Electron Orbit And The Formation Of Photons

A typical electron works to bear a 1 out of 137 chance of falling back-and-forth an energy level, in so as to work to form a photon from the residual excess energy that such a said electron will have just attained, when such a said typical electron is here to be orbiting around the nucleus of an atom.  This works to indicate, that any one given arbitrary electron, will tend to average at helping to work to form one discrete quantum of electromagnetic energy, -- for every 137 cycles of orbit by which such a said typical electron is here to work to be translated through, over the course of its motion, as it is here to be in the process of circulating around the nucleus of any one given arbitrary respective atom, that it is here to be most associated with, over a respective quantum of time. To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Sub-Atomic Particles And The Wave-Tug Of Legendre Homology

The higher that the quantity is to be, as to the number of Legendre-related superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that there are then to be  present, in so as to work to form an eminent wave-tug upon a set of one or more mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- the higher that the scalar amplitude will then tend to be, as to what the velocity of the directly corresponding orbifold eigensets, that are comprised in part of such said mass-bearing strings -- will then work to bear, over time.  Consequently -- the less Legendre-related superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that there are here to be present, in so as to work to form an eminent wave-tug upon a set of one or more mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- the less that the scalar amplitude will then tend to be, as to what the velocity of the directly corresponding orbifold eigensets, that are comprised in part of such said mass-bearing strings -- will then work to bear, one time.
This then works to show, -- that electrons tend to bear a significantly higher Hodge-Index of Legendre-related superstrings, that are here to help at working to tug these so-inferred individually taken electrons, into their correlative multiplicit path, at a relatively external reference-frame, than, instead, what the correlative Hodge-Index that would here be present, when it comes to the number of Legendre-related superstrings, that would here be present, in so as to help at tugging the individually taken nucleons into there correlative multiplicit path, at a relatively external reference-frame.  This is a major factor -- that works to show the obvious fact, as to the physical rational that is here to be associated with the condition as to being part of, -- as to why electrons tend to travel from within the  Ward-Cauchy-bounds of an atom, at a rate that is far faster than nucleons.  From the vantage-point of the Poincare level of an atom, -- nucleons tend to act, in so as to be vibrating from within the nucleus of an atom at nearly a standstill, whereas, as well as from the vantage-point of the Poincare level of an atom, -- electrons tend to act, in so as to be consistently be in the process of oscillating around the nucleus of an atom in an elliptical manner, over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!   To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Orthogonal Orbits

The physical condition of the orthogonal adjacent elliptical orbits of electrons -- as such said electrons are to be in the process of cycling around any one given arbitrary atom -- is influenced, by the condition of the previously implied relativistic E(8)XE(8) stringular oscillation-based tendencies.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Some Stuff As To Charge Generation

Positive charge generation tends to move things Into the relative forward-holomorphic direction From the relatively reverse-holomorphic direction.  Negative charge generation tends to move things Into the relative reverse-holomorphic direction From the relatively forward-holomorphic direction.  Adjacent charge generation -- that works to bear a trivially isometric tense of reverse-chirality -- will tend to push each other towards one another.  This is part of what happens when opposite charges attract each other. Here.  Picture yourself at the center of an atom.  (Remember -- forward-holomorphicity is to the relative left, and reverse-holomorphicity is to the relative right.)  The center of the atom is positively charged, while the electrons that work to surround the nucleus of the atom are negatively charged.  Next -- let's consider the constraint that, from the centerpoint of the so-eluded-to action, one is to bear a consideration of left-handedness.  The protons at the nucleus will be attracted to the electrons that surround it, and thereby, these said protons will have an inherent wave-tug towards the relative left.  Furthermore -- the electrons at the outskirts of the atom will be attracted to the protons that are at the nucleus, and thereby, these said electrons will have an inherent wave-tug towards the relative right.  This is why I have here arbitrarily eluded-to, that protons have a tendency of "wanting" to go into the relative holomorphic direction from the relative reverse-holomorphic direction -- while electrons have a tendency of "wanting" to go into the relative reverse-holomorphic direction from the relative holomorphic direction.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

More About Discrete Residual Energy Released As Photon

As I have mentioned before, and as it is quite already known in physics -- when electromagnetic energy is to strike an electron, the said electron is here to have a tendency of jumping back-and-forth energy levels, in so as to release its residual kinetic energy in the form of a photon.  As the just mentioned photon is in the process of being formed by the so-stated released residual kinetic energy of an electron, -- the directly corresponding electron that is here to be moving back-and-forth an energy level, in the process of indirectly working to form a discrete increment of light, that is in the form of an impending photon -- (the said electron) will here to tend to be re-bounding via the motion of a Ward-Supplemental-related manner, in the process of going from a condition of moving inward an energy level, into then going into a condition of moving outward an energy level.  Such a re-bounding Fourier-related activity, that is here to work to involve a Ward-Supplemental process, is here to then involve a set of  antiholomorphic Kahler conditions -- which, to an extent, is dependent upon the number of superstrings that work to comprise the overall electron, that is here to act as one respective overall orbifold eigenset, that is present at that given arbitrary electron's energy level and so forth, from within the given arbitrary atom of the said respective case.  Such a set of antiholomorphic Kahler conditions, is to then to rise in so as to form a set of Lagrangian-based Chern-Simons singularities, -- of which will then bear a set of complex roots, depending upon the number of spatial dimensions that the said electron is to be going through, as it is here to be traveling in a back-and-forth manner over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Session 11 Of Course 4 -- Why Charges Bear Their Correlative Charges

Protons are positively charged particles that have a small amount of mass.  Protons are made up of quarks and leptons.  Electrons are made up of three leptons each.  Protons generally are the simplest particles that exist with a charge that is just as positive as an electron’s charge is negative.  It has a lot more mass than an electron, and its residual energy discharge does not form light.  Electrons tend to move faster than protons, and electrons spin a lot more antisymmetrically than protons.  Electrons each have a fractional spin, while protons each have a whole spin.  A particle with a negative charge will have the opposite spin holomorphicty than an adjacent  particle with a positive charge.  The J is related to the symmetrism of particles, for the reason that J involves the spin-orbital-interactions of particles.  As stated, J is also related to the electric field of a given particle, since, J is related to the angular momentum of a given particle.  Angular momentum is related to spin-orbital-interaction, since the directoral impetus is influenced by the way something spins and orbits.  (The way something goes around influences the direction that it incorporates and the object’s drive in that direction.)  The electric field is that field that is most influenced by its charge.  Since electrons that are adjacent spin antisymmetrically in an atom, and antisymmetric is negative of symmetry, and this symmetrism is influenced by J and thus the charge of an electron, and the holomorphism of the orbit of an electron’s transversal motion is antiholomorphic relative  to the directoralization of the given electron’s path around the nucleus of an atom, the charge of an electron is  negative.  Since protons’ spin in an atom tends to be more symmetric, and the orbital vibrations of protons is holomorphic relative to the general Laplacian setting of an atom, a proton has a positive charge.  Electrons spin antisymmetrically in an atom because of their fractional spin, high velocity, and also because of the dynamics of their fields.  The electric fields of electrons tend to work on the world more than the electric fields of protons.  Remember how light is the result of the recycling of differential geometries?  Remember how the residual discharge of electrons is light?  Electrons do this because these are a point mass of charge versus the mass that appertains to protons and neutrons.  Well, this is why electrons have more dynamic fields that protons.  These electrons thus need to be geometrically arranged so as not to interfere with where these are at.  Electrons, to exist in a spot, have to be in their own spot.  Since their fields are more dynamic, they must spin antisymmetrically to adjacent electrons of the same atom or else these will collide fieldwise.  This description of  an electric field would also help to describe the magnetic field, since magnetic fields curl around electric fields.  If  two adjacent electrons of the same atom were to be perturbated to attempt these  to spin symmetrically, the electrons, instead, would find a new localization, since two things cannot occupy the same spot at the same time.  The field dynamics of subatomic particle is influenced by the velocities and directoralizations of these selfsame particles.  The velocity of a particle influences the field associated with it.  Thank you for enjoying this session.  Have a great day!  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued! Sam Roach.

