Some Stuff As To F-Fields

Let us consider the workings of an f-field.  It is here, in this particular case, to be of a superstring of discrete energy permittivity, -- that is proximal local to a given arbitrary mass-bearing orbifold eigenset, that is Gliosis to the topological stratum of  one given arbitrary  nucleon of an atom.  As I have stated before, an f-field is here to consist of a phenomenon, that is here to exist in a minimum of four spatial dimensions, plus time, -- over the course of any correlative respective Fourier Transformation, that is here to be pertinent to any directly associated situation, in which one is here to be considering the workings of such a said orbifold eigenset, that is here to be kinematic in its eminent relationship as acting as an f-field.  Aside from the three spatial dimensions that we, as people, are most familiar with, -- the fourth added spatial dimension, may here be described of as behaving as an elongated spatial parameter, that is here to be of a spiraling nature -- at any one given arbitrary respective Laplacian-related Ward-Cauchy-based condition, in which such a just inferred added fourth spatial dimension, is here to be considered.  This said elongated spatial dimension, that is here to behave in a spiral-like manner -- is to bear a helix-related nature, that is to here to bear a greater scalar amplitude of a torsion-like characteristic -- as the energy per time that is here to be applied to such a said f-field, is to increase in its directly corresponding scalar amplitude.Sam Roach.

Magnetism And The Right-Hand-Rule

As a beam of electromagnetic energy, is here to be propagating through time and space -- the correlative respective magnetic field, that is of such a case, is here to be wrapped around the correlative respective electric field, as is to be considered as by what is here to be called, -- the "right-hand-rule."
Let us here to be considering such a said propagation of electromagnetic energy -- to be traveling through the medium of a vacuum.  Next, let us consider that such a said beam of electromagnetic energy, is here to be set at one given arbitrary wavelength.  Such a said wavelength, is here to be the scalar distance -- that is here to be directly associated with one compete cycle of the fluctuation of the directly corresponding respective electric field.  Let us next say that the forward motion of the propagation of the correlative electric field, is here to be considered as the relative forward-holomorphic direction.  So, as a beam of such a tense of electromagnetic energy -- that is to here to be propagated by the distance of the so-eluded-to wavelength, that is of the so-eluded-to light-like phenomenology -- then, the directly corresponding magnetic field, that is here to be wrapped around the directly corresponding electric field, is to spiral in a clockwise manner -- around the respective electric field by one complete increment of cycle.  The larger that the wavelength of the light-like phenomenon is to be, the less tightly that the helicity or the spiraling will be, of the Laplacian-related torsion of such a said case -- when this is in consideration of the respective magnetic field to be wrapping around the respective electric field.  Consequently -- the smaller that the wavelength of the light-like phenomenon is to be, the more tightly that the helicity or spiraling will be, of the Laplacian-related torsion of such a case -- when this is in consideration of the respective magnetic field to be wrapping around the respective electric field.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Relative Frequency Of Gravitational Waves

As an initial aside, gravity waves tend to bear a wavelength of anywhere between 5*10^(-22) meters to 4*10^(-18) meters. The higher that the relative frequency is to be, as to the holonomic translation -- of what are to here be the presence of two given arbitrary sets of respective comparitive gravitational waves, to where each individually taken set is here to bear its component waves as to be working together here in unison -- the higher that the scalar amplitude will tend to be, as to the directly corresponding helicity of the directly corresponding phenomenology of the said set of gravitational waves, that are here to bear the so-stated higher frequency.  When in terms of a comparison between two different distinct gravitational waves, as is here to be a given example for reference, for instance, say if one given arbitrary gravitational wave were to here to have a higher frequency than another given arbitrary gravitational wave that is to as well to be considered here, -- then, the gravitational wave that is of a higher frequency, will tend to have a higher number of Fourier-related spiral-shaped formations over an extrapolated trajectory, than the other gravitational wave will tend to have, due to that Schwinger-related torsioning, that is here on account of an increased energy that is to applied to the said wave, in so as to work to cause the so-stated increase in frequency that is then to tend to create a higher degree of helicity -- when this respective situation is to be taken along the topological stratum of the actual physical entities, that are of the two said comparative gravitational waves.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.