My Premise, As To An Occasional Potential Inter-Meshing Amongst Different Universes

"Segments" that are of a given arbitrary "dimensional-train," that are here to work to represent part of one directly corresponding given arbitrary universal setting, in one set of parallel universes -- may occasionally potentially partially inter-mesh with "segments" that are of another given arbitrary "dimensional-train," that are here to work to represent part of another directly corresponding given arbitrary universal setting, in the same earlier stated set of parallel universes, and still Potentially maintain their initial tense of a universal setting -- under the course of the following two potentially feasible general stipulations:  P.S. What I mean by "universal setting," is as being of one type of universe.

1)  If the potentially resultant symmetry-related Ward-Cauchy boundary conditions, are to be physically obeyed -- to where such a potential partial inter-meshing would Not work to be prevented, -- by one tense or another, of something on the order of the Pauli Exclusion Principle (which could thence, otherwise work to prevent such a general inferred type of a potential partial inter-meshing).

AND;

2)  If the Ward-Cauchy norm-related conditions of the two different potentially partially inter-meshing "segments," that are here appertaining to small parts of two different inferred universal settings, are here to work to allow for both of such potentially inter-meshing "dimensional-trains," to consequently work to bear such a general tense of an orthogonal delineation -- to where these inferred segments, that are here to work to represent two different individually taken sets of Hamiltonian Operators, -- are then to be able to tend to bear a tense of a super string-related wobble, that would consequently work to signify the general type of a physical condition, to where both of these segments, that are here to be appertaining to small parts of two different respective universal settings, to still maintain the condition, as to continue to be of their originally respective inferred tense of two individually taken universal settings.

Otherwise; the initially eluded-to potential inter-meshing of two segments -- that are here to be appertaining to small parts of two different respective types of universal settings, would consequently more than likely Not be able to happen then!

I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Adjacent D-Fields

Any two different distinct adjacent d-fields, that are of a Noether-based flow -- tend to bear a tense of a relative covariant asymmetric spin -- the one toward the other, to where this works to allow for  those particle-related phenomenology, that work to exist from within the Ward-Cauchy-related bounds of such fields, to then to be able to obey the Pauli-Exclusion Principle.  This works to help these fields to keep from impeding upon each other's space.
To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

An Addition To The 3rd Part Of Session 1 Of Course 20

During any given arbitrary iteration of BRST, at any of one respective given arbitrary substringular loci -- the superstring of discrete energy permittivity of any respective case, and its correlative counterstring, bear both a covariant, a codeterminable, and a codifferentiable tense of oscillation, that is of a tightly-knit Fourier-based assymetric generation of their respective permutative indices -- as both the so-stated superstring and its correlative counterstring, will work here to decompactify, during the course of their dual scalar amplitude of the correlative eigenstate of the Polyakov Action, to the inverse of what their directly corresponding Lorentz-Four-Contraction happens to be -- during the course of the so-eluded-to iteration of BRST, of which is applicable at the so-eluded-to proximal localization at which such an iteration of instanton is to be happening at.  This tendency of a dual Fourier-based tense of an assymetric-related covariant-based spinning nature, is even more of an exemplification of the qualitative means of the Pauli Exclusion Principle, than the condition of the Laplacian-based assymetric delineation of the eigen-related discrepencies of one respective superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- when this is taken in comparison to the delineation of the eigen-related discrepencies of the directly corresponding counterstring.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part One of the 12th Session of Course 18

