Course 3 on Lorentz-Four-Contractions, Session 15, Part 1

Think of an object. It contains strings that are distributed throughout all 32 dimensions of the set of parallel universes that it is in. Some of the said strings cut through all 32of the dimensions. Some of the strings only exist in one dimension. The strings of the given object are thus arbitrarily assorted within any parameters which include directorals that fall in the dimensional fields that exist within the Continuum at that general region. Say, for instance, that the object given is not moving in an exact given dimension that we would call "forward holomorphically", "side-to-side", or "up-and-down." Let us think that a tangential motion relative to the earth was considered as a: Directoral axis (thickness of earth) based on a three-dimensional axes that included an earth associated axis that is tangential to it; associated, while the axis going "up-and-down" would arbitrarily be the k directoral. Let us arbitrarily define the dimensional situation and placement of the strings of the object based on the given directorals and the other 29 dimensions that one may define based upon the proscribed assortment of the directoral indices that we have shown. Make the axial size down to the discrete level of the width of a string, and the length of the axes as to include the field that defines the scope of the total range of motion of the given object. The object moves within its Ward boundaries. It does not move parallel to any of the given axes. It moves, say, in an arch that falls within the fields of each of the dimensions of the axes that define the region where the object moves. Since the object is always changing direction, it is constantly accelerating. I will conclude this session so as to relieve your suspense at a later time. I'm hoping that you can picture what I am describing in detail. If you can see a concept in your mind, the solution is clear.
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach.

Course 3 on Lorentz-Four-Contractions, Session 12, Part

Everything influences certain particular shape and behavioral characteristics of every string, yet the overall general Ward and eigenaction conditions that define the world-sheet operand and homotopic residue of a string may maintain exact discrete topology, sway, and angular momentum without considering each alteration in the Continuum, yet alone all the "zooming around" of sort of nearby strings. However, after many "close encounters", differentiating strings will eventually become interdependent with its "commonly" nearby constituents. The more a set of strings co-differentiate, the more of a chance that these will soon be interdependent upon each other. Strings do not act exactly like yarn or a pencil. (No Doy!) They vibrate! Yes, these are a basic form of energy, and vibration is energy, yet remember what I said of the necessity of point particles?! This is stuff that's smaller! The smaller you get, the more vibration that it has for its size. This is because the smaller stuff gets, the more it gets shoved around. So, when you detect a superstring, you are actually detecting a neighborhood of substringular iterations of the same phenomenon. If this wasn't true, the string wouldn't be able to vibrate, or thus exist. So, since the strings vibrate, we would have to be detecting such a neighborhood. What I mean by a "neighborhood" is the local region where such a given superstring is differentiating over a relatively small amount of instantons. Each "instanton" is the course of what I term as one iteration. Go ahead and assimilate what I have just written, and I will soon instruct you further in a better understanding of how and why Lorentz-Four-Contractions work.