Some Stuff About The Gell-Namn-Najshima Relations

Those sets of boundary-based conditions of the multiplicit acting quarks -- when one discerns the covariance of their so-eluded-to parity-based interactions -- that work to establish the kinematic interplay of their Ward-Caucy bounds, as taken over the multiplicit Sterling-based approximations of their sequential series of iterations, that is of their directly corresponding group instantons, -- that work to form that energy that such quarks function in, in so as to operate as such a partial of any directly related subatomic source of physical entity over time, -- is the concept of as to what may here be termed of as the Gell-Namn-Najshima relations that exist in the substringular.
 I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Some More Knowledge As To World-Sheets

There are many other superstrings that may be able to iterate and reiterate in the general locus as to where a given arbitrary world-sheet had acted upon -- as evidenced by the sequential set of permutations that may be imbued upon an initial given arbitrary ghost anomaly that had been formed, in a set locus that may be reformed and perturbated by the ensuing activity of the kinematic motion of alterior superstrings -- that will then have here moved upon the so-stated given arbitrary set of ghost-based indices, that had initially integrated at a previous discrete metrical instant.  This happens in such a manner  to where the so-eluded-to "initial" ghost anomaly had been formed here will then function in so as to act as the physical evidence of the given arbitrary superstring, that was implied to be the prior extrapolated Hamiltonian operator that had "first" moved upon the starting so-eluded-to Hamiltonian operand.  A world-sheet may be either cylindrical, a disc with an anuulus, a toroid, a mobius-shaped configuration, or, another general format of planar-based configuration, whose topology is hermitian -- if the torsioning of the Ward-Caucy bounds of the Sterling approximation, as to the kinematic "thrust" of that superstring, that would here work to form the so-eluded-to world-sheet and its corresponding ghost anomaly, bears both a harmonic Hamiltonian-based gauge-metric and a harmonic Hamiltonian-based local tracing of its directly corresponding Lagrangian.  If the superstring in question is perturbated into either an anharmonic singularization of gauge-metrics and/or if the superstring in question is perturbated from a local base of Lagrangian-based tracing -- that would here map a format of singularity in its delineatory eigenbase, then, the topological genus of the progression of the kinematic changes in the derivatives of the Ward-Caucy bounds, of the kinematic-based tracing of the motion of the said given arbitrary superstring, would bear a Chern-Simmons eigenbase.  This latter genus of implied torsioning would work to form an added eigenbase of Mobiaty to the extrapolatable tracing of either the pulse and/or the path of the so-stated given arbitrary superstring, which would here work to involve a Njenhuis set of tensors that  would work to alter the local "infrastructure" of the Rarita Structure eigenbase, -- that would then work to alter the local format as to how both the local gravity and the local space-time-curvature would be primed at the so-eluded-to cite.

Part Three of the Last Interim

Bosonic superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that are swivel-shaped -- when in terms of their general contour, in comparison with other two-dimensional superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- are more likely to become unorientable, and thus, these so-stated closed superstrings are more likely to be or are to become tachyonic.  The tendency of a tachyonic flow tends to be a relatively transient duration of flow -- relative to the tendency of Noether Flow, when in consideration of the lengths of comparative metrical duration.  Yet, the length of the parametric sway of the Lagrangian-basis of a tachyonic-based flow is often of a greater scalar magnitude than the length of the parametric sway of the Lagrangian-basis of a comparative Noether-based flow.  This is whether the kinematic basis of such a so-stated parametric flow is unitary, binary, tritiary, or of more multiplicity, respectively to another of such a comparative traceable substringular flow that is instead of a set Noether basis -- in terms of the respective consideration of the basis of directoral permtttivity that is over the directly corresponding given arbitrary group metric.  The more of a multivarious and/or multiplicit basis of a tachyonic-based flow is, the more likely that there will be a Chern-Simmons-based format of a Gaussian-based group attractor that will then here work to integrate within the general Lagrangian of Mobiaty that the holonomic substrate of substringular phenomena that is to become tachyonic will then, here, kinematically be able to be mobilized within -- over the ensuing duration in which the so-eluded-to substringular phenoemena is to be activated as being tachyonic, as a cross-product-based delineatory subgroup that is within what here may be considered any given arbitrary so-eluded-to Ward-Caucy bounds in which a tachyonic phenomena is thus formed.

Overall Directoral Topological Sway

When two orbifolds that are of two different universes are brought into a spurious-based Gliossi-based Yakwawa Coupling -- which is the initially given arbitrary orbifold striking into the second given arbitrary orbifold -- there is a certain covariant kinematic-based symmetry as to the motion of one of the orbifolds relative to the other one that is struck, as I have mentioned.  So, although there is a dual activity of two different Hodge-Index-based Hamiltonian operations -- that work to describe the substringular momentum of the initial eluded to orbifold relative to the other given orbifold, there is, also to be considered, the dual genus of the Lagrangian that works to inter-bind the interaction of the two orbifolds, that, here, come into direct contact with each other.  There is also the dual symmetrical directoral-based path that, here, works to trace both the fractals of the angular momentum-based Hamiltonian index and the fractal of the spin-orbital momentum-based Hamiltonian index as to the format and parity of the here eluded to collision.  So, when one considers the traceable mapping of the Ward-Caucy-based path directoral of the Lagrangian of the intially considered orbifold with the traceable mapping of the Ward-Caucy-based path directoral of the Lagrangian of the second given arbitrary considered orbifold -- that the first so-mentioned substringular group attractor works to describe as then here directly touching the second so-mentioned substringular group attractor in this scenario, the overall parity and chirality genus of the first eluded to semi-group as here interacting with the overall parity and chirality genus of the second eluded to semi-group, at contact -- along with the angling of the directoral topological sway of the two inter-reacting orbifolds during the self-same interaction -- works to help describe the here resultant conditions that are to then bear a Majorana-Weyl covariant mode upon both the metrical and phenomenal-based activity that happens, once the two so-stated orbifolds come into a direct contact here.  I will continue with the suspense later!
Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Changes in Layers of Reality

When a Major Reality Change happens, -- when one-ten-thousandth of history changes -- multiplicity pairs of two orbifold eigensets that are respectively of different universes each strike each other in a prominently Gliossi maner.  This condition of multiple pairs of relatively Njenhuis orbifolds striking is, in effect, a condition of many orbifolds striking each other as different physically kinematic spaces that are Njenhuis to one another, while yet bearing a tightly bound Yakawa Coupling with and upon each other.  This direct physical contact of core substringular field density of two different universe-based spatial indices hitting each other head-on will here happen in a spurious manner -- to where there is not enough time for these spaces that are intrinsically Njenhuis to each other in their covariance to synchrounize their instrinsice vibrations as these are inflected by the resultant perturbation in their Ward-Caucy bounds.  This works to deactivate what was the predominant layer of reality -- while yet activating another layer of reality as then being predominant.  Enough said here for now.  I will continue the suspense later!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Part Two(2) of the Thirteenth Session Session of Course 14

The world-sheets that directly correspond to one and two-dimensional substringular encoders are operational  as traceable mappings of a physical memory -- as to how and where these were, at the prior delineation.  This is only during the generally unnoticed format of those durations of Ultimon Flow that exist in-between successive iterations of group instanton.  The basic structure of these said one and two-dimensional substringular encoders, when these encode for the predominant layer of reality that is "phenotypical" at the "time" -- always come back to basically the same spot. This is because substringular encoders exist outside of the Ward-Caucy bounds of the world-tubes in which superstrings of discrete energy permittivity kinematically differentiate in over time. This is over the course of the iterations of the successive series of group instantons, of which would here directly correspond to the activity of the said encoder, as it is then the encoder of what would here be of the active predominant layer of reality.  This, of which, exists over the course of a given arbitrary duration that may be considered here.  The mini-string segments that extend from the base of the structures of a substringular encoder, though, vary in their delineation vastly, after each succeeding index of the iteration of group instanton.  The actual holonomic substrate that works to comprise any given arbitrary substingular encoder, when perceived at the base of its structural entity, is indistinguishably different during each succeeding iteration of group instanton.  This is when one considers the primal format of the general construction -- that is at the said base of the structure of the respective stringular encoder -- during an integrable set of group instantons.  Yet, at the Poincaire level of each first-ordered-point particle that works to comprise any given substringular encoder -- even at each comparable sequence of iteration that may here, then, in a covariant mapped-out tracing of the directly corresponding weaving, works to show the literal construction of each first-ordered index of the given arbitrary substringular encoder.  This is true, particularly, when one considers the integration of the said first-ordered indices that works to comprise the said encoder. Such a specific arrangement of the literal field of the corresponding mapped-based trace of the respective mini-string -- that inter-binds to form any of such said encoders -- will vary in terms of their structural genus. I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The Last Part Of the Ninth Session Of Course 14

The vibrating energy of nucleons is a form of plain kinetic energy, and, this just mentioned energy is therefore comprised of one-dimensional superstrings, or, in other words, these are comprised of open strings.  As an object that contains atoms increases in kinetic energy, the object differentiates kinematically with more one-dimensional open strings, likewise.  This is because kinetic energy is comprised of open one-dimensional superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.  Mass in electrons is comprised of two-dimensional closed superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.  Such a given arbitrary mass here -- in the case of electrons -- bears a negative charge.  Mass in protons is comprised of closed two-dimensional superstrings of discrete energy permittivity as well.  Yet, the difference between the genus of the  mass of an electron and the genus of the mass of a proton is related to the spinning tensors of their respective orbifold that work to form both formats of mass as having an opposite genus of spin-orbital parity.  Electrons have a fractional spin, whereas, protons have a whole spin.  This is because electrons are fermions and protons are bosons.  The phenomena of a proton is comprised of more vibrating hoops and less vibrating strands than the phenomena of electrons, on account of the condition that protons bear more mass and less plain kinetic energy than electrons.  This is part of what works to cause protons to act as bosons, while, electrons act as fermions.  Neutrons are phenomena that are comprised of one quark and two leptons, giving this a neutral charge.  (Neutrons bear no physical charge.)  Electrons are considered negatively charged because their energy per charge works to repel more per mass than that of their protonic counterparts. -- This is due to the condition that electrons bear a high transversal energy as compared to that of protons.  (The given arbitrary electrons of one given arbitrary atom cycle around a relatively speaking motionless nucleus that vibrates in a locally covariant static manner.)  Protons are considered to be positively charged because these attract electrons. -- Proton(s) have a wave-pull/wave-tug that acts upon the delineatory basis of the respective electron(s) of any given arbitrary atom.  Energy per charge is voltage.  Electric voltage works to repel, because the energy per charge that may be considered here works from the interior of the directly corresponding magnetic field of a given said eigenstate of such electric voltage toward the relative outward bearings of the respective Ward-Caucy bounds of the topological substrate where such a field of voltage exists -- this being at a locally static extrapolation of such a field.  This corresponds to the condition that electrons are at the exterior of any given arbitrary neutral atom, in relative positioning, when compared to the corelative nucleons, which are interior to the just mentioned electrons.  So, when we come into contact with any mass -- what we tend to detect is electrodynamic phenomena.  This is why electrons are considered to be the basis of point-mass.
I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part One of the Test Solutions to the First Test of Course 14

1)  A veilbien is a given arbitrary scalar degree or manner in which a Lorentz-Four-Contraction is applied toward a respective given arbitrary physical phenomenon -- of which alters in its physical condition when this is considered relative to its velocity or motion when relative to both the velocity or motion, &, the existence of electromagnetic energy (namely, light).

2)  A tetrad is a given arbitrary degree or manner in which a Lorentz-Four-Contraction is decreased or decremented toward a respective given arbitrary physical phenomenon -- of which alters in its physical condition when relative to its velocity or motion relative to both the velocity or motion, &, the existence electromagnetic energy (namely, light).

3)  A trivial isomorphism is a physical symmetry, of which here involves two or more respective individual mapped-out sets of physical patterns, that, when such an eluded to mapping is folded in a timeless manner -- forms a physical basis of a dual, or, potentially multplicit, traced reflection -- in terms of the directly related physical patterns that are here folded at a central coniaxial.  Such a folding at the said given arbitrary central coniaxial may be extrapolated in-between one or more directly related local eigensets of superstrings (physical spaces that are here comprised of two or more superstrings, each, of which operate to perform a specific function) of such an eluded to physical pattern-based format, when in conjunction with the given arbitrary substringular counterparts that are here directly involved with their corresponding superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.  Such counterparts of the so stated superstrings of discrete energy permittivity of which exist in the directly related eigensets, or orbifolds, that work to form this given arbitrary example of trivial isomorphism.  This would here happen in such a manner that will then form a reciprocal contour that is bimorphologically even, and, without any alterior permutations that would otherwise form an unwanted superfluity.  This format of such a condition of Ward-Caucy bounds is then one of which works to allow for  the condition of such a given arbitrary eluded to mentioned folding, in so as to form a potential extrapolatory multiple of the same format of local region-based tracing.

Session 8 Of Course 12, Part One

One-Dimensional superstrings may be relatively straight, arced, and/or swivel-shaped over the course of an iteration of group instanton.  When a one-dimensional string is swivel-shaped at a corresponding iteration of instanton, the mentioned swivel-like configuration may be like a loose line or it may have a traspositional differentiation in the hoops of the direrctly related swivel-like parts that work to comprise the outer topological basis of the directly related vibrating strand that we are discussing here.  What I mean by a transpositional differentiation is that the hoops that work to comprise the said swivel may arc at different angles -- when relative to a plane that is here outside of the Real Reimmanian plane that is to be considered in this given arbitrary case. When a string acts as a swivel-like vibrating strand at an iteration of group instanton, then the string considered here may spring out over the course of the said iteration in a potentially tachyonic manner over its ensuing Ultimon Cycle on account of the relative Real Reimmanian plane-based hoops that work to comprise the outer fringes of the said superstring that is within the Ward-Caucy bounds of the directly related superstring.  Part Two Later!  Sincerely, Sam.