The Strong Force And The Basis Of Charge

In a stable atom, a positive charge tends to happen -- when Ward-Cauchy-based eigenstates of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure, work to bear torsional eigenindices -- that bear a tendency of aiming to act in the operational direction, of pushing themselves into external phenomenology.

In a stable atom, a negative charge tends to happen -- when Ward-Cauchy-based eigenstates of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure, work to bear torsional eigenindices -- that bear a tendency of aiming to act in the operational direction, of pushing external phenomenology into the so-eluded-to internal phenomenology of the initially said general genus of Ward-Cauchy-based eigenstates.

So, one may say, that a positive charge is as a "dot-product"-based tendency, whereas, one may say that a negative charge in as a "cross-product"-based tendency.

I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Wave Modulae And Cohomological Generation

Let us initially consider the basic generic set-up, for the condition of the wave modulae of an eigenfunction.  What I am referring to is:  e^(lambda*the eigenfunction).  One may here come to grips with the three basic genre of the wave modulae of eigenfunctions, which would be:
1)  e^(lambda*the eigenfunction), when lambda is less than zero -- for degenerative cohomologies.
2)  e^(lambda*the eigenfunction), when lambda is zero -- for  purely Rham-based cohomologies.
&3) e^(lambda*the eigenfunction), when lambda is more than zero -- for  generative cohomologies.

Now, we will look at a specific example -- as to how this may be applied to a physical condition, at the sub-atomic level.:
One is to initially have a loose electron -- that is of a basically Rham-based cohomology -- to where the cohomological index is to neither work to bear a degenerative nor a generative cohomology.(lambda~0).
Next -- the said electron is to be magnetically pulled into the Ward-Cauchy-based field of an atom -- to where the cohomologies that the electron are to form are to now be of a net generative nature, to where lambda is here to be greater than 0.  (This is to then be related to what may be called a Faro wave function modulae.)
Next -- the said electron is to be struck by a photon -- to where there is the eminent formation of an antiholomorphic Kahler condition -- to where there will thus be the formation of a basically degenerative cohomological index.  In the process, as the electron is to be struck via a Calabi-Yau interaction, in the process of it going into an antiholomorphic Kahler condition, -- it is to first drop an energy level (towards the nucleus of its correlative atom), while then going back an energy level (away from the nucleus of its correlative atom) -- to where the said electron is to then to release a discrete quantum of energy, in the form of a photon, through the Fujikawa Coupling, via the Green Function.
I will explain cohomological generation later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Some Info About Magnetism Versus Gravity

The general genus of that Fourier-based activity, that is to here be directly involved with the torque of those eigenstates that are of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure -- work to help in the production of what may be termed of as atomic charges -- over time.  Electrical charges are associated with magnetism.  The Rarita Structure may be said to be the Ward-Caucy-based Hamiltonian operand -- of the general condition of what is to be the phenomenology of gravity.  This basic genus of comparison, is to thus help at working to explain a general relationship that exists -- between the phenomenology of magnetism, versus the phenomenology of gravity.  Thence, magnetism may be used to manipulate gravity.
I will continue with other suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

As To Certain Resultant Behaviors

Since the "gluing" together of those sub-atomic particles -- that works to help in the formation of nucleons, works to bear torsional eigenindices that are of a whole spin, -- at the Poincare level to the nucleus of an atom -- the so-stated nucleons, when in a steady-state mobility at the so-eluded-to internal reference frame, will tend to bear more of a tense of rest, at the so-eluded-to Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode that is at the said Poincare level to the nucleus of any given arbitrary atom that is at relative rest at the said internal reference frame.  While, since that "gluing" together of those three leptons in so as to help to form an electron -- works to bear torsional eigenindices that are of a fractional spin, -- at the Poincare level to the outer Ward-Neumman bounds of an atom --  when in a steady-state mobility at the so-eluded-to internal reference frame, will tend to bear more of a tense of rapid changes in positional delineation, at the so-eluded-to Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode that is at the said Poincare level to the outer Ward-Neumman bounds of an atom.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
I will return to work on the week that is to start on the 4th.

A Litte Bit As To Valence Stability

As everyone knows, if an atom has six protons in the region of its nucleus -- as well as the said atom having six electrons surrounding the region of its nucleus, then, the said atom, in and of itself, may be described of as a charge-wise stable particle.   This would then mean that the six positively charged protons of such a so-stated atom will be complemented by the six negatively charged electrons of the said atom, that is at hand.  So, the overall electron voltage of the overall positive charge of the atom -- of which is relatively centered From the nucleus of the said atom Towards its exterior -- will here be countered by the overall electron voltage of the negative charge of the atom, to where this said countering of negative charge is taken From the exterior Towards the interior of the nucleus of the so-stated atom of such a given case.  This would here work to attain the condition in this case, of the state of a stable atom -- that would here tend to bear no spontaneous valence charge at all, unless there is an overt force that acts upon the said atom -- in so as to form a static charge.  So, there will tend to be in this case, at the Ward-Neumman bounds of the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-based region that is interior to the region that lays from within the physical bounds of the spot, where the atom of such a given arbitrary case is at -- :one Njenhuis-based positive charge for every Real Reimmanian-based positive charge, stemming in a manner that is both orthogonal to the respective given arbitrary Real Reimmanian plane of such a case, as well as being orthogonal to the directoral-based wave-tug/wave-pull of the overall angular momentum J(S+L) of the topological sway of the so-eluded-to individually taken positive-based charges, that are extended from and propagated from the so-stated protons of such an atom; and, there will also be, one Njenhuis-based negative charge for every Real Reimmanian-based negative charge, stemming in a manner that is both orthogonal to the respective given arbitrary Real Reimmanian plane of such a case, as well as being orthogonal to the directoral-based wave-tug/wave-pull of the overall angular momentum J(S+L) of the topological sway of the so-eluded-to individually taken negative charges, that are extended from and propagated from the so-stated electrons of such an atom.  This arrangement of the charges that are incorporated from within what would here tend to be a perfectly charge-wise stable atom, tend to be pulled into the interior bounds of the said respective atom.  What I mean by the Ward-Neumman bounds of the atom, are the physical bounds of the respective atom that is being discussed -- in and of itself.  What I mean by the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-based region of the atom, in this case, is this:  whether or not the atom is moving transversally as a whole, and/or, whether or not the said atom is existing from within something that is moving transversally as a whole, as well, we are still working here to consider the activity of the atom, as a physical entity that is being considered in this case as being in a relatively transversal-based motionless mode -- as a holonomic substrate that would then be here considered over the course of a relatively respective given arbitrary Laplacian-based transform -- in order to consider those mappable tracings, that would then elude-to the determination of what I have discussed here.  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Part Two of Session 9 of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle and Orbifold Differentiation

When one is to take a supremum of a line of point particles, that are of a relatively non-kinematic eigenbase of Fourier-based Transformation -- one may then potentially get a postulative sphere that would then bear an additive spatial parameter of dimensinonality, that would here potentially be of a tensoric spatial dimension, that would directly appertain in this given arbitrary case to a spinor-based coniaxion --  that could here be attributed to the spinning of the so-stated spherical phenomenology of this scenario, happening here around the conformally invariant central conipoint of the directly associated coniaxial, of which is correlative to the physical existence of the holonomic substrate -- that may here be described of as the said spherical-based entity of this given arbitrary case scenario.  The here additive spatial parameter of tensoric dimensionality, that is directly associated with the said spinor-based coniaxion of the directly previously mentioned case, would then be of a relatively minimal Njenhuis-based nature -- since the condition of four spatial dimensions, works to involve one more spatial parameter of dimension than what is generally conceived of in a more macroscopic manner -- yet here only, in so far as an f-field is concerned.  An f-field may be typified of as the spatial dimensionality of the nucleus of an atom -- it works to concern the existence of four spatial dimensions plus time.  This would then be able to work to explain the existence of the first four relateable spatial dimensions that exist at the atomic and/or at the subatomic level, as being what may be deemed of as four relatively extended or stretched-out dimensions -- that are not of a nature that may be overtly conceived of as curled-up.  Yet, when one works to conceive of the existence of additional spatial parameters of dimensinonality -- one will then run-across physical dimensions that tend to be of more of a curled-up nature of dimensionality.  This curled-up nature would work to describe some of the content of both d-fields and p-fields.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Course 5 on Compactification and Yakawa Coupllings, Session One, Part Two

Is it possible for both the raking of leaves and the splitting of an atom to be done in nature at any given moment? Yes! Nature includes the whole universe. Yet, which of the two takes more force? Smushing an atom does. Why? The reason is that the more electrodynamic fields get in the way of a motion involving atoms, especially when you consider the fact that the atoms you are dealing with are the same type of general thing, the more resistance there is to direct manipulation. Look at it this way: A proton can't smush a proton, since like charges repel. An atom often has charge -- ions always do -- yet the density of its electrodynamic charges is such that a group of charge densities of the same nature will not have the intensity or direction to penetrate or smush the small volume of the field that exists in the region of an atom. When you are talking about leaves, these may be moved by direct physical contact such as we know it. Physical objects that we normally would try to move are generally just portable sets of molecules whose fields come together to form an entity. This entity may be solid to our view, and therefore not compactible. If the object appears to be compactible, then the empty spaces are obvious. If the object isn't, then its compactification will only happen under high pressure. What pressure? High physical or atmospheric pressure will help to smush the contents of an object if this pressure is directed on the object in a way that focuses inward. Will this compactification have rhyme or reason in terms of symmetry? This depends on the metrics of the forces of pressure that are existent upon the given object, and at what multiple directions that this physical force is exerted during the given set of metrics.

Course 3, Session 2

-->

When we look at the world around us, we see motion. If you were to examine a still object close enough, you would see that it too is constantly in motion. Sight is the most predominant sensory perception of most animals. If you can see something, its detection is keener in one’s mind than if it were sensed otherwise. Light is the basis of visual detection and warmth. (Heat is a form of electromagnetic energy.) If there were no heat, there would be no life or molecules. Since heat is light when at a certain wavelength, light is the most fundamental and important component and factor in allowing life to exist. Since light allows the motion of material phenomena, then there must be a relationship between the existence of light and the motion of objects.

Earlier, we discussed how light is created. An atom exists as a set of nucleon(s) that are surrounded by electrons. Things tend to take the path of least resistance. This is because phenomena tends to work at coming to rest or at least “trying” to expel the least amount of energy that it can. Look at people, they tend to try to do things in the easiest manner that they can. This is because when a person or a thing conserves energy, it has less of a tendency to be disorganized and thus this person or thing finds more stability. If something is more stable, then it is in less of a state of disorder. Disorder is entropy. Although entropy allows for important changes, such as melting, it also causes things to eventually fly apart. Look at your room. The more disorder it’s in, the more things get scattered. Life requires order, since it’s composed of a general organization of certain molecules. This is why life tends to try to stay at rest, and thus find more stability. Other material phenomena acts the same general way, since stability and thus the condition of staying at rest helps the phenomena. So, these obey the same general rule that of previously described. So when an electron finds a chance to exist with less energy in such a manner that it does not have to meet up with any undo resistance then, naturally, that electron will do what it takes to go to the general location that provides it with the opportunity to be more at rest. This entails an electron dropping an energy level in order to then have less energy, although maintaining mass at least for the most part. At this point, it releases that energy, since everything goes somewhere. This energy organizes in order to be a specific thing and is called a photon. Photons in the surrounding area come together in whatever number accompanies the direction in which these are propagated. Remember, the basic energy and wavelength of photons are discrete units. Depending on the combination of photons that form a single wavelength of a given type of light, that light could be whatever form of electromagnetic energy this would describe. Since light is key to existence, and is also a key residue of it, the very nature of light’s movement is key to the motion of all other physical phenomena.