Additional Saving Grace

 One additional saving grace about my physics blog, is that, if people all over the world, are going to be so busy, discussing the issues that I have presented and detailed in my writings, they may be potentially less susceptible, to wanting to hurt each other in a war!! IDEAS UNIFY!!!

Remember me saying something to the effect of that, dialogue, to me, means, I’m wrong you’re wrong, I’m right you’re right, let’s talk? I’ve used this expression in the past, to indicate that I have enough humility, to admit that neither myself nor anyone else is perfect! Now take this attitude to a global scale — cooperation! I know that this is not actually even similar to the topics of my particular blog genre, yet, if people actually tried to cooperate, and consider the needs of others more than their own, that this would help to make our world much safer! 

Perhaps society, at large, should try to foster a metaphorical sense of cooperation, between individual needs and group needs, just as Chern-Simons Invariants work to facilitate a common ground, between the needs of discrete quanta of energy, when in conjunction with the needs of the eminently corroborative Hamiltonian Topological Manifold ( the system of energy), that such a quantum of discrete energy here, is to be participating in!

When a team of mass-bearing super strings of discrete energy permittivity is to be spatially transmitted, particularly when the implicit spatial transference is Noether, the direction that the team of strings is inclined to travel in, takes precedence over the direction that the individually taken strings is inclined to travel in. As a physical compensation, there is then to be a pseudo warp-like effect, applied upon the respective super strings, in so as to accommodate the motion of the team of implicit discrete energy, in so as to physically rectify this situation. Such an earlier mentioned pseudo warp, is in the form of what I happen to term of, as being partition-based discrepancies. Such an implicit rectification is to remain consistent, until either the speed and or the direction of the stated team of strings, is to viably change. When the team of implicit discrete energy, is to change in either its speed and or direction, this general action will tend to cause a recalibration, in the piecewise continuous intricacies and or in the morphology of the stated pseudo warping, helping to generate unitary heuristic-gauge magnetic potential. When such potential is here to be coupled, with its eminently corroborative angular frequency, this tends to facilitate the formation of charge. Whereas; When such potential is here to be coupled with the eminently corroborative angular momentum, this, instead, tends to facilitate the formation of entropy. 

When the piecewise continuous intricacies, of the pseudo warping of the composite super strings, that are of an eminently corroborative team of mass-bearing strings, is to be recalibrated, this general physical operation, when such a general attribute, of the implicit unitary heuristic-gauge magnetic potential, is here to physically couple, with the eminently corroborative angular frequency, (this) will often tend to work to facilitate the formation, of the electric field, of the implicitly formed physical charge. Furthermore; When the morphology, of the pseudo warping of the composite super strings, that are of an eminently corroborative team of mass-bearing strings, is to be recalibrated, this general physical operation, when such a general attribute, of the implicit unitary heuristic-gauge magnetic potential, is here to physically couple, with the eminently corroborative angular frequency, (this) will often tend to work to facilitate the formation, of the magnetic field, of the implicitly formed physical charge.

The hemitian interaction, between the multiplicity of unitary heuristic-gauge magnetic potential, With the eminently corroborative angular frequency, will generally tend to be, of a relatively harmonic nature, since it will generally tend to be, of a relatively ordered nature. Whereas; The hermitian interaction, between the multiplicity of unitary heuristic-gauge magnetic potential, With the eminently corroborative angular momentum, will generally tend to be, of a relatively anharmonic nature, since it will generally tend to be, of a relatively unordered nature.  

