Thursday, November 4, 2010

Course 6, Session 5, Part 3, The Toroidal Nature Of Superstrings

Well hello again world, this is Samuel Roach here!  I hope that you are doing great, and that you are following along!
So, although there are 32 spacial dimensions per set of parallel universes, and there are three sets of parallel universes, the basis of spacial dimensionality is a three-dimensional world -- such as is perceived by an observer in the globally distinguishable.  When you look within the dimensions of a main world-sheet or a main world-tube, and one consequently observes a volume here, you are observing a three-dimensionality within another dimensionality.  The perceived "volume" you are observing is three-dimensional on a fundamental basis, because volume taken to where you can form an i/j/k (hat) directorallized field has a relative up-down-right-left-side-to-side basis of Neumman boundary conditions.  When you bring a field into observation to where you can dellineate these said basis of directorals -- you have globalized this field into an observers perspective.  Yet, since there are a total of 96 spacial dimensions in the physical portion of the Continuum, directorals that help to describe the delineation of space-time-fabric may be described by ihat, jhat, khat...isub2hat...lsub2hat, msub2hat, to nsub2hat.  The function of the globally distinguishable manner in which there is a basis in direcoralzation of ihat, jhat, and khat, acts according to the substringular, yet one is here able to detect indices within a smaller region.  Substringular globalizations arae smaller than the general Bases of Light are directly involved with the perceptions here, yet one is able to make computerized drawings of what is going on here based on what one knows of the activity here within specific moments of Lapalacian and Fourier Transformations.  Moments that are made up of simultaneous metric sequencial series (theoretical) are actually known as based on what we already understand, combined with experiment.  One knows the value of hbar by looking at a physics table which describes this.  When one is accurate to what is actual within the course of Planck Bar Time, then at least the accuracy of energy is within discreteness of one unit of energy.  When the curvature between two adjacent tori-sector-ranges relative to a central one is completely flush over the sub-metric that happens during the Bases of Light (which is in-between instantons and right before instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode), then the curvature is within one tense of a globalization of curvature as may be perceived by a living being.  Remember, substringular string is composed of many minit superstring, and mini-string forms the field of superstrings.  So, discrete energy permittivity is always perceived during instanton, and discrete energy impedance is always perceived during instanton.  Here's more as to why.:  it is the mutually interaction of discrete energy permittivity with discrete energy impedance that allows the activity of the light-cone-gauge to be able to fascilitate the "springing" into action of superstrings and their corresponding Planck phenomenon related phenomena through the course of the generally unperceived activity that happens in-between instantons.  Why do I write "Planck phenomenon related phenomena" instead of just "Planck phenomena?"  Because what I term of as just "Planck phenomena" is the smoothest curvature in terms of topological hermicity that is possible, given the general curvature of the corresponding Basis of Light that converts into that phenomena that interacts with superstrings so to create the basic fields of discrete energy permittivity and discrete energy impedance that form a disrete unit of energy that may be transversally described as an eigenstate of Planck energy, and also, that has discrete radial motion that may be describe of as an eigenstate of Planck Bar energy.  I would just love to hear some education responses.  I will leave with a question.:  How does the condition of the substringular's toroidal nature that is often exhibited as a unit fractor down to the toroidal nature that is often exhibited by superstrings?  I will begin to answer some of this question later.  Until then, I will continue with the suspense later, and you have a phenomenal day!  Sincerely, Sam.                                                        

No comments: