Dimensionality and Gravitational Pull

When a phenomenon is traveling with more spatial dimensions that are directly associated with the immediate field of the said phenomenon, when compared to the condition of the same phenomenon when it is traveling in fewer spatial dimensions, the degree of the relative scalar amplitude of gravity in general that is applied to the initially mentioned phenomenon is dependent upon whether or not the said immediate field -- that the said phenomenon that is traveling in additional spatial dimensions is traveling through per time -- has more of an abelian geometry applied to it, or, whether it has more of a non-abelian geometry applied to it. So, when a phenomenon is traveling in more dimensions than it usually is traveling through over an analogous timeframe -- these timeframes of which act through the same duration and through the same general format of terrestrial-based path -- if the initially mentioned phenomenon has more of an abelian-based differentially geometric field applied to it, then, the gravitational force that will act upon it will be greater than if it traveled in fewer spatial dimensions over the given arbitrary duration in the given arbitrary general format of projection. Yet, if the initially mentioned phenomenon has more of a non-abelian-based differentially geometric field applied to it, then, the gravitational force that will act upon it will be less than if it had traveled in fewer spatial dimensions over the given arbitrary duration in the given arbitrary general format of projection. This is because extraneous wave-tug and/or wave-pull that is abrasive upon a phenomenon under such an eluded to substringular scenario will add extraneous impedance upon the Rarita Structure-based eigenindices that are applied to a given phenomenon over a respective common duration in a respective common format of projection, while, a lowering of wave-tug and/or wave-pull that would otherwise be abrasive upon a phenomenon under such an eluded to substringular scenario will work to decrease the extraneous impedance upon the Rarita Structure-based eigenindices that are applied to a given phenomenon over a respective common duration in a respective common format of projection.  Less extraneous impedance acting upon a phenomenon means a both an added potential for permittivity and propagation of the immediate field of a given arbitrary phenomenon, and, such an added potential for permittivity and propagation is shown when there is less of a gravitational limitation that is imposed upon the same  stated given arbitrary phenomenon.  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.                                          

Session 9 of Course 9

A dilaton is a quantum of phenomena that comprises gravity.  A graviton is a quantum of transversal gravity.  A gravitino is a quantum of radial  gravity.  Perturbations in the metrical directoralizaation of gravitons and gravitinos are examples of space-time-related spurious operations.  World-Sheet-related spurious operations are characterized by perturbations in the transversal and radial propagations of superstrings.  Anharmonic differentiation in the radial actions of strings during the general Ultimon metric, coupled with the anharmonic differentiation of norm-states that act upon these strings, are spurious -- and such a spurious operation acts to redelineate the spacial transfiguration of the surrounding gravitons and gravitinos.  When spurious states quantize and propagate in a differentiating Hilbert Fock Space -- after countless iterations of instanton -- in the threshold of a given tori-sector-range that is multiplicitly delineated in an arbitrary region, are initially made taut (the abelian geometry will here involve a more directly Gliossi tangency) relative to one another -- while the consequence of such an arbitrary Fourier Transformation is that the described superstrings are then sucked into a quantum of dilatons and dilitinos that are inactivated by the prior tadpole-related group action.  The pull of the mentioned dilatons and dilatinos, coupled by the described spurious operation of the mentioned tadpoles upon the either Yang-Mills or Kaluza-Klein topological surface (such a surface that the given activity acts upon may holonomically be, in and of itself, either abelian or non-abelian in terms of the topological geometry of its wave-tug through a given arbitrary Lagrangian over the course of an arbitrary Fourier Transformation that is occuring in the region, that may be arbitrarily perceived within a relatively limited locus) that may be metrically described as existing within a Majorana-Weyl tense of conformal invariance.  Such a metrically-based Majorana-Weyl-associated topological interaction of the described superstrings of the given tori-sector-range, when dangerous tadpoles increase in terms of the frequency of their summed Hodge-Indices, may fray the substrigular fabric of the given tori-sector-range in its multiplicitly delineated region to form a black-hole.  Meanwhile, the space-hole eigenstates of the other tori-sector-ranges of the Overall-Space-Time-Continuum reconnect their topologically-ordered eigenstates so that the operation of Cassimer Invariance may keep the here associated superstrings that are left into a more consolidated network that lets the existence of pre-existing black-holes to fray to some extent the phenomena of their regions.  This consolidation transfigures after each iteration of instanton in which phenomena is brought into the mentioned black-holes.  Such tranfigurations is allowed by the resettling mode of the space-hole via Cassimer Invariance before each instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode.
Black-Holes may be elliminated in a fashion that alters these into a harmonic substance that is composed of homogeneous sets of kinematically covariant inter-relations of Campbell and Hausendorf Projections that still allow star and planetary cycling that does not eat up the mentioned stars and planets.  This mentioned operation also works to allow the assymetric radial and spin-orbital motion of galaxies in such a manner so that space-time-fabric will here no longer need to expand or contract.  The manner of such conversion I will not put on  the Internet no matter what!!!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.                                                     

FTAAN, Session 11

When a light-cone-gauge eigenstate is abelian, its corresponding superstring and counterstring are generally non-abelian. When a light-cone-gauge eigenstate is non-abelian, its corresponding superstring and counterstring are generally abelian. When a light-cone-gauge eigenstate is abelian, the mini-strings in-between the corresponding superstrings and its counterpart are also abelian. When a light-cone-gauge eigenstate is non-abelian, the mini-strings in-between the corresponding superstring and its counterstring are also non-abelian. When a light-cone-gauge eigenstate is abelian, the surrounding connective mini-strings are partially abelian with a tendency towards non-abelian. When a light-cone-gauge eigenstate is non-abelian, the surrounding connective mini-strings are partially abelian with a tendency towards abelian. The mini-strings that interconnect certain superstrings with certain other supersrings always have a tension, yet always have a slack in the line. Abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstates have relatively more slack in the connective mini-strings that connect their corresponding superstring, although abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstates themselves have no slack in the line in and of themselves. Non-Abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstates in and of themselves have slack in the line although their corresponding mini-strings that bind their corresponding superstrings have relatively less slack than the mini-strings that bind the corresponding superstring of abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstates. In other words, the peripheral mini-strings that associate with a light-cone-gauge eigenstate within a Gaussian eigenbasis have a virtually opposite abelian geometry to the abelian geometry of the given light-cone-gauge eigenstate itself. The abelian geometry of strings and counterstring themselves is generally opposite to that of the mini-strings that bind these. The abelian geometry of the mini-strings in-between strings and counterstrings is the same as that of the light-cone-gauge. A light-cone-gauge eigenstate is the same mini-string behavior in-between a Planck phenomena related phenomenon and its corresponding superstring. The light-cone-gauge is the integration of all of the light-cone-gauge eigenstates.