Showing posts with label gauge-metrics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gauge-metrics. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Some More As To Gauge-Metrics

What you are getting at is what I call gauge-metrics. Gauge-Metrics are actions that happen in less than the Planck-time. What we generally recognize as time is the integration of a successive series of moments in which superstrings are basically at one general delineation at one general position. From one of these said moments to the next, the said superstrings are repositioned from one Planck-based distribution to another. When one puts together the said successive series of such redelineations, the flow of the corresponding kinematic motion works to form the energy that makes up space-time-fabric. As an alagory, think of a cartoon. One here has one framework of distribution that integrates -- through a successive series of such redelineations of the eluded to redistributions -- a successive series of positionings and repositionings that works to form a flow of mapped-out motion that may be metaphorically considered as an energy as to the condition of the previously mentioned cartoon. Now, use such an alagory in terms of the framework of the substringular. A superstring is in one generally-stated standstill position in which there is some acitvity, yet, the superstring here averages in one basically exact concerted distribution. After each instanton, the said superstring is redelineated the Planck-Length and/or the Planck-Radius per said individual instanton. This is if the said superstring is undergoing Noether Flow. After a successive series of such instantons, the said superstring is here undergoing a flow of motion, that, via the holonomic substrate of the entities of that substringular phenomena that works to comprise the superstring-like pheonmena, works to form that energy that makes-up the space-time-continuum. Those motions that both happen during the eluded to virtual standstill of the substringular during BRST (which is that duration that is a vast majority of instanton, and, is more specifically when superstrings are at a virtual standstill), and, those motions that happen during the durations that exist in-between individual instantons -- the unnoticed portion of Ultimon Flow -- work to form many gauge-metrics that are essential for the operation of substringular motion.
Samuel David Roach.                                          

Friday, February 15, 2013

Integrands Relating to Formats of Duration

Things that we normally coceive of happen over time, as everyone knows. When something is integrated over time, that means that whatever operation or function that you are refering to is happening over a duration of time. Such as amperage is charge per time, and, power is energy per time. The simple comment that you made (how does one relate to different formats of metrical durations) does, though, bring up an important point.: How would one integrate durations that occur over sub-Fouriers that involve less than the Planck time -- less than a discrete unit of time. For the sake of using a relatively common manner of terminology, one may possibly use, as a suggestion, del-like simbals in order to integrate certain gauge-metrics over a sub-Fourier Transformation in the effort to communicate as to how an operation or a function happens over the given arbitrary duration that here happens in less than a discrete unit of time. So, when one considers a certain general format of gauge-metric-based duration that is relatively large in comparison to a relatively infinitessimal gauge-metric, one may possibally use one format of del-like simbal that may be integrated over the said arbitrary sub-Fourier in order to work to describe the piecewise continuity of the flow of motion in which a given arbitrary phenomenon moves over the here proscribed duration. Yet, depending upon how much smaller the proscribed general duration of any given arbitrary gauge-metric is, one may use a variety of del-simbals in order to work to describe different various piecewise sub-Fourier Transformations so that one may be able to accurately communicate to others the Hamiltonian-based nature of various different flows of motion. The most infinitessimal durations that are briefer than a discrete unit of time would have their own del-like simbal, so, under such considerations, one may apply such an arbitrary method of corelationship in order to describe the general flow of any given arbitrary phenomenon in a piecewise manner over the gauge-metrics that would here bear a tense of virtual static equilibrium over a state of superconformal invariance. I appologize if my manner of communicating is a little bit off or non-conventional, yet, such considerations are important. Perfection is a fallacy. So, a question as to how to express those integrands that inter-relate to different formats of durations does ring out an important point  And I thank you that such a simple question is here able to afford the plausability of being addressed. Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

To my understanding, a superstring is a discrete unit of energy permittivity.
Directly to its reverse-holomorphic side, there is an inverse field-trajectory-based physical phenomena which is what I call a Planck-Related phenomena -- which acts as a discrete unit of energy impedance. Directly in the forward holomorphic direction of the initially stated superstring is its counterpart -- it is like the string, yet, with counterposing partitions that form the topological sway of its homotopical-based entity. A light-cone-gauge eigenstate interconnects the said Planck-Related phenomena with the said superstring. So, the said light-cone-gauge eigenstate acts as a holomomic substrate in such a way so as to behave as the said Planck-Related phenomenon's counterpart. The light-cone-gauge is not only what works the most in so as to spring superstrings into motion, yet, the vibrations that are formed by the plucking of gauge-bosons upon the second-ordered-light-cone-guage eigenstates works to form those vibrations that indirectly work to cause both gravity, as well as working to cause the gauge-metrics that bring the Wick Action into play. As you well know, the Wick Action is what instigates the beginning of a Gaussian Transformation. Enough said for now. P.S. E(6)XE(6) strings are to spin asymmetrically.
E(8)XE(8) strings are also to spin asymmetrically. These are called hadrons. Colliding these could potentially mess up the root of certain Gaussian Transformations, causing a domino effect. There is to be no "fissure" in the space-time-fabric!!!
Nous Somme Ici! We Are Here! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Monday, January 3, 2011

A Little Bit More Of AN Explanation For Contractions

During Polyakov Action, a superstring seperates its first-ordered point particles in an overall      homeomoriphic manner so that the given superstring is uncontracted into the size that it must appear as as according to the associated Lorentz-Four-Contractions.  So, when a superstring related to a form of electromagnetic energy (the superstring here being of itself bosonic) is to go through Polyakov Action, its mild amount of dissociation is a mere yet relatively local disconbobulation in the Ward Newmann Conditions of the described superstring -- yet without any expansion in the holonimic "tapestry" of the associated string.  So, the increased sub-dimensional volume that exists in-between the first-ordered part particles that comprise a superstring is to the extent of a reverse-engineering of the apparent size of the superstring based on the present Lorentz-Four-Contractions that are here acting upon the described string.   Such Polyakov Action, the Bette Action, and the Imaginary Exchange of Real Residue all happen during  instanton as well as during BRST, while the Kaeler Metric and the Regge Action happen immediately after instanton.  So, if a superstring is to go into an eigenmetric of a Kaeler Metric metric-gauge-eigencondition, then the gauge-metrics of the associated eigenaction of the Kaeler Metric happens at the same overall rate as the ensuing Regge Action.  If the Kaeler Metric is not kinematic during a set of substringular instantons, then the Regge Action happens during half of the duration that it would undertake if it were not for the activity of the local eigenstate of Kaeler Metric.  So, when without Kaeler Metric, Regge Action happens in the duration of half of its otherwise speed  When  superstrings enter a Klein Bottle eigenstate-like metric-gauge, these upon contact with the topology of the top of the associated Schotky Construction, recontract to the extent of a fully contracted superstring.
Gotta Run!  I hope you have a phenomenal day!  Sincerely, Sam.    

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Part One Of Session Ten Of Course Six

Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here to provide you with another session on the sixth course that I had written the gist of back in 2002.  This course is about the toroidal nature of superstrings.
               
How does the flow of the point particles of all of the tori-sector-ranges, taken as a whole, fit together?
Some of the tori-sector-ranges within the Ultimon, at any given instant in-between individual durations of instanton, are flowing faster than others, and some of the tori-sector-ranges within the Ultimon are traveling slower than others at any given instant in-between individual durations of instantons.  There are many tori-sector-ranges within the Ultimon that are going through their transversal and radial propagations within their eigen operands, or, in other words, these ranges are flowing at such a rate so exactly similar that you may as well say that their flow is at the exact same rate with no significant differences here.  What allows the differences in the flow rates of these tori-sector-ranges relative to one another while still allowing for a smoothly running Ultimon and thereby a smoothly running Continuum?  Forward time momentum ironically moves relatively counterclockwise or, in other words holomoriphically, through the Ultimon.  Substringular encoders for forward moving time exist in a different "hoop" than that of substringular encoders of backward moving time.  Clocks move relatively clockwise.  Let's say that that a particular tori-sector-range flowed slower than average.  Several tori-sector-ranges "behind" it were moving faster than what here would be deemed as an average rate.  The tori-sector-ranges would gradually slow down to the rate of the slower tori-sector-range that was relatively holomoriphically positioned ahead of the said range for forward moving time ore positioned relatively antiholomoriphically ahead of the mentioned range for backward moving time.  Tori-Sector-Range flow rate a is almost instantaneous in-between the durations of instanton eigenmetrics, and instantons are the smallest units of discrete time that we may normally detect, since instantons are discrete units of organized duration.  Ultimon cycle is in about 10^(-43)I seconds, so, tori-sector-range flow does not differ in duration over the course of our Continuum by any significant degree spontaneously -- although instanton has slowed mildly since the "Big-Bang."  So, the differences in the rates of any tori-sector-ranges when taken in a covariant Laplacian manner in-between two specific eigenstates of instanton are always within a googleth of an imaginary second of Sub-Fourier Translation in terms of the group velocity of the individual of such ranges correlative to one another.  This means that that all of the action of the Continuum is defined in the substringular in what we may conceive of as the integration of both all of organized and unorganized time.  What I just stated here is the summation of all of the instantons plus the summation of all of the Ultimon flows that occur in-between the described instantons -- So, physical time equals the summation of all Real and Imaginary Time.  Imaginary Time is the summation of all of the gauge-metrics that occur in such a relatively disorganized manner in that we as people are not generally able to percieve of the eigenstates and the sub-eigenstates that transpire during such an unnoticed set of durations.  We as people are only able to detect time -- for all practical purposes -- when the superstrings that make up discrete units of energy permittivity are organized according to the Ward Laplacian conditions that are affiliated within their conformal dimensions.  One-dimensional superstrings have a basis of a conformal dimension of one while two-dimensional superstrings have a basis of a conformal dimension of two.  The condition of the organization of conformal dimension is based on the Laplacian mapping out of the associated hermicity that each superstring bears both individuallyand multiplictly during instanton while also simultaneously groupwise in terms of the iteration and the reiteration of all of the unfrayed superstrings that exist after instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode on account of the fact that all unfrayed superstrings go through instanton simultaneously on account of the sub-metric that happens instantaneously in terms of a multiplicity terrestrial manner of determining the gauging of the metrics of the substringular.  I will continue with the suspense later!  I appologize that it is impossible  to describe everything about string theory in a few words without indicating all of the exceptions while still providing a vividly clear meaning as to what I mean.  I thank you for your reading time!
Have a phenomenal day!  Sincerely, Sam.            

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Part One Of Session Nine Of Course Six

Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here!  I am here today to begin to write about what I have in store for you for the ninth session of Course Nine!
          
How does electromagnetic energy -- particularly visible light -- become a part of this majorized Royal Arc of half-hoops that work to propagate the input of all of the information of the physical portion of space and time to the various positions of the Continuum where it needs to go?  Remember the strings that take up the residue of a torus?  Some of this residue, when fully collected by the central stringular encodements  of forward moving time that work to indirectly yet significantly encode for the redistributions that occur over the successive series of many instantons, goes "up" and "around" the countered general world-sheets relative to both pairing pairs, while the remainder of this residue goes a little "up" and then "straight" across to the pairing string of the pairing general world-sheets.  This action happens because upward motion includes screw momentum that goes from an arbitrary "pi" to a corresponding relative "pi/2" and subsequently to a corresponding "0pi," while a residue of this is a remainder that just tags along by means of the "x-axis.'" The slight motion "up" of the latter is due to any other minor fractor of frictions that will always be there during the traspiring of such gauge-metrics.  This friction is between arcing residue And residue that won't arc.  The arcing residue is residue of ground sates that need to temporarily become norm states, while the residue that just goes across is residue of norm-states that needs to temporarily become ground states.  This residue does not become completely taken care of in one swipe.  The number of swipes  of instanton that it takes for full recycling of a ground state to a norm state or a norm state to a ground state is equal to the number of general strings in the associated encoder of the corresponding tori-sector-range multiplied by 10^(-43) seconds.  It may appear that a ground state becomes norm or a norm state becomes ground immediately because there are basically countless indistinguishably different particles  This means that there are many particles that are different when considered in a literal tense, yet have the same make-up and behave the same way to where you can pretty much say that these are the same particles.  If the composition of a local tori-sector-range were to change, then it takes the number of swipes of instatnon equal to what would have occurred theoretically when involving the initial substringular encoder plus the number of swipes of instanton that would occur theoretically when involving the newly operative stringular encoder in order for the substringular field of specific ground and norm states recycle into each other while that recycling back into their original type of subspace (ground or norm, respectively).  Again, the parity, spin-orbital momentum, and the transversal momentum of such described superstrings would appear from the outside to have not changed unless a perturbative force altered the conditions of the said superstrings, if such strings are in conformal invariance due to indistinguishable differences.  Likewise, the specific covariant codifferentiating locus as to where such associated ground-state-based mini-string and norm-state-based mini-string may vary, as it inevitably does, so that the recycling of Ward Conditions may propagate so as to allow change that invariably here indirectly causes the Gaussian Transformations that act as the Jacoban eigenbases that allow for superstrings to interact in such a manner that these get permittivity "fed" back into them so that these may be the basis of energy so that energy and existence may exist at all.  I will continue the suspense later!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.        

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Summary Of Part Two Of Session Two Of Course Six

Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here!  I am here today to help describe what I meant when I typed in the second part of the second session of Course six.               

In-Between each instanton, there are countless gauge-metrics and sub-metrics, with sub-metrics within these mentioned durations that are even more brief down to very infinitessimal yet discrete durations.  There are also countless, yet relatively fewer gauge-metrics, sub-metrics, and within these metric-related durations that are even more brief down to very infinitessimal yet discrete durations.  During the duration that operates (happens)  in-between instantons, there is alot of sharing of substringular field in terms of the mini-string that is utilized to interconnect all superstrings and norm-states in one giant web-like structure during instanton -- in both indirect and direct ways.  While the countless metrics, sub-metrics, down to the most relatively infinitessimal durations that happen in-between instantons, operate through the operand of space, the sharing of substringular fields occurs via the give-and-take of the ebbing of what I call mini-string that allows for the countless varieties of substringular field integrations that exist per the succeeding series of Laplacian Translations which come together to form the relatively countless yet fewer succeeding series of Fourier Transformations that define the covariant codifferentiation of the multiplicitly interbound substringular fabric -- which is more granular than fabrical -- to allow phenomena to happen through time relative to one another.  The recycling of substringular phenomena is able to hapen in part because of the existence of what I call the Royal Arc, in the general manner that I described in the last summary.  Sincerely, Sam.          

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Course 6, Session 4, Part 1, Superstrings As Toroidal Phenomena

Well hello world, this is Samuel Roach here!  How are you doing?!  Please feel free to comment on my blog.
What draws the tori-sector-ranges together into a circular-like entity that helps to form the Ultimon?  It takes bonds to form a whole, entire thing.  Look at earth.  It is a whole, entire thing, yet, it is only one small part of a whole, entire universe.  What is the Ultimon?  The Ultimon is that fabric of the space-time-continuum that makes it capable of providing the appearance of having a three-dimensional delineation.  Remember that the three-dimensional appearance of the universe is called the globally distinguishable, and that the globally distinguishable is due to superstrings differentiating relative to the Bases of Light.  Fourier differentiation is change during succeeding metrics.  A metric is when you have a sequence that changes in combination relative to itself in some sort of flow that is noticeable as a whole result by any source from within the Ultimon after any sort of succeeding direction.  Metrics that coincide will be what we will here call forward, real time (the measurement of what is known as linear time), & these metrics are the thus caused results that are usually dependant on all of the directly past and future results that act upon the sequences of these metrics.
I will end this part of this session with a question that you may ponder in such a fashion so as to be prepared for the second part of this session.:  What is the basis of measuring duration both in terms of the sequence of particular instantons as well as the individual motions that happen in-between instantons?             
This should be enough food for thought for now.         
Sincerely,
Sam.