The Effect Of Added Dimensions Upon The Force Of Gravity

When one has an isomorphism that is comprised of multiple superstrings that are relatively separated from being in the same general locus, yet, such superstrings are all within an Angstrom of each other, then, one has to consider the condition as to whether or not such extrapolated superstrings, over a time-wise differential association, are under a state of static equilibrium, or, if such a set of superstrings are more along the lines of behaving in both a perturbative and also in a relatively divergent manner. If one has two given arbitrary sets of superstrings that are proximal -- microscopically -- yet, are not of the same general locus, and, if the two said sets of superstrings are under a condition of superconformal invariance, as these said superstrings are non-trivially isomorphic the one set relative to the other, then, these superstrings would need to be acted upon in order to become diverged away from the eluded to condition of static equilibrium. If there happened to be a ghost inhibitor that acted as a buffer in-between the two eluded to general loci of each set of such superstrings that are here of the same universe, then, if some sort of norm-state projection that were to act upon both of the said sets of superstrings via the holonomic substrate of the said ghost inhibitor that were to be in-between the two eluded to orbifolds (physically-based spaces) were able to possibly work to produce an alteration or a perturbation in the said condition of static equilibrium that was here to initially be kinematic in-between the two said sets of superstrings that are in this case initially in a symmetry of non-trivial isomorphism, then, this would then make it possible to end the eluded to condition of static equilibrium. Such an alteration from what was here a given arbitrary case of superconformal invariance would tend to diverge the two sets of superstrings in such a manner in so that the directoral-based wave-tug/wave-pull of each individual set of superstrings would reverse in terms of their holomorphic permittivity. Such a reverse in directoral flow would then here indirectly cause the production of a Wick Action eigenstate, which would consequently cause the activity of a Gaussian Transformation that would act upon the general locus of part of the initial region in which the orbifolds, or, the physical spaces, that are here represented by the two sets of superstrings, so stated, that here work to perform two different functions that are Gliossi upon the holonomic substrate of the same universe. This is a general example as to that activity that may often work to allow for the need for the changes in certain norm-based conditions. Again, norm-conditions need to change often in order for room to be made for the essential operations of space-time-fabric.

More As To Norm-Conditions

More fundamental to the concept as to what are spaces of one universe, when relative to what are spaces of another universe -- that bear a certain tense of corresponding genus -- the one when relative to the other, is to be determined via the appropriate use of Li Algebra. This is more based upon angling, when in terms of comparisons that involve norm-conditions -- and norm-conditions are most practical in the application of comparing things based upon tangency and orphoganation. There is, of course, a certain need for the usage of linearity in the process. -- The proper application of Wilson Lines is to be used here in order to work to determine those subtentions that are needed in order to perceive of the appropriate comparisons of Njenhuis-based norm-conditions. Yet, one is not to belittle the fundamental premise that it is the general norm-conditional bases that works to compare substringular spaces more than the conditional bases that may just be extrapolated by a certain general context of linearity that works to correspond one tense of space when relative to another. Sam Roach.              

Course 11 About Orbifolds, Session 12, Part One

Orbifolds of one given arbitrary universe differentiate relative to each other -- both as set manifolds that exist over that mapping that may be extrapolated over a Laplacian Transformation -- as welll as over time.  Orbifolds that appertain to different individual universes relative to one another differentiate relative to the other respective orbifolds that are of their own given arbitrary universes in more of a kinematically influential manner than the degree in which the said orbifolds that are of different universes differentiate with orbifolds that are of the same universe  -- when this is taken over any given arbitrary Fourier Transformation that here involves a covariance of the individual eluded to orbifolds that are of the same universe when taken relative to one another.  Orbifolds of the same universe tend to kinematically differentiate with each other in at least some sort of a direct manner over the course of an individual given arbitrary iteration of Ultimon Flow.  For instance, when the multi-dimensional structures that work to comprise the physical membranes of specific orbifolds interact in a direct manner, then, such physical spaces -- that operate according to a specific given arbitrary function -- that are here described as orbifolds, are said to be directly involved with each other in at least some sort of an abelian manner over those group instantons in which orbifolds are kinematically functional over the Fourier Transformation in which the mentioned orbifolds are covariantly interacting in some sort of codifferntiable codeterminable manner.  Orbifolds that are of different universes that interact over the course of a given arbitray Fourier Transformation do not bear Gliossi interactions that are Poincaire upon the topology of the superstrings that work to comprise the said orbifolds.  Such a tendancy that is of a high expectation value is due to the different genus-formats of the norm-conditions of their respective Fadeev-Popov-Traces, the differences in such norm-conditions of which work to differentiate any of such given arbitrary orbifolds as belonging to different universes over the course of the associated sub-Fourier conditions, which is during those individual iterations of group instantons in which these orbifolds interact in a less direct manner over the integration of the said instantons that forms a successive series of relatively motionless frameworks that works to form the flow of energy that happens over time.  These conditions of differences in norm-based conditions appertains to the general field networking that happens under both the general Laplacian conditions of group instanton, as well as over the integration of the successive series of such delineatory states that works to form the kinematic flow of energy through time.  I will continue with the second part of this session later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Continual Motion

Let's say that interaction was everything. This here is merely an allogory to explain a much deeper concept.  In this given arbitrary case scenario, people are all over the place on the ground -- in this case, standing relatively "up."  The people, in the just mentioned case scenario, need to move around on their feet in order to interact.  If the mentioned people did not walk around in this case, nothing would be metaphorically existant.  People, as elluded to here, would be surrounding each other to quite an extent over a relatively large region.  So, in order for the people to walk around here -- in order for there to be a sense of social interaction -- this said condition would be needed here so that a sense of community would set on an allagorical tense of existence.  So, here, the multiple manners of the changes in direction as to where the mentioned people needed to walk around without bluntly knocking into each other would need to change quite often all over the place.  Depending on the spots where the said people were at, the types of changes in direction of walking -- as well as the amount of and the combinations of those just stated types of changes of direction to where the people, who are here all over the place on the ground, needed to walk, would both alter when in terms of the elluded to changes per general area as well as the corresponding changes that would here occur over time.  Some of the more specific spots where the said people are at here would involve a more likewise sort of manner of changes in walking patterns, while some of the other specific spots where the said people are at would involve various different types of changes of walking motion.  These two general types of conditions that are within the overall region of where the said people are at is mainly in consideration of those people of whom are relatively close to each other -- more so than the people who are at other spots from within the same general region.  Tangency means touch.  Touch always involves a 90 degree form of relation, and, people need to bear some sort of "touch" in order to interact.  Norm-Conditions are conditions relating to a 90 degree based-interaction.  I am, in laymans terms here, beginning to describe the need for changes in norm-conditions.  Sam Roach.

Hi, this is Sam Roach here. The condition as to whether or not two given different adjacent substringular phenomena are of the same universe or not is dependent on their relativistic norm-condition-based angle of vibration or oscillation via their covariant codifferentiable wobble during a group instanton that is involving both substringular phenomena. If there is a condition of normalcy -- with just the additional advent of a wobble of ~1.104735878*10^(-81)I degrees between their corresponding Planck-Related phenomena, then, the two said adjacent substringular phenomena are said to share a common Gaussian-Based Real-Related (as opposed to Njenhuisly-related) spatial relationship.

A Little More Good Stuff About The Higgs Boson

Hello, this is Samuel David Roach. M-Theory is the study as to the how, why, where, and during what metrics, superstrings tend to exist in membranes that may be described as orbifolds. Orbifolds form a general structural format in which superstrings may differentiate in both timeless and time-oriented delineations so as to form a particle-like and organizational-like basis in which to exist as bases of discrete spaces that may codifferentiate in such a manner in so that norm-conditions may both interact and alter.
The norm-conditions of superstrings must perpetually alter over multiplicit sequential series of interactive instantons so that phenomena may continue to kinematically move around each other so that motion, and thus energy, may persist at existing. The membranous condition of orbifolds works to allow phenomena to coexist as both energy-related, particle-related, and wave-related phenomena at the same focal-based-locus of metrical duration. This works to help explain part of why so much of phenomena may act as both a spot of discrete phenomena (particle-like), a general basis of kinematic motion (energy-like), as well as a displacement of a directoralized trace along a Ward-based Lagrangian (wave-like). This works to explain why electrons -- which, when these drop an energy level and then return back in order to remain in a condition that allows for the most stability, form photons -- are the atomic-based basis of the netting of the basis of pointal mass (particle), the foundation of mass that allows for E.M. to exist (energy), and are also the atomic-based foundation of wave-fronts (waves). Also, the condition that electrons exist in a basis of D-Fields that involve Fourier Transforms that bear a minimum of 6 spacial dimensions plus time over is alagorical to the condition that, when one takes the maximum number of spacial dimensions in Minkowski Space (26 spacial dimensions plus time), and add 6 interactive Njenhuis integrative spacial dimensions, one arives at the 32 spacial dimensions of one set of parallel universes. Neuclons exist in 4 plus time over a Fourier, and 6+4 =10.
Photons exist in a minimum of 10 spacial dimensions plus time in a Fourier.
Also, with steps that I will show at some other time, this is why the first Gaussian Transformation started after the equivalence of the first 50 million instantons. This relates to the condition that E.M. in a vacuum travels at 3*10^8 meters per second, and, 3*10^8/6 = 50 million. I do not know if this has been coined yet, yet, I would venture that one may be able to call the initial Higgs Boson eigenstate an
Isoelliptiabelianoid. I may be a tad wrong on the naming of this initial particle, yet, the rest of what I was saying makes perfect sense to me! I will continue with the suspese later! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
P.S.: I coined the term Isoelliptiabelianoid based on my effort to describe what I described in the end of my blogpost The leverage of the Higgs Action in 2009.
samsphysicsworld@blogspot.com.

