioned grouping. 

8) Next; Multiply this whole thing, by 2/3 — since the reductional minimal surface is heuristically in two spatial dimensions, and the gauge-action is of co-tangent bundle R3. 

9) Divide the entirety of what has been described so far, at this point, by 4*PI. 

10) The result of this math, in many general cases, will facilitate an endeavor, to determine the vector value, of certain proscribed cases, in terms of finding the desirable Chern-Simons Invariant Gauge-Action, of what this is to be eminently corroborative to happen to be in the process of finding out, in lieu of acting to better understand that metaphorical grip hold of wave tug, whose alterations spew into charge and or entropy. 

Things

 To explain something I’ve said before, in kind of an oversimplified manner, as put in layman terms, when motion in static equilibrium, interacts with thought frequency, as taken over a duration of time, this will often tend to form, what people would generally term of, as being “things.” By “things,” I mean Mass-Bearing Stuff! Furthermore; By the way, such an interaction, in order to be able to do this, let alone to be able to do this effectively, needs to be done, in a hermitian manner. 

When a phenomenon interacts with inverse thought, in a hermitian manner, this may often tend to work to form a tense, of a metric-gauge incursion. When a phenomenon interacts with inverse frequency, in a hermitian manner, this may often tend to work to form a tense, of a heuristic-gauge incursion. Furthermore; When a phenomenon interacts with inverse thought frequency, in a hermitian manner, this may often tend to work to form a tense, of a heuristic-metric-gauge incursion. So: When motion in static equilibrium, is imparted upon, via a direct coupling, in a hermitian manner, via a heuristic-metric-gauge incursion, as taken over a duration of time, this may often tend to work to  form, what people would generally term of, as being "things." -- in terms of mass-bearing stuff. To give one a clue, as to what I mean by "hermitian," in this particular case, is a flush, naturally smooth interaction, with no spurious nor superfluous motion. 

The incursion of inverse-thought-related gauge-action, may often tend to spontaneously result, in a pressure-associated Lagrangian-Based Drive. Furthermore; The incursion of inverse-frequency-related gauge-action, may often tend to spontaneously result, in a puncture-associated Lagrangian-Based Drive.

When a Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, is to become spontaneously charged physically, it will often tend to acquire, an attribute of heuristic-gauge eminence. 

When a recalibrated Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action, is harmonically incurred, it will generally tend to be a particular type of a case scenario, in which the eminently corroborative i*PI(Del) Action, will hereupon spontaneously couple, with the eminently associated, covariant proximal local, co-tangentially flowing kinetic frequency, in so as to form a tense of electrodynamic frequency, of which is tantamount, to physical charge. 

Electrodynamic frequency, is a particular case of physical frequency, in which there is here to be an equipoise, between its expressive magnetic field, &, its expressive electric field, — between its discrete energy impedance, &, its discrete energy permittivity, —Or; — between its physical Ward-Cauchy-Related restraint, &, its physical Ward-Cauchy-Related inhibition. 

What I meant here, by kinetic frequency, in this particular given case scenario, is the angular flow of incoming Lagrangian-Based motion, that is here to directly interact, with the respective Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action. This is here to occur this way, when the stated respective gauge-action is re-calibrated. Such gauge-actions, of this particular insinuated genre of phenomenology, are said to be re-calibrated, when the speed and/or the direction, of the eminently corroborative Hamiltonian Topological Manifold of such a given arbitrary case scenario, is to viably alter at all, relative to the motion and existence of electromagnetic energy. 

The proximal local spontaneous operational presence of the i*PI(Del)Action, is always going to tend to occur, when the eminently corroborative Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-actions, are also, as well, to be in the general process of being spontaneously re-calibrated, and vice versa. 

A Mass-Bearing perturbation into kinetic energy, often tends to be eminently associated, with what may be a particular genus, of a Rayleigh-Based Scattering. Whereas; A Kinetic-Bearing perturbation back into mass, often tends to be eminently associated, with what may be a particular genus, of a Riemann-Based Scattering. A Rayleigh-Based Scattering, often tends to be associated, with a Cevita type of action. Whereas; A Riemann-Based Scattering, often tends to be associated, with a Wess-Zumino type of action.

 

Zero-Point Energy — Why It Must Be As It Is

 Mini Stringular segmentation must exist, because the fields that guide and direct super strings, must be at least some kind of an actual phenomenon. Mini String-Related Segmentation (Mini Stringular segmentation), that is not coalesced from within the Neumann bounds of super Stringular fabric, primarily functions, as a gauged phenomenon, that facilitates the prompting, of the motion of discrete energy. Now; Consider a strand-like increment, of such mini Stringular segmentation. Take the phenomenology, of the span of its cross sectional physical attribute. The kinematic interplay of this respective phenomenology, is such a topological substrate, in which THIS is eminently tantamount, to the phenomenology of Zero-Point Energy. Now think, for a moment; The span of the cross section of a strand, does not go discreetly into the span, of the volume of a sphere-like entity. The sphere-like entity, here, is implicitly what I consider to be, the phenomenology, of first order point particles. (As to what I am referring to, in this particular case.) Next; First order point particles, as I describe them, are Not Exactly of the same condensity. So; Neither Zero Point energy Nor First order point particles, are energy again, taken at a lower level. Next; The segmentation working to bind the immense number of first order point particles, that come together, to form a super string, ( of which is tantamount, to the smallest increment of discrete energy), is Also Not consistently, of the same scalar amplitude of span-like sub-metric, to where, the stuff that’s smaller than super strings, is Not energy again, taken a lower level, yet, since it is actually stuff, and not just empty vacuum, as most scientists happen to seem to perceive of it now, that this can bring one to a viable conclusion, that it is very probable, that one can conceivably convert zero point energy into actual energy, and vice versa! Yet; The total amount of zero point energy potential — the net scalar magnitude, as to how much mini Stringular cross-sectional phenomena, is to be latently proximal local, to the phenomenology of one discrete super string of discrete energy, will always tend to be of the same scalar magnitude, to where the Planck Phenomenon, is the smallest thing, that we would normally conceive of as being energy — because everything that we call energy, consists of integer amounts of Planck-Related energy. (Whole Number Amounts , as compared to fractional amounts.) 

