Other Neat Ideas 5

 When a discrete physical charge is to be incurred, upon an eminently associated Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, that is here to be in the general process, of spontaneously becoming enhanced into a heightened tense, of a compacted/de-compacted dimensional exemplification of spatial expression, that the consequential charge impartation, that is henceforth to be spontaneously exhibited, by this implicitly enhanced eigenstate of chiral-based magnetism, will thereupon ( or would it?) tend to bear a corroboratively demonstrative Imaginary pulsation, that is here to often tend to bear a tense of upholding an interdependent vanguard, upon both the immediate past & the immediate future, Lagrangian-Based interface of the traceable path integral, that it is here to be trekking upon.

Please comment on this one. I believe I have reason to suspect what I am implying by imagining this!!!PHS1989.

Imaginary magnetic adhesion, may often tend to pull one eminently into the future. Whereas; Imaginary magnetic repulsion, may often tend to pull one eminently into the past. So; If a given arbitrary transportation-based device, were to bear the likings of a general flow of Imaginary charge, that was to recursively, after the implementation of a recursively incurred application of Real Riemann-Related charge, that was to pejoratively include — if not in even in a majoritarian manner — in between each of such recursive flows of Imaginary Charge — go from a tense of Imaginary magnetic adhesion to a tense of Imaginary magnetic repulsion back into a tense of Imaginary magnetic adhesion… and so forth; — that such a general physical operation, may, at times, work to facilitate a torque-like energy efficiency in the implicit aerodynamic craft, for at least a relatively decent proscribed duration, and this may sometimes be a tactic to be utilized, if and when the theoretical ideal lack of net mass loss to the ship’s energy supply is not kept ample, due to things I won’t say here. 

Physically expressed Nijenhuis frequencies, of which are here to be demonstrably exhibited by the general venue of kinematically propagated spatial disturbances, may often tend to be eminently corroborative, to the general likings of the physical operation, of zero-pole-based Fourier-Related Transformations, as these are here to be denotable as being kinetically transferred, when in lieu of the potentially likely case scenario, in which one is here to be considering the loop-like manner by which time is often to be expressible as, since time can move both forward and/or backward, since it's not purely linear. This is primordially eminent, when one is to be in the general position of time traveling. 

The dimensional compactification of a Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, will often tend to be eminently corroborative, with Imaginary magnetic adhesion. Whereas; The dimensional de-compactification of a Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, will often tend to be eminently corroborative, with Imaginary magnetic repulsion. 

The dimensional compactification of a Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, will often tend to be eminently corroborative, with jumping into the future. Whereas; The dimensional de-compactification of a Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, will often tend to be eminently corroborative, with jumping into the past. Again; Dimensional compactification, is eminently corroborative, with a spatial situation, in which there are less spatial dimensions involved, yet to where, everything else is otherwise analogous. Furthermore; Dimensional de-compactification, is eminently corroborative, with a spatial situation, in which there are more spatial dimensions involved, yet to where, everything else is otherwise analogous. This is NOT to be confused with Lorentz-Four-Contraction-Related activity, in which there is, in this latter just mentioned case scenario, there is to be an attenuation in the scalar amplitude, of one or more metric-related spatial parameters, of which are here to be denoted to the dimensional configuration, of the implicit team of energy. 

First off; I wanted to recap something, that I’ll admit I haven’t made clear enough. The Betti Number, is an Imaginary Ordering. When a discrete quantum of energy permittivity (a super string), is to bear a holomorphic propagation, in a certain number of anharmonic dimensional parameters, when going into BRST, then, the Betti Number, will, at that point in physical translation, be equal to the positive Imaginary Number, that is here to be tantamount, to that earlier implied certain number of anharmonic dimensional parameters. I will continue more with the suspense, Later! See you soon, in the upcoming paragraphs, illustrating ideas, appertaining to, as the discrete energy differentiates!!! Sam Roach! (1989).

Two different and distinct covariant Hamiltonian Topological Manifolds, are to be spontaneously undergoing respectively distinct and different dimensional compactifications, except that one of such individually taken actions of compactification, is to occur relativistically quicker, than the other of such respective individually taken actions of compactification. That Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, of which is here to be incurring its eminently corroborative act of decreasing in net spatial dimensionality, in a relativistically quicker rate, relative to the motion and presence of electromagnetic energy, will often tend to work to bear a stronger jump into the future, than the other of such comparative individually taken Hamiltonian Topological Manifolds, over its net Progression. 

