A Little Bit About Flux Density

Let us here consider the multiplicit array of magnetic flux density eigenstates -- when this is taken in terms of the substringular.  An entity of a magnetic flux density, consists of multiple -- when globally distinguishabley speaking -- adjacent magnetic waves, that, through vibration, may extend the reach of their electromagnetic influence, over the span of some respective covariant bearing of time.  Yet, their correlative composite magnetic waves, that may here be adjacent to our extrapolation-related observance -- may actually be more separated than we would like to initially perceive these as being, if one were to consider the overall delineation of some of such waves, -- when all of the directly corresponding Lorentz-Four-Contractions are to be theoretically counted out of the scenario for a "time being."  Furthermore -- in a closest to an absolute tense, the Ward-Cauchy-related conditions, that are here to work to determine the boundary conditions at a microscopic set of considerations,  are here to be of the hierarchy -- as to how things are to actually behave in the realm of the substringular.  So, in a more real sense than the globally distinguishable, individual waves that are propagated from the source of a magnetic flux density -- may be separated over the course of taking the considerations of a Laplacian set of extrapolation-related conditions, even though all of the correlative waves that are to extend from a phenomenology that may here be considered to be of a magnetic flux density, are to be of one Gaussian-based eigenmatrix.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

A Little About The Size Of Certain Phenomena In The Substringular

Let us consider differential operators that are based on exact and linear associations of points from within their neighborhoods. If the points form exact differential associations, then these are 3*10^(-78) meter apart in the globally distinguishable and 10^(-86) meter apart in the substringular. If a differential association of points is linear, then you may draw a straight line from one end of the association to the other. Generally, a set number of points from strings come together at the center of state of each tori. These points then get "picked up" by constituent-force-sectors that tend to remain in the "line of fire" of these center of state points from strings. The forward time momenta related points then travel counterclockwise around our space-time-continuum to the tori sector region right before the prior tori sector region. The points then travel down the heterotic string, across, and up to the parallel tori sector region of the middle-continuum. The forward time momenta related points then travel counterclockwise to the tori sector region right before the prior tori sector region. The points then travel down the heterotic string, across, and up to the parallel tori sector region of the far-continuum. The forward time momenta related points then travel counterclockwise to the tori sector region right after the prior tori sector region. The points then travel down the heterotic string, across, and up to the parallel tori sector region of the middle-continuum. The forward time momenta related points then travel counterclockwise to the tori sector region right after the prior tori sector region. The points then travel down the heterotic string, across, and up to the parallel tori sector region of the near-continuum (where we live). The forward time momenta related points then travel counterclockwise a little more than one rotation of the our space-time-continuum to the tori sector right after the prior tori sector region. The five thousand substringular encoder templates and the five thousand substringular counterstring templates of the given tori sector then have begun a momentary breach of topology that is brought together by mini-strings (10^(-129)meter thick). This temporary breach is called the "space-hole." Once the "space-hole" happens, the quaternionic-instanton-impulse pulls the substringular templates and the substringular counterstring templates into the heart of the given tori sector region so that the substringular may reiterate. At this time, the globally distinguishable time of 10^(-43)second happens. The substringular pulse in-between globally distinguishable time is 10^(-43)second (H time).

                       
The "space-hole" is for about .283 H bar tme in the substringular.

We only notice globally distinguishable time.

Please tell me what you think of this!!!

Remember, be as tough as a fiber that is 3*10^(-35) meter long!

Catch you two! (Peace)

Sincerely,

Samuel Roach
                         
               

Course 6, Session 4, Part One

Well hello world, this is Samuel Roach here! How are you doing?! Please feel free to comment on my blog.


                     
What draws the tori-sector-ranges togetheer into a circular-like entity that helps to form the Ultimon? It takes bonds to form a whole, entire thing. Look at earth. It is a whole, entire thing, yet, it is only one small part of a whole, entire universe. What is the Ultimon? The Ultimon is that fabric of the space-time-continuum that makes it capable of providing the appearance of having a three-dimensional delineation. Remember that the three-dimensional appearance of the universe is called the globally distinguishable, and that the globally distinguishable is due to superstrings differentiating relative to the Bases of Light. Fourier differentiation is change during succeeding metrics. A metric is when you have a sequence that changes in combination relative to itself in some sort of flow that is noticeable as a whole result by any source from within the Ultimon after any sort of succeeding direction. Metrics that coincide will be what we will here call forward, real time (the measurement of what is known as linear time), & these metrics are the thus caused results that are usually dependant on all of the directly past and future results that act upon the sequences of these metrics.

I will end this part of this session with a question that you may ponder in such a fashion so as to be prepared for the second part of this session.: What is the basis of measuring duration both in terms of the sequence of particular instantons as well as the individual motions that happen in-between instantons?

This should be enough food for thought for now.

Sincerely,

Sam.

Part One of Something That Was Intended Earlier

Think about it. Stuff exists. Things come into play the way that they do based on the

             
summed happenings that preceded this. A limited mind can not possibly be consciously

aware of everything that has ever happened, is happening, or ever will happen by the

very nature of the word limited. Yet, through a little knowledge and rational thinking,

there are many things about life that you may determine through PATTERNS. For

example: One plus one is two. You could never count to two trillion, yet you just know

that one-trillion plus one-trillion is two trillion. Of course, you might add. That takes no

grandiose knowledge. But did you notice here that you did this with a pattern? Can you

think of many other patterns that fit this example? Sure.

Another aspect of rational thinking is CLUE FITTING. If you ate one calorie of food,

this alone couldn’t possibly make you gain one pound of fat non-water weight, since one

pound of fat non-water weight due to calories consists of roughly 3,500 calories. Two

things cannot occupy the same spot at the same time. An ice cube cannot remain frozen

in a hot pan. Etc… .

Yet another aspect of rational thinking is FAMILIARITY. You know that ice is colder

than water. Day is brighter than night. Steel is harder than felt.

Yet another aspect of rational thinking is ROLE PLAYING. I don’t mean pretending

necessarily that you are everything, yet putting a situation into a scenario to where

through familiarity, clue fitting, and patterns, you may estimate an interaction and/or a set

of interactions.

Another aspect of rationality is DISTINGUISHABILITY. If you can distinguish

similarities, differences, if something exists and where that is, and what it is collecting

and/or giving off, then you may become more actively familiar with what you are talking

about.

Finally, and aspect of rationale is BOUNDEDNESS AND SENSE OF DIRECTION.

If you know where you are and where you can go, then you are in less danger than if

you don’t. Knowing something’s limitations may go hand-in-hand with the potential

locations in which the object may travel.                   

Last Test Questions For Course Six (Session Sixteen)

1)  What is the Thought Force that brings phenomena into the metaphysical?  Elaborate.

                  
2)  Why are superstrings detectable as tori-sector-ranges?

3)  Why are detectable superstrings the illuminated ones?

4)  How could different superstrings encode as the same phenomena?

5)  What is the difference between stringular sequences and stringular series reiterations?

6)  Why must there be stringular sequence and stringular series reiterations?

7)  What stringular conditions indicate life?

8)  What is the difference between one and two-dimensional supestrings in the globally distinguishable?  Elaborate.                                                

The Fifteenth Session of Course Six

Well hello again world, this is Samuel Roach!  Wait 'till you see what I have in store for you today!
                  
               
Tori-Sector-Ranges operate to form the same related sequences, and tori-sector-ranges operate to provide the same related series reiteration when these described ranges kinematically operate to define a pattern of phenomena that tend to not change to the perception of beings who detect the related superstrings in the globally distinguishable.  The actual superstrings that work to define the static equilibrium that I have just described in general may actually have changed and turned into different forms of superstrings when one considers specific eigensets of ground-states as individually considered phenomena, yet, the types of superstring that would occupy the same positions as the prior mentioned superstrings along the Main-World-Tubes throughout the Ultimon would be there, even though the specific topological substance that would be operated upon would be technically different.  The concept here is the concept of change that amounts to the same thing as before.  This is called indistinguishable difference.  This is because the basic fabric of the Continuum is all wave propagation in the form of the "drive" of thought energy, and all thought energy is brought into view gradually by a reverse cross product ("unscrewed").  So, all physical phenomena is wave that is, in a sense, "educated" until it is brought into the perspective of mind energy.  This "education" comes from communication among the members of the Continuum.  Misguided communication among phenomena and living forms tightens the cross-product of Chi that binds life-forms to suffering.  Right education drives life-forms into the Light of accurate patterns of the Collective Consciousness.  When one knows that everything is based on both Mind and Energy, then one is able to know that combinations of sequences of tori-sector-ranges that have some control over their own succession.This is the basis of being able to overcome, to some extent, the entropy around them -- and is therefore the basis of Life.  Such improved thought patterns being brought into cognitive view show the fact that life that begins and ends in harmony is the General Life of Space-Time-Substance.
(Time is more granular than fabric, so it is easier to change the future outcomes of reality than those of the past.)  That's all for now.  Please prepare for the last test of this Course!  You have a phenomenal day!
Sincerely, Sam.                                                                          

