As To Tense Of Inertia — Just A Thought

 The following is just a “thought,” as to a key difference that I perceive — as to a relationship between the general tendency of an abelian light-cone-gauge topology, And, the general tendency of a non abelian light-cone-gauge topology. The general stratum of an abelian light-cone-gauge topology (Kaluza-Klein), tends to be inclined to propagate (phenomenology) Into a general tense of inertia; whereas, the general stratum of a non-abelian light-cone-gauge topology (Yang-Mills), tends to be inclined to propagate (phenomenology) Out of a general tense of inertia. (1989). To Be Continued! Sincerely, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH.

The Ensuing Part As To Entropic Photons

You can probably see the pattern of what happens to a photon, that has just become entropic -- for the immediately ensuing iterations of group-related instanton, if the said photon does not once again scatter upon another holonomic substrate of physical phenomenology in the meanwhile.  For the fourth set of 64 consecutive iterations of instanton that the said entropic photon is going through, starting upon its direct impact upon another phenomenology, it will work to bear what may be described of as having holomorphic torsional-based eigenindices that will bend in a hermitian-based manner, in up to three of the ten correlative coniaxions that are related to the spatial dimensionality that the said photon is moving through.  This is because the so-stated entropic photon will tend to bend here in ten spatial derivatives as it is moving in a minimum of ten spatial dimensions, plus time, over the course of the said entropic photon being in the process of being delineated through time and space.  This will then work to decrease the degree of the genus of the so-eluded-to Chern-Simons nature of the so-stated entropic photon -- seeing that it will, during the said fourth consecutive set of 64 said iterations of being "entropic," be Chern-Simons now, in a Lagrangian-based manner, in only seven of the ten spatial coniaxions that it is moving through, instead of being Chern-Simons in a Lagrangian-based manner in eight of such covariant and codifferentiable Fourier-translated coniaxions that are directly related to the ten spatial dimensions that such a given arbitrary photon is going through, as a metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operator, as it is tending to change in this Fourier-based process in up to ten spatial derivatives, over time.  This will work to cause such an entropic photon to still be partially Yau-Exact.  Such a photon will still work to bear here -- what may be deemed of as an abelian or as a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology.  This will be the tendency of such, during the 193rd to the 256th of such consecutive iterations -- upon colliding with another physical phenomenology, in a Gliosis-based manner at the Poincare level -- if such a photon does not directly strike another orbifold eigenset in a direct manner in the meantime.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Five Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

When taken along the topological surface of any given arbitrary second ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate, that is of a non abelien light-cone-gauge topology -- the directly corresponding holonomic substrate of the Laplacian-based condition of the so-stated topological surface, that is pertinent in this respective case, is of a sinusoidal nature and Not of a supplemental-based nature, during the correlative individually taken durations of BRST that are to here be directly related to the so-eluded-to iterations of group-related instanton, by which any respective given arbitrary Yang-Mills or non abelien light-cone-gauge topology is to be interactive, when upon its Gliosis-based environment in the substringular.  This is to where, to an extent, one may say that the tendency of any respective given arbitrary non abelien or Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology, is to be of more of a smooth-curved nature than that of an otherwise jointal-based nature -- over the course of each individually taken iteration of BRST, that is to here be directly related to each of the correlative individually taken iterations of the directly pertinent sequential series of group-related instanton.  This will here work to indicate that the Laplacian-based nature of a Yang-Mills or a non abelien light-cone-gauge topology, will tend to have a relatively higher scalar amplitude of working to bear a relatively stronger elastic modulae over time -- than that of a directly comparitive Kaluza-Klein or an abelien light-cone-gauge topology -- while the Laplacian-based nature of a Kaluza-Klein or an abelian light-cone-gauge topology, will tend to have a relatively higher scalar amplitude of working to bear a relatively stronger fractal modulae over time, than that of a directly comparitive Yang-Mills or a non abelien light-cone-gauge topology.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Four of the Seventh Session of Course 16

Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology is strongly related to the condition of homotopy as well in this format of general consideration:  The conditionality of every unfrayed superstring being indirectly or directly interconnected with every other unfrayed superstring is related to the condition of the general basis  of Lorentz-Four-Contractions.  This is due to the condition that the dual general state that all motion is relative to both the existence and the motion of electromagnetic energy is involved with the recycling of the geni of norm-state conditions.  -- The recycling of the segments of unfrayed mini-string segments works to involve the activity that is involved with Lorentz-Four-Contractions, and, the general basis of the recycling of unfrayed substringular field networking -- that is performed by the indistinguishably different "manufacturing" of globally ground-states being unnoticeably altered into being of globally norm-states and vice versa -- is the general format of activity that works to both allow for homotopy and the ability for the so-stated Lorentz-Four-Contractions.  The activity of the Polyakov Action -- that happens during the same metrical association as the Bette Action -- is primed by the condition of the indistinguishably different re-assortment of the so-stated conditionality of norm-states that are being altered via the existent state of homotopy.  This works to indicate as to part of the general import -- that phenomena that are of a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology bear upon the process of both the recycling of substringular field density, as well as the import that such geni of topology works to bear upon the condition of both homotopy and the existence of Cassimer Invariance.  I will leave you with this concept.:  Light, as well as the sum of all other electromagnetic energy, works to allow for the existence of special relativity, due to the just prior inter-relationship of the recycling of differential geometries with both the motion and the existence of all other physical phenomena.  Electromagnetic energy that is not entropic always bears a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology, and, mass as a mass always bears a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology.  This works to form the manner as to the relationships of abelian-based geometries that are of differing abelian natures.  To Be Continued.
Sam Roach.

As to why a mass must then change in topology

A phenomenon with both Yau-Exact singularities in-between the superstrings that work to comprise the said phenomenon and a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology may not, as such, travel at the speed of light or faster -- on account of the ensuing genus of conditionality.:  Let us say that one were to have an interconnection that was 6 radians long, via a theoretical Wilson Line that would here work to interconnect two given arbitrary phenomena.  Let us say that the so-stated genus of interconnection was of a supplemental nature that was  relatively tight.  One would then not able to, of its own accord, be able to stretch the eluded to interconnection to 2pi  radians without breaking those strands that would here work to form the initially so-stated interconnection between the two eluded to phenomena that I have eluded to as being interconnected by the eluded to strands of this given arbitrary scenario.  Likewise, any physical phenomena that are of a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology have an abelian light-cone-gauge topology -- since this is what a Kaluza-Klein topology means.   An abelian light-cone-gauge topology is of a supplemental nature, and thus, it is not of a sinusoidal nature.  Although a sinusoidal nature has the possibility of being stretched-out further than its initially eluded to delineation is, a purely supplemental nature that is taught may not.  Yet, a supplemental interconnection that is already of a stretched-out format would already be able to be of the length that it would then here already be of, as an ansantz.  This is why a mass -- as it is normally thought of --- of both a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology with Yau-Exact singularities in-between the superstrings that work to comprise the said mass -- must  be altered into having a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology in order to go at the speed of light or faster.  Also, as an ansantz, a vast majority of the speed in a worm-hole is due to the contorsioning of space.  The alteration of light-cone-gauge topology may only be done by the right scattering amplitude, that I will not discuss in my blog.  I will continue with a reasonable amount of suspense later! Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Course 3 on Lorentz-Four-Contractions, Last Test Solutions, Part 1

1) At .5c, the superstrings of the given object closest region along the given axis would contract lengthwise according to l = ((1-v^2/c^2)^.5). The superstrings of the given object that surrounded the prior mentioned region would contract moderately. The superstrings that did not define the length of the given object, and thus were furthest from the center of the specific axis given, would not contract at all, since the superstrings here would not define the length of the given object.

2) Matter and kinetic energy that are of a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology contract relative to light because, since light is the result of the recycling of differential geometries, and all motion that involves mass that is of an abelian light-cone-gauge topology moves relative to the basis of such recycling, the physical parameters associated with such phenomena of mass must alter when such phenomena change in kinematic differentiation relative to light.

3) l = ((1-v^2/c^2)^.5, m = (1/(1-v^2/c^2)^.5), and relative to one traveling just under light speed, t = (1-v^2/c^2)^.5, or the proportion of more time noticed by a stander by as compared to one traveling just under light speed would obey t = (1/(1-v^2/c^2)^.5).

4) Its length would contract by .6, its mass would increase by (1/.6), and, the amount of time noticed by the one going at .8c would be .6 of the time of a stander by.

5) A mass with a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology can not travel at light speed or else it would have all of the mass in space and time. This is because a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology is abelian, and such topology bears a maximum fractal modulae in terms of its Gliossi field generation as encountered with just under light speed, and you can not increase such a fractal stress and expect it to obey the properties of a non-abelian light-cone-gauge topology.

6) Since the center of such strings specifically travels at .8c, this central region would contract according to (1-v^2/c^2)^.5 and (1/(1-v^2/c^2)^.5), and, the Lorentz-Four-Contractions would ease homeomorphically as one examines the further regions of the kinematic strings involved here.

7) The strings that are directly in the path of the directoralizations that moves at the given "quick" speed would contract in their given directoralizations according to Einstein's equations. Yet, since the two phenomena moving at the "quick" speed are differentiating in a multiplicit directoralization, the observation of such contractions would form a radial covariance that would be non-trivially isomorphic. The superstrings that are slower would also obey Einstein's equations would contract less.

8) A spherical object consisting of many superstrings that is moving in a unitary direction and is not spinning, orbiting, nor otherwise radially differentiating kinematically will only contract lengthwise toward the center of its directoralization, and would thus not contract uniformally.