The Strong Force And The Basis Of Charge

In a stable atom, a positive charge tends to happen -- when Ward-Cauchy-based eigenstates of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure, work to bear torsional eigenindices -- that bear a tendency of aiming to act in the operational direction, of pushing themselves into external phenomenology.

In a stable atom, a negative charge tends to happen -- when Ward-Cauchy-based eigenstates of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure, work to bear torsional eigenindices -- that bear a tendency of aiming to act in the operational direction, of pushing external phenomenology into the so-eluded-to internal phenomenology of the initially said general genus of Ward-Cauchy-based eigenstates.

So, one may say, that a positive charge is as a "dot-product"-based tendency, whereas, one may say that a negative charge in as a "cross-product"-based tendency.

I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

As To Conical World-Sheets

Let us say that we are to initially be considering a respective given arbitrary one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity, that works to bear a two-dimenisonal world-sheet -- that works to map-out the projection of the trajectory of the said respective string.  This so-stated world-sheet acts as the physical memory of the field density that is most Yukawa to the said superstring, in its proximal localization at the Poincare level.  Such a so-eluded-to field -- that would here appertain to the integration of the correlative eigenindices, that are to here act as that force that may be exhibited by the so-stated superstring, in a manner that is Gliosis to the immediate external surface of the topology of the said superstring -- that is here in this particular case, a given arbitrary open-loop of discrete energy permittivity, that is to then behave as the fermionic string of this case scenario.  Now if the superstring were to be projected into that tense of holomorphicity -- that would here be directed in such a manner, in so as to work to form a cross-product that would here be in the direction of its thickness, then, the correlative resultant cohomology that would thence be formed would tend to form a Rham-based integration of a washer-based pattern of shape -- that would here tend to bear a relatively small annulus, when this is taken in consideration of the scalar magnitude of one "mer" of each so-eluded-to ghost-based index, that is here to work to form the directly corresponding cohomological trace of the said one-dimensional superstring.  Yet, if instead, the said open-loop or fermionic superstring -- were to be projected into that tense of holomorphicity -- that would here be directed in such a manner, in so as to work to form a cross-product that would here be in the direction of its length, then, the correlative resultant cohomology that would here be formed, would tend to form a Rham-based integration of a set of conical-shaped ghost-based indices -- that, in so long as there is no spontaneous antiholomorphic Kahler condition immediately following -- will tend to point its coniaxial-like apex at least somewhere n the relative Minkowski-based direction that will tend to behave as more of a Hamiltonian operator that is moving as a relative cross-product, rather than tending to point its coniaxial-like apex in the relative Minkowski-based direction that would otherwise behave as more of a Hamiltonian operator that is to then be moving in the relative dot-product direction of the so-eluded-to Ward-based general substringular neighborhood of such an arbitrary scenario.  This has to do with the general tendency of superstringular inertia, in that it tends to be unthwarted -- until an external force is to act upon it.
To Be Continued!  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.