Reductional Electrodynamics — A Start

 Whenever a Ward-Cauchy-Based Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, is to change in either its direction and/or speed, relative to the motion and presence of electromagnetic energy, it will thereupon spontaneously tend to consequently occur, that such a stated Ward-Cauchy-Based Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, will resultantly have a heightened expectation value, of generating one or more discrete increments, of unitary heuristic-gauge magnetic potential. Such unitary heuristic-gauge magnetic potential, is eminently tantamount, to the corroborative effect, of what I happen to call, the “i*PI(Del)Action.” Such a generation of unitary heuristic-gauge magnetic potential eigenstates, is thereby to spontaneously occur, alongside with the spontaneous occurrence of the re-calibration of Chern-Simons Invariants. Again, as I have mentioned before; Chern-Simons Invariants are only invariant, when both the speed and the direction, of the eminently associated Hamiltonian Topological Manifold in question, is to be maintained in consistency, relative to the motion and presence, of electromagnetic energy. So; When a given arbitrary Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, is to either alter, in its speed and/or in its direction of motion, when this here is to be considered, relative to both the motion and the presence of electromagnetic energy — namely, relative to the motion and presence of light — , that it will thereupon consequently tend to spontaneously occur, that the Chern-Simons Invariants will spontaneously alter to a different venue, or, in other words, the Chern-Simons Invariants will therefore spontaneously become re-calibrated. 

When the general physical characteristics, of the local homotopic conditions, of discrete energy quanta, are brought into perturbation or alteration, at a reductional Ward-Cauchy level, that it will thereby spontaneously tend to consequently occur, that such a general case scenario, will tend to be highly likely, to result in generating, unitary heuristic-gauge magnetic potential. When such unitary heuristic-gauge magnetic potential, is to physically couple with a viable tense of angular frequency, in a hermitian manner, that the spontaneous result, is physical charge. 

Homotopy basically amounts, to contortion-based symmetry. Contortion is eminently associated with the corroborative bending of a directly associated tense of phenomenology. And symmetry is the general condition, in which stuff on one side of a mathematically centralized configured line, is mappable in likeness to the stuff on the other side of such a self same mathematically centralized configured line, if one were to be in such a metaphorical position, in so as to be able to fold the eminently corroborative phenomenon that bears “symmetry,” at the stated configured line of implicit denotation, inward upon itself. If one could theoretically fold something at its center, and the stuff on one side of the folding matches the stuff on the other other side of the folding, then, the implicit “something” of phenomenology that was folded, is said to be symmetrical. So; To get back to what I was saying, when something that is constantly recursively changing its shape, is to bear a covariant tense of respectively recursive symmetry, in a manner, to where the modus operandi of the bending-of-topological-contour-related symmetry is to all of the sudden be changed, due to the physical condition, that the eminently corroborative Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, is to be changing in its speed and or changing in its direction of motion, relative to the motion of light, then, this general process, will thereupon often spontaneously tend to facilitate, a single direction spontaneous wave tug upon the time related component of the eminently corroborative space time fabric at hand, in the general manner of a modulae non degenerative puncture, in its re-established forward holomorphic direction, of which, at that small of a level, will thereupon tend to form unitary heuristic-gauged magnetic potential. 

What I term of, here, as being, the “modulae non degenerative puncture,” is a puncturing of the morphology of the implicit topological manifold, yet, Not a puncturing of its eminently associated tense of elastic/fractal modulae. 

When the heuristic-gauge magnetic potential, is to eminently couple with a tense of angular frequency, in a hermitian manner, it will often tend to form charge. Whereas; When the heuristic-gauge magnetic potential, is to eminently couple with a tense of angular momentum, in a hermitian manner, it will often tend to form entropy.

The faster that a Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold is to be spatially transmitted, the Greater that its eminently associated Lorentz-Four-Contraction will tend to be, to where its spontaneously resultant i*PI(Del)Action will tend to have a relative enhancement in its scalar magnitude/amplitude, to where its consequentially resultant probable charge potential will thereby tend to be amplified. 

A Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, that is to recursively maintain both a constant tense of radial momentum, And, a constant tense of transversal momentum, over a viably proscribed duration of time, will consequently tend to spontaneously manifest a steady state i*PI(Del)Action, to where the resulting expression of its effectual potential magnetism, will thereby tend to not be spontaneously perturbative. 

The more compact the Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, the more resolute the Fourier-Related-Progression. The more hermitian that the Lagrangian-Based flow of a Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold is to be, the more succinct the Fourier-Related-Progression. 

Metaphorical Thoughts

 Let’s say, that one were to figuratively liken, the multiplicity of space time fabric, to the multiplicity of language. One could then metaphorically consider: the nouns to be likened to the Hamiltonians, the verbs to be likened to the Lagrangians, the adjectives to be somewhat likened to the metric gauge, the adverbs to be somewhat likened to the heuristic gauge, and the prepositions to be likened to the re-calibration of Chern-Simons singularities. 

