Part Two(2) of the Thirteenth Session Session of Course 14

The world-sheets that directly correspond to one and two-dimensional substringular encoders are operational  as traceable mappings of a physical memory -- as to how and where these were, at the prior delineation.  This is only during the generally unnoticed format of those durations of Ultimon Flow that exist in-between successive iterations of group instanton.  The basic structure of these said one and two-dimensional substringular encoders, when these encode for the predominant layer of reality that is "phenotypical" at the "time" -- always come back to basically the same spot. This is because substringular encoders exist outside of the Ward-Caucy bounds of the world-tubes in which superstrings of discrete energy permittivity kinematically differentiate in over time. This is over the course of the iterations of the successive series of group instantons, of which would here directly correspond to the activity of the said encoder, as it is then the encoder of what would here be of the active predominant layer of reality.  This, of which, exists over the course of a given arbitrary duration that may be considered here.  The mini-string segments that extend from the base of the structures of a substringular encoder, though, vary in their delineation vastly, after each succeeding index of the iteration of group instanton.  The actual holonomic substrate that works to comprise any given arbitrary substingular encoder, when perceived at the base of its structural entity, is indistinguishably different during each succeeding iteration of group instanton.  This is when one considers the primal format of the general construction -- that is at the said base of the structure of the respective stringular encoder -- during an integrable set of group instantons.  Yet, at the Poincaire level of each first-ordered-point particle that works to comprise any given substringular encoder -- even at each comparable sequence of iteration that may here, then, in a covariant mapped-out tracing of the directly corresponding weaving, works to show the literal construction of each first-ordered index of the given arbitrary substringular encoder.  This is true, particularly, when one considers the integration of the said first-ordered indices that works to comprise the said encoder. Such a specific arrangement of the literal field of the corresponding mapped-based trace of the respective mini-string -- that inter-binds to form any of such said encoders -- will vary in terms of their structural genus. I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.