Thought waves, that are here to be tugged Towards a given arbitrary node of the collective consciousness, tend to work to bear a verging, that is here to be of a co-tangential manner. Whereas; Thought waves, that are here to be tugged Away form a given arbitrary node of the collective consciousness, tend to work to bear a verging, that is here to be of a tangential manner. Furthermore; The physical scattering, that is here to be directly involved, with the "sheaving," of the cohomology of a given arbitrary set of thought waves, (as one particular general genus or tense of an Etale cohomology), that are here to be relatively new at being Introduced, Into the general physical construct, of a given arbitrary respective node of the collective consciousness, tends to act as being more similar to a Riemann Scattering, than of a Rayleigh Scattering. Whereas; The physical scattering, that is here to be directly involved with the "inverted sheaving," of the cohomology of a given arbitrary set of thought waves, (as one particular general genus or tense of a p-Adic cohomology), that are here to be relatively new at being Dispersed, as Out of the general physical construct, of a given arbitrary respective node of the collective consciousness, tends to act as being more similar, to a Rayleigh Scattering, than of a Riemann Scattering. Next; The heuristic sheaving of thought waves, may be interpreted, as one particular tense or genus of a Wess-Zumino Interaction. Whereas; The "inverse sheaving" of thought waves, may be interpreted, as one particular tense or genus, of a Cevita Interaction. I WILL CONTINUE WTIH THE SUSPENSE LATER! To Be Continued! Sincerely, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH.
Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Friday, May 21, 2021
Etale Cohomology -- Expressed -- Spherical Manner/Euclidean Manner
A given arbitrary heuristic sheave -- may often either be expressed, in a spherical-related manner, -- such as with different genre of case scenarios, that are here to work to involve concentric shell-related phenomenology; Or, a heuristic sheave -- may also often be expressed, in a euclidean-related manner, -- such as with the general case of the sheaving, that is here to be directly involved with the braided Etale Related cohomology, of a laser emission. TO BE CONTINUED! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach. (1989).
Heuristically Projected Laser, Versus Heuristic Tesla Energy
The propagation of the multiplicity of heuristically projected laser emissions, works to act as a genus-related tense of a heuristic sheaving. Thereby; The propagation of the multiplicity of heuristically projected laser emissions, tends to work to display a genus-related tense of an Etale cohomology.
Whereas;
The propagation of the multiplicity of heuristically emitted Tesla Energy, works to act as a genus-related tense of an inverted sheaving. Thereby; The propagation of the multiplicity of heuristically emitted Tesla Energy, tends to work to display a genus-related tense of a p-Adic cohomology. Sincerely, Sam Roach.
"Stemming" Of Second-Order Light-Cone-Gauge Eigenstates
The Laplacian-Based holonomic substrate of non abelian second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates, works to act as "chords" of intertwined mini-string-related segmentation, that are here to be functionally subtended, during the durational course of each individually taken iteration of group-related instanton, between any one given arbitrary Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate, and its directly corresponding superstring of discrete energy permittivity. The actually projected "stemming" of the corroborative mini-string-related segmentation, From where it is linked at both inferred ends of a subtended Laplacian-Based case scenario -- to where the corroborative mini-string-related segmentation, is hereby to work to bear a strong helicity of twist upon itself -- in so as to work to form the earlier inferred holonomic substrate, of the mentioned second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that are of any given arbitrary correlative respective case, in so as to work to behave like the Laplacian-Based euclidean-related mappable-tracing, of a modified Bessel Function. Such an intertwining of stemmed-out mini-string-related segmentation, may be thought of, as appearing like a modified euclidean-related mappable-tracing, of a tense of a heuristic genus of superstring-related sheaving (as related to an Etale Cohomology). To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
Wednesday, May 19, 2021
As To Scalar Magnitude -- Etale/p-Adic Cohomology
An Etale cohomology tends to work to bear a heuristic sheaving.
When the Etale cohomology abelian-related "Grouping" factor, has a scalar magnitude of
"-i*(e^2);"
Then, the scalar magnitude, of the directly corresponding heuristic sheaving, will consequently tend to be "0." (This will consequently tend to indicate, that there will here, in this particular case, be NO heursitic sheaving being displayed here.)
Whereas:
A p-Adic cohomology tends to work to bear an inverse sheaving.
When the p-Adic cohomology abelian-related "Grouping" factor is "0;"
Then, the scalar magnitude of the directly corresponding inverse sheaving, will consequently tend to be
"-i*(e^2)." (This will consequently tend to indicate, that there will here, in this particular case, be No abelian-related "Grouping" being exhibited here.)
Please let me know if this is up to par! I am just beginning to learn of this type of cohomology! SAM.