Course 6, Session 14, Part One

What is the shape of a superstring in the globally distinguishable?  The shape of a superstring in the globally distinguishable is effected during the Polyakov Action by the Lorentz-Four-Contractions that are imposed upon such a phenomena in the substringular.  The illuminated superstrings in the substringular are those strings where the associated tori-sector-ranges are, prior to a given instanton, collected and recycled.  The residue of superstrings that is collected and recycled is operational during the sub-metric that transpires during the condition when the Bases of Light is active as I have described before.
                                                                                            
The actions of the instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-range of the tori-sector-ranges in the Ultimon form a Lorentz-Four-Contraction effect upon the illuminated superstrings of each mentioned tori-sector-range taken individually for their related strings.  This effect forms a field that surrounds the superstrings when these strings are detected in the globally distinguishable.  What this effect does is that it curls the angular momentum around the magnetism of the very same field that detects the spacial parameters of the associated superstrings.  This mentioned effect curls the affiliated perception that we detect superstrings in such a way during a set sequential series of instantons, involving the Polyakov Action that the discrepencies of a two-dimensional superstring in this arbitrary case here, shows a hole in the middle of a surface that curls like an intertube around the just described hole or annulus.

Test Questions For The Second Test Of Course Six (6)

1)  What factor allows one to know how many instantons of a set tori-sector-range needs to iterate  in order to define when a first-ordered point particle of a superstring, of the described tori-sector-range, will be recycled  from being converted with indistinguishable difference into a different form of differential geometry while then being recycled back with a similar tense of indistinguishable difference back into the same general format of differential geometry?

2)  What are the two general differential geometry types?

3)  Describe in general how norm-state-related first-ordered point particles of the substringular are recycled.

4)  Describe in general how ground-state-related first-ordered point particles of the substringular are recycled.

5)  When both limits of the Royal Arc are commuted through recycling, what is this shape?

 6)  What is this prior mentioned shape in reference to test statement "6" as integrated along one general main world-sheet?

7)  Describe why there are, in-between the durations of each instanton, instanton-quaternionic-field-impulses.

8)  Describe how tori-sector-ranges vary in flow.

9)  Describe why a "steady-state" related superstring must constantly, in-between the duration of each instanton,  travel along the whole orbit of the Continuum.

10)  What fascillitates the binding of superstrings in the globally distinguishable?

11)  Why must substringular travel be almost instantaneous in terms of our terrestrial time?

12)  Why is dark phenomena essential in order for any phenomena to exist at all under our present conditions of time and space?                                                                                                            

Part Two Of Session Ten Of Course Six (6)

Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here!  I am here to continue with the second part of the tenth session of the sixth course of my string theory!
               
A superstring in the substringular is 3*10^(8) smaller in length for one-dimensional superstrings and 3*10(8) smaller in circumference for two-dimensional superstrings than when these are detected in the globally distinguishable.  So, a one-dimensional superstring in the substringular is 10(-43)meter in length and a two-dimensional superstring is 10(-43) meter in circumference in the substringular.  Sorry I gotta run.  I will continue with the next part later.  You have a phenomenal day!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.            

A Summary Of The Third Part Of Session Five Of Course Six

Hi there world, this is Samuel Roach here.  I am here today to summarize the third part of the fifth session of Course Six.
            
Physicality is comprised of 96 spacial dimensions plus time.  Each set of parallel universes is comprised of 32 spacial dimensions plus time.  Even though one may have conformal dimensions of various phenomena which may arbitrarily be comprised of anywhere from 0 to 32 spacial dimensions plus time in any given universe, the foundation of dimensionality is a three dimensional base -- to where, when one observes any phenomena up close enough, everything has a relative "up, down, and side-to-side" as well as the opposite "side" to each of these fundamental holomoriphic positionings in any arbitrary case.  Conformal dimensionality corresponds to what makes up the dimensionality of a phenomena so as to invariably define what comprises the basis of what we would normally describe as one-dimensional, two-dimensional, three-dimensional...32-dimensional in terms of how we in the globally distinguishable are able to determine and value these dimensions in one set of parallel universes.
So, the holonomic entity of a one-dimensional superstring works to define the general basis as to what has one dimension when one considers one Laplacian framework at instanton; the holonomic entity of a two-dimensional superstring works to define the general basis as to what has two dimensions when one considers one Laplacian framework at instanton, etc... .  So, based on conformal dimensions that work to define the basis of dimensionality as a whole, there are phenomena in each set of parallel universes (sundry numbers of these) that, depending on the Laplacian and/or the Fourier conditions of these various phenomena, may exist in anywhere from 0 (for a point particle given a Laplacian condition) to 32 dimensions plus time.
I hope that this "sheds light" on what I had posted the other day.  Sincerely, Sam.    

