Since the 1/2th to 1/10,000th of the point particle acts as the whole point particle in terms of the source of pulse, in a way, the point particle is going against the Pauli Exclusion Principle. The point is also below the stringular level. You can extrapolate information about the points, yet, one may not directly use individual points by a physical means. This is because the iterations of the point defy the discrete level of factor by a factor of 2 to 10,ooo as implied before. So, you may not determine where point density is and what it is giving off directly under instantaneous circumstances, as implied by the Heisenberg Exclusion Principle.
If you were a spring with many springs attached, and you were pushed together tightly, what would you do if you were let go? You would spring in many directions. Likewise, if you were condensed oscillation, and you were basically at many spots at the same time (yet not at the precise same metric), what would you do if you were given plenty of room to move, and were pushed along a tapered curve over a relatively great distance? You would spring out in many directions -- many per each attached spring. what if something got the "ball" rolling, and you spring as given among many of such springs? Such a motion would not only propel your attached springs, yet it would also work to spring and propel the other springs if these could interact in the proper geometric order. What this is eventually getting at is the origin of my explanation of the light-cone-gauge. I will conclude with my point that I am trying to get at with this session later. I hope that you are putting the pieces of the puzzle together.
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment