Hermitian Fourier Transformation Of Polyakov Action -- Anti Gravity

 The hermitian Fourier Transformation of the Polyakov Action, when this is here to be occurring, under the proximal local physical conditions, of a directly correlative anti gravitational field, tends to permeate in a more uninhibited manner, through the general operand of space-time-fabric, that it is here to be incurred through, than when this is here, instead, to be occurring, under the proximal local physical conditions, of a directly correlative heuristic gravitational field. I WILL CONTINUE WITH THE SUSPENSE LATER! SINCERELY, SAM.

Some Definitions -- Appertaining To My Model Of String Theory

 Hamiltonian Operator -- 1) The overall energy of a system.

                                          2) The overall zero-point energy of a system.

Lagrangian -- 1) The actual motion of a discrete quantum of energy.

                      2) The actual motion of a cohesive set of discrete energy quanta.

                      3) The actual motion of a Hamiltonian Operator.

Hamiltonian Operand -- The proximal local physical Substrate, of which a Hamiltonian Operator is to be traveling through, over the course of a proscribed duration of "time."

Lagrangian-Based Path -- The sequential series of the mappable-tracing, of a Hamiltonian Operand.

Hamiltonian Operation -- 1) The functional tendency of action, of which a given arbitrary Hamiltonian Operator is to incur, upon its respective Ward-Cauchy-Related environment.

                                         2)The actual kinematic activity of a Hamiltonian Operator.

                                         3) The actual gauged-action of a Hamiltonian Operator.

Time -- The successive series of covariant group-related instantons. 

I encourage Anyone to provide input -- as to your ideas, appertaining to this blog! Sincerely, SAM.

                      

De Rham Cohomology -- Isotropic Stability -- Homeomorphic Field

 Let us initially consider a mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, that is here to be working to form the mappable tracing, of a De Rham cohomology. If both the said mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, As Well As the given arbitrary particular Legendre (co)homology, that is here to be working to kinetically transfer the said set of discrete energy that is of such a case, are to both bear the general physical condition, of being of an isotropically stable nature, then, it will follow, that the resultant Lagrangian-based flow of motion, that is in this particularly mentioned case, to be directly associated with the mapping-out of a De Rham cohomology, will then consequently have a greater chance of working to bear the general physical condition of being of a homeomorphic nature, than if both the mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy that is here to be transferred, And, that Legendre (co)homology, that is here to be in the respective process of working to kinetically transfer it, through its correlative Hamiltonian operand, were to otherwise Not be of an isotropically stable nature. To Be Continued! Sincerely, SAMUEL ROACH. (1989).

Flat Ricci Curvature And De Rham Cohomology

 A cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, is more likely to work to map-out a De Rham cohomology, if the Hamiltonian Operand that it is here to be transferred through, is to work to bear a flat Ricci Curvature, -- than if such a said cohesive set of discrete energy is, instead, to be transferred through a Hamiltonian Operand, that is here to work to bear a spurious tense of a Ricci Curvature. To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach. 

Ebbing Of Pressurized Vacuum-Related Eigenstates

The multiplicity of the general existence, that is here to involve the flow of the overall set of those disturbances of space-time-fabric, that are here to work to form the existence of discrete energy quanta -- are assisted in formation, by the continual wave-tug related ebbing (when this is here to be related, as a general tense of "push" and "pull") that is of the kinematically differentiating "eigenstates" of pressurized vacuum potentials, that are brought into the condition, of acting as nodes of motion-related holonomic substrate, -- by the covariant, co-differentiable, and the co-determinable interdependent associations, that appertain to the continual inextricable Logos-involved inter-relationship, that is of the multiplicity of the general interaction between metric-gauge and gauge-metric phenomenology, as such gauging is here to help to allow for the sustainable continuation of such overall pressurized vacuum "eigenstates," to be propagated in an iterative manner, along the general course of the Hamiltonian Operand of Ultimon Flow. I will continue with the suspense later! 

