Session 7 of Course 9 on Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge

What forms the Mobius Twist of an activated tori-sector-range, the Mobius Twist of which completes itself at the center-state eigenbasis of the prior mentioned tori-sector-range?  The encoder strings (the encoder string and its counterpart) of an activated tori-sector-range enter the encodement section that these encoder string belong to.  Meanwhile, the Planck phenomenon related phenomena along with their corresponding superstrings homotopically release residue into the Royal Arc that these belong to.  After the Planck phenomena and their corresponding superstrings cycle their section of the Ultimon, and the corresponding encoder string and its counterpart cycle their respective section of the Ultimon as well -- roughly one time, the space-hole happens.  While the space-hole happens, the Planck phenomenon-related phenomena form a large Basis of Light.  When the instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode happens, the overall Basis of Light reties into the many Planck phenomena that exist.  The Planck phenomena visages, virtual Planck phenomena, and the virtual Planck phenomena visages act as the field of the Overall Basis of Light.  So, when the Overall Basis of Llight reties into many Planck phenomena, the virtual Planck phenomena, Planck phenomena visages, and the virtual Planck phenomena visages retie to accomedate the Planck phenomena.  By the time that the stringular encoder and its counterpart, that are associated with the given Basis of Light that is being discussed here, of an activated tori-sector-range are molded into a center-state, the Planck phenomena, virtual Planck phenomena, Planck phenomena visages, and the virtual Planck phenomena visages are retied into their iteration-based fields.  Here, imaginary exchange of Real Residue occurs.
Next, I will discuss the concept of time-orieted and relatively timeless light-cone-gauge-eigenstates.                               

Session 3 On Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge

A substringular encodement and its physical counterpart iterates at its home tori-sector-range in the arbitrary case that I am now starting to describe.  The substringular encoders then break down into point particles that retain a closely knit neighborhood relative to each other.  The forward time related encoder particles travel counterclockwise around the Ultimon and the backward time related encoder particles travel clockwise around the Ultimon in their respective world-tubes.  The forward and backward encoder particles meet at their respective tori-sector-range regions at one tori-sector-range locus per encoder before it reaches its primed location, given the general locus of where the tori-sector-range-based substringular encoder that is positioned reverse-holomorphic relative to a given encoder is at. This is during the same covariant multiplicit metric as the specific case of the arbitrary home tori-sector-range region that I have been here describing, relative to the other forward and backward time related encoder particles.  The backward and forward time related substringular particles in the process make just under one circuit of their world tubes, on account of the fact that, during the beginning of Ultimon Flow, it takes one hbar of Imaginary yet actual time for all of the superstrings in one particular given world-tube to go just around the general locus of where the tori-sector-range that is reverse holomorphic in terms of Laplacian placement is at when one considers the relative positioning of any specific tori-sector-range that one could mention that is here traveling through Ultimon Flow.The encoder phenomena, along with what these encode for, are now pulled into the Main Heterotic String Fabric.  In the meanwhile, it takes the same general circuit around the world-tubes for the superstrings of an encoder as it takes for the respective encoder (the encoders encode for what we would call superstrings) in one hbar time to be in a position to enter the Main Heterotic Stringular Fabric, since the encoders, during instanton, are localized just above the center of the annulus where such encoders pull their respective superstrings, counterstrings, and Planck-Like phenonemena into the mentioned locus of the Main Heterotic Stringular Fabric.  For such encoders of our set of parallel universes, which here is the arbitrary case scenario, the encoders then travel into the said Heterotic fabric, pulling themselves with their contingent phenomena norm to anti-holomorphic (relative "down") into the sides of the said Fabric, while then moving in a cross-product directoralization to just "under" the middle set of parallel universes, while then moving norm-to-holomorphic (relatively "up") into the middle set of parallel universes.  The prior mentioned encoders then break down into point particles that retain a closely knit neighborhood relative to each other.                            
The forward time related encoder particles travel counterclockwise around the Ultimon and the backward time related encoder particles travel clockwise around the Ultimon in their respective world-tubes.  The same then happens as before, except that the (n-1) function as to the general locus where the tori-sector-ranges are pulled into the Main Heterotic String Fabric happens, in this case, in such a manner so as to pull phenomena into the relatively far set of parallel universes.  I will continue with the suspense later.  Sincerely, Sam.                                                                  

The Importance of E(8)XE(8) Strings

One may wish to understand the importance of E(8)XE(8) superstrings. These type of heterotic superstrings exist at the outer periphery of every orbifold and at the outer periphery of every orbifold eigenset. Such heterotic strings that are adjacent spin asymmetrically so that these may have their own Laplacian and Fourier subspace that is not intruded upon. Orbifolds that comprise of mass and orbifold eigensets that comprise of mass have pairing counterpart E(8)XE(8) strings that have a non-trivial isomorphism related to their Laplacian placement per iteration of the substringular, and orbifolds that comprise of light and orbifold eigensets that comprise of light have pairing counterpart E(8)XE(8) strings that have a trivial isomorphism related to their Laplacian placement per iteration of the substringular. This is because orbifolds and orbifold eigensets that appertain to mass bear a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge-topology, and has spacial singularities in-between their respective superstrings and in-between their respective orbifolds that are Yau-Exact, while, the orbifolds and orbifold eigensets that appertain to light generally bear a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge-topology (always except within very few instantons that the light has scattered), and has spacial singularities in-between their respective superstrings and in-between their respective orbifolds that is not Yau-Exact. So, the E(8)XE(8) strings work to bind the superstrings into orbifolds and E(8)XE(8) strings work to bind the respective orbifolds into orbifold eigensets (like a fractor of the activity of gluons binding leptons and quarks into sub-atomic particles, except that the given heterotic strings described are more kinematic, since these described heterotic superstrings differentiate in a sub-level to phenomena such as gluons.

Course 2, Session 1

What is a line? A line is a curvature that goes straight in whichever direction you consider it going in. If the line were ideal and not a segment, then it would go infinitely in either direction. Since the universe that we are dealing with is limited, it is finite. Anything that is finite as a discrete size. Therefore, any line that is physical is limited, and thereby finite. Thus, there are no physical lines with infinite length. This means that there is actually no ideal line. Lines are segments.

In our previous course, we discussed that phenomena is constantly in flux. Organization allows life, and life proves a relative degree of order. In order for order to proceed from physical flux and reassociations, there must be a set of physical points that are flush for every eigenstate of encasement. Each point particle of such a flush array must have a counterpart that allows each to lock in as a stabilized action. Otherwise, the flush orientation would just be a transient coincidental array and THAT would not happen. The counterpart would associate here due to an attraction due to wave supplementation. The flush array of Real points mentioned here is an example of a one-dimensional string. Its counterpart is the Fock Space association of the string.

Strings are physical. These are relatively optimum and necessarily, yet these are not ideal. Strings are small, yet these also have thickness. These are straight, yet these are not infinite in flushness. Strings are temporary per iteration, yet these hold near position for a slightly longer metric than the adjacent point commutators, although these subsequently speed up for a brief while.

Every string in the substringular has segments that make it up. Each of these segments is a separation from space as it normally is, and I call these “partitions.” Each of these “partitions” encodes for a string in the realm that we would detect them. Each of these globally distinguishable strings has one aberration from flushness. The aberration from the flushness of the globally distinguishable strings is equal to the thickness of one point particle. In the substringular, the partition is smaller than the string that it encodes for. The strings in the substringular keep flush top to bottom in the world-tube/general world-sheet that these iterate in.