If a superstring is traveling through a given arbitrary Lagrangian that has a path-based spike that not only changes in three more derivatives than the number of spatial dimensions that the said superstring is traveling through over time -- to where, via the directoral-based path of the superstring going through its directly corresponding Hamiltonian operand, works to form a synchronous set of singularities that are each of a factor of infinity -- yet, the superstring at the locus of Chern-Simmons spike bears an elongated pulse, the genus of the unitary basis of the said Chern-Simmons spike would be infinity^3*infinity, or, in other words, infinity^4. Yet, if one were to trace the said given arbitrary mappable tracing of the eluded to Lagrangian path of the superstring in the relatively opposite direction (here, instead, in the relatively reverse-holomorphic direction), then, the genus of the eluded to Chern-Simmons spike would be of (0+)^3*infinity, or, in other words, (0+)^2. Yet, if the Lagrangian-based singularity was infinity^3, and, the pulsation of the directly corresponding superstring was truncated at the locus of Chern-Simmons singularity, in the relatively forward-holomorphic direction of the Hamiltonian operation of the said superstring, then, the genus of the Chern-Simmons spike would be infinity^3*(0+), or, in other words, infinity^2. In the opposite mappable tracing, the genus of the eluded to Chern-Simmons spike would be (0+)^3*(0+), or, in other words, (0+)^4. This is if the given arbitrary said conditions of Chern-Simmons spike were to be both non-hermitian and spurious. The ghost anomalies that work to form the directly affiliated cohomologies would here be of the respective genus formats of a correlative set of displays of Doubolt cohomologies. This is a little reminder from before. To Be Continued!
I will continue with the suspense later! Sincerley, Sam Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment