Mini Stringular segmentation must exist, because the fields that guide and direct super strings, must be at least some kind of an actual phenomenon. Mini String-Related Segmentation (Mini Stringular segmentation), that is not coalesced from within the Neumann bounds of super Stringular fabric, primarily functions, as a gauged phenomenon, that facilitates the prompting, of the motion of discrete energy. Now; Consider a strand-like increment, of such mini Stringular segmentation. Take the phenomenology, of the span of its cross sectional physical attribute. The kinematic interplay of this respective phenomenology, is such a topological substrate, in which THIS is eminently tantamount, to the phenomenology of Zero-Point Energy. Now think, for a moment; The span of the cross section of a strand, does not go discreetly into the span, of the volume of a sphere-like entity. The sphere-like entity, here, is implicitly what I consider to be, the phenomenology, of first order point particles. (As to what I am referring to, in this particular case.) Next; First order point particles, as I describe them, are Not Exactly of the same condensity. So; Neither Zero Point energy Nor First order point particles, are energy again, taken at a lower level. Next; The segmentation working to bind the immense number of first order point particles, that come together, to form a super string, ( of which is tantamount, to the smallest increment of discrete energy), is Also Not consistently, of the same scalar amplitude of span-like sub-metric, to where, the stuff that’s smaller than super strings, is Not energy again, taken a lower level, yet, since it is actually stuff, and not just empty vacuum, as most scientists happen to seem to perceive of it now, that this can bring one to a viable conclusion, that it is very probable, that one can conceivably convert zero point energy into actual energy, and vice versa! Yet; The total amount of zero point energy potential — the net scalar magnitude, as to how much mini Stringular cross-sectional phenomena, is to be latently proximal local, to the phenomenology of one discrete super string of discrete energy, will always tend to be of the same scalar magnitude, to where the Planck Phenomenon, is the smallest thing, that we would normally conceive of as being energy — because everything that we call energy, consists of integer amounts of Planck-Related energy. (Whole Number Amounts , as compared to fractional amounts.)
Here's something, that I may have touched upon in the past, yet, I just thought that I would reiterate this particular concept. Take the frequency of a neutrino. Square this. Next -- multiply this, by the mass of the lightest neutrino. Now; Take this whole thing. Cube this. This will give one a scalar magnitude, that is here to be tantamount, to the amount of a Joule Second, that works to comprise the general phenomenology, of what may be termed of, as being "zero-point-energy." Next; To see how much smaller, that zero-point-energy is to be, when in viable comparison, to the phenomenology of a Planck Phenomenon, -- Divide the particular respective amount, of a Joule Second, that works to comprise the general phenomenology, of zero-point-energy, by the Planck Constant. (The Planck Constant, if I recall right, is about 6.6260400735*10^(-34)Joule Seconds). Once one has divided the scalar magnitude of zero-point-energy, by the scalar magnitude of the Planck Constant, this will give one the proportionality, as to how much smaller that zero-point-energy is, than the Planck Phenomenon. As indicated by implicit reasoning, by the means communicated to one by the previous paragraph of discussion, the phenomenology of zero-point-energy IS NOT just a relationship between the transversal Planck Energy And the Radial Planck Energy, as some scientists seem to think. It is an actual phenomenology. Nothingness is incapable of doing anything, yet alone being able to guide and direct superstring-related fields. If this doesn't make an adequate amount of sense to you, carefully read Both of these paragraphs, of this particular blog post. If you have any comments or questions, please, don't hesitate to respond to me. I don't bite! Together, we are capable of performing dialogue! Dialogue indicates the humility to listen to others, in spite of how right you think that you are. You can learn from Anyone!!!
Thought Frequency and Pulsation, are inversely related expressions of space-time-fabric. It seems to potentially be apparent, that the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, is the inverse of the Fourier-Related-Progression. So; Since the Fourier-Related-Progression, is inverse thought frequency per kinetic energy, the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, is potential energy per inverse thought frequency. Highly steady state energy per pulsation, would then be tantamount to mass time, and this latter thing would hereupon be tantamount to highly steady state energy per inverse thought frequency. The Higgs Action works to facilitate taking kinetic-like energy, and “manufacturing” it, into the demonstrative expression, of a highly steady state energy per inverse thought frequency, as taken over a duration of time.This, consequently, works to facilitate the resulting formation of mass, and, the heuristically coupled inverse repercussion of this, is the spontaneous ordination, of the piecewise delineation of waves, which, if not spurious in spatial translation, will generally tend to bear the capacity, of acting as the process, of a piecewise continuous delineation, of a given arbitrary system of waves. Furthermore: Mass is a phenomenon, that Exhibits the coupling, of highly steady state energy in conjunction with thought frequency, &, the inverse of the coupling between highly steady steady state energy in conjunction with thought frequency, is the progressive delineation of a system of waves. Energy tends to be “highly” steady state, when it is to “appear” to be transversally stable, from an internal reference frame, that is from within a metric span of 25 Planck Phenomenon, from its immediately externalized Neumann bounds. Picture an atom. Right near it, it may seem to not be moving around. Yet, from a much more external reference frame, it might be moving around a lot. Can you imagine?!
First of all, I wanted to clarify, that what I mean by inverse thought frequency, is the inverse of the overall quantity, of thought times frequency. Next of all, I wanted to add, that the more hermitian, that the quotient, of highly steady state energy per inverse thought frequency, is to be, (of which, one may also describe this to be, as behaving like the product, or coupling, of highly steady state energy, with actual thought frequency), that it will thereby generally tend to spontaneously result, in such a particular type of a case scenario, that the resultant end product, of such an implicit intermingling, will more than likely have a more harmonic interplay of an eminently corroborative Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, than an otherwise analogous case scenario, in which such an implicit intermingling is not as hermitian in overt incursion, — to where, a fairly hermitian intermingling, of highly steady state energy with thought frequency, as was implied by the viably indicated physical interaction of product-like operation-like activity that I had previously mentioned, as kinematically propagated over a duration of actual time, will tend to generally incur a fairly high expectation value, of working to have a greater capacity of being of a Kahler-Related mass-bearing nature, than if otherwise, instead, that it were a potentially viable intermingling of these, that was NOT brought into a spontaneous physical interaction, in a hermitian manner.
Electrodynamic frequency per time, often tends to spontaneously facilitate a tense, of incurred magnetic pull. Whereas; Energy per electrodynamic frequency, often tends to facilitate a tense, of incurred magnetic push. Furthermore; When electrodynamic frequency per time, is coupled with energy per electrodynamic frequency, this general physical operation, tends to work to form electromotive power. &, electromotive power coupled with (electrodynamic frequency per time), tends to form electromotive impedance.
An abelian light cone gauge topology, tends to be eminently gauged, upon the spatial component, of space time fabric. And; A non abelian light cone gauge topology, tends to be eminently gauged, upon the time-based component, of space time fabric.
A compact mass-bearing Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, that is relatively strong in its eminently associated metric-gauge-related action of viable physical restraint, will often tend to bear a fairly enhanced manner of resolute pulsation, in the general course, of its eminently corroborative Fourier-Related-Progression.
The smallest regional swipe of scalar delineation, that can possibly be physically divvied out, is the scalar magnitude of zero point energy, which is About 3.11223*10^(-129) times the net metrical scalar magnitude, of that of the Planck Phenomenon. Again, here’s how I came up with this.: Take the heuristic frequency of a neutrino. Square this. Next; Multiply that by the mass, of the lightest viably possible neutrino. Cube that whole thing. Now; Divide what you just got, by the Planck Constant, and voila, you get a factor, at least somewhat analogous, to that of, 3.11223*10^(-129).