Course 6, Session 7, The Toroidal Nature Of Superstrings

Well hello again world, this is Samuel Roach here!  Here is the continuation of my string theory "saga."                
So, allow me to ellaborate on what I mean by the "Royal Arc.":  As described in earlier courses, the overall world-sheets (the Main Ones) of the Continuum exist as three sets of four hoop-like world-sheets Plus an arrangement that allows these sets to communicate in a sense.  The arrangement here consists of three main phenomena.:  The fields central to the overall "hoops", the Main Heterotic String Fabric, and, an integral half-hoop which I describe as a "Royal Arc."  A half-circle that is majorized through a relatively large Lagrangian, in terms of circumference, is an arbitrary example of an arc.  An integrated half-circumference of a circle that bends around into a circular connection is a half-hoop.  The ways of Main-World-Sheets plus the Main Heterotic String Fabric plus the Royal Arc, as taken from a distance, appears as a circle.  This is because the thickness of those phenomena is so much smaller than the diameter of the Ultimon.  What I am describing here is in the substringular, since one can not detect the general propagation of light in the globally distinguishable as well as one may extrapolate such phenomena in the substringular.  Light usually travels in the half-hoops of the Ultimon.  These "half-hoops" are the basis of the "infinite-world-toroid."  Light, since it usually travels in these half-hoops, usually has residue that is being recycled in the Royal Arc.  From where is light generally detected?  Light is generally detected in the substringualr at each stringular mapping that may be extrapolated in the globally distinguishable, or, a set of strings in the substringular for each of the four Main-World-sheets for each of the three sets of parallel universes per tori-sector-range may be at least a tad detected via mathematical calculations that may be completed from an extrapolation of substringular activity.  Besides the one-fifteenth of phenomena that we can see from earth, all of the rest of the superstrings of the Main-World-Sheets of the given tori-sector-ranges are relatively uniluminated, due to the condition of Ward Polorization.   This means that most physical phenomena is redistribution-based holonomic entity that is not simultaneously integrated directly with the predominant Basis of Light (the layer of reality that corresponds to the predominant layer that we tend to view in our universe.   All sentient beings have perspective based on the Fourier differentiation of light.
I will continue with the suspense of session eight soon.  In the meanwhile, as my dad used to say, "Think enthouseastic, and you will be enthouseastic!"  Please enjoy my blog.  I am more willing to review comments now that the "spam comments" have decreased.  Please, have a phenomenal day!  Sincerely, Sam.                 

Course 6, Session 5, Part 3, The Toroidal Nature Of Superstrings

Well hello again world, this is Samuel Roach here!  I hope that you are doing great, and that you are following along!
So, although there are 32 spacial dimensions per set of parallel universes, and there are three sets of parallel universes, the basis of spacial dimensionality is a three-dimensional world -- such as is perceived by an observer in the globally distinguishable.  When you look within the dimensions of a main world-sheet or a main world-tube, and one consequently observes a volume here, you are observing a three-dimensionality within another dimensionality.  The perceived "volume" you are observing is three-dimensional on a fundamental basis, because volume taken to where you can form an i/j/k (hat) directorallized field has a relative up-down-right-left-side-to-side basis of Neumman boundary conditions.  When you bring a field into observation to where you can dellineate these said basis of directorals -- you have globalized this field into an observers perspective.  Yet, since there are a total of 96 spacial dimensions in the physical portion of the Continuum, directorals that help to describe the delineation of space-time-fabric may be described by ihat, jhat, khat...isub2hat...lsub2hat, msub2hat, to nsub2hat.  The function of the globally distinguishable manner in which there is a basis in direcoralzation of ihat, jhat, and khat, acts according to the substringular, yet one is here able to detect indices within a smaller region.  Substringular globalizations arae smaller than the general Bases of Light are directly involved with the perceptions here, yet one is able to make computerized drawings of what is going on here based on what one knows of the activity here within specific moments of Lapalacian and Fourier Transformations.  Moments that are made up of simultaneous metric sequencial series (theoretical) are actually known as based on what we already understand, combined with experiment.  One knows the value of hbar by looking at a physics table which describes this.  When one is accurate to what is actual within the course of Planck Bar Time, then at least the accuracy of energy is within discreteness of one unit of energy.  When the curvature between two adjacent tori-sector-ranges relative to a central one is completely flush over the sub-metric that happens during the Bases of Light (which is in-between instantons and right before instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode), then the curvature is within one tense of a globalization of curvature as may be perceived by a living being.  Remember, substringular string is composed of many minit superstring, and mini-string forms the field of superstrings.  So, discrete energy permittivity is always perceived during instanton, and discrete energy impedance is always perceived during instanton.  Here's more as to why.:  it is the mutually interaction of discrete energy permittivity with discrete energy impedance that allows the activity of the light-cone-gauge to be able to fascilitate the "springing" into action of superstrings and their corresponding Planck phenomenon related phenomena through the course of the generally unperceived activity that happens in-between instantons.  Why do I write "Planck phenomenon related phenomena" instead of just "Planck phenomena?"  Because what I term of as just "Planck phenomena" is the smoothest curvature in terms of topological hermicity that is possible, given the general curvature of the corresponding Basis of Light that converts into that phenomena that interacts with superstrings so to create the basic fields of discrete energy permittivity and discrete energy impedance that form a disrete unit of energy that may be transversally described as an eigenstate of Planck energy, and also, that has discrete radial motion that may be describe of as an eigenstate of Planck Bar energy.  I would just love to hear some education responses.  I will leave with a question.:  How does the condition of the substringular's toroidal nature that is often exhibited as a unit fractor down to the toroidal nature that is often exhibited by superstrings?  I will begin to answer some of this question later.  Until then, I will continue with the suspense later, and you have a phenomenal day!  Sincerely, Sam.                                                        

Course 6, Session 4, Part 1, Superstrings As Toroidal Phenomena

Well hello world, this is Samuel Roach here!  How are you doing?!  Please feel free to comment on my blog.
What draws the tori-sector-ranges together into a circular-like entity that helps to form the Ultimon?  It takes bonds to form a whole, entire thing.  Look at earth.  It is a whole, entire thing, yet, it is only one small part of a whole, entire universe.  What is the Ultimon?  The Ultimon is that fabric of the space-time-continuum that makes it capable of providing the appearance of having a three-dimensional delineation.  Remember that the three-dimensional appearance of the universe is called the globally distinguishable, and that the globally distinguishable is due to superstrings differentiating relative to the Bases of Light.  Fourier differentiation is change during succeeding metrics.  A metric is when you have a sequence that changes in combination relative to itself in some sort of flow that is noticeable as a whole result by any source from within the Ultimon after any sort of succeeding direction.  Metrics that coincide will be what we will here call forward, real time (the measurement of what is known as linear time), & these metrics are the thus caused results that are usually dependant on all of the directly past and future results that act upon the sequences of these metrics.
I will end this part of this session with a question that you may ponder in such a fashion so as to be prepared for the second part of this session.:  What is the basis of measuring duration both in terms of the sequence of particular instantons as well as the individual motions that happen in-between instantons?             
This should be enough food for thought for now.         
Sincerely,
Sam.

Course 5, Session 13, Part Two

Well hello again world, this is Samuel Roach here to speak to you today more about the session that I began discussing over the internet yesterday!
        
Differential geometries recycle in order to allow for the kinematic redistributions of mini-string, whose redelineation allows for the continued Fourier activity of topology via a covariant yet interconnected homotopy (with the exception of what goes into black-holes).  The eigenstates of the operation of the recycling of substringular phenomena gives off indices or constituent-force-sector codifferential loci that eventually become used elsewhere.  These eigenstates bear a Gliossi touch to other phenomena in a manner that may be mathematically based on the angle of 4pi(I) degrees based on the perspective of the globally distinguishable.  The association and relationship of globally distinguishable phenomena with other parallel universe phenomena within a given setting has a differential geometry that involves Imaginary three-dimensional tangency.  This tangency is coupled with the resonant vibration of the associated Bases of Light from within their given tori-sector-ranges.  This relationship, when reverse fractored,  maximizes the ability of color perception of living beings of whom observe phenomena.  If it wasn't for Imaginary tangency, the reverse fractored stipulated condition of color would not be possible.  Waves not only form as energy to form light, yet these waves interact at C(a constant)*Ipi degrees in many ways so as to form our ability to perceive of color.  Real tangency as a basis of borne tangency at the substringular level when reverse fractored could never allow the formation of color.  It takes a Njenhuis interaction via the sundry sequential Fourier Series  of integrated covariant and codifferential phenomena to allow for the reverse fractored condition of color.  The higher the coefficient that is to be multiplied by Ipi to determine a tensoric substringular borne tangency via countless superstings integrated as a unit of phenomena, the more likely that the "color" that would appear in the globally distinguishable would not be perceived, since the described observation of the "color" would then tend to be Ward Polorized to cause the perceived phenomenon to appear to the given viewer as dark matter.  This substringular "sensory perception" is an arbitrary example of a Yakawa Coupling.  This Coupling is an electrodynamic perception that involves electrostatics involving borne tangencies interacting with Njenhuis conditions of unborne tangencies within a proscribed operational field that involves an associated Ward Caucy boundedness.  I will continue with the suspense later.  Sincerely, Sam.       

Course 5 on Compactification And Yakawa Couplings, Session 2, Part Two(2)

So, with the quilt, the spaces described are not matter, these spaces bear insignificant energy or electromagnetic energy, and are compressible. So, what does that make the quilt? Compactible. How could the quilt be viewed of as space? Matter is mostly empty space. The more you break down phenomena, the more that you find it to be empty space. Yet reality exists. All reality depends on a framework of certain relative truth that depends on a pervasive logic, integrating into an overall reality. If this reality is truly real, then this logic shall be completely pervasive. Something that is matter has mass. Mass of the right atmospheric pressure and gravitational pull on earth will have weight. Something that is actual space as we know it to be will hot have weight. A mass of a quilt will have weight. Something that is of the globally distinguishable that is not overtly matter, energy, or electromagnetic energy will hot have size or weight in a gravitational field. A quilt consists of a mass that also has many spaces. By some weird concoction, the space may be able to form an energy. Yet, is it? No! Why? To distinguish that, yes, all is in a sense space -- yet that what is termed of as space means basically nothingness by my present content. Also, yes, all is energy -- yet that what is termed of as energy by my present context is stuff that resists compactification. What do I mean by resist? If you smush a quilt enough to eliminate the holes, you will start to encounter difficulty in smushing it any further. Why? The quilt is stuff. Stuff doesn't want to go away. If stuff gets smushed to where it doesn't want to smush any more, all of the loose spaces are gone and the stuff is said to be fully compactified or compact. The process of compactifying a phenomenon is said to be COMPACTIFICATION.

Course 4 On The Substringular Vs. The Globally Distinguishable, Session 16, Last Test

1) What is the substringular?

2) What is the gloabally distinguishable?

3) How does phenomena differentiate relative to make the substringular appear as the globally distinguishable?

4) How fast does phenomena "circle" the ultimon?

5) Why is most physical phenomena a vacuum at any given moment?

6) When is a string a string? Describe an instanton.

7) How do point particles find heir way back to form a specific string?

8) How does spin effect the relationship between the subsringular and the globally distinguishable?

9) How does roll effect the relationship between the substringular and the globally distinguishable?

10) Describe point reformation.

11) How does point reformation effect he relationship between the substringular and the globally distinguishable?

12) Describe how point particles may form a vacuum when altered.

13) Describe how a vacuum may change into strings.

14) How does the multiaxial codifferentiation of a supersting effect its relationship to light.

15) Why must the multiaxial codifferentiation of a string be fully normalized in order for the associated superstring to be tachyonic?

16) When may a particle "catch up" with light?

17) Is the multiaxial codifferentiation of a "normal" superstring normal to or parallel with the general flow of point particles? Why?