The cohomologies that directly appertain to both the existence and the activity of orbifolds, and, the cohomologies that directly appertain to the integration of the mappable tracings of the multivarious world-sheets -- any respective world sheets, of which, are the trajectory of the physical projection of substringular phenomena of holonomic substrate -- are never of a completely static nature, over time.  Cohomologies are the integration of ghost-based indices.  Ghost-based indices are the physical memories as to the what, when, where, and how, the various substringular entities had been and moved, over time.  So, as any given arbitrary substringular entity has moved from one spot to another, the physical mappable tracing of as to where the so-stated substringular entity had been, when it had been at the said respective general locus of this specific given arbitrary case, what the integration of those indices that had come together in so as to work to form the so-stated substringular entity had been, and how the said substringular entity had moved -- over the course of the activity of that same respective given arbitrary substringular entity, is helped to be able to be extrapolatable to an observer, of whom may have worked to determine both the existence and the activity of the so-eluded-to holonomic substrate that had behaved as the so-stated substringular entity.  Due to general conditions such as the Heisenburg Principle and the Pauli-Exclusion Principle, such a general genus of extrapolatory-based detection is here to basically be mainly of a mathematical-based nature -- with our present-day modern technology.  Yet, when one is to understand the basic premises of as to how, when, where, and what a given general locus of proximal substringular entites is to behave over time, at a reasonably tightly secure locus of nature, then, it is more proportionabley viable to bear a condition of having a higher probability to be able to more accurately determine the so-mentioned conditionalities of as to the when, where, how, and what, the holonomic substrate that works to comprise any respective given arbitrary substringular entity had behaved -- in the manner that would work to help at better determining a more reliable extrapolation of the manner of activity of the said substringular phenomena, that could here be of a correlative physical scenario.  Since motion in the substringular -- for all practical purposes -- happens basically everywhere and all of the time in actual physical nature, any correlative respective set of cohomological indices is basically always going to be in some sort of motion or change, over any detectable time period in which one may be able to work to make any viable extrapolation as to the behavior of any Yakawa-based couplings of ghost-based indices.  This often holds true -- even if there are no spontaneous Gliossi-based interactions of discrete superstrings, that are to happen upon the topological stratum of the holonomic substrate of the so-eluded-to cohomologies -- for the reason of the ansantz-based fact that norm-state projections are basically constantly working to interact with the multiplicit assortment of ghost anomalies, over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Some Stuff About Gauge-Bosons

Gauge-Bosons are essential in the field of a light-cone-gauge-eigenstate since, when

                
individual gauge-bosons "pluck" the second-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstates that

exist in the field of a first-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstate, the resulting vibrations

are second-ordered Schwinger Indices (the summation of such vibrations per first-

ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstate being a first-ordered Schwinger Index) that flow

through the Rarita Structure to allow for the Ricci Scalar to function so that gravity may

take effect. This is just in reference to the E(6)XE(6) type of gauge-bosons. Just as

adjacent electrons have to spin antisymmetrically, to give a reverse-fractored example,

in order to obey the Pauli Exclusion Principle, adjacent E(6)XE(6) strings must bear an

assymmetric spin-orbital tensorism in order to not infringe on each others' space. Such

an antisymmetric spin-orbital tensorism is caused by the spurious effect of the Chern-

Simmons field that exists between adjacent E(6)X(E(6) strings. Such a Chern-Simmons

field is due to the condition of such gauge-bosons differentiating per instanton in-between

a discrete energy unit of permittivity and a discrete energy unit of energy impedance. So,

whether a related light-cone-gauge topology is abelian or non-abelian, the substringular

field that binds these gauge-bosons to both sides of an associated first-ordered-light-

cone-gauge-eigenstate is primarily abelian so that the "plucking" of the second-ordered

light-cone-gauge-eigenstates will not shatter the given first-ordered light-cone-gauge-

eigenstate. The fabric of substringular field is what I call "mini-string." Mini-String is

the fabric of gauge-action that interconnects the topology of all unfrayed substringular

phenomena that forms the homotopic structure of the substringular. My website is http://

www.samsphysicsworld@blogspot.com.

