Another Post From Course 5

What does it mean for two waves from separate point particles to touch and rub each other?  Consider a point particle again as a ball of yarn.  A ball of yarn is made up of string that has a static tendency when rubbed.  Let us say that you loosened the ends of two balls of string (the ends that were on the outside).  You rubbed these ends against each other briefly.  What happened?  The fray of the strings interconnected to an extent (depending on the toutness of each string), the strings became slightly charged one toward another, and a slight amount of heat was produced.  Now, what if you rubbed these string ends for just a little bit longer and then let go?  What would probably happen?  The strings would stay together for at least one moment.  Why?  When the strings’ ends are rubbed, an electrostatic discharge happens to a slight extent between these ends.  Electrons rub around, giving off a mild charge.  The mild charge is in terms of the angular momentum that is dispensed during the rubbing of the described electrons, while the shock of voltage that one could potentially receive from this is due to the spin-orbital interaction of the described electrons.  The described angular momentum is in terms of the roll of the electrons as a transversal radiation.  The propagation of this energy is the electric filed in this case.  In order for there to be roll, there has to be spin and orbit.  As the electrons roll around between the ends of the metaphorical yarns of string, these are also spinning (twisting 90 degrees to the twist that happens during the roll) and orbiting each other (moving radially as a whole relative to each other).  The propagation of the energy given off as the result of this spin and orbit type motion is the magnetic field dispensed here.  From experience, when you spin a bunch of materials near each other, what happens?  The materials get sucked into each other!  So, when there is a magnetic discharge between two objects, what tends to happen?  The two objects tend to be brought in toward each other!  I will continue with the suspense of this session later.

Until then, you have a phenomenal day!  Sam

Extra Stuff About Cyclic Permutations

Let us initially consider a phenomenology that goes through a state of a Fourier-related activity,  that is repeated over and over again -- yet, to where such a so-eluded-to general tendency of a cycle is to work to bear one or more slight changes, over the course of the iterations of each of such a so-eluded-to process or processes of cyclical states.  If the pattern of the cyclical changes, is never symmetrically completed -- in such a manner to where the overall pattern of such a general condition of a cycle is not equivalently iterative, then, such a cyclical pattern is said to diverge.  Yet, if the pattern of the cyclical changes, is to instead, be symmetrically completed in such a manner -- to where the overall pattern of such a general condition of a cycle is to be equivalently iterative, then, such a cyclical pattern is said to converge.  For instance -- let us consider an elliptical pattern, that is cyclical in permutation.  Let us say -- within a here considered tendency of time constraints -- that one physical phenomenology is to orbit around another physical phenomenology, in such a manner to where the tense of such an orbit, per each adjacent iteration of orbit, is to be slightly different is its precise Lagrangian-based contour, -- yet, let us say that in this given arbitrary case scenario, that after one thousand iterations of such an elliptical tendency of orbit, that the whole overall general pattern of a cyclical tendency is to be repeated in the exact same manner again, to where the second set of one thousand iterations of such an elliptical orbital-based tendency is to be exactly the same as the first set of one thousand iterations of such an elliptical orbital-based tendency.  In this just mentioned tense of a condition of cyclical permutation, the cycle is to here be symmetrical in its behavior, and thus, such a so-stated tense of a condition of cyclical permutation is to here be convergent, -- at least over the course of the first two thousand iterations of such a pattern of a cyclical-based permutation-related tense of elliptical orbit.  Furthermore, there are three general genre of Fourier-related cyclical permutations -- of which may sometimes be combined. There are Lagrangian-based cyclical-based permutations, and/or there are metrical-based cyclical permutations, and/or there are contour-based cyclical-based permutations.  I will later discuss what is meant by a Laplacian-related state of conditions, that would work to bear a tense of cyclical permutation.

I will continued with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.