Stipulation -- Resonant Flow Of Chern-Simons Invariant-Related Metric-Gauge Eigenstates -- Generation Of Surplus Kinetic Energy

 To my estimation, it is possible, that when the facilitated formation of a tense of recursively re-calibrated Chern-Simons Invariant-Related metric-gauge eigenstates, is to work to form a back-and-forth resonant flow, between initially being of a heuristically hermitian nature, to then being of a heuristically spurious nature, and back again, and so on, that this general process over time, may often work to bear the potential possibility, of working to generate a surplus, of exhibited holonomic kinetic energy-related eigenstates. SAMUEL DAVID ROACH. (PHS 1989). 

The Main Difference Between Voltage AND The Main Influence Formed By The Force Of Pressurized Vacuum

 The Main difference between Voltage AND the Main Influence that is created by the Force of Pressurized Vacuum (this Main Influence, of which is a general tense of a metric-gauge-related field), is:

Voltage is kinetic energy per charge; Whereas, the Main Influence that is created by the force of pressurized vacuum -- is equivalent to energy in static equilibrium, of which tends to be in a state of super-conformal invariance at an internal reference-frame, per charge. I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, SAM. (1989).

Some Stuff As To Conversion Of Mass Into Energy

When mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity are to be converted into kinetic energy-related superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, -- such initially stated mass-bearing strings often tend to be opened up, at the covariant proximal loci of their directly corresponding partition-based discrepancies. I will continue with the suspense later!To Be Continued!Sincerely, Samuel Roach.

Disassemmbled Out Of Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode

When a set of mass-bearing orbifold eigensets, are here to be disassembled out of their multiplicit tense of a Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, -- then, the initially inferred mass, is then to convert into a tense of kinetic energy, -- as is implied by Einstein's equation:  E=MC^2.  To Be Continued!  Sam.

Kinetic Energy Associated With Mass-Bearing Superstrings

The higher that the quantum of Legendre-related superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that act in so as to work to form a wave-tug upon a set of mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- over an evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric -- the more kinetic energy, that is here to then tend to be directly associated with the said mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittiivty, that is of this so-mentioned given arbitrary case.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Kinetic Energy And Isotropic Stability

Plain kinetic energy that is generated by the activity of mass-bearing superstrings, that are of discrete energy permittivity, tends to be stable in its isotropism, whereas -- plain kinetic energy that is generated by the activity of superstrings of discrete electromagnetic energy, tends to be unstable in its isotropism.  This then means, -- that superstrings of discrete plain kinetic energy permittivity -- that are generated from the motion of mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, will tend to be isotropically stable, whereas, superstrings of discrete plain kinetic energy permittivity -- that are generated from the motion of superstrings of discrete electromagnetic energy, will tend to be isotropically unstable.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Holomorphicity Of Kinetic Energy Versus E.M.

Discrete quanta of electromagnetic energy, are comprised of bosonic superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that work to bear their individually taken holomorphic direction -- in the general multiplicit directoral, that is of the fractal of the angular momentum that is of the individually taken direction of the relative positioning of the anuulus of its toroidal-based core-field-density, -- whereas, discrete quanta of kinetic energy, are comprised of fermionic superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that work to bear their individually taken holomorphic direction -- in the general multiplcit directoral, that is of the fractal of the angular momentum of the individually taken direction of the relative positioning of the apex of its conical-based core-field-density.  This is the fundamental difference as to how a discrete quantum of electromagnetic energy goes about moving in its correlative holomorphic direction, as to be compared to the manner in which a discrete quantum of kinetic energy is to go about moving, in what happens to be its own correlative holomoprhic direction.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

As To Dissipated Kinetic Energy

Kinetic energy that is dissipated, tends to be converted into one of the following "things," as long as it is not frayed.:  This said kinetic energy tends to either be converted into:  Electromagnetic energy, via the Fujikawa Coupling, as is according to the Green Function;  or, it is converted into a mass-bearing superstring of discrete energy permittivity; or, it will make an indistinguishabley different perturbation in its reference frame of Hamiltonian operation; or else it will tend to be recycled in its Ward-Caucy-based conditions, into a certain Hodge-based holonomic substrate -- that is of a given arbitrary scalar amplitude of norm-state-projection(s).  I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Part One of the Ninth Session of Course 9 on Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge

There are many times as many two-dimensional superstrings as one-dimensional superstrings.  Another way to put it, there are many times as many closed or bosonic superstrings as there are open or fermionic superstrings.  So, for instance, when an electron forms a photon by dropping an energy level, a phenomena that contains one-dimensional superstrings in terms of its plain kinetic energy -- this phenomena with plain kinetic energy being an electron -- drops an energy level so as to emit a particle that is comprised, in part, of a two-dimensional superstring that here is a photon.  A photon is an arbitrary example of a phenonema whose discrete energy permittivity is comprised of a bosonic, or closed, or another words, of a two-dimensional superstring.  Nuclei of atoms do not bear much plain kinetic energy as compared to that of electrons.  For that reason, the nuclei of atoms have a higher percentage of two-dimensional superstrings than the percentage of two-dimensional superstrings that an electron has.  Superstrings may open and superstrings may shut.  A one-dimensional superstring shuts to form a two-dimensional superstring, as an arbitrary example, when the plain kinetic energy that comprises an elecatron forms the substringular  portion of a photon.  A two-dimensional superstring of a photon opens to form a one-dimensional superstring that comprises a discrete unit of kinetic energy permittivity when a discrete unit of electromagnetic energy converts to a discrete unit of kinetic energy.  Zero-Norm-States (loose point particles) are what open or shut superstrings.  When a point particle that forms a line of tangency by being norm to a disc-like configuration of point particles that interconnect directly via a mini-string segment, this is an example of a negative-norm-state when these states travel in the reverse-holomorphic  general direction during Ultimon Flow.  If I previously accidentally flipped the concept of the relative holomorphicity before as to this, this right here is the way it is.  Here is how I can see better as to what I am talking about now:  The scattering of the collision of negative-norm-states with substringular phenomena leaves a ghost-like and virtually motionless pattern of where the prior mentioned substringular phenomena had been in an arbitrary prior iteration.  I will continue with the suspense later.  Until then, aim your spear for the moon so that you can get your spear across the river.
The just mentioned comment is a metaphor for trying to continually improve in life.
Have a phenomenal day!                          
Sincerely,                          
Sam Roach.                                              

Course 9, Session 8, Part One

Light-Cone-Gauge-Eigenstates have three action characteristic types:  transversal (angular momentum)  motion, orbital motion, and radial (spin) motion.  There are 44 modes of light-cone-gauge angular momentum per Planck-related phenomena -- not including the dual Laplacian sinusoidal wave patterns of light-cone-gauge eigenstates when these are non-abelian, 84 modes of light-cone-gauge orbit per Planck-related phenomena -- not including the dual Laplacian sinusoidal wave patterns of light-cone-gauge-eigenstates when these are non-abelian, and there are 128 modes of light-cone-gauge spin per Planck-related phenomena -- not including the dual Laplacian sinusoidal wave patterns of light-cone-gauge eigenstates when these are non-abelian.  For every covariant mode propagation of Planck-related phenomena that happens during the countless Fourier Transformations that operate during the existence of history -- that involve electromagnetic energy or plain kinetic energy (the directly prior of which bear a non-abelian light-cone-gauge topology) --, there is a different amplitude of the dual Laplacian sinusoidal wave patterns for the corresponding non-abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstates that are related with the associated Planck-related phenomena.  Each Planck-related phenomena has an associated light-cone-gauge eigenstate that has its own integrated angular momtentum, orbit, and spin.  Abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstates do not form a dual Laplacian sinusoidal wave pattern, although these light-cone-gauge eigenstates torque per instanton according to their angular momentum, orbit, and spin modes.
I  have at least two more posts that move in the direction of explaining both time-oriented and relatively timeless-oriented light-cone-gauge eigenstates -- the what, how, and why of this topic is explained here.
I will continue with the suspense later!                                                                     
Sincerely,
Sam Roach.

Solutions To Test One Of Course # Five

1) If two masses differ in compactification, these masses differ in the amount of space that exists in-between the core densities of the masses considered individually while then being compared.

2) If two masses of the same volume differ in compactification, then one mass has more spaces in-between its core densities than the other.

3) When an umbrella is open, it is relatively uncompacitfied. When an umbrella is shut, it is relatively compactified.

