Course 4 On The Globally Distinguishable Vs. The Substringular, Session 2, Part 2

Picture this (no smoke!). You are on a globe. The whole scenario is stuff in a spot. So, you and the globe bear an impetus in a given direction or angle (angular momentum). Now, if the globe were to spin, or spin differently, you would tend to want to fly off of the globe in a straight line that is perpendicular to the globe at the point that you were on it. Any straight line that touches one point of a surface bears a sense of 90 degrees. Such spinning involves spin-orbital interaction. As you can see, spinning of a sphere throws off points along the surface of that sphere as lines that are perpendicular to that sphere. When you consider an electron's wobble and transversel/radial motion, you can see why an electron's magnetic field isn't totally jointal. Like you probably already know, totally discrete or totally globally jointedness does not allow for symmetric differentiation. So, if an electron's homotopic field bears such aberrations unexplainably, then perhaps your angle of measurement, your angle of approach, or the fields involved with producing the angles of measurement or angles of approach are wrong. If there are no aberrations in the fields of your angle of measurements and in your approach, and the J of your detection produces a nullification of residue in the way of imaging the correlative fields of the given electron, and if the electron's relative position at a given metric is extrapolated with an expectation value of basically 1 in terms of identifying the proper local neighborhood of where the electron is at, then the electron may be properly identified. The fields of that electron must then bear a smooth surface differentiation when considering the transfer of J through whatever medium that the electron is in, as long as that environment does not destroy the electron or form direct homotopic aberrations during the metric in which the given local neighborhood is detected.