Homotopic Topological Sway Of Majorana-Weyl-Invariant Spinor

 When a given arbitrary Majorana-Weyl-Invariant Spinor is to oscillate, in a manner that is relatively Nijenhuis to the holomorphic direction of the correlative wave-tug, that is here to be of its directly associated angular momentum, it hereby follows, that the corroborative torsional topological sway, of its earlier inferred tense, of a spin-related oscillation, may be said to tend to bear the general tense, of a physical homotopic symmetrical attribute.(1989). TO BE CONTINUED! SAMUEL DAVID ROACH.  

Why Lagrangian-Based Motion Tends To "Ripple"

 Discrete Quanta of energy have the general tendency, of continually working to bear both an oscillation-based motion, And, a transversal-based motion. When these are to combine, this general tendency of a simultaneously combined radial And transversal motion, (at the vantage-point of the respectively considered individually taken discrete quanta of energy), works to form the multiplicity, of a frequency of vibration -- as taken over the durational-based Fourier-Related-Progression, of the Lagrangian-Based motion, of the kinematic spatial translation, of a given arbitrary directly associated tense of a Hamiltonian Operator. (And, a Hamiltonian Operator is generally considered to be the overall energy of a system.) Such an earlier stated frequency, of which may often be perceived of as being the Inverse of the time of an energy-related physical vibration, may often be indicative, of the ripple-like motion of an eigenstate of an energy-related disturbance of space, of which is to interact spontaneously with the immediately externalized space-time-fabric that surrounds it, in a Gliossis-based manner, over time, in so as to work to form the general tense, of the topological multiplicity, of what may be thought of as being, cohomology-related manifolds. TO BE CONTINUED! SINCERELY, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH. (1989).

Kahler-Based Quotients And Substringular Structural Integrity

The greater the scalar amplitude of the correlative Kahler-based quotient of an orbifold eigenset -- the more fortified the E(8)XE(8) oscillation-based tendency is.  The more fortified the E(8)XE(8) oscillation-based tendency is, -- the greater the structural integrity is, of the directly corresponding orbifold eigenset.  Samuel David Roach.

An Editorial As To The "Force"

The following is simply an editorial:

Is it possible, -- that the proximal local existing presence of quantized E(8)XE(8) stringular-based oscillation-related tendency in life forms (or, in other words, in any given arbitrary phenomenology, that is able to, in at least some manner of degree or another, to overcome at least some of its surrounding entropy) , is related to both the existence of soul energy, as well as here to be related to the existence of what one may term of here as being the entity of the multiplicit field of sentient-based "force?"  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Fluctuation In Electric Field

The wavelength of a beam of any given arbitrary tense of electromagnetic energy, is equal to one complete oscillation of the fluctuation of the directly corresponding respective electric field.
Here's one way of looking at what is here to be meant by "the fluctuation of the directly corresponding electric field."
Let us consider a metaphorical "shaft of brightness," that is here to be at one given arbitrary maximum cross-sectional measure of thickness, for such a so-eluded-to beam.  Let us now say that this said respective shaft, is here to be traveling in a vacuum -- to where it will be propagated, in so as to be traveling as straight as the general innate bending of space and time is to be designated-- along the general course of space and time.  As this said "shaft of brightness" is to be propagated along the general course of space and time -- the so-eluded-to projected beam of brightness, that is here to be linearly delineated, will then tend to go from smoothly decreasing in its cross-sectional thickness, to then going into smoothly re-gaining its initial so-eluded-to cross-sectional thickness, and back again.  In the meanwhile, the center of such a harmonic tense of a fluctuation is to be going as perfectly straight -- as the natural bending of space and time will tend to allow. The scalar distance that is to be considered here, as being taken along the vantage-point, of an extrapolation that is here to be Poincare to the topology-related center of such a so-named shaft of brightness, in which there is here to be the completion of one whole individually taken tense, of the earlier mentioned harmonic perturbation in the cross-sectional thickness of the so-eluded-to beam -- may be here to be analogous to what is meant -- as to what is here to be happening to a beam of electromagnetic energy, as it is here to be harmonically fluctuating in its electric field over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Adjacent Superstring Wobble Versus Adjacent Light-Cone-Gaug Wobble

Take the covariant angling of oscillation-based wobbling, that is here to exist between any two given arbitrary immediately adjacent superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.  Whatever this so-eluded-to covariant angling of oscillation-based wobbling is -- multiply it by i (the square-root of -1), and one will then get what the covariant angling of oscillation-based wobbling will be, between the two directly corresponding first-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates -- that are here to act in so as to work to make-up the primarily wave-based functioning of the discrete energy impedance, that is to be directly corresponding to the correlative superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- that are of such a respective given arbitrary case scenario.  So, if two immediately adjacent superstrings are subtended from each other, with a covariant angling of oscillation-based wobbling of (10i)degrees -- as just an arbitrary example, and this would then certainly mean that these two said superstrings will tend to be of two different universal settings -- then, those first-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that are here to work to make up the two comparative said respective discrete quanta of energy -- will then be in so as to work to bear a covariant angling of oscillation-based wobbling of (-10) degrees.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.