Course 4 on The Globally Distinguishable Vs. the Substringular, Session 12, Part One

So, protons are bigger than electrons. This is true both in terms of size and in terms of mass. Since a proton has more mass than an electron, it has more two-dimensional superstrings associated with its mass than an electron does. Each fundamental particle just under the level of the proton is a certain thing that describes a three-dimensional delineation in the globally distinguishable. In the subsringular, these "packages" that are here have such delineations that are actually sequences of one- and two-dimensional strings. Each of such sets is in an order in a majorized plane. Each of such stringular encodements is just a segment of its correlative substringular string. (I'll explain this later.) The order of such a set is a thin band of strand-like phenomena and hoop-like phenomena that are very limited in side-to-side transversel sway besides the basic vibration of the said superstrings. It is limited by the Caucy Ward conditions of the given world-tube that is affiliated with the said superstrings. The whole set of such sets that comprises the proton is an association of substringular sequences that exist on separate parts of a tori-sector-range (one of such per part). The symmetrism of these sequences bears a wave-tug that is mini-string that goes from not fully compactified to fully compactified once its surrounding pressure is exerted upon it in an abelian way in a manner that is like a "party whistle" that acts thru any holomorphic operand that is vacant. (Stuff with a perturbative symmetrism will push the described mini-string into an anharmonic mode.) Please wait for the physical example that I will describe to you during the second post of this session so that you will have a better feeling for the concept that I am trying to let you know.
You have a phenomenal day!
Sam.

Course 4 on The Globally Distinguishable Vs. The Substringular, Session 9, Part 2(Two)

The globally distinguishable has no infinite changes in the position of an object between two direct moments of where that object is. -- In other words, in the globally distinguishable, if an object is at one spot in one nanosecond in the globally distinguishable, it cannot appear to exist at the other end of the Continuum during the next nanosecond unless it enters the SUBSTRINGULAR. In the globally distinguishable, every particle that appears near each other is near each other. Particles that we view of as far away from each other are far away from each other. Basically, the globally distinguishable assumes that the reality that we observe is as is. It assumes that the three-dimensional delineations that we observe actually define the basis of interaction, when, in fact, these do not do that. Newtonian physics works based on the conclusions reached with the globally distinguishable. Most "logical" conclusions of physics based on matter interplay involves all stipulation as derived from the workings of the globally distinguishable. How can one say that the globally distinguishable is ever wrong? Anomalous singularities alone proves the fact that the globally distinguishable is not the ultimate in perception. When the interacting physical limits define the basis of an object to be interspersed in space and time, then it can be proven that the locus of an object is not completely isolated, and inevitably that all energies interact within very, very brief periods. Thus, no objects are only closely isolated for what we would term of as even the briefest time period. The briefest time that is actually time is 10^(-43) of a second.

Course 4 on The Globally Distinguishable Vs. The Substringular, Session Nine, Part 1

Where something is depends on what you are trying to pinpoint. Let's say, for instance, that you are trying to find a boat on the ocean. The boat may or may not be moving, at least of its own accord. If you knew the exact latitude and longitude of the ship to the nearest second at a certain instant (the selfsame minute), you would then have a neighborhood with which to look in that might be sufficient enough to help you find the boat. A boat is what we would call an object. An object that is tangible to our world is three-dimensional and moves in three-dimensional space. Any object as we just called it is a phenomenon that is perceived by us as a three-dimensional delineation in the GLOBALLY DISTINGUISHABLE. I term it as such because our direct perceptivities are in a universal encoding that our physical senses can detect or distinguish. Such an encodement of perception gives us completion in our ability to unify actual occurrences and things as an entity that is global. Another way of looking at this is that our general reality as we view it and live in it as a physical entity is the globally distinguishable. The laws of physics that are the most commonly associated with normal, everyday occurrences as we would normally think of them is the condition of reality that is thus termed globally distinguishable. So, based on this, where a person goes is where they are, not only in terms of their whole body, yet, also in terms of every particle that comprises that person -- no only at the outside of the journey, yet during the whole journey. I will continue with the suspense of this session later. Until then, you have a phenomenal day.
Catch you two!
Sincerely,
Sam.

Course 3 on Lorentz-Four-Contractions, Last Test, Part 2

9) How may one get a spherical object to Lorentz-Four-Contract uniformally?

10) May a material object contract as in one dimension in the globally distinguishable? Why? At what level could such a contraction happen?

11) Describe in general the directoralization of phenomena much larger than a string. What if its volume is radial?


12) If an object is in 3-D, how may its other dimensions happen?

13) Do strings vibrate?

14) Describe how the reiteration of a string in its neighborhood effects how it is detected.

15) Describe how an oscillating path is Lorentz-Four-Contracted by the transversel motion of its velocity in a given directoralization.