What forms the Mobius Twist of an activated tori-sector-range, the Mobius Twist of which completes itself at the center-state eigenbasis of the prior mentioned tori-sector-range? The encoder strings (the encoder string and its counterpart) of an activated tori-sector-range enter the encodement section that these encoder string belong to. Meanwhile, the Planck phenomenon related phenomena along with their corresponding superstrings homotopically release residue into the Royal Arc that these belong to. After the Planck phenomena and their corresponding superstrings cycle their section of the Ultimon, and the corresponding encoder string and its counterpart cycle their respective section of the Ultimon as well -- roughly one time, the space-hole happens. While the space-hole happens, the Planck phenomenon-related phenomena form a large Basis of Light. When the instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode happens, the overall Basis of Light reties into the many Planck phenomena that exist. The Planck phenomena visages, virtual Planck phenomena, and the virtual Planck phenomena visages act as the field of the Overall Basis of Light. So, when the Overall Basis of Llight reties into many Planck phenomena, the virtual Planck phenomena, Planck phenomena visages, and the virtual Planck phenomena visages retie to accomedate the Planck phenomena. By the time that the stringular encoder and its counterpart, that are associated with the given Basis of Light that is being discussed here, of an activated tori-sector-range are molded into a center-state, the Planck phenomena, virtual Planck phenomena, Planck phenomena visages, and the virtual Planck phenomena visages are retied into their iteration-based fields. Here, imaginary exchange of Real Residue occurs.
Next, I will discuss the concept of time-orieted and relatively timeless light-cone-gauge-eigenstates.
Showing posts with label Mobius Twist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mobius Twist. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Session 7 of Course 9 on Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge
Posted by
samsphysicsworld
at
12:47 PM
0
comments
Labels:
"layers of reality",
Basis of Light,
counterpart,
encoder,
home tori-sector-ranges,
Mobius Twist,
Planck phenomena,
Residue,
Ultimon Flow
Friday, March 11, 2011
More About On-Shell Mass
A two-dimensional superstring has a three-dimensional field associated with it. When
a relatively knit Fourier Transform that is highly Laplacian forms a torroidal structure
with an annulus at its central coniaxial, the whole Majorana-Weyl supercharge associated
with the operation of the associated superstring’s conformally invariant kinematism
is delineated, after the group metric that forms the basically Gliossi-Sherk-Olive field
described, at the outer shell general locus of that given M-field that is associated with
the described kinematic differentiation of the given two-dimensional superstring’s three-
dimensional field. This considers the fact that every superstring, whether it partakes
of mass or not, has a mass index. Such an on-shell supercharge as taken thru a Fourier
Transform that alters the spin-orbital and angular momentum distribution, delineation,
and directoralization of the associated three-dimensional field toroidal structure converts
the Yau-Exact indices transport in such a way as to form a discrete unit of mass as
to the M-field structure that I have conveyed. This is tantamount to that a spherical
shell with a physical charge in its center delineates all of the energy of its charge along
the topography of its associated shell. Likewise, the norm state Ward conditions of
the annulus of a toroidal 3-D field of a 2-D superstring delineates all of the angular
momentum and spin-orbital distribution indices at the outer shell of that given toroidal
3-D structure. Likewise, the “figure-eight” twisted toroidal structure created by certain
fermionic superstrings forms the point mass of electrons and neutrinos. This mass
of certain fermions is created by this: The norm state conditions when considering
the Ward conditions of the annuli of the two relatively Mobius ends of the “figure-
eight” described have angular momentum and spin-orbital momentum that transfers
their distribution and directoralization indices outward to the outer topology of the
given “figure-eight-like” structure. The kinematic differentiation of the Yau-Exact
indices of the “figure-eight” structure as a whole causes the given phenomenon to
translate, thru the Fourier Transform of the given M-field thru a Minkowski or Hilbert
Lagrangian, its mass indices into an integration of Hamiltonian eigenstates that allow
the Kaluza-Klein phenomena, as with 3-D fields of 2-D superstrings, to convert and/or
maintain as a mass. The abelian geometry of the light-cone-gauge of such Yau-Exact
structures causes the E(6)xE(6) gauge-bosons related to form Schwinger indices that
keep the M-fields oriented to coalesce their Noether indices into a conformally invariant
manner that has to be orientable per general locus in order to translate to a proceeding
general locus as long as the mass indices associated are limited. Since any M-field needs
a limited Lagrangian distribution in order to delineate its Majorana-Weyl indices over a
group metric that is based on a harmonics or anharmonics that may not coincide with a
group directoralization of Noether flow unless the associated superstring is unorientable,
Kaluza-Klein mass is always under light speed, per iteration, and mass must become
Yang-Mills as in a worm-hole or Yang-Mills also, if otherwise tachyonic, which is true
when mass bears unorientable yet finely directoralized motion via a Ward polarizable
dark matter holomorph. Unorientable superstrings may only be as such temporarily when
in a large group even if Reverse-Lorentz-Four-Contracted. Mass may become Yang-
Mills and tachyonic if its field delineation is majorized.