To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach. 

Tightly-Knit Holomorphic Transfer

Let us initially consider two different cohomology-related mappable-tracings -- of which are here to be correlative to those world-sheets, that are to be of the paths of two different respective individually taken kinematic orbifold eigensets, -- that are here to bear a tense of trivial asymmetry, when this is here to be taken as an overall interdependent Yukawa-related relationship, that is of both a covariant, a co-determinable, and of a co-differentiable nature.  Let us next consider, -- that there is here to ensue, the Gliosis-based activity of a group-attractor, that is here to work to form a general spontaneous activity -- that is to result in a general manipulation of the topological manifold of the earlier inferred set of trivial asymmetric world-sheets, by which the the initially mapped-out interdependent Lagrangian-based paths, are then to work to bear a helical-related tensor, that is to be consequently imparted upon the topological surface of the tracings of the said world-sheets, at a level that is Poincare to the surface, that is immediately external to the shell of the core-field-density of the path-based cohomology-related eigenstates, that work to form the world-sheet-related physical memory of those orbifold eigensets, that had just tread upon the herein inferred proximal local Hamiltonian operand.  The more tightly-knit that the holomorphic transfer is to be, of the inferred interdependent covariant-related helicity, that is here to work to inter-bind the so-eluded-to trivial asymmetric path-like entities, the greater that the scalar amplitude will tend to be, of the helical twisting, that is here to be of the Yukawa-related coupling of the two said asymmetric paths. Therefore; the less tightly-knit that the holomorphic transfer is to be, of the inferred interdependent covariant-related helicity, that is here to work to inter-bind the so-eluded-to trivial asymmetric path-like entities, the less great that the scalar amplitude will tend to be, of the helical twisting, that is here to be of the Yukawa-related coupling of these two said asymmetric paths. To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Some More As To Schwinger-Indices And Gravity Waves

After the general Fourier-related activity of gauge-bosons -- acting in so as to "pluck" the correlative second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates of one respective discrete quantum of energy, in a manner that is metaphorically like a harp being played -- to where this is to form Schwinger-Indices, that are thence to be propagated outward from the here directly corresponding locus of the correlative discrete quantum of energy, -- the consequent Schwinger-Indices that are thence formed, are initially formed as a fractal of what are commonly thought of as gravity waves.  Once enough of such a general genus of Schwinger-Indices are to become eigen -- via the here consequent quantization of the so-eluded-to vibrations that are here to be propagated along the proximal local Hamiltonian operand-related eigenstates that are here of the Rarita Structure -- this happens to where the consequently formed eigenstate of holonomic substrate that are to literally act, in so as to be effectual as a metrical-gauge-related eigenstate of what we would normally think of as actual gravity waves, are thence to be formed.  Since gravity waves are a set of Schwinger-Indices-related eigenindices, that come together in a quantific manner -- in so as to operate in order to perform one specific function in space and time, -- gravity waves behave as to the multiplicit vibrations along the Rarita Structure, as orbifold eigensets are to behave as those directly corresponding discrete quantum of energy that work to comprise any said given arbitrary orbifold eigenset.  Once that enough of any one specific set of Scwhinger-Indices that are formed, in so as to act as a fractal of gravity waves, are to be quantized enough, in order to perform one specific viable Ward-Cauchy-based function in time and space, -- the consequently formed gravity waves are vibrations or wave-like phenomenology, that are simultaneously propagated -- in a manner that is relatively outward and perpendicular to the proximal locus region that such individualy taken gravity waves are to be traveling through -- in the form of one relatively symmetric or one relatively assymetric homotopic gravitational-based Hamiltonian operator, that is pulled through the correlative Hamiltonian operand that it is being transferred through, as such gravity waves are to consequently to be delineated along its directly corresponding Lagrangian-based path.  Such gravity wave-based eigensets, (what are most commonly thought of as the individually taken gravity waves themselves), are extremely smaller in diameter than a wavelength of light, although such gravity wave eigensets are extremely larger than the diameter of one discrete increment of a quantum of energy.  Such gravity waves tend to have a diameter that is on the order of 10^(-18) of a meter to 10^(-21) of a meter.This would then make gravity wave eigensets, or, to keep it simple, gravity waves, -- to be basically logarithmically in-between the size of a discrete quantum of energy and the size of any respective given arbitrary wavelength of electromagnetic energy, as such a quantization of vibrations along the Rarita Structure, is made Yukawa to discrete energy--  over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David.

Some Substringular Activity In Laymens Terms

Let us consider the following metaphorical analogy, -- in so as to work to improve the reader's perspective, as to what is going on in the Ward-Cauchy-based bounds of the substringular realm -- by relating as to what is happening here, in pretty-much laymens terms.  Let us say -- in this analogy -- that one is to be the orbifold eigenset in and of itself.  The so-eluded-to person is to be moving in a direction-based path, in so as to reach a given arbitrary physical destination.  The person -- as a metaphorical orbifold eigenset -- is to then to be the allegorical Hamiltonian operator.  The region that is to be traversed, from the point of origin -- to the point of destination -- is to be the allegorical Lagrangian-based path.  The medium that one is to be moving through, over the course of moving along the said Lagrangian-based path, is the allegorical Hamiltonian operand.  What one is doing in the process of moving through the said allegorical Hamiltonian operand -- is the metaphorical Hamiltonian operation.  If one is to be making a straight shot from the point of origin to the point of destination, then, one may then say that the path as to where one had just traveled, is of a discrete unitary Lagrangian-based path.  Even if the path that is here to be traversed, is not of a directly straight translation over time, -- if the path that is to be traversed, is of one smoothly taken genus of motion, then, the path is of a discrete Lagrangian-based path.  And, if the path that one is to here to metaphorically take -- is to be done in a bunch of jagged motions, then, the translated Lagrangian-based path is not discrete.  Next, translate what I have just conveyed -- to what is happening at the Ward-Cauchy-based level of the substringular, and, you will then get a better idea as to some of what I have tried to teach you, about the cohomological-related mappable-tracing of the motion of orbifold eigensets, over time.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Dimensions Move Through

Let us consider both an f-field, a d-field, and a p-field.  Let us next say, that, over a discrete amount of time, -- both an orbifold eigenset of an f-field, an orbifold eigenset of a d-field, and an orbifold eigenset of a p-field, are to all to travel through what would otherwise be a common general Hamiltonian operand-based region.  What is here to tend to work to influence the general Ward-Caucy-based condition, in so as to help to cause both the f-field to move through a minimum of four spatial dimensions, the d-field to move through a minimum of six spatial dimensions, and the p-field to move through a minimum of ten spatial dimensions (all of these being plus the dimension of time), is that, given the general genus of the vibrations of those superstrings that are to work to make-up each of the three individually taken general genre of field-based attribute -- along with the manner by which such superstrings of such said respective given arbitrary fields are to be tugged through such a so-eluded-to Hamiltonian-based operand -- a tendency will form, in so as to have a respective minimum of four spatial dimensions (for f-fields), six spatial dimensions (for d-fields), and ten spatial dimensions (for p-fields), is to be the said case for the three different said genre of field-based attribute.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

More As To Gaussian Transformations Versus Gauge-Transformations

With a Gaussian Transformation that is here to not be a gauge-tranformation, as the directly corresponding discrete energy quanta that are to here be most Yukawa to the correlative Kahler-Metric manifold -- as the correlative directly corresponding holonomic substrate of the pertinent Klein Bottle eigenstate, that is to be made Gliosis to the just mentioned discrete energy quanta, is to shake in a significant manner, this shaking is to only happen in the general direction of the holomorphic directorial-based Lagrangian-based Hamiltonian operand, that is in the path of holomorphic wave-tug of the correlative set of discrete energy quanta, where the correlative set of superstrings of discrete energy permittivity are to ensue, right after the then metric-wise iteration of BRST is to then be happening.  Yet -- with a Gaussian Transformation that IS here to be a gauge-transformation, as the directly corresponding discrete energy quanta that are to here be most Yukawa to the correlative Kahler-Metric manifold -- as the correlative directly corresponding holonomic substrate of the pertinent Klein Bottle eigenstate, that is to be made Gliosis to the just mentioned discrete energy quanta, is to shake in a significant manner, this shaking is to happen in both the general direction of the holomorphic directorial-based Lagrangian-based Hamiltonian operand, as well as in the Njenhuis-to-holomorphic directorial-based Lagrangian-based Hamiltonian operand, that is in the path of the holomorphic wave-tug of the correlative set of discrete energy quanta, where the correlative set of superstrings of discrete energy permittivity are to ensue, right after the then metric-wise iteration of BRST is to then be happening.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Cyclical Reverberations And Reference Frames, Part One

Let us initially consider one given arbitrary reference frame -- that is of an orbifold eigenset, that is to be kinematic as a holonomic substrate, that is cyclical in its Fourier-related transformation, while it is in the process of moving along a generic tense of a rectangular Lagrangian-based path -- during which the specific respective so-eluded-to Hamiltonian operand of such a case, is varied per iteration of such a so-stated generic rectangular path, on account of those directly corresponding angular perturbations that are to here happen to the Stoke's-based topological substrate of the Fourier differentiating orbifold eigenset, to here be of a Yukawa-based nature to the core-field-density of the said eigenset, in so as to work to make-up the specific so-eluded-to tense of such a cyclical permutative holonomic substrate, that is of the internal reference frame of the holonomic substrate of the here respective given arbitrary set of superstrings that are here to operate in so as to perform one specific function over time.  Let us then consider, that, at an external reference frame -- the directly corresponding orbifold eigenset is to here work to bear a Fourier-based tensor of field generation -- to where, at the vantage-point of the so-stated external reference frame, the said orbifold eigenset is to, as well, bear a simultaneous motion that is gradually pushed into the relative norm-to-forward-holomorphic direction, as the said orbifold eigenset is in the process of being reverberated through the earlier said rectangular Lagrangian-based path, over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

As To Oribifold Eigensets And Curved-Space

The closer that a phenomenology that is of a lower mass-based genus, moves towards a phenomenology that is of a higher mass-based genus, in this respective given arbitrary case  -- the less that the Lagrangian-based path that was of the initially so-stated orbifold eigenset, will move as if it was moving in a discrete unitary-based manner, -- since the hightened gravitational-based index will then tend to here, move in the "direction" of as having a more curved-like Hamiltonian operand.  This is as the phenomenology of a lower gravitational -based index is propagated towards the phenomenology that is a higher gravitational-based index.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Clifford Expansions -- The General Gist Of It

