Course 4 on The Substringular Vs. the Globally Distinguishable, Session 1, Part 2

The shape and size and energy of the electron may, however, be pinpointed within a region by algebraic probabilities that corner the Ward kinemation of an electron within a specific locant, like a synchronized set of puzzles that define the only way that a condition may be applied. This is not even delving into the abilities of discrete that may be surfaced by the lower size and more varied degree of flexibility afforded by dealing with vvibrations that exist at a lower level than those that scientists are currently able or willing to deal with. If one were to measure, through current probability, the approximate shape of an electron, and came up with a ten-dimensional basis to its kinematic differentiation, then we are starting to get is business. Look at the 3 prime axes in terms of the electron's three main dimensions. View the electron as a motion that covers as small of a region of locus as you may detect without adulterating the primal Ward conditions that define those boundaries that allow the electron to be what it is. Mark any field gaps in homotopy in terms of spin-orbital differentiation. These work to define an error in how the detection reads the flow of radial to transversel kinematism of the electron, or it draws an aberration in how the electron's field is changing. If there is proof that the field of the electron is changing due to a discretely applied outward singularity, then this may be marked off from being an error of detection. Next, how to treat errors in detection.