Session 11 Of Course 4 -- Why Charges Bear Their Correlative Charges

Protons are positively charged particles that have a small amount of mass.  Protons are made up of quarks and leptons.  Electrons are made up of three leptons each.  Protons generally are the simplest particles that exist with a charge that is just as positive as an electron’s charge is negative.  It has a lot more mass than an electron, and its residual energy discharge does not form light.  Electrons tend to move faster than protons, and electrons spin a lot more antisymmetrically than protons.  Electrons each have a fractional spin, while protons each have a whole spin.  A particle with a negative charge will have the opposite spin holomorphicty than an adjacent  particle with a positive charge.  The J is related to the symmetrism of particles, for the reason that J involves the spin-orbital-interactions of particles.  As stated, J is also related to the electric field of a given particle, since, J is related to the angular momentum of a given particle.  Angular momentum is related to spin-orbital-interaction, since the directoral impetus is influenced by the way something spins and orbits.  (The way something goes around influences the direction that it incorporates and the object’s drive in that direction.)  The electric field is that field that is most influenced by its charge.  Since electrons that are adjacent spin antisymmetrically in an atom, and antisymmetric is negative of symmetry, and this symmetrism is influenced by J and thus the charge of an electron, and the holomorphism of the orbit of an electron’s transversal motion is antiholomorphic relative  to the directoralization of the given electron’s path around the nucleus of an atom, the charge of an electron is  negative.  Since protons’ spin in an atom tends to be more symmetric, and the orbital vibrations of protons is holomorphic relative to the general Laplacian setting of an atom, a proton has a positive charge.  Electrons spin antisymmetrically in an atom because of their fractional spin, high velocity, and also because of the dynamics of their fields.  The electric fields of electrons tend to work on the world more than the electric fields of protons.  Remember how light is the result of the recycling of differential geometries?  Remember how the residual discharge of electrons is light?  Electrons do this because these are a point mass of charge versus the mass that appertains to protons and neutrons.  Well, this is why electrons have more dynamic fields that protons.  These electrons thus need to be geometrically arranged so as not to interfere with where these are at.  Electrons, to exist in a spot, have to be in their own spot.  Since their fields are more dynamic, they must spin antisymmetrically to adjacent electrons of the same atom or else these will collide fieldwise.  This description of  an electric field would also help to describe the magnetic field, since magnetic fields curl around electric fields.  If  two adjacent electrons of the same atom were to be perturbated to attempt these  to spin symmetrically, the electrons, instead, would find a new localization, since two things cannot occupy the same spot at the same time.  The field dynamics of subatomic particle is influenced by the velocities and directoralizations of these selfsame particles.  The velocity of a particle influences the field associated with it.  Thank you for enjoying this session.  Have a great day!  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued! Sam Roach.

Part Three of the Fourteenth Session of Course 6

Well hello again world, this is Samuel Roach here!  Glad to converse with you!  Here comes part three!
            
Superstrings release the residue of their ground-states during the sub-metric that transpires during the Bases of Light because illuminated superstrings are almost always in a Main World Tube & because illuminated superstrings always acquire the residue of their respective tori-sector-ranges that is essential for the recyclling of differential geometries, and differential geometries recycle to allow for the Bases of Light.  You see, since the most overtly recycled ground-states are, as a fraction of the sum of all matter and energy, equal in quantum to the fraction of the back-and-forth sways that are released from the Klein Bottle during an eigenmetric of the Kaeler-Metric versus those associated back-and-forth sways that are fully confined in the Klein Bottle during the mentioned eigenmetrics of the Kaeler-Metric.  There are constantly Gaussian Transformation occurring.  This is a 15 to 1 ratio -- fifteen times as much dark matter and dark energy as light matter and light energy.  The integration of light's basis is light.  Light is the basis of perception.  Perception is the basis of communication.  Communication (here, specifically commutation) is the basis of iteration and reiteration.  Reiteration is the basis of prolonged existence.  Prolonged existence is the only way a reality can begin and continue.  The reason for the reverse-fractor relation of the Kaeler-Metric to the ration of dark matter and dark energy versus light matter and light energy is that the basis of Ward Polarization is equal to the fraction of relatively mildly worked upon recycled ground-states to relatively overtly worked upon recycled ground-states.  Also, there is fifteen times as many Hodge Indices related to norm-states as the Hodge Indices related to ground-states when one includes the Fourier Translation of states in both the Main-World-Tubes as well as in the Royal Arc.  I provide a more rigorous explanation as to why this is the way this is during the publishing of the fourth part of this session.  I will continue later with the fourth and last part of this session.  Until then, you have a phenomenal day!  God bless you in the name of Yahweh!  Sincerely, Sam.                                                                          

Course 5, Session 13, Part Two

Well hello again world, this is Samuel Roach here to speak to you today more about the session that I began discussing over the internet yesterday!
        