I will certainly continue with the suspense Later! ‘Till then, I hope you are having a good day, and make today the most phenomenal day of your life! Sincerely, Sam Roach (1989).

String theory is the metaphorical language of energy, and Fourier-Analysis is the metaphorical language of waves. Energy is both wave and particle based. This gives one an idea, as to Why Fourier-Analysis is so crucial to string theory. 

Entropy is energy of heat transfer per Kelvin Mole. Entropy that is conveyed in a De Rham manner, often tends to bear a benevolent physical nature. Whereas; Entropy that is conveyed in a Dolbeault manner, often tends to bear a malignant physical nature. Although at least some entropy is necessary, for various changes in physical states to occur, it is my theory, that even though it goes against the second “law” of thermodynamics, that it is possible, to be able to viably decrease, at least some of the scalar effectual presence, of the multiplicity, of malignant entropy. 

Harmonically propagated sound, often tends to work to bear a tense of consonant vibration. Whereas; Anharmonic associated propagated sound, often tends to bear a tense of dissonant vibration. Consonant vibration may often tend to facilitate, the generation of resonant pulsation. Whereas; Dissonant vibration may often tend to facilitate, the degeneration of resonant pulsation. One may think of resonant pulsation, in a way, as being the physical manifestation, of the inverse of isotropically stable thought frequency. 

Whenever a physical phenomenon is kinematically propagated and/or transferred through space (over a duration of time), this will inevitably work to involve a system of waves. Therefore; Whenever a time-related physical occurrence is to take place, such an occurrence will inextricably tend to work to involve, at least some sort of Fourier-Related System, since waves are thus involved. 

When one is dealing with a system of waves, that is taking place in Less than one discrete increment of time, one may, perchance, call this, a Laplacian-Related "activity," as taken from within the scope of a tightly-knit Fourier-Related situation. Remember: Fourier-Related Analysis, is the language of waves. 

Consider the following: Take a theoretical snapshot of a wave-based delineation, of a given arbitrary proscribed system of waves, over the course of one Planck-Related instance. Next; Take a theoretical snapshot of the wave-based delineation of the same system of waves, yet over the ensuing course of the proceeding Planck-Related instance. Keep going as such. Now; recursively display the respective sequential series, of the integrative set, that is of such theoretical snapshots, in the proscribed order that these were taken. This will give one a viable indication, as to the wave-related progression, if taken in the insinuated piecewise continuous manner eluded to, to where, this general procedure, will work to facilitate a knowledge, as to the eminently corroborative, given arbitrary Fourier-Related-Progression, that is here to be, of such a particular genus of a case scenario. When given in lieu of its Lagrangian-Based Drive, this will tend to work to refine, such a facilitation, as to understanding how such a wave-based system enfolds, to where the metaphorical artifacts of knowing how such a system is to proceed, is thus enhanced. 

Here is a procedural hint, in so as to facilitate being able to determine Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-actions, in general, for the arbitrary genus of case scenario, involving co-tangent bundle R3.:

1) Consider the trace depiction of the motion, that is of the eminently corroborative Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, being mathematically worked with here, as taken at a snapshot of its delineation, in terms of the mathematical physics description, that is here to describe the way that the minimal surface, that is implicitly mentioned here is to be mapped out — as a generic pattern of mappable oscillation.

2) Consider the given arbitrary, eminently involved mathematical physics expression, of kinematically propagational-related import, that is most relevant to the suitings, of such a respectively proscribed case scenario. 

3) Take both the first order integral, and, the second order integral, of the just mentioned expression of kinematically propagational-related import, in respect to a durational parameter of variable. 

4) Take the last three implicit values of kinematically propagational-related import, and add them together. 

5) Consider the just mentioned summation, as one whole group. 

6) Consider the directional attributes, that the gauge-action being considered, is inextricably to be taken in. 

7) Multiply the initial implicitly mentioned vector trace, by the latter mentioned grouping. 

8) Next; Multiply this whole thing, by 2/3 — since the reductional minimal surface is heuristically in two spatial dimensions, and the gauge-action is of co-tangent bundle R3. 

9) Divide the entirety of what has been described so far, at this point, by 4*PI. 

10) The result of this math, in many general cases, will facilitate an endeavor, to determine the vector value, of certain proscribed cases, in terms of finding the desirable Chern-Simons Invariant Gauge-Action, of what this is to be eminently corroborative to happen to be in the process of finding out, in lieu of acting to better understand that metaphorical grip hold of wave tug, whose alterations spew into charge and or entropy. 

In a metaphorical nutshell: The i*PI(Del)Action, amounts to being — Unitary heuristic-gauged magnetic potential. 

Whenever individually taken Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-actions are re-calibrated, unitary heuristic-gauged magnetic potential is generated. When such a respectively indicated potential is to couple with a discrete quantum of angular frequency, in at least a fairly hermitian manner, this will generally tend to form charge.,Yet; If, instead, such a respectively indicated potential is to couple with a discrete quantum of angular momentum, again, in at least a fairly hermitian manner, this will generally tend to form entropy. 

Things

 To explain something I’ve said before, in kind of an oversimplified manner, as put in layman terms, when motion in static equilibrium, interacts with thought frequency, as taken over a duration of time, this will often tend to form, what people would generally term of, as being “things.” By “things,” I mean Mass-Bearing Stuff! Furthermore; By the way, such an interaction, in order to be able to do this, let alone to be able to do this effectively, needs to be done, in a hermitian manner. 

When a phenomenon interacts with inverse thought, in a hermitian manner, this may often tend to work to form a tense, of a metric-gauge incursion. When a phenomenon interacts with inverse frequency, in a hermitian manner, this may often tend to work to form a tense, of a heuristic-gauge incursion. Furthermore; When a phenomenon interacts with inverse thought frequency, in a hermitian manner, this may often tend to work to form a tense, of a heuristic-metric-gauge incursion. So: When motion in static equilibrium, is imparted upon, via a direct coupling, in a hermitian manner, via a heuristic-metric-gauge incursion, as taken over a duration of time, this may often tend to work to  form, what people would generally term of, as being "things." -- in terms of mass-bearing stuff. To give one a clue, as to what I mean by "hermitian," in this particular case, is a flush, naturally smooth interaction, with no spurious nor superfluous motion. 

The incursion of inverse-thought-related gauge-action, may often tend to spontaneously result, in a pressure-associated Lagrangian-Based Drive. Furthermore; The incursion of inverse-frequency-related gauge-action, may often tend to spontaneously result, in a puncture-associated Lagrangian-Based Drive.

When a Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, is to become spontaneously charged physically, it will often tend to acquire, an attribute of heuristic-gauge eminence. 

When a recalibrated Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action, is harmonically incurred, it will generally tend to be a particular type of a case scenario, in which the eminently corroborative i*PI(Del) Action, will hereupon spontaneously couple, with the eminently associated, covariant proximal local, co-tangentially flowing kinetic frequency, in so as to form a tense of electrodynamic frequency, of which is tantamount, to physical charge. 

Electrodynamic frequency, is a particular case of physical frequency, in which there is here to be an equipoise, between its expressive magnetic field, &, its expressive electric field, — between its discrete energy impedance, &, its discrete energy permittivity, —Or; — between its physical Ward-Cauchy-Related restraint, &, its physical Ward-Cauchy-Related inhibition. 

What I meant here, by kinetic frequency, in this particular given case scenario, is the angular flow of incoming Lagrangian-Based motion, that is here to directly interact, with the respective Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action. This is here to occur this way, when the stated respective gauge-action is re-calibrated. Such gauge-actions, of this particular insinuated genre of phenomenology, are said to be re-calibrated, when the speed and/or the direction, of the eminently corroborative Hamiltonian Topological Manifold of such a given arbitrary case scenario, is to viably alter at all, relative to the motion and existence of electromagnetic energy. 

The proximal local spontaneous operational presence of the i*PI(Del)Action, is always going to tend to occur, when the eminently corroborative Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-actions, are also, as well, to be in the general process of being spontaneously re-calibrated, and vice versa. 

