Part One of the Third Session of Course 14

Superstrings often differentiate into what may be extrapolated of as "lines" of strings.  Superstrings from the same universe that consist, in part, of just two Planck phenomena that are of the same universe away may be of the same relative positional angle, yet, at a different general locus.  Superstrings that are from the same universe that are in discrete units of two Planck phenomena of the same universe away may also be of the same positional angle, yet, again, at a general locus.  The Planck phenomena of the strings that I have just mentioned that are at the same relative positional angle, yet, are at a different general locus, will bear superstrings that are at the same relative positional angle, yet, at a different spot as well.  The substringular counterparts of these strings, here, will also be at the same relative positional angle, yet, at a different general locus as well.  The strings just mentioned, in such a given arbitrary situation, work to display trivial isomorphism -- at a distance, with a gap in-between the activity of the said substringular phenomena.  The Planck phenomena in such a situation also work to display a tense of trivial isomorphism -- at a distance, with a gap in-between the activity of the said substringular phenomena.  Also, the counterparts that directly are associated with the directly prior phenomena will display another genus, or tense, of trivial isomorphism -- at a distance, with a gap in-between the activity of the said substringular phenomena.  Generally, such substringular phenomena that I just mentioned will bear a non-trivial isomorphism, due to the relative non-kinematic Lagrangian that would here exist in-between the said corresponding phenomena.  This is in terms of the mapping of their covariant trivial or non-trivial isomorphisms, respectively. I have a bit more to say about this soon.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Course 9, First Course of Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge, Session 12

How do Planck Phenomena propagate?:   Strings are in iteration in the following arbitrary case scenario.  Imaginary exchange as described by an odd function happens as real residue is given off here and received.  This means that the relative bottoms of the here mentioned superstrings are exchanged with the corresponding relative tops of the respective substringular counterparts.  (The superstrings & their counterparts are now decompactified by a factor of one to 3*10^8.)  This prior activity rasises the stringualr counterparts and moves these "down" closer to the prior mentioned superstrings.  The slack here causes the discussed bottom of the substringular counterparts to exchange with the said tops of the corresponding superstrings (reciprocal imaginary exchange).  The prior activity lifts the superstrings (not to be confused with their counterparts) and moves these down closer to their corresponding Planck Phenomena.  The Planck Phenomena stays relatively stationary in the meanwhile -- when not including the wobble of the said Planck Phenomena.  This motion that I have just described contracts the light-cone-gauge like a spring, causing the ensuing Ultimon Flow.  This springing flaps the angular momentum of indices of the said Planck Phenomena in an anharmonic/harmonic cycle that flaps just enough to allow Ultimon Flow, like a paint stirrer twitches then flapped.  The twists in the light-cone-gauge eigenstates that are related to what I just mentioned bears gauge-metrics that help determine whether or not the superstring travel at any given velocity and/or tensorically based speed or not. (The "tensorically based speed" would be a velocity that is based on the directoralization of a tree amplitude.)  A full twist in the fabric of the light-cone-gauge allows for a relatively "infinite" speed, such as the amplitude of phenomena displacement that happens during Ultimon Fllow,  while any twist quotient in-between allows for any speed of the superstrings in-between, since tachyonic motion may redistribute phenomena to basically any other location in just one sequential series of instantons.  Such a displacement that is derived in-between the Real Reimmanian duration that exists from one instanton to the next one may redistribute phenomena as such on account that Ultimon Flow is the Imaginary based flow that cycles the Ultimon in-between two consecutive Real Based instantons.  These mentioned twists are never entangled when unfrayed, yet, the twists are in the individual fabric of the five-quantum-based and ten-quantum-based first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates that are associated with one-dimensional and two-dimensional superstrings respectively.  Two-Dimensional superstrings may influence one-dimensional strings to have their light-cone-gauge first-order-based quanta to twist to an arbitrary proscribed extent and vice                                                        versa.                                                                                                                                                      
I will continue with the suspence later.  Expect a lot of posts soon now that I have my time freed up and my computer is working better now!  God Bless.  Samuel David Roach.