a relatively knit Fourier Transform that is highly Laplacian forms a torroidal structure
with an annulus at its central coniaxial, the whole Majorana-Weyl supercharge associated
with the operation of the associated superstring’s conformally invariant kinematism
is delineated, after the group metric that forms the basically Gliossi-Sherk-Olive field
described, at the outer shell general locus of that given M-field that is associated with
the described kinematic differentiation of the given two-dimensional superstring’s three-
dimensional field. This considers the fact that every superstring, whether it partakes
of mass or not, has a mass index. Such an on-shell supercharge as taken thru a Fourier
Transform that alters the spin-orbital and angular momentum distribution, delineation,
and directoralization of the associated three-dimensional field toroidal structure converts
the Yau-Exact indices transport in such a way as to form a discrete unit of mass as
to the M-field structure that I have conveyed. This is tantamount to that a spherical
shell with a physical charge in its center delineates all of the energy of its charge along
the topography of its associated shell. Likewise, the norm state Ward conditions of
the annulus of a toroidal 3-D field of a 2-D superstring delineates all of the angular
momentum and spin-orbital distribution indices at the outer shell of that given toroidal
3-D structure. Likewise, the “figure-eight” twisted toroidal structure created by certain
fermionic superstrings forms the point mass of electrons and neutrinos. This mass
of certain fermions is created by this: The norm state conditions when considering
the Ward conditions of the annuli of the two relatively Mobius ends of the “figure-
eight” described have angular momentum and spin-orbital momentum that transfers
their distribution and directoralization indices outward to the outer topology of the
given “figure-eight-like” structure. The kinematic differentiation of the Yau-Exact
indices of the “figure-eight” structure as a whole causes the given phenomenon to
translate, thru the Fourier Transform of the given M-field thru a Minkowski or Hilbert
Lagrangian, its mass indices into an integration of Hamiltonian eigenstates that allow
the Kaluza-Klein phenomena, as with 3-D fields of 2-D superstrings, to convert and/or
maintain as a mass. The abelian geometry of the light-cone-gauge of such Yau-Exact
structures causes the E(6)xE(6) gauge-bosons related to form Schwinger indices that
keep the M-fields oriented to coalesce their Noether indices into a conformally invariant
manner that has to be orientable per general locus in order to translate to a proceeding
general locus as long as the mass indices associated are limited. Since any M-field needs
a limited Lagrangian distribution in order to delineate its Majorana-Weyl indices over a
group metric that is based on a harmonics or anharmonics that may not coincide with a
group directoralization of Noether flow unless the associated superstring is unorientable,
Kaluza-Klein mass is always under light speed, per iteration, and mass must become
Yang-Mills as in a worm-hole or Yang-Mills also, if otherwise tachyonic, which is true
when mass bears unorientable yet finely directoralized motion via a Ward polarizable
dark matter holomorph. Unorientable superstrings may only be as such temporarily when
in a large group even if Reverse-Lorentz-Four-Contracted. Mass may become Yang-
Mills and tachyonic if its field delineation is majorized.
Posted by
samsphysicsworld
at
1:49 PM
0
comments
Labels:
annuli,
Fourier Transformation,
Gliossi-Sherk-Olive,
Hilbert Lagrangian,
Kaluza-Klein,
Laplacian,
M-field,
Majorana-Weyl,
Minkowski-Space,
Mobius Twist,
Schwinger Indices,
Ward conditions,
Yau-Exact
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Course 5, Session 7, Part One
Point particles touch each other and rub against each other because of the ends from these that extend from their interacting. The touch and rub of separate point particles toward each other is very brief. Not only is the touching a kinematic transition, yet the point particles themselves are a condensed set of oscillations that act as as an individual phenomena discharge. Remember that phenomena discharge is stough that involves nodes of redistributed space? Space is everywhere what exists. Physical space is space that involves discrepancies. A discrepancy is a lack of what would theoretically be actual. Why is physicality like this? Remember Cassimer Invariance? Recycling? Mobius Twist approximation? What the last three things mean is that physicality is actual, yet the discharge pairing is odd. Picture this. You are a juggler. You are juggling an odd number of things. Can this be done? Yes. Yet it involves a repeat that does not directly overlap. Here. Let's say that you were to juggle three things. You start with two in one hand and one in another. You toss one up and place the thing that that is closest to the empty hand into it as you are about to catch the tossed thing. As this continues, the order of things keeps changing. Lack of order is disorder. Numbers in counting go from odd to even to odd. When pairing is not even on a team, somebody substitutes. Making due happens. Making due involves a controlled way of handling disorder. Disorder is something that is not taken account into in theory, unless such theory includes the effects of entropy. Disorder is the key to discrepancy. Discrepancy is on account of the fact that reality to a limited viewpoint is three-dimensional at the base. Three is the smallest odd counting number besides one. One is unitization. Unitization basically means that a thing is a thing. Nothing has to happen for the basis of unitization to exist. Reality is. Real odd numbers that mean something besides unity or autonomy or self-existence start at three. I will continue with the suspense of this session later. Until then, you have a phenomenal day!
Sincerely,
Sam.
Sincerely,
Sam.
Posted by
samsphysicsworld
at
3:51 PM
0
comments
Labels:
Cassimer Invariance,
kinematic transition,
Mobius Twist,
point particles,
recycling,
unitization
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)