A Mass-Bearing perturbation into kinetic energy, often tends to be eminently associated, with what may be a particular genus, of a Rayleigh-Based Scattering. Whereas; A Kinetic-Bearing perturbation back into mass, often tends to be eminently associated, with what may be a particular genus, of a Riemann-Based Scattering. A Rayleigh-Based Scattering, often tends to be associated, with a Cevita type of action. Whereas; A Riemann-Based Scattering, often tends to be associated, with a Wess-Zumino type of action.

 The direction of motion, that a given arbitrary Ward-Cauchy-Related Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, is to have a probable tendency of being propagated through, is generally considered, to be the relative holomorphic direction, of the particular respective given arbitrary case scenario insinuated of here. Equal and opposite to the direction of motion of a given arbitrary Ward-Cauchy-Related Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, is the anti-holomorphic direction. The holomorphic direction, is in the relative i direction. The equal and opposite direction to the holomorphic direction, or, in other words, the anti-holomorphic direction, is in the relative -i direction.  The multiplicity of the Lagrangian, is the multiplicity of the motion of energy. The multiplicity of the Hamiltonian, is the multiplicity of the thing of energy. The Hamiltonian, is the system of a given arbitrary case scenario of energy. Its respective Lagrangian, is the respective motion, of which the eminently corroborative Hamiltonian, is to undergo, as it is transmitted through time and space. When one is to couple the thing of energy, with the direction that such a Hamiltonian is to be traveling through, one will spontaneously resultantly get the motion of that Hamiltonian of energy. Whereas; When one is to couple the motion of energy, with the reversal of the direction that the energy is to be propagated through, one is to get the thing of energy. 

I WILL CONTINUE WITH THE SUSPENSE LATER! IF YOU WANT ME TO EXPLAIN SOMETHING I HAVE CONVEYED, IN MORE UNDERSTANTABLE WORDS, JUST ASK!!!

SAMUEL DAVID ROACH, PINCKNEY MICHIGAN, U OF M, EMU, AND WCC!!!

THIS BLOG, IN PART, IS IN COMMEMORATION TO THE FAMILY OF MANKIND, INCLUDING MY YOUNGEST RELATIVE, KINSLEY! 

Phenomenology, in the general multiplicity of description-related venue, is space-time fabric. Metric-Gauge-Based gauge-action, tends to bear a metaphorical grip of wave-tug, that is physically applied, upon the space-based component of space-time fabric. Whereas; Heuristic-Gauge-Based gauge-action, tends to bear a metaphorical grip of wave-tug, that is physically applied, upon the time component of space-time fabric. 

Unitary pulse coupled with frequency, tends to often facilitate the spontaneous formation of space. Whereas; Unitary pulse coupled with thought, tends to often facilitate the spontaneous formation of time. 

Thought may be thought of, as inverted space. Frequency may be thought of, as inverted time. Space-time-fabric may be thought of, as being the inversion of thought frequency. 

The Fourier-Related-Progression may be thought of, as being the dividend, between a tense of space-time-fabric and energy. Whereas; The Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode may be thought of, as being the dividend, between a tense of energy and space time fabric. The more inextricably “rooted” that the space time fabric is to be, of which a tense of steady state energy is to be projected through, the stronger that its eminently corroborative Majorana-Weyl Invariant-Mode will often tend to be, since it will consequently tend to spontaneously work to bear, a deeper Kahler-Based Quotient. Furthermore; The more profound that the energy is to be, that is to be projected through a particular medium of space and time, the deeper that its eminently corroborative Fourier-Related-Progression, will consequently tend to spontaneously work to bear, since energy inevitably involves waves, to where a profound tense of wave-like motion, will inextricably tend to involve a profound recursively mappable delineation of wave-based projected trajectory. The Higgs Action “Agenda,”: Couple Space-Time Disturbance with Space Time Fabric, as taken over a duration of time, in so as to facilitate the generation of mass-bearing phenomenology. 

Couple the Lagrangian of space time energy with inverse frequency, to form strings. Stringular manifestation over time, is the motion of such strings. 