4) The empty spaces in-between the fabric of a quilt shows a degree of a lack of compactification in the said quilt.

5) When space is composed of a mass, kinetic energy, or an electromagnetic energy, when composed of discrete phenomena, it is an overt thing. When space is empty, it is nothing.

6) Differentiating space forms energy when it differentiates over time in a kinematic directoralization. Energy in static equilibrium is matter. Matter with relatively little empty space is relatively compactified.

7) A point particle that is first-ordered is like a ball of yarn because it consists of intertwined mini-string.

8) Point particles that are first-ordered that are unfrayed are all interconnected via mini-string during instanton, just as balls of yarn in a hoop may all directly or indirectly interconnect via the ends of these balls of yarn interconnecting.

9) All first-ordered point particles interconnect via the transit of Ultimon Flow.

10) The spin and roll of first-ordered point particles causes the emission of mini-string. The emission of mini-string interconnects the said point particles Such spin and roll also makes the said point particles kinematic. The kinematic interconnection of such particles tug these phenomena along the Ultimon, thus causing Ultimon Flow.

11) Spin and roll are related to magnetic field.

12) The drive in a direction of a point is related to angular momentum, and produces the sub-basis of electric field.

13) A Yakawa Coupling is the touch, rub, and curl of substringular phenomena upon each other.

About On-Shell Mass Structure

A two-dimensional superstring has a three-dimensional field associated with it. When a relatively knit Fourier Transform that is highly Laplacian forms a toroidal structure with an annulus at its central coniaxial, the whole Majorana-Weyl supercharge associated with the operation of the associated superstring’s conformally invariant kinematism is delineated, after the group metric that forms the basically Gliossi-Sherk-Olive field described, at the outer shell general locus of that given M-field that is associated with the described kinematic differentiation of the given two-dimensional superstring’s three-dimensional field. This considers the fact that every superstring, whether it partakes of mass or not, has a mass index. Such an on-shell supercharge as taken thru a Fourier Transform that alters the spin-orbital and angular momentum distribution, delineation, and directoralization of the associated three-dimensional field toroidal structure converts the Yau-Exact indices transport in such a way as to form a discrete unit of mass as to the M-field structure that I have conveyed. This is tantamount to that a spherical shell with a physical charge in its center delineates all of the energy of its charge along the topography of its associated shell. Likewise, the norm state Ward conditions of the annulus of a toroidal 3-D field of a 2-D superstring delineates all of the angular momentum and spin-orbital distribution indices at the outer shell of that given toroidal

3-D structure. Likewise, the “figure-eight” twisted toroidal structure created by certain fermionic superstrings forms the point mass of electrons and neutrinos. This mass of certain fermions is created by this: The norm state conditions when considering the Ward conditions of the annuli of the two relatively Mobius ends of the “figure-eight” described have angular momentum and spin-orbital momentum that transfers their distribution and directoralization indices outward to the outer topology of the given “figure-eight-like” structure. The kinematic differentiation of the Yau-Exact indices of the “figure-eight” structure as a whole causes the given phenomenon to translate, thru the Fourier Transform of the given M-field thru a Minkowski or Hilbert Lagrangian, its mass indices into an integration of Hamiltonian eigenstates that allow the Kaluza-Klein phenomena, as with 3-D fields of 2-D superstrings, to convert and/or maintain as a mass. The abelian geometry of the light-cone-gauge of such Yau-Exact structures causes the E(6)xE(6) gauge-bosons related to form Schwinger indices that keep the M-fields oriented to coalesce their Noether indices into a conformally invariant manner that has to be orientable per general locus in order to translate to a proceeding general locus as long as the mass indices associated are limited. Since any M-field needs a limited Lagrangian distribution in order to delineate its Majorana-Weyl indices over a group metric that is based on a harmonics or anharmonics that may not coincide with a group directoralization of Noether flow unless the associated superstring is unorientable, Kaluza-Klein mass is always under light speed, per iteration, and mass must become Yang-Mills as in a worm-hole or Yang-Mills also, if otherwise tachyonic, which is true when mass bears unorientable yet finely directoralized motion via a Ward polarizable dark matter holomorph. Unorientable superstrings may only be as such temporarily when in a large group even if Reverse-Lorentz-Four-Contracted. Mass may become Yang-Mills and tachyonic if its field delineation is majorized.