Showing posts with label cohomological eigenstates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cohomological eigenstates. Show all posts

Friday, September 27, 2019

Chirality, Parity, And Sets Of Cohomological Eigenstates

The condition of two different covariant sets of cohomological eigenstates, as having the opposite chirality -- will tend to cause a degeneration of their cohomology -- which will consequently reverse-fractal into a tendency, in which there will then be two different charged stratum -- that are then to work to bear a degeneration of charge, the one toward the other.  Whereas;  The condition of two different covariant sets of cohomological eigenstates, as having the opposite parity -- will tend to cause an attraction of one of these two sets of cohomological eigenstates, towards the other, -- which will consequently reverse-fractal into a tendency, in which there will then be two different charges of the opposite chirality.  (A "positively" charged stratum and a "negatively" charged stratum.) 
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Wednesday, September 25, 2019

Cox Rings And Tense Of Parity

When a given arbitrary Cox Ring -- that is here of one respective ordered grouping of a set of cohomological eigenstates, is to undergo a Wess-Zumino interaction at the Poincare level, -- the said ordered grouping of such an inferred respective set of cohomological eigenstates, will tend to have a higher probability of maintaining its covariant tense of parity.  Consequently -- when a given arbitrary Cox Ring, -- that is here of one respective ordered grouping of a set of cohomological eigenstates, is to undergo a Cevita interaction at the Poincare level, -- the said ordered grouping of such an inferred respective set of cohomological eigenstates, will tend to have more of a probability of reversing its covariant tense of parity.  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Wednesday, June 19, 2019

More As To Cohomological Eigenstates, Eigenindices

Cohomological eigenstates may either be abelian or non abelian groupings, that latch at a locus that is proximal local to the topology of discrete energy; whereas -- cohomological eigenindices are discrete motions of such abelian or non abelian groupings, that work to indicate the presence of the thence proximal local said cohomological eigenstates.  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Thursday, June 28, 2018

Dimensionality And Cohomology

The higher that the intrinsic spatial dimensionality of a substringular field is -- since this means here, that the correlative knotting of the directly corresponding superstrings of such a case are here to tend to be of a higher power -- the more that those respective cohomological eigenstates and those respective cohomological eigenindices, that are thence to be formed by the interaction of the said superstrings with their point commutative environment, will potentially bear a tighter knitting than those superstrings, that are of Ward-Cauchy-related fields that are of an intrinsically lower spatial dimensionality.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.