Residual "Slack" Of Wave-Based Discrete Energy Impedance

 The main superstring-related physical operation, of which gauge-bosons perform -- is Tantamount to this:

Gauge-Bosons, in effect, take the equivocal residual "slack" of chorded mini-string-related segmentation, that is here to be viably latent, in the proximal local vibrational holonomic substrate, that is here to be present, at the general region of the core-field-density, of wave-based discrete energy impedance (wave-based discrete energy "lag"), and these inferred gauge-boson eigenstates, are thence to consequently work, at tangentially "slinging," such an inferred tense of equivocal residual holonomic vibrational "slack," of chorded mini-string-related segmentation, in a manner, that is here to be propagated, directionally outward and away from the general proximal local core-field-density, of which is here to be eminent to the general region, of the core-field-density, of the inferred given arbitrary light-cone-gauge eigenstate, that is here to be directly corresponding, to such a given arbitrary associated cased scenario -- to where, such a propagated set of wave-sublets, are thence to ripple along the multiplicity, of the vast array of mini-string-related inter-connective differential configuration, that is here to be latent, along the general multiplicity of the Rarita Structure, in so as to thereby have a general tendency, of working to interact with other superstring-related fields, in order to work at helping to form the multifarious forces of physical nature. TO BE CONTINUED! SAM.

Difference Between Externalized Core-Field-Density And Actual Topology Of Superstring

 In my model of string theory, the following is the fundamental difference, between what I term of as being the "externalized core-field-density" of a superstring/counter string, and, the topology itself of such a said superstring/counter string:

As the multiplicity of mini-string-related segmentation, of which works to form the topological substrate of superstring-related fields (in order for the actual fields of such superstrings/counter strings to have any directional sense), works to be trace-wise mapped-out, in a Laplacian-Based manner, to where such a trace-wise approach, is directed, in a respectively covariant manner, Towards an actual given arbitrary inferred superstring/counter string of discrete energy permittivity, the density of such an inferred barrage of convergent zero-point-energy-related "eigenstates," is to consequently become so "thick," that the multiplicity of phenomenology, of which is here to be on the order of, as being as large of, or larger than, the general phenomenology of discrete energy quanta, will usually tend to Not be able to get any closer to the actual "topology" of such a said superstring/counter string. 

Such said mini-string-related segmentation, tends to have a significantly greater convergence Towards superstrings/counter strings, than towards their directly corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates.

The multiplicity of the general region, adjutant to a superstring of discrete energy permittivity, at which the density of the convergent mini-string-related segmentation is so dense, that phenomenology will tend to not have much of a likelihood, to become even nearer to such a said superstring, is what I term of as being, -- the "externalized core-field-density" of a superstring/counter string. 

Whereas; -- The multiplicity of the actual topology, of a given arbitrary superstring/counter string of discrete energy permittivity, is the actual phenomenology of such a said string/counter string, -- in and of itself.