Let us here consider two different distinct given arbitrary orbifold eigensets, that begin to exist at a relatively adjacent proximal localization -- to where both of these said orbifold eigensets are initially existing in a tense of Majorana-Weyl-Invariance -- over an initial relatively transient duration of a sequential series of group-related instantons.  Let us next say that the two respective given arbitrary different distinct orbifold eigensets of such a case, are perturbated out of their initial covariant-based condition of Majorana-Weyl-Invariance -- to where the two initially so-stated orbifold eigensets are to here go from being of a proximal localized nature, in so as to being of Laplacian-based adjacent manner, into going into a divergence that happens in so as to increase the scalar amplitude as to the relative substringular distance that is to now exist between and among the two said orbifold eigensets, over a set duration of time.  Let us say, that, in the process of the so-eluded-to Cevita interaction that is to operate as a gauge-metrical Hamiltonian operator or operation -- in so as to work at causing the two so-eluded-to metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operators, that exist as the holonomic substrate of two distinct given arbitrary orbifold eigensets, to diverge in a space-wise manner over time -- this will happen to where the Lagrangian-based path that may be mapped-out here, in so as to work to show the manner as to how the two said metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operators are to move through their respective individually taken distinctly different Hamiltonian operands, to where this is to happen in both cases when taken individually as a hyperbolic path of an euler-based divergence in space, over a euclidean-based time-frame.  This general manner of divergence, is one genus as to what a Clifford Expansion of covariant localization may be -- when this is taken in consideration as to the relative divergence of two different distinct metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operators -- that are brought into a tense of separation, that may be mapped-out in a Laplacian-based manner, after the two said Hamiltonian operators (in this case, the two said orbifold eigensets) have differentiated in a Fourier-based manner, in so as to have gone through a relatively viable tense of both a transversal and a viable tense of a spin-orbital particle and wave-based sequential series of motions through time and space.

A Simple Analogy

Here is a simple Analogy made in laymens' terms -- in so as to make it easier for someone who may not be a physicist, to be able to better grasp what is meant by some of my terminology -- that I occasionally may use in so as to describe certain activities that happen, such as, in the substringular.:
Let us consider an analogy, in which one may metaphorically call a "person" as the metaphorical Hamiltonian operator.  Let us next consider the environment by which the said person is to be moving through, as the metaphorical Hamiltonian operand.  Let us then say that the person's motion through the environment in which the said given arbitrary person is to be going through, over time, is to be the metaphorical Hamiltonian operation.  The mappable tracing of the path in which the metaphorical person is to be moving through, may then be thought of as the metaphorical Lagrangian-based path.
Again, this is just an analogy as to what I mean by certain things -- when I describe such things in the substringular.  So, if one is to fractal this down to the phenomenology of the substringular -- this so-stated analogy may be able to help one to better understand what I am trying to express.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Reason For Transmission of Scattered Cohomologies

As I have said before, the residue of the multiplicit scattered GSO cohomologies has the tendency of being pulled off of the multiplicit relative Real Reimmanian Plane into the multiplicit relative Njenhuis Plane -- as the residue of the multiplicit scattered Neilson-Kollosh cohomologies have the tendency of being pulled off of the multiplicit relative Njenhuis Plane into the multiplicit relative Real Reimmanian Plane.  This tendency is on account of the following Laplacian-based set of  conditions:  The genus of the overall general norm-state-projections that are of the multiplicit relative Real Reimmanian Plane work to bear a harmonic even parity with the genus of the overall general norm-state-projections that are off of the multiplicit relative Njenhuis Plane -- in such a manner in so as to bear a multiplicit condition of their being a tendency of the Laplacian-based existence of a mean Lagrangian-based path that is of an even chirality, -- towards each enharmonically scattered GSO ghost that has been broken down by a Rayleigh scattering, and, there is a tendency of the Laplacian-based existence of a mean Lagrangian-based path that is of an even chirality, -- toward each enharmonically scattered Neilson-Kollosh ghost that has been broken down by a Rayleigh scattering. The condition, that, for every action -- there is an equal and opposite reaction -- happening in the opposite direction from the first said action, -- works to elude to the condition in which the antichiral parity of the adjacent eigenmembers of one set of cohomological indices that have just undergone a Rayleigh-based scattering of ghost anomalies, -- will work to cause the then existent condition of a proximal local chiral parity that bears a Hamiltonian operand that works to bear a clear path that is of a mean Lagrangian, to cause the pre-existent condition that the substringular tends to work in so to move in the direction of optimum rest, to cause a wave-tug/wave-pull of what may be thought of as the so-eluded-to just scattered ghost-based indices to recycle in the manner that I have just described of earlier in this post.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Some Ideas as to Slater Equations