Here's something, that I may have touched upon in the past, yet, I just thought that I would reiterate this particular concept. Take the frequency of a neutrino. Square this. Next -- multiply this, by the mass of the lightest neutrino. Now; Take this whole thing. Cube this. This will give one a scalar magnitude, that is here to be tantamount, to the amount of a Joule Second, that works to comprise the general phenomenology, of what may be termed of, as being "zero-point-energy." Next; To see how much smaller, that zero-point-energy is to be, when in viable comparison, to the phenomenology of a Planck Phenomenon, -- Divide the particular respective amount, of a Joule Second, that works to comprise the general phenomenology, of zero-point-energy, by the Planck Constant. (The Planck Constant, if I recall right, is about 6.6260400735*10^(-34)Joule Seconds). Once one has divided the scalar magnitude of zero-point-energy, by the scalar magnitude of the Planck Constant, this will give one the proportionality, as to how much smaller that zero-point-energy is, than the Planck Phenomenon. As indicated by implicit reasoning, by the means communicated to one by the previous paragraph of discussion, the phenomenology of zero-point-energy IS NOT just a relationship between the transversal Planck Energy And the Radial Planck Energy, as some scientists seem to think. It is an actual phenomenology. Nothingness is incapable of doing anything, yet alone being able to guide and direct superstring-related fields. If this doesn't make an adequate amount of sense to you, carefully read Both of these paragraphs, of this particular blog post. If you have any comments or questions, please, don't hesitate to respond to me. I don't bite! Together, we are capable of performing dialogue! Dialogue indicates the humility to listen to others, in spite of how right you think that you are. You can learn from Anyone!!!

Thought Frequency and Pulsation, are inversely related expressions of space-time-fabric. It seems to potentially be apparent, that the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, is the inverse of the Fourier-Related-Progression. So; Since the Fourier-Related-Progression, is inverse thought frequency per kinetic energy, the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, is potential energy per inverse thought frequency. Highly steady state energy per pulsation, would then be tantamount to mass time, and this latter thing would hereupon be tantamount to highly steady state energy per inverse thought frequency. The Higgs Action works to facilitate taking kinetic-like energy, and “manufacturing” it, into the demonstrative expression, of a highly steady state energy per inverse thought frequency, as taken over a duration of time.This, consequently, works to facilitate the resulting formation of mass, and, the heuristically coupled inverse repercussion of this, is the spontaneous ordination, of the piecewise delineation of waves, which, if not spurious in spatial translation, will generally tend to bear the capacity, of acting as the process, of a piecewise continuous delineation, of a given arbitrary system of waves. Furthermore: Mass is a phenomenon, that Exhibits the coupling, of highly steady state energy in conjunction with thought frequency, &, the inverse of the coupling between highly steady steady state energy in conjunction with thought frequency, is the progressive delineation of a system of waves. Energy tends to be “highly” steady state, when it is to “appear” to be transversally stable, from an internal reference frame, that is from within a metric span of 25 Planck Phenomenon, from its immediately externalized Neumann bounds. Picture an atom. Right near it, it may seem to not be moving around. Yet, from a much more external reference frame, it might be moving around a lot. Can you imagine?!

First of all, I wanted to clarify, that what I mean by inverse thought frequency, is the inverse of the overall quantity, of thought times frequency. Next of all, I wanted to add, that the more hermitian, that the quotient, of highly steady state energy per inverse thought frequency, is to be, (of which, one may also describe this to be, as behaving like the product, or coupling, of highly steady state energy, with actual thought frequency), that it will thereby generally tend to spontaneously result, in such a particular type of a case scenario, that the resultant end product, of such an implicit intermingling, will more than likely have a more harmonic interplay of an eminently corroborative Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, than an otherwise analogous case scenario, in which such an implicit intermingling is not as hermitian in overt incursion, — to where, a fairly hermitian intermingling, of highly steady state energy with thought frequency, as was implied by the viably indicated physical interaction of product-like operation-like activity that I had previously mentioned, as kinematically propagated over a duration of actual time, will tend to generally incur a fairly high expectation value, of working to have a greater capacity of being of a Kahler-Related mass-bearing nature, than if otherwise, instead, that it were a potentially viable intermingling of these, that was NOT brought into a spontaneous physical interaction, in a hermitian manner. 

Electrodynamic frequency per time, often tends to spontaneously facilitate a tense, of incurred magnetic pull. Whereas; Energy per electrodynamic frequency, often tends to facilitate a tense, of incurred magnetic push. Furthermore; When electrodynamic frequency per time, is coupled with energy per electrodynamic frequency, this general physical operation, tends to work to form electromotive power. &, electromotive power coupled with (electrodynamic frequency per time), tends to form electromotive impedance.