Aside from Tesla Energy ( which is non Abelian), a phenomenon of an Abelian light cone gauge topology, is more likely to exhibit space-time abrasion, than a phenomenon of a non Abelian light cone gauge topology.
Tesla energy tends to exhibit a relatively strong tense, of space time abrasion. Tesla energy is of a non Abelian light cone gauge topology. Tesla energy tends to exhibit, the eminent corroboration, of a relatively strong scalar magnitude, of energy of heat transport (transfer), per Kelvin Mole, of the given arbitrary medium it is transmitted through.
High energy of heat transport, tends to make hot temperatures seem hotter. For example: Water has a higher energy of heat transport than air tends to have. Consequently; Water, when it’s hot, is hotter to the senses, than an otherwise analogous tense of air, will tend to exhibit.
A phenomenon of an Abelian light cone gauge topology, that is more eminently corroborative in covariant interaction, with phenomenology that is of a non Abelian light cone gauge topology, is often to tend to bear a more enhanced tense of magnetic charge flow, than an otherwise analogous phenomenon of an Abelian light cone gauge topology, that instead, is less eminently corroborative in covariant interaction, with phenomenology that is of a non Abelian light cone gauge topology.
For instance: electrons are mass bearing. These are eminently reductional, as a specific genus of phenomena, that is of an Abelian topology. Protons are also mass bearing. These are eminently reductional, as another specific genus of phenomenology, that is of an Abelian topology. Yet; Electrons tend to be more eminently associated, with the flow of kinetic energy, than protons are ( generally). Kinetic energy is of a non Abelian topology. So, electrons tend to be more associated with the flow of magnetic charge than protons are.
The more firmly tugged, that a mass-bearing phenomenology is to be, by the Legendre (co)homology, that is eminently generated, by the projected trajectory, of a tense of kinetic energy, the more eminently corroborative that the covariant interrelation will tend to be, between the Abelian topology of the respective mass-bearing phenomenon, with the respective counterpart of non Abelian topology, as the latter is exemplified by the earlier stated tense of kinetic energy.
When a firmly tugged mass-bearing phenomenology, that is physically transported by a tense of kinetic energy, as taken at an externalized reference frame from its internal reference frame of super conformal invariance, is to spin harmonically in a hermitian manner, that such a general physical process, will often tend to bear the characteristics, of a magnetic tense of smoothly charged phenomenology.