Showing posts with label Khovanov. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Khovanov. Show all posts

Saturday, July 17, 2021

A Idea That Has Recently Come To Me, That Is Certainly "Outside Of The Box"

 Here is something that I have recently postulated, that I am not, at this point in time, completely sure of, yet that I thought that I would run this by with you.

Initially; You know how it is commonly known, that a sub-atomic particle of matter and its anti-matter counter part, are here to often have a similar type of a general structure, YET that the matter-based particle is here to have the opposite chirality of charge as the anti-matter-based particle is here to have?! Next; You know how, in a sense, cohomology acts as a fractal of charge?! Well; If you would like to, please check-out the logic, of what I am about to present.

Let us say that there is a tense of the net wave-tug, that may here be eminent in its correlation, with a matter/ant-matter-based cohomology-related eigenstate, that is here to be of:

1) One particular general genus of a field of physical nature. (Of either a non-entropic electromagnetic field; an entropic electromagnetic field, a d-field;, an f-field, a "graviton" field (although here, to only be wave-based); a "gravitino" field (although here, to only be wave-based); a Higgs field, a Neilson-Kolosh-Based field, Or a Neutrino-Based field.)

2) Of either a wave-based nature OR of a  particle-based nature.

3) Of either a Symplectic geometry OR of a Khovanov geometry.

Let us then, take into comparison, two of such individually taken considered Jacobean field eigenbases; to where the only difference that is here to be between them, is that one of such Jacobean eigenbases is to be of a  matter-based nature, -- whereas the other of such Jacobean eigenbases is here to be of an anti-matter-based nature. Next let us stipulate, the difference, between the general tense of the net wave-tug, that is here to exist, in a viable comparison between two different otherwise equivocal individually taken cohomology-related eigenstates, one of such being directly appertaining to the indicated matter-based Jacobean eigenbase, while the other of such being directly appertaining to the indicated anti-matter-based Jacobean eigenbase. 

I stipulate; that the correlative multiplicity of an individually-taken matter-based cohomology-related eigenstate, of such an inferred nature, will often tend to work to bear a tense of a net wave-tug, that is here to be directly associated with its correlative anti-holomorphic partial of angular momentum, that is here to work to bear a scalar amplitude of a "negative i" times the correlative multiplicity of an individually taken anti-matter-based cohomology-related eigenstate, of such a case. This is to where; the correlative multiplicity of an individually taken anti-matter-based cohomology-related eigenstate, of such an inferred nature, will often tend to work to bear a tense of a net wave-tug, that is here to be directly associated with its correlative anti-holomorphic partial of angular momentum, that is here to work to bear a scalar amplitude of "i" times the correlative multiplicity of an individually taken matter-based cohomology-related eigenstate, of such a case. 

Please let me know what you think, as to such a postulate that I have recently been considering for a while now!  I WILL CONTINUE WITH THE SUSPENSE LATER! SINCERELY, SAM ROACH. pa

Thursday, May 21, 2020

Second-Order Light-Cone-Gauge Eigenstates And Slippage

Just as those cohomology-related eigenstates, that are directly corresponding to the proximal local presence of a symplectic geometry -- are to tend to work to bear less slippage, at a level that is Poincare to the topological surface of such a respective superstring of discrete energy permittivity, that is here to work to bear such an inferred tense of a symplectic geometry -- than what often tends to be the case for those cohomology-related eigenstates, that are, instead, to be directly corresponding to the general tendency as to what is here to occur, with the correlative grouping of those cohomology-related eigenstates, that are here to be appertaining to the proximal local presence of a Khovanov geometry; it then tends to follow, that any second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstate that is here to be directly corresponding to a given arbitrary discrete quantum of energy, that is of an abelian light-cone-gauge topology, will tend to bear less of a tense of a scalar amplitude of slippage upon a Gliosis-based contact, -- than those bearings of a relative tense of a general scalar amplitude of slippage, that would otherwise occur, for any second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstate, that is here to instead to be directly corresponding to a given arbitrary discrete quantum of energy, that is of a non abelian light-cone-gauge topology.  This is why any given arbitrary second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstate, that is of a non abelian topology, will eminently have a set intrinsic tense of sinusoidal standing waves -- of which are internally like a tense of a minute fractal of a soliton-related nature, at a level that is Poincare to the Gliosis-based topological surface of such a herein stated second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstate,  since such sinusoidal waves are here to be Like a non-rippling "standing wave" at an internal reference-frame, while these are here to be in the process of being shifted around very quickly at an immediately external reference-frame. This acts, in so as to help to work to compensate for the so-inferred tense of slippage.; Whereas, -- any given arbitrary second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstate, that is of an abelian topology, will eminently have a set intrinsic tense of a More "supplemental" nature at a level that is Poincare to the Gliosis-based topological surface of such a herein stated second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstate, since the condition of a lesser tense of a scalar amplitude of slippage, tends to work to allow for the relinquishment of the eminent need for such sinusoidal "divots," that would Otherwise be necessary for the correlative gauge-bosons of such a given arbitrary quantum of energy, to be able to go into the act of plucking such stated light-cone-eigenstates, in so as to work to produce those Schwinger-Indices that are "proliferated," in so as to work to help to form the countless eigenstates of the various basic forces of nature. Sam Roach.

Monday, May 4, 2020

Some More Stuff, As To Isotropically Stable Superstrings

When a superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- whether such a said superstring is to be of either a symplectic geometry or of a Khovanov geometry, is to be working to generate as much cohomology as it is here to be degenerating, -- over the course of some discrete evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric, -- and if, as well, there is here to be the Ward-Cauchy-related condition physical present here, in which the said superstring is to basically act as "one unit," as it is to be undergoing the general course of its translation through space over time, -- to where the topological surface of such an implied string, when this is here to be taken at a level that is Poincare to the general region that is "barely" external to the holonomic substrate of the here mentioned topological surface of this said superstring, is to bear a relatively consistently minimal topological "rippling" of its inherent homotopic indices of vibrational oscillation, then, one may say that such a said superstring of discrete energy permittivity, will consequently tend to bear an isotropically stable nature, that is known to act as being of a Floer (co)homology. Sam Roach.

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

Symplectic Versus Khovanov Knotting Equations

When one is to work to determine the knotting equations for a system of cohomology, to where these so-eluded-to equations are here to work to be describing a symplectic geometry, -- the main difference that there is, between the formulation of this said cohomology and the formulation of a Legendre homology, is that, when determining a cohomology, one is here to be converting a Minkowski space into a Hilbert space; whereas, -- when one is to work to determine the knotting equations for a system of a Legendre homology,  to where these so-eluded-to equations are here to work to be describing a Khovanov geometry, -- the formulation of this said general genus of homology is as such, to where one is to instead, to be converting a Hilbert space into a Minkowski space.  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.