Part One of the Interim Between Course 17 and Course 18

One may wonder what metrical phenomena transpires, in the process of when a given arbitrary point particle is initialized as being either of a ground-state nature or as being of a norm-state nature.  Here, I will give a general brief summary.  A superstring is iterated over the course of group instanton -- the core of such a given arbitrary instanton being the metrical duration of BRST.  It (the said superstring) is a conformal set of first-ordered point particles that integrate and interact as being a genus of a relatively exact and differential associations -- each partition of such a holonomic substrate of exact differential association is here then being of a relatively linear nature.  The superstring in question will here only exist as a string of first-ordered point particles for a brief slice of time.  After which, most of the indices that had worked to comprise the so-stated superstring of discrete energy permittivity cycle around the world-tubes of the Continuum -- in the process of the generally unnoticed duration of Ultimon Flow.  This process of the cyclical iteration and re-iterations of superstrings works to cause a certain degree of indistinguishable replacement, of which occurs in such a manner in so as to fulfill the conformal invariance of any given arbitrary superstring of said discrete energy permittivity, if such a so-eluded to holonomic substrate is to be reiterated over the course of an ensuing group instanton.  As the said superstring is in the process of what I may term of as being of a transition kernel, the first-ordered point particles that had worked to comprise the so-stated superstring exist as relatively separated partitions -- of which are segments that exist as relatively straight lines.  (Such relatively linear segments still work to bear the general curvature of space-time-fabric, that would here exist at the directly associated level, and each of such segments would here not be actually of the nature of a Wilson Line.)  The directly affiliated Real and Fock compositions of the various parts of the directly corresponding superstrings of discrete energy permittivity act as being of the nature of being half-full -- these so-eluded-to first-ordered point particles are, during BRST, of a half-compactified core-field-density.  The main difference between such a condition of a point particle, that works to comprise a so-stated superstring -- when in contrast with its counterpart -- is that the so-eluded-to point particle of a superstring tends to bear only one Gliossi-based extraneous wave that juts out from it, besides those segments of mini-string that work to interconnect it to the other first-ordered point particles of its stringular-based composition -- whereas, its directly corresponding counterstring tends to bear many Gliossi-based extraneous waves that jut out from it, besidess those segments of mini-string that work to interconnect it to the other first-ordered point particles of its stringular composition.  This works to make a superstring that is of discrete energy permittivity of a Real Reimmanian-based nature, while yet making its counterstring of a Fock-based nature.  This thus works to make such a superstring's counterpart the holonomic substrate of the wave-function-like eigenbase as to what works to fulfill the condition of being a discrete unit of energy permttivity.
I will continue with the suspense later!!! To be continued!!! Sam Roach.

Waves, Energy, And Particles

A phenomenon is what it is when it is what it is. The wave-based evaluation of a particle as a wave is an extrapolation that works to describe certain characteristics of the particle as behaving as a wave. These are called De Broglie Waves. When one considers what would normally be thought of as a wave as a particle, again, this is an evaluation of a wave as behaving via a certain extrapolation of consideration as a particle. When one considers a certain quantum of energy as a wave, again, this is based on a certain context that is used to denote various given arbitrary characteristics of the said quantum of discrete energy as behaving in a certain specific situation as a wave. One step further, the conceptualization of the various substringular phenomena as waves -- when under specific given arbitrary conditions, is an evaluation that is used under a certain given arbitrary pretext -- in such a manner in so that a specific condition may help to be determined in an effort to better explain a specific observed characteristic that is needed under a given arbitrary determination. Yet, a phenomena in a given specific situation is what it is when undergoing a specific condition or set of conditions when that specific condition is pertainent at a given extrapoloatory scenario at a given framework of either timelessness (Laplacian-based conditions) or, at a given framework of time-oriented conditions (Fourier-based conditions). None the less, phenomena may, over certain various changes in conditions, often convert from a basically wave-like phenomenon into a basically particle and/or energy-like phenomenon. Such changes happen all of the time at one spot or another in the Continuum. Much of such interchanges and evaluations are determined in multi-consideration of a phenomenon's relationship to light and its motion. This is because all motion, mass, and length of physical phenomena bears characteristics that are based upon their relationship to light and the motion of light (E.M. more specifically. I will continue with the suspense later! Sincrerely, Sam Roach.

An Explaination Of Topology

Superstrings are comprised of first-ordered point particles that integrate into the general shape-like formats of either vibrating strands or vibrating hoops that form the discrete energy that makes-up the Continuum. Superstrings are generally vibrating hoops of such phenomena. First-Ordered point particles are "yarned together" mini-string that forms the general compositional genus of tiny spheres that organize to form the prior mentioned superstrings. The mentioned vibrating hoops are bosonic strings -- of which are primordially considered as two-dimensional. The mentioned vibrating strands are fermionc strings -- of which are primordially considered as one-dimensional. This does not directly consider the condition of heterotic superstrings, even though heterotic strings are completely real. This goes beyond the scope of what I am discussing here. The prior said mini-string is the fundamental basis of the topology that works to form the basis of substringular fields. Superstrings are primarily interconnected by the said mini-string. Topology is the general term for the "substance" that forms both the Poincaire-based and the Clifford-based interconnectivity that works to form the respective composition and the networking of superstrings -- in so that superstrings may not only exist in such a manner in so that these may be able to operate as the discrete foundation for the existence of energy, yet, also, so that superstrings may be able to bind into a covariant relationship that allows these said superstrings to be able to interact in both a direct and in an indirect manner. The said topology interacts in both field-based segments and in field-based curvatures that cause both the Laplacian-based mapping of the "topography" of superstrings, as well as to be able to cause the Laplacian-based mapping of the "topography" of the field indices that work to interbind the said superstrings, to act as the operational basis as to what this said topology is. The interconnectivity of all unfrayed topology to all other unfrayed topology per instanton is homotopy. The tendency of the said homotopy is the foundation of Cassimer Invariance. Sam Roach.

Course 5 on Compactification and Yakawa Couplings, Session Four, Part Two

Now, to return to my analogy of the ramifications of spin and roll. As the balls of yarn spin and roll while cycling thru the hoop (going around), the twisting from the spin and roll action causes the yarn ends separated from each ball of yarn to interact with each other. How? Each ball of yarn is spinning, rolling, and moving along the hoop at a high rate of speed. The balls of yarn are close enough to where the ends of each ball described are able to interact, yet far enough away from each other to where the balls as a whole will not collide with each other. Since the balls of yarn are spinning, rolling and moving as units so fast, the yarn of the balls extending from these balls will want to hyper extend and move in all sorts of directions. Since the balls of yarn have closeness, and what I said above is happening, the yarn that is extended from the balls will need to interact (touch, rub, and curl around each other). This is because the ends of yarn extended from the balls will be where each other are at for each ball toward each other ball at least once during the one complete rotation of the balls around the hoop that I mentioned earlier. Picture the balls of yarn as point particles. The interaction of the ends of yarn of each ball of yarn in terms of these ends of yarn touching, rubbing, and curling around each other as the balls of yarn go around the hoop described earlier is an interaction symbolizing a Yakawa Coupling. Yakawa is the person's name who described a related phenomena a long time ago, and a coupling is an interaction (touching, rubbing, and curling around). When spouses are a couple, what do they do? They touch each other, rub up against each other, and curl around each other. The words have a similar history (couple -- coupling). Yakawa seemed to think that coupling was based on string as strings. Yet, as I described in previous courses, in order for strings to exist, there must be points that make these up. As far as traveling to other parts of the Continuum in basically no time flat, which I could teach, the smallest form of Yakawa Coupling that is necessary to understand is that of a point particle (within a substring) taken as a piece of yarn. If you will recall from a previous course, the hoop that I am describing is considering the universes in terms of a substringular framework instead of a globally distinguishable framework.

Course 4 on The Globally Distinguishable Vs. The Substringular, Session 14, Part One

So, nuclei particles and electrons are composed of smaller particles. These smaller particles in the subsringular are actually sequences of strings that exist in individual parts of a tori sector. As these sequences iterate and reiterate, these effect the stuff that they interact with. These sequences also have direct wave connections with other of "such types" of sequences. Simplify to two stringular sequences. These are connected by wave during one quaternionic-instanton-field-impulse-range. Once the strings of these sequences leave the range of the instanton field, the point particles associated with these strings move out of a line formation and into a more scrambled formation. There is still at least some wave connection between some of the waves that existed not only between the points of the individual strings, yet also between the points of each string toward each other. As a matter of fact, if these strings end up reiterating in the same general relative locant, there will be some wave connection between all of the points of both strings during the whole transit of the strings as points around the Continuum. Not only will the condensed oscillations or points effect the stuff that it goes through, yet the strung out waves will also effect the stuff that these encounter on their way around the ultimon (Continuum). As a matter of fact, points have fields, as said before. Two things con not occupy the same spot at the same time. So, points tend to rely on strung out waves, in the substringular, to produce effects. I will continue with the suspense of this session later. Until then, have a phenomenal day!
Sincerely,
Sam.

Course 4 on The Globally Distinguishable Vs. The Substringular, Session 9, Part 2(Two)

The globally distinguishable has no infinite changes in the position of an object between two direct moments of where that object is. -- In other words, in the globally distinguishable, if an object is at one spot in one nanosecond in the globally distinguishable, it cannot appear to exist at the other end of the Continuum during the next nanosecond unless it enters the SUBSTRINGULAR. In the globally distinguishable, every particle that appears near each other is near each other. Particles that we view of as far away from each other are far away from each other. Basically, the globally distinguishable assumes that the reality that we observe is as is. It assumes that the three-dimensional delineations that we observe actually define the basis of interaction, when, in fact, these do not do that. Newtonian physics works based on the conclusions reached with the globally distinguishable. Most "logical" conclusions of physics based on matter interplay involves all stipulation as derived from the workings of the globally distinguishable. How can one say that the globally distinguishable is ever wrong? Anomalous singularities alone proves the fact that the globally distinguishable is not the ultimate in perception. When the interacting physical limits define the basis of an object to be interspersed in space and time, then it can be proven that the locus of an object is not completely isolated, and inevitably that all energies interact within very, very brief periods. Thus, no objects are only closely isolated for what we would term of as even the briefest time period. The briefest time that is actually time is 10^(-43) of a second.