Whenever electromagnetic energy scatters upon another phenomenon -- one or more photons is each (each photon), individually taken, acting in so as to strike the externalized core-field-density of the light-cone-gauge topology of another discrete quantum of energy. So, whenever electromagnetic energy is to scatter upon anything in a Noether-related manner, over time -- the resultant Gaussian Transformation that is correlative to the Kahler-Metric, that is here in a Gliosis-related manner, may be called a gauge-transformation. It is the Fourier-based activity of gauge-bosons -- acting in so as to "pluck" the correlative and respective second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates, -- that works to form those Schwinger-Indices, that move in so as to flow about the Rarita Structure, in so as to work to influence as to what genus of force is to be displayed at where, in the Ward-Cauchy realm of the substringular. When such Schwinger-Indices come together, in so as to work to form a wave-based holonomic substrate -- that is to travel in both a transversal and in a perpendicular manner over time -- this works to form gravitational waves. When such Schwinger-Indices work to help at localizing a multiplicit quantum of discrete energy per cohomological generation over time, -- this works to then help at forming a basis for the electromotive force. When such Schwinger-Indices work to form a centralized knotting of eigenstates along the multiplicit Rarita Structure eigenstates -- this works to help at forming the strong force. Furthermore, when such Schwinger-Indices work to destabilize the strong force indirectly at various loci, -- this works to help at forming the weak force. Metaphorically think of the Rarita Structure as like the "veins" and the "arteries," in a way, in the general tense of a perception, that is over the sequential series of instantons that occur during the generally noticed duration of Ultimon Flow. Next, -- metaphorically think of the Schwinger-Indices as the "blood" that works to help at carrying nutrients to the multiplicit array of living cells, -- by the condition that this is symbolic of the condition that the Fourier-related activity of the multiplicit Schwinger-Indices, works along the Rarita Structure, in so as to help to provide for the enactment of the basic forces that exist in nature.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
Showing posts with label loci. Show all posts
Showing posts with label loci. Show all posts
Saturday, June 2, 2018
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Session 9 Of Course One
If two things are next to each other, then these are near. If the same two things are
separated by a substantial distance, then these are far. Two things that are near each other
are relatively local. Two things that are far from each other are not relatively local. Two
things that are made relatively local to each other have become localized. Two things,
however, that were relatively local and subsequently became separated have become
delocalized.
A man who lives by his neighbor is local to that neighbor. The man’s children, you
might add, are even more local to that man. Yet the man’s neighbor is certainly more
local to him than someone on the opposite side of the planet, at least in terms of physical
nearness. As a standard, a locality in America is named by the county or city that that
person lives in. You may say, “I live in Pinckney, Michigan, which is in the United
States.” Likewise, one may always be able to grunge through more and more detail as
to where a particle is, yet the precision of how specific you define your locality is often
defined by the need that your specific description is to suffice. For instance, if you
wanted to know where a cluster of molecules was, you probably wouldn’t delve down to
the subatomic level. Rather, you would only need to search a level or two smaller than
what you are looking for in order to find the region in which the thing you are looking for
may be found. In this case, maybe searching down to the level of small molecules that
may cluster in such a way so as to find what you are searching for.
Loci may mean spots where things interdependently differentiate, or it may mean spots
that are near because these are attached. For instance, a uniform is near the body of a
baseball player, yet it is not a part of that baseball player’s body. A chair may be near
the table that it goes to, yet the chair is not part of the table. You might say, “Well, the
uniform is local to the ball player’s body, yet it isn’t part of his body. And the chair
is local to the table, yet it isn’t part of the table.” Exactly. So, if you consider certain
phenomena as things that are made of parts, and these parts are made up of parts, when
is something just local, and when is the object at hand in and of itself? What you need to
define is what you are calling a specific thing. If the ball player’s whole body, including
his hair, was the definition of a specific thing, then any part of his body would not be
considered just local to his body – it would be part of his body. Yet, if the definition of
the given specific thing was only the living portion of the ball player’s body, then his hair
would be local to his body versus being part of the same specific thing.
The electrons of an atom are local to that atom, while the electrons of another atom
are local to that other atom and not local to that first one. This is because we are not
treating the atom as a static blob, but as a kinematic interplay of components that are
interdependent. So, there is no “specific thing” that defines that entity of an atom, since
an atom is the basis of the structure of matter, and matter is energy in static equilibrium.
So, if you are talking about anything being local to the neighborhood of an atom, you are
talking about a particle or object that is at least adjacent to the field of that atom. Yet if
you are talking about something that is local to an atom, you are talking about something
taking place within the given atom itself. For instance, anybody in a city is a local
resident of that city, and everybody in that city is part of that city. If you were part of a
pencil, you are considered localized within that pencil. This is because the members of a
city, just as the electrons of an atom, are kinematic at their respective levels, whereas the
parts of a pencil are not kinematic at an observers respective level.
separated by a substantial distance, then these are far. Two things that are near each other
are relatively local. Two things that are far from each other are not relatively local. Two
things that are made relatively local to each other have become localized. Two things,
however, that were relatively local and subsequently became separated have become
delocalized.
A man who lives by his neighbor is local to that neighbor. The man’s children, you
might add, are even more local to that man. Yet the man’s neighbor is certainly more
local to him than someone on the opposite side of the planet, at least in terms of physical
nearness. As a standard, a locality in America is named by the county or city that that
person lives in. You may say, “I live in Pinckney, Michigan, which is in the United
States.” Likewise, one may always be able to grunge through more and more detail as
to where a particle is, yet the precision of how specific you define your locality is often
defined by the need that your specific description is to suffice. For instance, if you
wanted to know where a cluster of molecules was, you probably wouldn’t delve down to
the subatomic level. Rather, you would only need to search a level or two smaller than
what you are looking for in order to find the region in which the thing you are looking for
may be found. In this case, maybe searching down to the level of small molecules that
may cluster in such a way so as to find what you are searching for.
Loci may mean spots where things interdependently differentiate, or it may mean spots
that are near because these are attached. For instance, a uniform is near the body of a
baseball player, yet it is not a part of that baseball player’s body. A chair may be near
the table that it goes to, yet the chair is not part of the table. You might say, “Well, the
uniform is local to the ball player’s body, yet it isn’t part of his body. And the chair
is local to the table, yet it isn’t part of the table.” Exactly. So, if you consider certain
phenomena as things that are made of parts, and these parts are made up of parts, when
is something just local, and when is the object at hand in and of itself? What you need to
define is what you are calling a specific thing. If the ball player’s whole body, including
his hair, was the definition of a specific thing, then any part of his body would not be
considered just local to his body – it would be part of his body. Yet, if the definition of
the given specific thing was only the living portion of the ball player’s body, then his hair
would be local to his body versus being part of the same specific thing.
The electrons of an atom are local to that atom, while the electrons of another atom
are local to that other atom and not local to that first one. This is because we are not
treating the atom as a static blob, but as a kinematic interplay of components that are
interdependent. So, there is no “specific thing” that defines that entity of an atom, since
an atom is the basis of the structure of matter, and matter is energy in static equilibrium.
So, if you are talking about anything being local to the neighborhood of an atom, you are
talking about a particle or object that is at least adjacent to the field of that atom. Yet if
you are talking about something that is local to an atom, you are talking about something
taking place within the given atom itself. For instance, anybody in a city is a local
resident of that city, and everybody in that city is part of that city. If you were part of a
pencil, you are considered localized within that pencil. This is because the members of a
city, just as the electrons of an atom, are kinematic at their respective levels, whereas the
parts of a pencil are not kinematic at an observers respective level.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)