Sincerely,

Samuel David Roach                                                                                 

Course 4 on the Substringular Vs. the Globally Distinguishable, Session 6, Part 1

Since the 1/2th to 1/10,000th of the point particle acts as the whole point particle in terms of the source of pulse, in a way, the point particle is going against the Pauli Exclusion Principle. The point is also below the stringular level. You can extrapolate information about the points, yet, one may not directly use individual points by a physical means. This is because the iterations of the point defy the discrete level of factor by a factor of 2 to 10,ooo as implied before. So, you may not determine where point density is and what it is giving off directly under instantaneous circumstances, as implied by the Heisenberg Exclusion Principle.
If you were a spring with many springs attached, and you were pushed together tightly, what would you do if you were let go? You would spring in many directions. Likewise, if you were condensed oscillation, and you were basically at many spots at the same time (yet not at the precise same metric), what would you do if you were given plenty of room to move, and were pushed along a tapered curve over a relatively great distance? You would spring out in many directions -- many per each attached spring. what if something got the "ball" rolling, and you spring as given among many of such springs? Such a motion would not only propel your attached springs, yet it would also work to spring and propel the other springs if these could interact in the proper geometric order. What this is eventually getting at is the origin of my explanation of the light-cone-gauge. I will conclude with my point that I am trying to get at with this session later. I hope that you are putting the pieces of the puzzle together.
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach.

Course 4 on The Substringular Vs. the Globally Distinguishable, Session 5, Part two

The whole "point particles" including the empty space of the points' homogeneous fields are really point particle neighborhoods. Do you remember me mentioning the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the Heisenburg Exclusion Principle? The Heisenburg Exclusion Principle basically says that you can not find or determine exactly where a very small particle is at and what it is giving off at the same time. The Pauli Exclusion Principle is basically that two things can not occupy the same spot at the same time. (Adjacent electrons must bear antisymmetric spin.) A typical point particle as its core density iterates and reiterates within a volume of roughly two to 10,000 times the volume that it would have if it was completely condensed. It does this iterating throughout the translation of its point particle neighborhood radii (consistently during iteration and Ultimon Flow). The point particle, as a density, is condensed oscillation. Condensed oscillation will tend to "want" to spring out when it is given a chance, just like a spring will spring out when it is released. The world-tube governs the Ward Conditions of the strings. Strings are the basis of the organization of point particles. So, a point particle will "want" to reiterate primarily in the relative center state of its neighborhood after the point iterates one radii of its neighborhood over the course of the substringular activity that involves the given point particle (when one considers 'the flow from iteration time to Ultimon time to be a blend of metrical activity). This is because the cross-section of the given world-tube will be holomorphically translated after during such a travel. Yet, this would leave one to 9,999 dispersed areas of locant that are not covered! No problem. After the point travels the given distance, it will iterate at all two to 10,000 states due to the majorization of the plane that the point traverses. This is because the point particle, in traveling the radii of its neighborhood, will curve in four directions besides its "0" dimensional framework. This is because the given point particle neighborhood is treated here as one of the simplest "three-dimensional" phenomenon that is curving in space to where it behaves like a "four-dimensional" phenomenon as the Ultimon cycles. Each added dimension adds a power of ten to the areas equivalently swept, since the world-tube bears 10 directly associated dimensions (explained later) and 10^0 = 1, 10^1 = 10, 10^2=100, 10^3=1,000, and 10^4=10,000. So, the point is at 10,000 different locations many times over the cycle of one iteration. (It is at one spot at a time, yet this is at a lower level of discrete. This is under regular Einsteinian motion. 1/10,000 of the condensed oscillation centered in a point particle neighborhood pulses radially after each iteration of the substringular.

Glossary for Courses 1 and 2

1) The Heisenburg Principle -- The condition that you can't detect where an electron is and what it is giving off at the same time.

2) The Pauli Exclusion Principle -- The fact that adjacent electrons of the same atom spin antisymmetrically.

3) Angular Momentum -- The transversel directoral wave-tug of a physical phenomenon.

4) Spin-Orbital-Momentum -- The radial directoral wave-tug of a physical phenomenon.

5) Electric Field -- The wave field due to the angular momentum of a physical phenomenon that is electrical or smaller.

6) Magnetic Field -- The wave field due to the spin-orbital-momentum of a physical phenomena that is electrical or smaller.

