Mini-Stringular Segmentation And The i*PI(del) Action

Here's some metaphorical "food for thought."
What the "action" of the said i*PI(del) action is to be, is the multiplcit and multivarious interactions, that are of those directly corresponding loci of mini-stringular segmentations, that are to act or exhibit here -- a set of gauge-metric eigenstates, that are here to work to tend to result in, -- the correlative conditions, by which the multiplicit discrete quanta of energy permittivity are to then to have a Laplacian-related delineation of those "partition-based discrepancies," that are here to be distributed as inferred, -- as is to be proportional to the directly corresponding eminent Polyakov Action.  This "action" of increments, of what may be thought of as being "quanta" of zero-point-energy -- works to not only help-out in delineating the appropriate number of partition-based discrepancies per superstring and its correlative counterstring, as is as accordling to the scalar amplitude of the Polyakov Action, -- it also tends to work to follow the same general "trend" of attribution, to all of the superstrings, that are of one given arbitrary respective orbifold eigenset.  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Rate Of iPI(del) Action

Let's initially consider a mass-bearing orbifold eigenset, -- that is thus, in part, comprised of mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.  As the here proximal local Polyakov Action is to either be increased or decreased in its scalar amplitude (magnitude), then, the directly affiliated Lorentz-Four-Contraction, is to here be respectively either to be decreased or increased.  This is because the Polyakov Action acts here, in so as to be an inverse operation -- of what is known of as the Lorentz-Four-Contraction.  For instance -- as such a said general tendency, such as the Polyakov Action, is to be increased (This is a case in which the correlative mass-bearing orbifold eigenset, is here to be slowed down), there is then to be an increase in the number of partition-based discrepancies, that are here to exist in those superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that are here to exist in the directly corresponding orbifold eigenset, that would here be expressed to be of a correlative nature.  Consequently -- as a tendency such as the Polyakov Action, is to increase in its rate, -- then, the correlative rate -- as to an increase in the so-eluded-to Hodge-Index, that is here to be as of the number of partition-based discrepancies -- that are here to exist in those individually taken superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that are here to work to comprise such an orbifold eigenset, will then tend to be increased in its scalar amplitude.  This increase here, will then tend to be inversely proportional -- to what will here be a decrease in the number of mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that are here to work to comprise the said orbifold eigenset.  This would then work to mean, that there will here tend to be an increase in the rate of the directly correlative iPI(del) Action -- that is here to be proximal local to those mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that are here to work to comprise the initially implied mass-bearing orbifold eigenset.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.