A Continuation Of Yesterday

This is so that the previously mentioned homogeneous wave permittivity will allow for the commutation of spin symmetry via the indices that are local to all three substringualr groups at one group metric or another on their way thru the Continuum -- differentiating time-wise with the chirality of the residue as it vibrates thru, while being in proportion to the related norm-conditions that are in transition by being in  covariance with the angular momentum of each sector of the mentioned substringular residue.  In the meanwhile, the tri-local substringular encodements converge the locus of the related orbifolds in proportion to the euclidean-based even distribution of their wave propagation and residue.       
I will do the third part of this discussion tommorrow!  I will talk to you then.  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

A Little Bit More About Cassimer Invariance

So did you think a little bit about what I have written about Cassimer Invariance?
To bring back a recollection, Cassimer Invariance is the perpetual tendency of substringular phenomena interchanging eigenstates to maintain homotopy per instanton.  
Here is some more knowledge that may help you to better understand what the directly prior deffinition means.:  Phenomena that is substringular moves through Ultimon Flow in-between each instanton.              
In ((2pi hbar-6hbar)+hbar Imaginary time) until an Imaginary Planck-Bar moment before instanton, phenomena goes through a duration that involves what I have described as the "space-hole" -- during which the Bases of Light appertaining to the ensuing instanton is organized.  During this mentioned duration, substringular phenomena goes through relatively mild untying and retying of topology that is necessary for the changes that are necessary for substringular phenomena to not be frayed along with that phenomena that is frayed due to black-hole activity, as well as the mentioned untying and retying of topology just described is necessary in order for ensuing Gaussian Transformations to be spontaneously adjusted and allowed to happen.  The condition that I have just described in terms of fascillitating Gaussian Translations and Gaussian Transformations to happen is necessary on account of the condition that space-time-fabric is not completely hermitian in terms of the multiplicit codifferentiation that surrounds any particular orbifold neighborhood.  This may be related on account of the ansantz that not all orbifolds are Yau-Exact -- only mass and mass that is translated through a worm-hole is Yau-Exact.  The condition that there is partially Yau-Exact and Chern-Simmons activity that sorrounds any substringular neighborhood that is completely Yau-Exact is evidence that shows the validity of the concept of the sentence that I typed just before this one.  Wherever there is a mass, there is at least a certain degree of heat that is directly associated with that mass when one considers the duration in which any arbitrary mass that one could consider has vibrated in some sort of molecular manner over any measurable amount of time.  Even if you could get a molecular arrangement to acheive absolute zero Kelvin over a certain arbitrary duration, there will always be a certain amount of electromagnetic and/or plain energy interaction that sorounds the general region in which an arbitary mass is existent in in any duration in which the said mass is able to molecularly vibrate.  The condition that there is always a certain amount of partially Yau-Exact and Chern-Simmons differentiation that surrounds any arbitrary mass that is existent over any period in which any said mass is able to molecularly vibrate is proof that all Fourier Transfomations that are based on Yau-Exact orbifold translations are sorrounded to at least some extent by electromagnetic energy and/or plain energy.  Since only Yau-Exact orbifold conditions are completely hermitian and non-spurious, both plain energy and electromagnetic energy always have a certain degree of Chern-Simmons behavior.  Although electromagnetic-based energy is formed based on the hermitian motion of  Fujikawa Coupling activity, the motion of plain energy and electromagnetic energy when scattered upon a mass always bears a certain degree of a lack of hermitian-based motion.  This is why Fourier-based Gaussian Translations and Fourier-based Gaussian Transformations may only happen when there is a certain amount of retying of substringular activity.  This retying can not happen during instanton on account of the need to maintain homotopy.  Such retying can only happen right before the quaternionic-instanton-field-impulse-mode.  Such a duration then is to happen during the duration in which the "space-hole" and the Bases of Light are organized.  It is during the prior mentioned duration that the relatively Laplacian conditions that correspond the two general simultaneous gauge-metrics that the brief relatively mild retying of space-time-fabric is able to happen to the necessary extent so that the necessary norm-conditons of any particular region may be tweeked so that the said norm-conditions may contiue to codifferentiate with its surroundings.  I am only able to describe so much at once.  In time, you will get a clearer meaning as to what I am saying.       
I will continue with the suspence later!  God Bless You, and have a phenomenal day!
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach.