Elaboration Of The Earlier Simple Concept

 So; If one were to take the initial product, between the net i*PI(Del) Action of a given arbitrary Hamiltonian Operator, with its frequency of kinetic motion, as coupled with the resonant frequency, that this self-same Hamiltonian Operator works to express, while then crossing this, with its homotopic restraint, the consequentially resultant value, will tend to be tantamount, to the energy per charge, or the voltage, that such a stated Hamiltonian Operator, is here to be exhibiting. SAMUEL ROACH.(1989).

The utilization of sound-based frequencies, may often tend to enhance electromotive current. 

Flow Of Magnetic Charge

 The permittivity of the flow of magnetic charge, works to form current (charge per time). And; The impedance of the flow of magnetic charge, works to form resistance (energy*time per charge squared). The dot product of the permittivity of the flow of magnetic charge, With the impedance of the flow of magnetic charge, works to form voltage, (energy per charge). TO BE CONTINUED! SINCERELY, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH. 

Harmonic/Anharmonic Strain Of Energy-Related Phenomenology

 At times; Sound applied to voltage, may often tend to be capable, of working to form a harmonic tense, of a strain of energy-related phenomenology. Whereas, at other times; Heat applied to voltage, may often tend to be capable, of working to form an anharmonic tense, of a strain of energy-related phenomenology. 

The Main Difference Between Voltage AND The Main Influence Formed By The Force Of Pressurized Vacuum

 The Main difference between Voltage AND the Main Influence that is created by the Force of Pressurized Vacuum (this Main Influence, of which is a general tense of a metric-gauge-related field), is:

Voltage is kinetic energy per charge; Whereas, the Main Influence that is created by the force of pressurized vacuum -- is equivalent to energy in static equilibrium, of which tends to be in a state of super-conformal invariance at an internal reference-frame, per charge. I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, SAM. (1989).

More About Regional Nodes Of Mini-String-Related Segmentation

 The following is an additional hypothesis, that makes sense to me.  Please let me know if this makes sense to you. The ratio of convergent discrete regional nodes of hyperbolically approached mini-string-related segmentation, With convergent discrete regional nodes of euclidean approached mini-string-related segmentation, helps at working to determine the force of magnetic repulsion. (Appertaining to Voltage). Whereas; the ratio of convergent discrete regional nodes of euclidean approached mini-string-related segmentation, Per time, helps at working to determine the force of magnetic attraction. (Appertaining to Amperage). I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Covariant Metric-Gauge-Related Pulsation And Electrodynamics

When one is to have a cohesive set of orbifold eigensets, that are here to work to bear a covariant tense of a metric-gauge-related pulsation -- that is thence to bear a unitary Lagrangian-based path, that is to have its bearings via an overall holomorphic-related directional drive, -- the consequential resultant repulsive component of such an inferred tense of a metric-gauge-related pulsation, tends to be relatively more associated with a fractal of Voltage than amperage; whereas, the consequential resultant attraction component of such an inferred tense of a metric-gauge-related pulsation, tends to be relatively more associated with a fractal of Amperage than voltage. To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Change Of Electrodynamic Flow And Chern-Simons Singularities

When an electrical current ( a tense of charge per time) is to bear a tense of perturbation, over a given arbitrary course of time -- this tends to be indicative of the directly corresponding presence of Lagrangian-based Chern-Simons singularities, -- as appertaining to the here correlative manner of the kinematic activity of the said electrical current.  Consequently; when amperage is to work to bear a tense of perturbation over time, this tends to be indicative of the presence of the directly corresponding presence of Lagrangian-based Chern-Simons singularities.  Furthermore; when the flow of the magnetic field is to bear a tense of perturbation, over a given arbitrary course of time, this tends to be indicative of the directly corresponding presence of metric-based Chern-Simons singularities.  Consequently; when a tense of voltage (a tense of energy per charge) is to bear a tense of perturbation, over a given arbitrary course of time -- this tends to be indicative of the directly corresponding presence of metric-based Chern-Simons singularities, -- as appertaining to the here correlative manner of the kinematic activity of the here inferred tense of energy per charge. I will continue the suspense later! To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Type Of Chern-Simons Invariants And Charge

The quicker that a mass-bearing orbifold eigenset is to fluctuate in its pulsation over time, -- the faster that the rate of its directly corresponding metric-related Chern-Simons Invariants will tend to fluctuate -- of which will consequently tend to reverse-fractal into resulting, in an increased scalar magnitude of charge per time, -- of which will then tend to result in an increased amperage.  The quicker that a mass-bearing orbifold eigenset is to fluctuate in the externalized distribution of its cohomology-related generation over time, -- the faster that the rate of its directly corresponding Lagrangian-related Chern-Simons Invariants will tend to fluctuate -- of which will consequently tend to reverse-fractal into resulting in an increased scalar magnitude of energy per charge, of which will then tend to result in an increased voltage. Sam Roach.

A Potentially Viable Idea

Here's a little bit of something to think of, in relation to the main influences of physical nature:

(((Discrete Metric-Gauge-Related-Field-Operator)*(Discrete i*PI(del) Action)*(Power (4.135607315*10^(-17) of one Watt))*(Discrete Inertial-Related Pulsation)*(Discrete Idea)*(Discrete Entropy)*(Discrete Charge))/(Discrete Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode))
= 2.062365054*10^(-129)*(6.62607004*10^(-34)Joules*Seconds) (Zero-Point Energy).

((1.110972413*10^(-18)Kg/Coulumbs)*(8.635858*10^(-63)Coulumbs*Seconds)*(4.135607315*10^(-17) of one Watt)*(8.71563*10^(-79)Meters*Seconds)*(7.041797292*10^(-27)Inverse Meters)*(3.364124329*10^(-25)Seconds/Coulumbs)*(1.6022*10^(-19)Coulumbs))/(9.5942*10^(-80)Kilograms*Seconds)).

= 2.062365054*10^(-129)*(6.62607004*10^(-34)Joules*Seconds) (Zero-Point Energy), or, in other words, this is 2.062365054*10^(-129) of the Planck Constant!

I apologize for the mistake about this earlier!!!

I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

P.S.:  Yes Doctor Little, this is the blog of one of your patients!

An Interesting Analogy

Even though what I term of as being the force of pressurized vacuum, the point commutative force, and also the electromotive force, -- are three different basic types of force -- here is an analogy that I think is interesting:

The force of pressurized vacuum is to "voltage," what the point commutative force is to "amperage."
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincrely, Samuel David Roach.

Polarity Of Legendre Homology

Let us initially consider a tense of a discrete overall quantum of Legendre homology, that is here to be delineated by the generation of the Lagrangian-related activity of an electromagnetic source.  Next, let us say that the voltage (energy per charge) that is to be directly associated with the said electromagnetic source, is to be of a positive polarity. This will then mean -- that the directoral-related angular momentum of the earlier mentioned delineated Legendre homology, will be directed as a cross-product-related operation of kinetic energy, -- to where the kinetic energy that is here to be produced by the said electromagnetic source (in the form of voltage, or, energy per charge), will here be directed relatively outward.  However, -- if the voltage is to, instead, to be directly associated with a negative polarity, then, this will mean -- that the directoral-related angular momentum of the so-eluded-to Legendre homology, will then, in this ulterior case, be directed as a dot-product-related operation of kinetic energy, -- to where the kinetic energy that is here to be produced by the said electromagnetic source (in the form of voltage, or, energy per charge), will here be directed relatively inward.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Another Post From Course 5

What does it mean for two waves from separate point particles to touch and rub each other?  Consider a point particle again as a ball of yarn.  A ball of yarn is made up of string that has a static tendency when rubbed.  Let us say that you loosened the ends of two balls of string (the ends that were on the outside).  You rubbed these ends against each other briefly.  What happened?  The fray of the strings interconnected to an extent (depending on the toutness of each string), the strings became slightly charged one toward another, and a slight amount of heat was produced.  Now, what if you rubbed these string ends for just a little bit longer and then let go?  What would probably happen?  The strings would stay together for at least one moment.  Why?  When the strings’ ends are rubbed, an electrostatic discharge happens to a slight extent between these ends.  Electrons rub around, giving off a mild charge.  The mild charge is in terms of the angular momentum that is dispensed during the rubbing of the described electrons, while the shock of voltage that one could potentially receive from this is due to the spin-orbital interaction of the described electrons.  The described angular momentum is in terms of the roll of the electrons as a transversal radiation.  The propagation of this energy is the electric filed in this case.  In order for there to be roll, there has to be spin and orbit.  As the electrons roll around between the ends of the metaphorical yarns of string, these are also spinning (twisting 90 degrees to the twist that happens during the roll) and orbiting each other (moving radially as a whole relative to each other).  The propagation of the energy given off as the result of this spin and orbit type motion is the magnetic field dispensed here.  From experience, when you spin a bunch of materials near each other, what happens?  The materials get sucked into each other!  So, when there is a magnetic discharge between two objects, what tends to happen?  The two objects tend to be brought in toward each other!  I will continue with the suspense of this session later.

Until then, you have a phenomenal day!  Sam

A Special Case Of A Reverse Fractal

When superstrings of discrete energy permittivity interact with the torsional indices of the relatively proximal localized eigenstates of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure -- this will tend to work to form at a more macroscopic level, more of a point-based natured tense of magnetism that is in the lines with the activity of voltage -- than in the lines with the activity of current, when this is taken over time.  Yet, when the correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates in the substringular, work to interact with the torsional indices of the relatively proximal localized eigenstates of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure -- this will tend to work to form at a more macroscopic level, more of a point-based natured tense of magnetism that is in the line with the activity of current than with the lines with the activity of voltage, when this is taken over time.

As To The Fractals Of Voltage And Current

You probably know the fact that voltage is energy per charge.  You probably also know that current is charge per time.  Voltage is more related to the condition of magnetism than current is.  A magnetic field of any given arbitrary case scenario is more related to permittivity than the electric field of the same respective given arbitrary case scenario is.  An electric field of any given arbitrary case scenario is more related to impedance than the magnetic field of the same respective given arbitrary case scenario is.  Superstrings act as discrete quanta of energy permittivity.  Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates act as discrete quanta of energy impedance.  Superstrings act as the basis of the particle-based nature of discrete energy permittivity.  Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates act as the basis of the particle-based nature of discrete energy impedance.  The correlative counterstrings -- that are directly corresponding to the respective superstrings of any given arbitrary case -- act as the basis of the wave-based nature of discrete energy permittivity.  The correlative light-cone-gauge eigenstates that are directly corresponding to the respective Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates of any given arbitrary case -- act as the basis of the wave-based nature of discrete energy impedance.  The discrete energy quanta of any given arbitrary specific case are of a lower scalar amplitude than the discrete quanta of charge.  Therefore, one is able to have a definitive quantity of discrete energy before one is to have any discrete charge at all.  Superstrings are the key to the basis of discrete energy.  Yet -- current requires the existence of at least a certain amount of charge, in order to be of any tangible extrapolation or consideration.  This works to indicate --  that the functional basis of superstrings, is more related to energy per charge than to charge per time.  The magnetic field is more of a direct correspondence to the voltage of any respective given arbitrary case scenario, than to the correlative current of the same said case.  This is why superstrings are here said to be of the nature of the discrete quanta of energy permittivity.  The electric field is more of a direct correspondence to the current of any respective given arbitrary case scenario, than to the correlative voltage of the same said case.  This is why Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates are here said to be of the nature of the discrete quanta of energy impedance.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Course One On Wave-Tug

Two things interact in a situation. These objects or phenomena change relative to each other as both things associated in space and as two items that act as placeholders in both their individual relative time and their collective relative time. Suppose that each of these two items were a cane. Two canes. Both of these canes struck each other in many ways at the top of their structures, yet the canes never pulled each other to any significant sway, and thus only interacted as a static force that redistributed the ends of each other. Now let's say that the bottom of the canes were held by a highly powerful grip that had a leeway of some elastic modulae. In other words, the bottoms of the canes were held tightly, yet by a medium that was not rigid -- like a pair of hands. When the canes at their tops were to strike, these would be momentarily redistributed, while then returning to an approximation of their original spot. Like you can see, their differentiation would be static, and no significant net change would appear over any transient period of time in terms of the appearance of the scene. Yet, if you were to hook the ends of the canes, there would be a chance that one of the canes would pull the other. Even if both of the people holding the canes were of equal strength, depending on how the canes were twisted and/or torqued, could cause a net change in how these would be pulled.

                          
Tug has to do with push-pull action. In order for there to be a push or a pull, there must be some static connection for at least one moment. For instance, you push a stone. In order for you to move it at all, your hand must have some interaction with the stone for at least one moment. If you tried to lift anything without interconnection, your hands would slip and you wouldn't be able to lift it. When something pulls something else, there is a significant static modulae that allows for the puller to pull. This interconnection is classically done when the two objects are hooked one onto another.

Waves tug, since these push and/or pull. The interconnection comes through electrostatics and/or hookable cusps in the morphology of the waves' structure. Strong electromagnetic fields pull in more wavelike phenomena, while strong electrostatic fields such as a high voltage fence will actually push out a person who tries messing with it. (High amps will pull you in and electicute you, while a high voltage/low amperage situation will knock you away once the low amperage momentarily attempts to pull you in.) This is because amperage is charge per second, and a high amount of electrical charge flowing in a limited amount of time hooks any adjacent conductive material since this will balance the adjacent electrical band levels, and voltage is energy per charge, and if a wire has a lot of energy per charge, yet not much charge is flowing through the wire per time, then the low charge per time will barely attempt to pull the person while the wire's high energy will form a field that will repel the person as they are being shocked. Both examples of pull and push are examples of how interaction is a matter of wave-tug. General relocalization of particles is due to the various tendencies of wave-tug.

The Test Solutions That Were Missing From A Course One Test

1)All “stuff in a spot” must have angular momentum because a discrete physical entity always bears a presence in a direction with a scalar magnitude.




2)Something actual that is not “stuff in a spot” would be the “space-hole,” since this is a metric that happens in-between instantons.


              
3)Strings must be composed of smaller phenomena since strings vibrate and curl. The presence of oscillation in the topology of a phenomenon indicates the presence of smaller phenomena.



4)Mass is energy in static equilibrium.



5)Electromagnetic energy is energy that is formed by an electron, once thought to be a point mass, dropping an energy level.



6)A high voltage wire tends to push one away from the wire.



7)A high amperage/low voltage wire will hold one upon the wire until the current is released. One tenth of an amp may kill a person.



8)A smoothly vibrating sinusoidal wave is an example of a harmonic wave.

An opposite wave of energy, when the initial wave of energy is applied toward the “opposite wave” would cancel the energies of these waves, yet such an occurrence could not destroy discrete homotopic unit of condensed oscillation that exists on a smaller scale.



9)The electron is the source of electrostatics. Three leptons of a charge of (-1/3) each glue together to form an electron (which has a charge of (-1).



10)Curves that change in at least the first two derivatives along the contour of these curves are waves. These waves are composed of energy that either staticly and/or kinematically is distributed along the topography of the curves that comprise the given waves. Superstrings act as open strands and closed loops that vibrate as topological waves that comprise a Planck related length/circumference respectively.