Let us here consider the motion of an orbifold -- an orbifold that moves as a substringular projection through a discrete Lagrangian, over time.  Let us now consider the here present condition, that the so-stated substringular projection works to map-out a cohomological-based projection -- as the physical memory of the orbifold that I have here mentioned is pulled in the relatively holomorphic direction, through the said Lagrangian that the superstring had projected itself through, in so as to form a ghost-based extrapolation as to the what, when, and how the said set of superstrings that are here functioning in so as to perform a specific substringular operation -- in the Ward-Caucy-based confines of the codifferentiablity of the proximally local Poincare-based indices, to the so-eluded-to scenario.  Let us now consider the condition, that, the fractal of the angular momentum -- the Hamiltonian-based permittivity that the so-stated orbifold exhibits, by its here eluded-to substringular behavior -- that the said orbifold works to show, over a discrete period of time, is pulled by an exterial wave-tug.  This genus of a wave-tug-based activity works to exhibit a median-based euclidean expansion of the said orbifold's Hamiltonian-based operand, over the time in which it is moving across the so-stated discrete Lagrangian that I have here mentioned.  This general format of an expanding field of an orbifold, that works to bear a relatively optimum abelian geometry -- in the process of the said orbifold's traverse across that Lagrangian in which it has been moving in, over the here mentioned group-related metric -- will bear an orbifold that is pulled at a subtended angle, through the vantage-point of the here eluded-to coniaxion, that is of a 45 degree-based nature.  If one were to multiply the permittivity of the directly corresponding Hamiltonian, that appertains to the scalar magnitude of such a median eigenbase of a relatively hermitian-based relatively abelian flow of corroberative superstrings, over time,  by the reciprocal of the square-root of two, -- when one here considers the Hodge-Indices that work to depict the initial so-eluded-to Hamiltonian of the so-stated orbifold that we are here dealing with -- this will help to establish what the multiplets of the so-eluded-to Hamiltonian of this case are.  This format of working to determine what such a euclidean-based median substringular expansion may be extrapolated as -- in terms of what the correlative Hamiltonian eigenbase of such a case is.  This is, in general, the idea behind determining what a Slater equation is. To Be Continued!!! I will continue with the suspense later!  Sam Roach.

A Little Bit Of A Tutorial About Chern-Simmons Singularities

If a superstring is traveling through a given arbitrary Lagrangian that has a path-based spike that not only changes in three more derivatives than the number of spatial dimensions that the said superstring is traveling through over time -- to where, via the directoral-based path of the superstring going through its directly corresponding Hamiltonian operand, works to form a synchronous set of singularities that are each of a factor of infinity -- yet, the superstring at the locus of Chern-Simmons spike bears an elongated pulse, the genus of the unitary basis of the said Chern-Simmons spike would be infinity^3*infinity, or, in other words, infinity^4.   Yet,  if one were to trace the said given arbitrary mappable tracing of the eluded to Lagrangian path of the superstring in the relatively opposite direction (here, instead, in the relatively reverse-holomorphic direction), then, the genus of the eluded to Chern-Simmons spike would be of (0+)^3*infinity, or, in other words, (0+)^2.  Yet, if the Lagrangian-based singularity was infinity^3, and, the pulsation of the directly corresponding superstring was truncated at the locus of Chern-Simmons singularity, in the relatively forward-holomorphic direction of the Hamiltonian operation of the said superstring, then, the genus of the Chern-Simmons spike would be infinity^3*(0+), or, in other words, infinity^2.  In the opposite mappable tracing, the genus of the eluded to Chern-Simmons spike would be (0+)^3*(0+), or, in other words, (0+)^4.   This is if the given arbitrary said conditions of Chern-Simmons spike were to be both non-hermitian and spurious.  The ghost anomalies that work to form the directly affiliated cohomologies would here be of the respective genus formats of a correlative set of displays of Doubolt cohomologies.  This is a little reminder from before.  To Be Continued!
I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerley, Sam Roach.

A Little Bit About Operands

So, one may inquire, what is the holonomic substrate that works to comprise the Hamiltonian operands of general space-time-fabric?  I can see why so many people have been avidly awaiting the suspense that will be eluded to as such in course 13 -- which is about Substringular Transformations.  So, as a heads up to this so stated course 13, the holonomic substrate that works to comprise the Hamiltonian operands of general space-time-fabric are the loci where the general phenomena of the ultimate fractal of pressurized vacuum is not kinematically Gliossi to such spots and regions in any of such manner that may here be termed of as Poincaire at the conipoint-based eigenstate-based positionings -- per hermitian-based motion that here involves the motion of such eigenstates of the general phenomena of the ultimate fractal of pressurized vacuum -- that may be marked upon such Laplacian-based delineations of such given arbitrary mappings in open space.  This works to describe the phenomena of what open space that is not overtly kinematic as a substringular operation, or, also of what open space that is not overtly kinematic as a substringular operator, must be defined of as in so as to define the existence of non-kinematic-based spatial regions.  All spatial regions are made up of at least potential pinpoints that may be mapped of as conipoint-based eigenstates that may have a certain value and/or a characteristic that these derive and may be derived from -- as well as a value and/or a characteristic that these bear over the course of both the Laplacian conditions that these exist in, as well as over the alterior Fourier conditions that their coexisting operators and operations bear over the time that such a latter Fourier condition appertains to -- under whatever given arbitrary overall Ward-Caucy conditions that the overall  framework of a certain physical scenario may portray in so as to depict some kinematic activity that happens through that free space that I here define as the holonomic substrate that works to comprise a certain Hamiltonian-based operand-like phenomena.  More to that in course 13.
I will continue with the suspense later!  By the way, good question!!!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.
Catch You "Two!"

Part Two As To A Clarification of Courses 2 and 4

The idea where I left off during my last blog post, the general gist of it, is that every system must go through a succession of stress and relaxation.  The conicentral substring that is being related here has many globally distinguishable superstrings that are directly related to it in terms of the directly associated Laplacian Ward conditions that exist during any given arbitrary instanton in which one may extrapolate the mapping of the corresponding  superstrings.  The substrates of the given basis of light works to fold into  mini-traces that are here tied to each globally distinguishable superstring.  The flow that one may be able to determine from the subsequent Fourier-based activity involves a looping throughout the general operand of the Ultimon.

Prelude to Course #9, My View On Phenomenology, The Next Part

Well hello again world, this is Samuel David Roach here!  I hope that you are enjoying my blog! 
Here we go!

              
Every life-form consists of things, yet no life-form is a thing in and of itself.  So, every living being bears a metaphysical partial quality, yet, every life-form consists of some form of matter.  A spiritual being consists of spiritual things, while a material being consists of material things.  Metaphysical means beyond the physical.  Metaphysical reality is reality that consists of mind that utillizes, to some extent, reality.  Physical reality is phenomena that utilizes reality without at least some sort of awareness.  Sentient means aware.  Physical reality is the operand through which activity may happen.  Physical matter is the stuff that is used to allow the activity to happen which needs to happen so that life may exist.  If there were no stuff that was used to develop the fate of the activities of souls, there would be no life to begin with.  Life is mind in action.  Without action or life, there would be no mind.  Without mind, there would be no reality.  So, in a sense, mind and energy the basis of all reality -- and matter is energy is static equilibrium.
Now that I have shown some of my basic views on phenomenology, next time, I plan on starting the next course that I have in store for you in string theory.  This next Course is the first course that I have for you about Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge.  The views of these last two posts are not directly related to the next Course that I am about to start discussing, yet, I felt compelled to have some sort of tie in-between some of the concepts that I related in Course 6 and the actual body of Course 9.  You will not receive Courses 7 and 8 on my blog.  (NOYB).  Sincerely, Sam Roach.