Differential geometries recycle in order to allow for the kinematic redistributions of mini-string, whose redelineation allows for the continued Fourier activity of topology via a covariant yet interconnected homotopy (with the exception of what goes into black-holes).  The eigenstates of the operation of the recycling of substringular phenomena gives off indices or constituent-force-sector codifferential loci that eventually become used elsewhere.  These eigenstates bear a Gliossi touch to other phenomena in a manner that may be mathematically based on the angle of 4pi(I) degrees based on the perspective of the globally distinguishable.  The association and relationship of globally distinguishable phenomena with other parallel universe phenomena within a given setting has a differential geometry that involves Imaginary three-dimensional tangency.  This tangency is coupled with the resonant vibration of the associated Bases of Light from within their given tori-sector-ranges.  This relationship, when reverse fractored,  maximizes the ability of color perception of living beings of whom observe phenomena.  If it wasn't for Imaginary tangency, the reverse fractored stipulated condition of color would not be possible.  Waves not only form as energy to form light, yet these waves interact at C(a constant)*Ipi degrees in many ways so as to form our ability to perceive of color.  Real tangency as a basis of borne tangency at the substringular level when reverse fractored could never allow the formation of color.  It takes a Njenhuis interaction via the sundry sequential Fourier Series  of integrated covariant and codifferential phenomena to allow for the reverse fractored condition of color.  The higher the coefficient that is to be multiplied by Ipi to determine a tensoric substringular borne tangency via countless superstings integrated as a unit of phenomena, the more likely that the "color" that would appear in the globally distinguishable would not be perceived, since the described observation of the "color" would then tend to be Ward Polorized to cause the perceived phenomenon to appear to the given viewer as dark matter.  This substringular "sensory perception" is an arbitrary example of a Yakawa Coupling.  This Coupling is an electrodynamic perception that involves electrostatics involving borne tangencies interacting with Njenhuis conditions of unborne tangencies within a proscribed operational field that involves an associated Ward Caucy boundedness.  I will continue with the suspense later.  Sincerely, Sam.       

Course 4 on The Globally Distinguishable Vs. The Substringular, Session 13, Part One

Existence is primordially action and its result. The result of action is stuff. The result is space that obtains relative change in the given action. As said before, light is the result of the recycling of differential geometries. Differential geometries are real because they are shown by the results of action. Actions are recycled by the recycling of the geometries that are obtained by those particles that comprise the universe on the substringular scale. Light is the source of detection. Detection is the source of perception. So, how light is formed and how it differentiates effects the parameters we perceive and our world view of them. Light in the substringular bears wave-tug with strings (one- and two-dimensional). This wave-tug influences the metric in which the strings related to a common eigenbasis of light interacts and transpires. Meter, as said before, is successiveness in action. The successiveness of action in terms of superstrings in a tori-sector-range is allowed by a quaternionic-instanton-mode. Each eigenstate of such a mode allows for each subsequent instanton, and each instanton is an iteration of Real time for the space-time-continuum. The integration of instantons is time. I will continue with the suspense of what I am leading up to later. Until then, you have a great day.
Sam.

Course 3 on Lorentz-Four-Contractions, Last Test Solutions, Part 1

1) At .5c, the superstrings of the given object closest region along the given axis would contract lengthwise according to l = ((1-v^2/c^2)^.5). The superstrings of the given object that surrounded the prior mentioned region would contract moderately. The superstrings that did not define the length of the given object, and thus were furthest from the center of the specific axis given, would not contract at all, since the superstrings here would not define the length of the given object.

2) Matter and kinetic energy that are of a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology contract relative to light because, since light is the result of the recycling of differential geometries, and all motion that involves mass that is of an abelian light-cone-gauge topology moves relative to the basis of such recycling, the physical parameters associated with such phenomena of mass must alter when such phenomena change in kinematic differentiation relative to light.

3) l = ((1-v^2/c^2)^.5, m = (1/(1-v^2/c^2)^.5), and relative to one traveling just under light speed, t = (1-v^2/c^2)^.5, or the proportion of more time noticed by a stander by as compared to one traveling just under light speed would obey t = (1/(1-v^2/c^2)^.5).

4) Its length would contract by .6, its mass would increase by (1/.6), and, the amount of time noticed by the one going at .8c would be .6 of the time of a stander by.

5) A mass with a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology can not travel at light speed or else it would have all of the mass in space and time. This is because a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology is abelian, and such topology bears a maximum fractal modulae in terms of its Gliossi field generation as encountered with just under light speed, and you can not increase such a fractal stress and expect it to obey the properties of a non-abelian light-cone-gauge topology.

6) Since the center of such strings specifically travels at .8c, this central region would contract according to (1-v^2/c^2)^.5 and (1/(1-v^2/c^2)^.5), and, the Lorentz-Four-Contractions would ease homeomorphically as one examines the further regions of the kinematic strings involved here.

7) The strings that are directly in the path of the directoralizations that moves at the given "quick" speed would contract in their given directoralizations according to Einstein's equations. Yet, since the two phenomena moving at the "quick" speed are differentiating in a multiplicit directoralization, the observation of such contractions would form a radial covariance that would be non-trivially isomorphic. The superstrings that are slower would also obey Einstein's equations would contract less.

8) A spherical object consisting of many superstrings that is moving in a unitary direction and is not spinning, orbiting, nor otherwise radially differentiating kinematically will only contract lengthwise toward the center of its directoralization, and would thus not contract uniformally.

Course 2, Session 16, Last Test

1) Describe the shape of a Basis of Light.

2) What pulls the ground state indices near the center state?

3)Why do differential geometries recycle?

4)Why and how does the "Arc" function with the Basis of Light?

5)What do I mean by "inhale" and "exhale?"

6) How does the association of strings effect the Basis of Light? the "Basis of Light" is where the Mobius Twist of the Continuum completes itself.

7)What is illumination?

8)What indicates the recycling of differential geometries besides just saying "illumination?" What condition of the Mobius Field does this indicate?

9)Logically show why norm and ground states must recycle.

10)Why is their unused residue?

11)Is residue shared among strings of a tori-sector-range?

12)What proves that all residue will be used up in due time?