Zero-Point Energy — Why It Must Be As It Is

 Mini Stringular segmentation must exist, because the fields that guide and direct super strings, must be at least some kind of an actual phenomenon. Mini String-Related Segmentation (Mini Stringular segmentation), that is not coalesced from within the Neumann bounds of super Stringular fabric, primarily functions, as a gauged phenomenon, that facilitates the prompting, of the motion of discrete energy. Now; Consider a strand-like increment, of such mini Stringular segmentation. Take the phenomenology, of the span of its cross sectional physical attribute. The kinematic interplay of this respective phenomenology, is such a topological substrate, in which THIS is eminently tantamount, to the phenomenology of Zero-Point Energy. Now think, for a moment; The span of the cross section of a strand, does not go discreetly into the span, of the volume of a sphere-like entity. The sphere-like entity, here, is implicitly what I consider to be, the phenomenology, of first order point particles. (As to what I am referring to, in this particular case.) Next; First order point particles, as I describe them, are Not Exactly of the same condensity. So; Neither Zero Point energy Nor First order point particles, are energy again, taken at a lower level. Next; The segmentation working to bind the immense number of first order point particles, that come together, to form a super string, ( of which is tantamount, to the smallest increment of discrete energy), is Also Not consistently, of the same scalar amplitude of span-like sub-metric, to where, the stuff that’s smaller than super strings, is Not energy again, taken a lower level, yet, since it is actually stuff, and not just empty vacuum, as most scientists happen to seem to perceive of it now, that this can bring one to a viable conclusion, that it is very probable, that one can conceivably convert zero point energy into actual energy, and vice versa! Yet; The total amount of zero point energy potential — the net scalar magnitude, as to how much mini Stringular cross-sectional phenomena, is to be latently proximal local, to the phenomenology of one discrete super string of discrete energy, will always tend to be of the same scalar magnitude, to where the Planck Phenomenon, is the smallest thing, that we would normally conceive of as being energy — because everything that we call energy, consists of integer amounts of Planck-Related energy. (Whole Number Amounts , as compared to fractional amounts.) 

Here's something, that I may have touched upon in the past, yet, I just thought that I would reiterate this particular concept. Take the frequency of a neutrino. Square this. Next -- multiply this, by the mass of the lightest neutrino. Now; Take this whole thing. Cube this. This will give one a scalar magnitude, that is here to be tantamount, to the amount of a Joule Second, that works to comprise the general phenomenology, of what may be termed of, as being "zero-point-energy." Next; To see how much smaller, that zero-point-energy is to be, when in viable comparison, to the phenomenology of a Planck Phenomenon, -- Divide the particular respective amount, of a Joule Second, that works to comprise the general phenomenology, of zero-point-energy, by the Planck Constant. (The Planck Constant, if I recall right, is about 6.6260400735*10^(-34)Joule Seconds). Once one has divided the scalar magnitude of zero-point-energy, by the scalar magnitude of the Planck Constant, this will give one the proportionality, as to how much smaller that zero-point-energy is, than the Planck Phenomenon. As indicated by implicit reasoning, by the means communicated to one by the previous paragraph of discussion, the phenomenology of zero-point-energy IS NOT just a relationship between the transversal Planck Energy And the Radial Planck Energy, as some scientists seem to think. It is an actual phenomenology. Nothingness is incapable of doing anything, yet alone being able to guide and direct superstring-related fields. If this doesn't make an adequate amount of sense to you, carefully read Both of these paragraphs, of this particular blog post. If you have any comments or questions, please, don't hesitate to respond to me. I don't bite! Together, we are capable of performing dialogue! Dialogue indicates the humility to listen to others, in spite of how right you think that you are. You can learn from Anyone!!!