7) Cassimer Invariance -- The fact that all physical phenomena is recycled.

8) The Space-Hole -- The condition in-between sub-stringular iterations when homotopy is temporarily broken and re-sewn.

9) Homotopy -- the condition of all mini-string being interconnected in one fashion or another throughout the ultimon.

Test 2 of Course 1

1)Draw two hooks that catch each other. If these hooks are the same size and are tugging with the same force and in the supplemental direction, what could cause these to be released?

2)Explain how different directions of wave-tug may be advantageous or disadvantageous to pulling in the other hook.

3)Pretend that nearness is according to a polar diagram. When are two points near for sure, when are these very near, and when are these far?

4)Pictorially contrast two near particles with two far ones. State an example in which all four of these particles are relatively near as compared to that. State another example of two particles that are much more localized than any of those particles.

5)Name the ”neighborhood” of your writing utensil.

6)What are the local neighborhoods of a molecule of the air that you are breathing?

7)Relate the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the Heisenburg Principle to an electron. Name a flaw in this argument.

8)Relate the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the Heisenburg Principle to a string. What must be so in order to validate any conclusions as to how these principles function. (Use your imagination. I need to see effort and a development of truth based on our lessons.

Dimensionality

Space has both a Minkowski and a Hilbert dimensional basis. Minkowski space is flat space. Flat space may only exist in up to 26 spacial dimensions. Hilbert space is space that bears a non-holographic volume. Hilbert space, from the perspective of one universe, may have anywhere from three to thirty-two spacial dimensions. All space, whether it is Minkowski based or Hilbert based, also has the dimension of time. Whether or not a particular differentiation is time-based or not time-based will effect whether or not the given differentiation involves a Fourier Transform or a Laplacian Transform. So, both Minkowski space and Hilbert space, given the condition of particular description, may be described occasionally with Fourier Transforms and occasionally with Laplacian Transforms. The space of each of the three sets of parallel universes, taken individually, involves thirty-two spacial dimensions plus time. Time is a measurement of relative motion of the associated spacial dimensions. So, all physicality involves ninety-six spacial dimensions plus time. The thirty-two spacial dimensions of one set of parallel universes involves a multiplicitly intertwined integration of a twenty-six dimensional flat sheet of space-time that is made intertwined by the kinematics of covariant homotopy, along with the six associated Njenhuis spacial dimensions that are a counterpart of the six Real Reimmanian spacial dimiensions of the D-fields of the orbifold eigensets that individually comprise electrons. This integration of a multiplicit intertwined sheet of twenty-six Real Reimmanian spacial dimensions with six Chern-Simmons based Njenhuis spacial dimensions that act as an equal and opposite Cassimer-based reaction to the Real Reimmanian spacial dimensions of an electron forms an over-riding Hilbert space that bears a homotopy that is too Lagrangian per group metric to be flat-based, since it is thirty-two dimensional spacially plus time, in the bases of volume perceived is not flat then. Since the bases of spacial dimensionality when considering the multiplicit multi-twined Mobiaty along with the field integration of the electromotive force, whose gravitational settling provides for the strong force of gluons, is not a mere translation of a steady or even a torsional integration of flat space, the bases of space-time volume must be a maximal Hilbert space per set of parallel universes, and thus, space-time is not simply based on a holographic perception of exterialized volume. The Chan-Patton rules governing the field networking of electrons to obey the Pauli Exclusion principal of adjacent electrons spinning antisymmetricly causes space to be defined as a hyperextended sheet that is torsioned in a Gliossi manner with six added dimensions in a virtual Mobiaty that envelopes to incorporate a second side and a second edge after the Laplacian "procurement" of each orbifold spacial distribution. That is why the E(8)XE(8) strings that hold orbifolds and orbifold eigensets together must also, and can only, spin antisymetrically, relative to adjacent E(8)XE(8) strings that are surrounding the same respective orbifolds and orbifold eigensets.