Cool Stuff

 The coupling of the i*PI(Del)Action with angular momentum, may often tend to be eminently associated, with the facilitation of the scattering of infrared photons. Furthermore; The coupling of the i*PI(Del)Action with angular frequency, may often tend to be eminently associated, with the facilitation of the formation of chiral-based magnetism. In other words; The coupling of unitary heuristic-gauged magnetic potential with angular momentum, may often tend to work to form the scattering of infrared photons. While the coupling of unitary heuristic-gauged magnetic potential with angular frequency, may often tend to work to form chiral-based magnetism. 

The covariant proximal local presence of imaginary charge, often tends to be eminently associated, with the alteration of spatial dimensionality. The greater that the eminently corroborative positive ordering of Nijenhuis (imaginary) physical impartation is to be, that is here to be directly associated with the action of a particular incurred imaginary charge, the more that the respectively associated spatial dimensionality, will tend to be decreased. Furthermore; The greater that the eminently corroborative negative ordering of Nijenhuis (imaginary) physical impartation is to be, that is here to be directly associated, with the action of a particular incurred imaginary charge, the more that the respectively associated spatial dimensionality, will tend to be increased. 

Free-Will often tends to be more eminently corroborative with heat than with sound, whereas, Imagination often tends to be more eminently corroborative with sound than with heat. 

Free-Will often tends to be more potentially corroborative with entropy than with charge, whereas, Imagination often tends to be more potentially corroborative with charge than with entropy. 

Free-Will tends to be more restrained in a metric-based manner than in a time-wise-related manner, whereas, Imagination tends to be more restrained in a time-wise-related manner than in a metric-based manner. 

A holomorphic driven chiral-based magnetic eigenstate, tends to be eminently associated, with a negative charge. Whereas; An anti-holomorphic driven chiral-based magnetic eigenstate, tends to be eminently associated, with a positive charge. 

Adjacent Holomorphic driven chiral-based magnetic eigenstates, tend to spin asymmetrically, relative to each other, due to the ramifications of mirrored symmetry. 

Holomorphic driven chiral-based magnetic eigenstates, tend to bear the opposite charge than what is expressed from the likes of antiholomorphic driven chiral-based magnetic eigenstates. Anti chiral charges, or, in other words, opposite charges, attract. 

Holomorphic driven chiral-based magnetic eigenstates, when individually taken, tend to be comprised of, by a more dimensionally compact Hamiltonian topological manifold, than their eminently corroborative anti holomorphic driven chiral-based magnetic eigenstate counterparts, when individually taken, in a respectively considered manner. 

Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action recalibration due to the kinetic interplay of fractional spin, tends to spontaneously work to form the covariant proximal local presence, of holomorphic driven chiral-based magnetic eigenstates. Whereas; Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action recalibration due to the kinetic interplay of whole spin, tends to spontaneously work to form the covariant proximal local presence, of anti holomorphic driven chiral-based magnetic eigenstates. 

When a mass-bearing Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, is to work to bear a fractional spin, the  corroborative equal and opposite reaction to the general likings of this, of which is here to be eminently associated, with the directly related harmonic re-calibration of Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action, is thence to work to facilitate the formation, of a holomorphic driven chiral-based magnetic eigenstate, of which is here to spontaneously generate, the covariant proximal local presence, of a negative charge.

When a mass-bearing Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, is to work to bear a whole spin, the corroborative equal and opposite reaction to the general likings of this, of which is here to be eminently associated, with the directly related harmonic re-calibration of Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action, is thence to work to facilitate the formation, of an anti holomorphic driven chiral-based magnetic eigenstate, of which is here to spontaneously generate the covariant proximal local presence, of a positive charge.

Let’s say that one is to consider, here, in a given arbitrary case scenario, two different and distinct commutations of wave-based transference. Both of which, here, are to express the same piecewise continuous quantum, of net physical energy. One of such commutations of wave-based energy, is here, in this particular case scenario, to express a relatively stronger pulse, than the other of the two. That commutation of wave-based transference of the two, that exhibited the stronger pulsation, is here to be exhibiting the greater scalar magnitude, of Fourier-Related-Progression. 

Let’s say that one is here to consider, two different and distinct commutative wave-based transferences. One is to be binary metric-gauged, while the other is to be unitary metric-gauged. Otherwise, these two different respective commutative wave-based transferences, are to be viably analogous. That implicit transference of wave-related phenomenology, that is here to be binary metric-gauged, will thereupon tend to spontaneously work to exhibit, a stronger Fourier-Related-Progression, than the other one. 

Nijenhuis Impedance

 The impedance that is eminently corroborative, with the dealings of an imaginary voltage, will generally tend to be Nijenhuis, in so long as one is here to be working to entail a physical situation, in which time is moving forward linearly. 

Gravity affects the direction of motion of mass-bearing objects. When the direction of a Hamiltonian Topological Manifold is to alter, relative to the motion of light, this will inextricably generate unitary heuristic-gauge magnetic potential, even if there is no viable change or changes in speed. Anti gravity, often tends to decrease the potential negative effects, that gravity can occasionally seem to cause. So; An anti gravitational field, may often tend to decrease the potential likelihood, of gravitational force, to otherwise have the capacity, of generating unwanted re-calibrations, to the Chern-Simons effect, that a particular Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, may initially be expressing. 

The physical attribute of a re-calibrated Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action, that is eminently associated with the flow of the discrete energy permittivity, that is eminently corroborative with the holomorphic adjustment, of the directly pertinent Hamiltonian Topological Manifold at hand, works to facilitate the generation of electrical field,  of the probable spontaneously formed implicit charge. Whereas; The physical attribute of a re-calibrated Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action, that is eminently associated with the flow the discrete energy impedance, that is eminently corroborative with the holomorphic adjustment, of the directly pertinent Hamiltonian Topological Manifold at hand, works to facilitate the generation of magnetic charge, of the probable spontaneously formed implicit charge. 

Alterations in the piecewise continuous intricacies, of the eminently corroborative tense, of the holonomic substrate, that is viably demonstrative, of the directly associated re-calibrated Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action eigenstates, will often tend to effect the scalar magnitude, of the eminently associated electromotive permittivity. 

Alterations in the morphology, of the eminently corroborative tense, of the holonomic substrate, that is viably demonstrative, of the directly associated re-calibrated Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action eigenstates, will often tend to effect the scalar magnitude, of the eminently associated electromotive impedance. 

Whenever the speed and or the direction, of a kinematically propagated Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, is to alter in its eminently associated scalar amplitude, there will generally tend to resultantly be, at least some sort of consequential spontaneously generated heuristic-gauge magnetic potential, that is to be facilitated into formation, in lieu of the implicitly adherent spontaneous dual interaction, in which the eminently corroborative Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action eigenstates, are here to be in the relatively simultaneous process, of being recalibrated. 

The formation of eigenstates of the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, tends to be proximal local to the likings of Higgs Field eigenstates. 

The deeper that the resonant pulsation of the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode tends to be, the more inextricably bound that its spontaneous gravitational tug will consequently tend to be. 

The more resolute that the Fourier-Related-Progression, of a Noether-Based macroscopic Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, tends to be, the more likely that invasive superfluous phenomena, that would otherwise potentially be in the way of the implicit tangential path, that is here to be of the stated manifold, will thereby not be as critical of a viable dilemma, for the formidably safe motion, of the respective macroscopic Hamiltonian Topological Manifold. 

The prior is particularly due to the physical condition, that increased resolution in Fourier-Related-Progression, is often enhanced, by the general likings of an accompaniment of increased externalized voltage, and, voltage-like phenomenology, tends to form a tense of physical pressure, that may often work to push certain phenomena away. 

A highly compact macroscopic Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, has a greater tendency of working to viably bear an overt tense of succinct Fourier-Related-Progression, than an otherwise analogous macroscopic Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, that instead, is not as highly compact. 

When a Lagrangian-Based Expansion is escalating, the eminently corroborative Hamiltonian Topological Manifold is to be altering in its relative speed. This respective situation, will tend to alter the layout, of the piecewise continuity, of the bend-related symmetry, that such an implicit team of cohesive mass-bearing eigenstates, is here to be exhibiting in covariance. Furthermore; When the recursive delineation of a Lagrangian-Based Expansion works to bear spatial deformation, then, the eminently corroborative Hamiltonian Topological Manifold is to be altering in its relative direction. This respective situation, will tend to alter the delineation-based shape, of the bend-related symmetry, that such an implicit team of mass-bearing eigenstates, is here to be exhibiting in covariance. 

When both the speed and the direction are to change, for the likings of a kinetically transferred, mass-bearing Kahler Hamiltonian Topological Manifold, then both the net electric field & the net magnetic field, will tend to spontaneously become equivocally effected, in the general process, of which is here to work to involve, a respective re-calibration of Chern-Simons Invariant gauge-action, as taken over time.

Electrodynamic Gaussian Braided Deformative Flow

 The magnetic flux of a physical current of charge, may potentially be described of as working to express:

The Electrodynamic Gaussian Braided Deformative Flow of a correlative kinematic covariant interdependent interaction, of a directly corresponding set of cohomological eigenstates. SAM ROACH.

Highly Magnetic Cohesive Set Of Discrete Energy Quanta

 A given arbitrary Noether-based mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, that is here to be of the nature of a specific given arbitrary Hodge-Index of a quantum energy state, -- is to tend to be of a highly magnetic nature; when it is both to work to bear an isotropically stable homeomorphic rotational spatial translation, over a proscribed duration of time, as well as when it is to work to bear an isotropically stable homeomorphic transversal spatial translation, over that same eluded-to proscribed duration of time. Sincerely, SAM ROACH. (1989).

Part Two As To Magnetic Flux Density

So, each wave that is of one given arbitrary phenomenology of magnetic flux density, is an eigenstate of each of the other of such waves.  The magnetic flux density of each individually taken tori-sector-range of electrodynamic energy, would then act as an individual eigenmatrix -- if the light-related cohomological-based tracing is here to be conformally invariant upon the entire oscillation of point particles of the first-order, -- that are of the Ward-Cauchy bounds of the so-eluded-to Lagrangian-related trace, in so as to work to allow for one to be able to make a Laplacian-related tracing, that is piecewise continuous along the circuit of the entire physical memory as to both the how, the when, and the where that the flux density that is given, had just differentiated in, in a Fourier-related manner.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

As An Aside: 

The matrix of a magnetic flux density eigenstate, could potentially work to involve multiple tori-sector-ranges on the substringular level. Anyways, when an eigenstate of a magnetic flux density holonomy, is to be operationally delocalized, then, the Ward-Cauchy-Related conditions, of which are here to be eminently associated, with the delineated distribution of its initially proximal local Majorana-Weyl-Invariant cohomology-related singularity, will often have the general tendency of being attributably nullified. With such inferred mass-bearing Hamiltonian Operators, this just eluded-to process of operational delocalization, will often tend to occur within the general region of the majorized plane, of the directly associated GSO cohomology-related field, of the inferred eminently corroborative proximal local Calabi-Yau Manifold, of which is here to be behaving as such an earlier stated tense of a mass-bearing Hamiltonian Operator. Each of such individually taken desingularizations, is initiated via the gauge-metric-related action, of a kinematically-based operational holonomic tensor, of which is to incur its eminent engagement upon such a stated Calabi-Yau Manifold, in so as to tend to work to effect the corroborative general physical attribute, of the net light-cone-gauge eigenstate, of which is here to be imperatively associated, with the workings of the magnetic flux density eigenstate, that is here to be eminently associated, with such an earlier implied set, of multiple tori-sector-ranges, Again; In this. particular case scenario, what I mean by "tori-sector-ranges," are here to be corroborative to the workings, of a respective set of multiple layers of reality, that are here to still be of the same universal setting. 

Another Post From Course 5

What does it mean for two waves from separate point particles to touch and rub each other?  Consider a point particle again as a ball of yarn.  A ball of yarn is made up of string that has a static tendency when rubbed.  Let us say that you loosened the ends of two balls of string (the ends that were on the outside).  You rubbed these ends against each other briefly.  What happened?  The fray of the strings interconnected to an extent (depending on the toutness of each string), the strings became slightly charged one toward another, and a slight amount of heat was produced.  Now, what if you rubbed these string ends for just a little bit longer and then let go?  What would probably happen?  The strings would stay together for at least one moment.  Why?  When the strings’ ends are rubbed, an electrostatic discharge happens to a slight extent between these ends.  Electrons rub around, giving off a mild charge.  The mild charge is in terms of the angular momentum that is dispensed during the rubbing of the described electrons, while the shock of voltage that one could potentially receive from this is due to the spin-orbital interaction of the described electrons.  The described angular momentum is in terms of the roll of the electrons as a transversal radiation.  The propagation of this energy is the electric filed in this case.  In order for there to be roll, there has to be spin and orbit.  As the electrons roll around between the ends of the metaphorical yarns of string, these are also spinning (twisting 90 degrees to the twist that happens during the roll) and orbiting each other (moving radially as a whole relative to each other).  The propagation of the energy given off as the result of this spin and orbit type motion is the magnetic field dispensed here.  From experience, when you spin a bunch of materials near each other, what happens?  The materials get sucked into each other!  So, when there is a magnetic discharge between two objects, what tends to happen?  The two objects tend to be brought in toward each other!  I will continue with the suspense of this session later.

Until then, you have a phenomenal day!  Sam