Thought Frequency and Pulsation, are inversely related expressions of space-time-fabric. It seems to potentially be apparent, that the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, is the inverse of the Fourier-Related-Progression. So; Since the Fourier-Related-Progression, is inverse thought frequency per kinetic energy, the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, is potential energy per inverse thought frequency. Highly steady state energy per pulsation, would then be tantamount to mass time, and this latter thing would hereupon be tantamount to highly steady state energy per inverse thought frequency. The Higgs Action works to facilitate taking kinetic-like energy, and “manufacturing” it, into the demonstrative expression, of a highly steady state energy per inverse thought frequency, as taken over a duration of time.This, consequently, works to facilitate the resulting formation of mass, and, the heuristically coupled inverse repercussion of this, is the spontaneous ordination, of the piecewise delineation of waves, which, if not spurious in spatial translation, will generally tend to bear the capacity, of acting as the process, of a piecewise continuous delineation, of a given arbitrary system of waves. Furthermore: Mass is a phenomenon, that Exhibits the coupling, of highly steady state energy in conjunction with thought frequency, &, the inverse of the coupling between highly steady steady state energy in conjunction with thought frequency, is the progressive delineation of a system of waves. Energy tends to be “highly” steady state, when it is to “appear” to be transversally stable, from an internal reference frame, that is from within a metric span of 25 Planck Phenomenon, from its immediately externalized Neumann bounds. Picture an atom. Right near it, it may seem to not be moving around. Yet, from a much more external reference frame, it might be moving around a lot. Can you imagine?!

First of all, I wanted to clarify, that what I mean by inverse thought frequency, is the inverse of the overall quantity, of thought times frequency. Next of all, I wanted to add, that the more hermitian, that the quotient, of highly steady state energy per inverse thought frequency, is to be, (of which, one may also describe this to be, as behaving like the product, or coupling, of highly steady state energy, with actual thought frequency), that it will thereby generally tend to spontaneously result, in such a particular type of a case scenario, that the resultant end product, of such an implicit intermingling, will more than likely have a more harmonic interplay of an eminently corroborative Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, than an otherwise analogous case scenario, in which such an implicit intermingling is not as hermitian in overt incursion, — to where, a fairly hermitian intermingling, of highly steady state energy with thought frequency, as was implied by the viably indicated physical interaction of product-like operation-like activity that I had previously mentioned, as kinematically propagated over a duration of actual time, will tend to generally incur a fairly high expectation value, of working to have a greater capacity of being of a Kahler-Related mass-bearing nature, than if otherwise, instead, that it were a potentially viable intermingling of these, that was NOT brought into a spontaneous physical interaction, in a hermitian manner. 

Electrodynamic frequency per time, often tends to spontaneously facilitate a tense, of incurred magnetic pull. Whereas; Energy per electrodynamic frequency, often tends to facilitate a tense, of incurred magnetic push. Furthermore; When electrodynamic frequency per time, is coupled with energy per electrodynamic frequency, this general physical operation, tends to work to form electromotive power. &, electromotive power coupled with (electrodynamic frequency per time), tends to form electromotive impedance.

An abelian light cone gauge topology, tends to be eminently gauged, upon the spatial component, of space time fabric. And; A non abelian light cone gauge topology, tends to be eminently gauged, upon the time-based component, of space time fabric. 

Gauge-Invariant Chi

 Cognitive Lucidity, may often tend to be eminently corroborative, with a viably generative tense, of progressively harmonic, gauge-invariant Chi. 

When Chi is levied and restrained, in lieu of the reductional imparting, which is here to be generated in terms of its effectual impact upon resonant vibration, as here enacted by a recursively stable gauge-action, of which is exemplified, by the covariant proximal local presence, of a relatively consistent tense of wave-tug, it will thereupon often tend to occur, that such an implicit tense of Chi, will consequently often tend to spontaneously act or behave, in such a resultant general manner, in so as to work to bear an enhanced potential expectation value, of bearing the probability of facilitating the induction, of a tense of know how, in the mind of the individual working to exhibit such Chi-Like characteristics, to where this may often tend to help to enhance their innate capacity, of being able to better achieve or do, at least in terms of their logic faculties of thought, whatever they had set out to do, as within reason. 

Chi that is far removed from being gauge-invariant, may often tend to be eminently associated, and/or eminently corroborative, with either: a confused psychological, emotional, and/or spiritual state. 

Isotropically stable Chi, may often tend to be gauge-invariant. Whereas; Chi that is very unstable isotropically, may often tend to completely lack gauge-invariance. Isotropically stable Chi, may often tend to be eminently associated and/or eminently corroborative, with either mental, emotional, and/or spiritual stability. Whereas; Chi that is very unstable isotropically, may often tend to be eminently associated and/or eminently corroborative, with either mental, emotional, and/or spiritual instability.

Smoothly gauged Chi, that works to bear a balanced tense of incurred restraint, may often tend to work to organize the eminently associated thought-bearing emotional state, that the eminently corroborative living entity, that is demonstrating such Chi, is here to be exemplifying. Furthermore; Isotropically stable Chi, that spontaneously works to bear an eminently associated tense of homomorphic incursion, may often tend to work to focus the eminently associated thought-bearing emotional state, that the eminently corroborative living entity that is demonstrating such Chi, is here to be exemplifying. 

Chi that is harmonically organized and focused, may often tend to eminently work to involve yin(g). Whereas; Chi that is anharmonic in its organization and focus, may often tend to eminently work to involve yang. 

When the manner of the restraint of a physical state, that may be deemed of as a pseudo tense of a pressure fractal,  as taken upon a covariant Fourier-Based topological manifold, of a kinematically propagated increment of Chi, when in terms of the maintenance of a consistent tense of wave-tug impedance, is to be recursively applied in its physical incursion, in a manner that is to be relatively indistinguishable in difference, in the way that it is imparted, over the general course of its piecewise continuous flow, as the stated increment of such Chi, is to be spatially transmitted via its kinetic transference, that, it will consequently tend to follow, that this general genus of a case scenario, that here involves the tangential generation of a Chi-Related field, may often tend to be considered, to bear a relatively high expectation value, of working to demonstrate, a fairly viable tense, of gauge-invariance. 

The more isotropically stable that an eminently associated tense of harmonic Chi is to be, the more likely that the eminently corroborative yin(g), will thereupon often tend to be relatively strong in focus, for the directly associated life form, of which is here to be exhibiting such a respective tense of Chi. Furthermore; The more isotropically stable that an eminently associated tense of anharmonic Chi is to be, the more likely that the eminently corroborative yang, will thereupon often tend to be relatively strong in focus, for the directly associated life form, of which is here to be exhibiting such a respective tense of Chi. 

The spontaneous Action of metric coupling, upon a covariant tense, of an initial state of kinematically propagated Chi, may often tend to facilitate the organization of the thought processes, of the respective life source of the cognitive lucidity, that is here to tend to bear at least some sort of autonomy-like control, over the seat of their emotional thought-like state. Furthermore; The Action of the spontaneous Homomorphic flow, of a covariant tense, of an initial state of kinematically propagated Chi, of which is eminently corroborative, with the piecewise continuous intricacies, that are here to bear an eminent corroboration, with a steady-state consistency in the wave-tug scalar amplitude, that is hereupon physically applied over a duration, may often tend to facilitate the focus of the thought processes, of the respective life source of the cognitive lucidity, that is here to tend to bear at least some sort of autonomy-like control, over the seat of their emotional thought-like state. 

Chi that is gauge-invariant, both metrically and heuristically, may often tend to be more time-wise efficient, than an otherwise analogous genus of Chi, that is instead, simply gauged metrically. 

Just as frequency is the inverse of time, thought is the inverse of distance. So; Metric-gauge-related action, involves gauging something with inverse thought. — &; Heuristic-gauge-related action, involves gauging something with inverse frequency. 

Pulsation often tends to bear at least some kind of a coupling, between inverse thought and inverse frequency. Furthermore: Take a given arbitrary genus, of some sort of coupling, between inverse thought and inverse frequency. Consider this whole thing, as a particular quantity, that is acting as a unit, per respective eminently corroborative kinetic energy. This last insinuated whole thing, is a particular physical phenomenon, that I term of as being, “The Fourier-Related-Progression,” since it acts to entail the piecewise delineation, of a particular system of waves. 

Ward-Cauchy-Related Gauge-Action, that is eminently applied upon the corroborative spatial component, of space time fabric, often tends to work to enhance the resolution, of the directly associated Fourier-Related-Progression. Furthermore; Ward-Cauchy-Related Gauge-Action, that is eminently applied upon the corroborative time-based component, of space time fabric, often tends to work to enhance the succinctness, of the directly associated Fourier-Related-Progression.