• Hi, my name's Sam. As to the condition that would exist if you were to try to collide two photons dead on, that's a bad idea. Here, let me explain.
Photons are formed by electrons dropping an energy level to release unneeded energy. When this happens, a Fujikawa Coupling happens in the direction of the permittivity of the a given photon, yet, in the reverse-holomorphic end of the bosonic superstring that forms a discrete unit of energy permittivity. Ward Norm conditions form the basis of substringular differential geometry. So, if you were to take the norm-to-holomorphic spin-orbital-axial of the delineation of the described Fujikawa Coupling as the photon is being formed from the released kinetic energy of a said electron, you get an orphogonal wave-tug upon the said photon that causes its related E(6)XE(6) strings to lay in the direction of the transversal angular momentum of the said photon. Also, if an electron is quantized at all with other photons, it is going to exist in an orbifold. Orbifolds have E(8)XE(8) strings associated with these. Remember, E(6)XE(6) strings that are adjacent spin assymetrically as well as E(8)XE(8) strings that are adjacent spin assymetrically. So, to try to smash the described heterotic superstrings is an effort to abuse the tendencies of these said heterotic strings to spin assymetrically. This is no mistake in observation, yet, doing what they are trying to do is certainly a mistake. Without the assymetric spin-orbiting of E(6)XE(6) strings, the Rarita Structure would be damaged locally -- which could lead to a "domino" effect. Without the assymetric spin-orbiting of E(8)XE(8) strings, the homotopy of adjacent orbifolds would fishure, which could have a "domino" effect. Maintaining homotopy is quintessential for the continued existence of life.
Also, colliding gluons could undo the local Wick Action eigenstates, which could have a domino effect. Please let everyone read this so that we may --- as a team -- end the Hadron Colliding Experiment. Thank You. Sincerely, Sam. Life is the most important reality.
Showing posts with label orphoganol wave-tug. Show all posts
Showing posts with label orphoganol wave-tug. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Solutions To Test Two of Course One
1)(For Initial Two Pictures, See Handwritten test solutions.)
If these hooks, due to the lack of rigidity between these, slipped along the borne
tangential surface that interconnected them, then these hooks would dually slide off of
each other along the shared topographical region of borne tangency.
2)Wave-Tug in the direction of the hooks’ individual changes in the second derivative of
curvature, taken individually yet dually, that appertains to a topographical dual position
where there is an actual limit of curvature along the touching surfaces of the hooks,
particularly if the reverse directional pull pulled these hooks upon each other, would be
advantatious toward keeping the hooks together.
Wave-Tug that is directed away from the actual change in the second derivative of the
curvature of the hooks, which would slide the hooks’ tips toward each other, particularly
if there was a torsional three-dimensional force that produced a lack of borne tangency,
would be disadvantatious to keeping the hooks together. Additional force of one hook
upon another would increase the chance of the second hook to be pulled in the first
hook’s direction. Additional force of the second hook upon the first hook would increase
the chance of the first hook to be pulled in the second hook’s direction
3)In a polar diagram, when two points are within the same ellipse yet not touching, these
points are relatively near. With the same polar diagram, if these points were complete
yet touching, these points would be very near. If these points are of two totally different
ellipses, then these points are far.
4)(For correlative pictures, See Handwritten Solutions.)
If there were two particles that were 50 ellipses away, that would make all four points in
A and B near.
If two particles were complete yet touching, that would make all four of the points of A
and B appear far.
5)The “neighborhood” of my writing utensil is the paper I am writing on, my hand I am
writing with, and the air existent that touches my writing utensil.
6)The local neighborhood of a molecule of the air I am breathing are the other molecules
of the air I am breathing, my body that absorbs the air, and the superfluous dust in the air
I am breathing.
7)Electrons spin antisymmetrically so that these may be at different spots at the same
time. That is the Pauli Exclusion Principle. You can not find with an expectation value
of “1” (pure certainty) where an electron as at and what it is giving off at the same time.
The Pauli Exclusion Principle is always true, yet, via extrapolating substringular activity,
one may basically have a good idea of where an electron is at and what it is giving
off at the same time. Syncronous electrical flow may provide an expectation value to
determine this with virtual certainty.
8)Adjacent superstrings oscillate antisymmetrically so as not to intrude upon each
other (Pauli Exclusion Principle). You can not pinpoint a superstring’s position and its
scattering and requantification at the same time (Heisenburg Principle). Superstings
constantly change in differential clause per group metric, and superstrings recycle
on account of the activity of ultimon flow. Superstrings, even though these reverse
fractorially form a tense of inertia, are never inert both during and in-between instantons.
If these hooks, due to the lack of rigidity between these, slipped along the borne
tangential surface that interconnected them, then these hooks would dually slide off of
each other along the shared topographical region of borne tangency.
2)Wave-Tug in the direction of the hooks’ individual changes in the second derivative of
curvature, taken individually yet dually, that appertains to a topographical dual position
where there is an actual limit of curvature along the touching surfaces of the hooks,
particularly if the reverse directional pull pulled these hooks upon each other, would be
advantatious toward keeping the hooks together.
Wave-Tug that is directed away from the actual change in the second derivative of the
curvature of the hooks, which would slide the hooks’ tips toward each other, particularly
if there was a torsional three-dimensional force that produced a lack of borne tangency,
would be disadvantatious to keeping the hooks together. Additional force of one hook
upon another would increase the chance of the second hook to be pulled in the first
hook’s direction. Additional force of the second hook upon the first hook would increase
the chance of the first hook to be pulled in the second hook’s direction
3)In a polar diagram, when two points are within the same ellipse yet not touching, these
points are relatively near. With the same polar diagram, if these points were complete
yet touching, these points would be very near. If these points are of two totally different
ellipses, then these points are far.
4)(For correlative pictures, See Handwritten Solutions.)
If there were two particles that were 50 ellipses away, that would make all four points in
A and B near.
If two particles were complete yet touching, that would make all four of the points of A
and B appear far.
5)The “neighborhood” of my writing utensil is the paper I am writing on, my hand I am
writing with, and the air existent that touches my writing utensil.
6)The local neighborhood of a molecule of the air I am breathing are the other molecules
of the air I am breathing, my body that absorbs the air, and the superfluous dust in the air
I am breathing.
7)Electrons spin antisymmetrically so that these may be at different spots at the same
time. That is the Pauli Exclusion Principle. You can not find with an expectation value
of “1” (pure certainty) where an electron as at and what it is giving off at the same time.
The Pauli Exclusion Principle is always true, yet, via extrapolating substringular activity,
one may basically have a good idea of where an electron is at and what it is giving
off at the same time. Syncronous electrical flow may provide an expectation value to
determine this with virtual certainty.
8)Adjacent superstrings oscillate antisymmetrically so as not to intrude upon each
other (Pauli Exclusion Principle). You can not pinpoint a superstring’s position and its
scattering and requantification at the same time (Heisenburg Principle). Superstings
constantly change in differential clause per group metric, and superstrings recycle
on account of the activity of ultimon flow. Superstrings, even though these reverse
fractorially form a tense of inertia, are never inert both during and in-between instantons.
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
A Summary Of Part One Of Session Five Of Course Six
Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here! I am here today to explain a little bit more what I meant by "chords" in the first part of the fifth session of Course Six.
Every first-ordered point particle is interconnected with other first-ordered point particles via mini-string. Mini-String is the phenomena based substance of substringular fields. Mini-String is comprised of second-ordered point particles that exist in bi-holomoriphic succession in such a way so as to form curved and straight lines of interconnection that interconnect the first-ordered point particles that form the substance of norm-states, relatively loose point commutators, superstrings, and the counterparts of norm-states and the counterparts of superstrings (not to mention heterotic strings, the Klein Bottle eigenstates, and the Higgs Action eigenstates. Second-Ordered point particles are comprised of third-orderd point particles. Third-Ordered point particles only exist in the loci where second-orderd point particles exist in. Second-Ordered point particles that are adjacent to one another are interconnected with each other via what I term as sub-mini-string. Sub-Mini-String is thread-like and not pointal in nature. Sub-Mini-String most directly interconnects third-ordered point particles that are interbound in the loci of second-ordered point particles. The sub-mini-string that interconnects point particles is more direct in wave-tug (tending here to imply a condition of conformal straightness or flushness), or, in other words, the sub-mini-string that interconnects point particles is more abelian in-between second-ordered point particles that are adjacent when the said successive point particles are of the same layer of reality. A layer of reality is a set of substringular phenomena of one whole space-time-framework of the same or of different universes that have the same ratio of Ying and the same ratio of Yang. Susbstringular phenomena that are of different layers of reality, when the said phenomena are relating to second-ordered point particles that are adjacent, do not tend to have as abelian of a wave interconnection as adjacent substringular phenomena that are adjacent that are of the same layer of reality. Here, what I mean by an abelian interconnection is a direct wave-tug that pushes or pulls in a uni-direcoralized Lagrangian. At the pointal level, such a wave-tug tends to be conformally straight or flush relative to the immediate surroundings of the associated point particles.
Every first-ordered point particle is interconnected with other first-ordered point particles via mini-string. Mini-String is the phenomena based substance of substringular fields. Mini-String is comprised of second-ordered point particles that exist in bi-holomoriphic succession in such a way so as to form curved and straight lines of interconnection that interconnect the first-ordered point particles that form the substance of norm-states, relatively loose point commutators, superstrings, and the counterparts of norm-states and the counterparts of superstrings (not to mention heterotic strings, the Klein Bottle eigenstates, and the Higgs Action eigenstates. Second-Ordered point particles are comprised of third-orderd point particles. Third-Ordered point particles only exist in the loci where second-orderd point particles exist in. Second-Ordered point particles that are adjacent to one another are interconnected with each other via what I term as sub-mini-string. Sub-Mini-String is thread-like and not pointal in nature. Sub-Mini-String most directly interconnects third-ordered point particles that are interbound in the loci of second-ordered point particles. The sub-mini-string that interconnects point particles is more direct in wave-tug (tending here to imply a condition of conformal straightness or flushness), or, in other words, the sub-mini-string that interconnects point particles is more abelian in-between second-ordered point particles that are adjacent when the said successive point particles are of the same layer of reality. A layer of reality is a set of substringular phenomena of one whole space-time-framework of the same or of different universes that have the same ratio of Ying and the same ratio of Yang. Susbstringular phenomena that are of different layers of reality, when the said phenomena are relating to second-ordered point particles that are adjacent, do not tend to have as abelian of a wave interconnection as adjacent substringular phenomena that are adjacent that are of the same layer of reality. Here, what I mean by an abelian interconnection is a direct wave-tug that pushes or pulls in a uni-direcoralized Lagrangian. At the pointal level, such a wave-tug tends to be conformally straight or flush relative to the immediate surroundings of the associated point particles.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)