Here Is Some Knowledge To Help You To Better Understand Sub-Mini-String

Sub-Mini-String is what interconnects both third-ordered-point-particles to each other as well so as to interconnect second-ordererd-point-particles into the type of mini-string that forms the fields that are exhibited by superstringular phenomena.  First-Ordered-Point-Particles are formed by the "yarning" of mini-string into the various forms of compactifications that allow for the respective various forms of first-ordered-point-particles that exist in the arena of space-time-fabric.             
Sub-Mini-String segments bind via an extreme fractal example of a pressurized vacuum.  Ideally, one would think that sub-mini-string segments would be flushly homeomorphically cylindrical.  Yet, the ends of the segments of sub-mini-string are not necessarily a fractal of cross-sectional orientafolds.  Often, either end and/or both ends of sub-mini-string segments are conically angled by up to 11.25 conical degrees if one were to observe such a conical angling at such a close range that a given arbitrary sub-mini-string segment would here appear to be three-dimensional.  Such an angling may be singularized, trivially isomorphic when one considers both ends of such a mentionable segment, or non-trivially isomorphic when one considers both ends of such a mentionable segment.  So, when such a said segment is non-trivially isomorphic at its maximum conical slanting at both ends, the overall conical angling difference would, in under a Laplacian condition, be a 22.5 degree difference.  This coincides with the condition that a Higgs Action eigenstate subtends to an angling of 22.5 degrees to the relative left of a relatively straight up and down subtending when a Klein Bottle eigenstate is to move holomorphically and that the same arbitrary Higgs Action eigenstate subtends to an angling of 22.5 degrees to the relative right from a relatively straight up and down subtending when the respective Klein Bottle eigenstate is to move antiholomorphically under the same eigenmetric of any arbitrary Kaeler-Metric eigenstate.  Either way, when one considers a Wilson Line that measures the general length of a sub-mini-string segment, the length of that segment is always 16 times as long as its thickness at its center.  Sub-Mini-String is always the same thickness.  Again, this is not a length that is derived by a theoretical Gliossi-based Laplacian measurement, yet, this considered length, which is always the same, is based on a Wilson Line that measures the general length of any given sub-mini-string segment.  Here is what I mean.  Take both ends of any of such said segment.  Consider pseudo-orientafolds that extend "above" or "below" a given segment that we are discussing.  Draw a line that is straight that connects the orientafolds.  That given line will always be the same length, whether the said segment is homeomorphically cylindrical, conically angled at one end, trivially isomrphically conically angled at both ends, or non-trivially isomorphically conically angled at both ends.  This is what I mean by a Wilson Line.  The ends of sub-mini-string always flushly touch in a Gliossi Manner, whether the given ends are conically angled or not.  This goes to show that the slanting of the conically angling of the ends of such said sub-mini-string segments are always bimorphologically isomorphic to the degree that such segments are angled.  The number of variations of such slantings is the following:  Take the reciprocal of
(~1.104735878*10^(-81)), and divide this number by 16.  During the space-hole, the relatively forward holomorphic ends of the segments of sub-mini-string that bind those loci of mini-string (reverse-fractaled of sub-mini-string) that are to temporarily disconnect to retie before the quaternionic-instanton-field-impulse-mode.  Such a sub-metric of brief disconnection is due to the virtual lack of a fractal of pressurized vacuum in loci of substringular field.  Based on the Laplacian condition that is in consideration of the placement of the substringular field eigenstates as this is happening, the sub-mini-string segment ends that nearly break homotopy reconnect in the manner that involves the least resistance.  This retying is what allows for the continuation of Gaussian Transformations, of which allows for the spontaneous kinematic covariance that is essential for metric-gauge to be activated so that superstrings may be discrete energy so that reality may continue.  I will continue with the suspence later.                                    

More About Ghosts

When you detect what seems to be superstrings over a tightly-knit Fourier Transformation, mainly, what you will be detecting will be Gliossi-Sherk-Olive-Ghosts.  It is easy to confuse these with superstrings in and of themselves.  The difference is that superstrings and their reversely-holomorphically-positioned field trajectories are designed as I have stated, while, Gliossi-Sherk-Olive-Ghosts will always be detected as relatively torroidal -- such as may be described in M-theory.  Yet, orbifolds that consist of superstrings may, at times, also be relatively torroidal in nature.  The difference is that the prior mentioned ghosts are much closer to the Planck-Length than the length of an orbifold.  Got to go!  I will continue with the suspence later!                   
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach.                          

Part One of the Ninth Session of Course 9 on Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge

There are many times as many two-dimensional superstrings as one-dimensional superstrings.  Another way to put it, there are many times as many closed or bosonic superstrings as there are open or fermionic superstrings.  So, for instance, when an electron forms a photon by dropping an energy level, a phenomena that contains one-dimensional superstrings in terms of its plain kinetic energy -- this phenomena with plain kinetic energy being an electron -- drops an energy level so as to emit a particle that is comprised, in part, of a two-dimensional superstring that here is a photon.  A photon is an arbitrary example of a phenonema whose discrete energy permittivity is comprised of a bosonic, or closed, or another words, of a two-dimensional superstring.  Nuclei of atoms do not bear much plain kinetic energy as compared to that of electrons.  For that reason, the nuclei of atoms have a higher percentage of two-dimensional superstrings than the percentage of two-dimensional superstrings that an electron has.  Superstrings may open and superstrings may shut.  A one-dimensional superstring shuts to form a two-dimensional superstring, as an arbitrary example, when the plain kinetic energy that comprises an elecatron forms the substringular  portion of a photon.  A two-dimensional superstring of a photon opens to form a one-dimensional superstring that comprises a discrete unit of kinetic energy permittivity when a discrete unit of electromagnetic energy converts to a discrete unit of kinetic energy.  Zero-Norm-States (loose point particles) are what open or shut superstrings.  When a point particle that forms a line of tangency by being norm to a disc-like configuration of point particles that interconnect directly via a mini-string segment, this is an example of a negative-norm-state when these states travel in the reverse-holomorphic  general direction during Ultimon Flow.  If I previously accidentally flipped the concept of the relative holomorphicity before as to this, this right here is the way it is.  Here is how I can see better as to what I am talking about now:  The scattering of the collision of negative-norm-states with substringular phenomena leaves a ghost-like and virtually motionless pattern of where the prior mentioned substringular phenomena had been in an arbitrary prior iteration.  I will continue with the suspense later.  Until then, aim your spear for the moon so that you can get your spear across the river.
The just mentioned comment is a metaphor for trying to continually improve in life.
Have a phenomenal day!                          
Sincerely,                          
Sam Roach.                                              

Session 3 On Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge

A substringular encodement and its physical counterpart iterates at its home tori-sector-range in the arbitrary case that I am now starting to describe.  The substringular encoders then break down into point particles that retain a closely knit neighborhood relative to each other.  The forward time related encoder particles travel counterclockwise around the Ultimon and the backward time related encoder particles travel clockwise around the Ultimon in their respective world-tubes.  The forward and backward encoder particles meet at their respective tori-sector-range regions at one tori-sector-range locus per encoder before it reaches its primed location, given the general locus of where the tori-sector-range-based substringular encoder that is positioned reverse-holomorphic relative to a given encoder is at. This is during the same covariant multiplicit metric as the specific case of the arbitrary home tori-sector-range region that I have been here describing, relative to the other forward and backward time related encoder particles.  The backward and forward time related substringular particles in the process make just under one circuit of their world tubes, on account of the fact that, during the beginning of Ultimon Flow, it takes one hbar of Imaginary yet actual time for all of the superstrings in one particular given world-tube to go just around the general locus of where the tori-sector-range that is reverse holomorphic in terms of Laplacian placement is at when one considers the relative positioning of any specific tori-sector-range that one could mention that is here traveling through Ultimon Flow.The encoder phenomena, along with what these encode for, are now pulled into the Main Heterotic String Fabric.  In the meanwhile, it takes the same general circuit around the world-tubes for the superstrings of an encoder as it takes for the respective encoder (the encoders encode for what we would call superstrings) in one hbar time to be in a position to enter the Main Heterotic Stringular Fabric, since the encoders, during instanton, are localized just above the center of the annulus where such encoders pull their respective superstrings, counterstrings, and Planck-Like phenonemena into the mentioned locus of the Main Heterotic Stringular Fabric.  For such encoders of our set of parallel universes, which here is the arbitrary case scenario, the encoders then travel into the said Heterotic fabric, pulling themselves with their contingent phenomena norm to anti-holomorphic (relative "down") into the sides of the said Fabric, while then moving in a cross-product directoralization to just "under" the middle set of parallel universes, while then moving norm-to-holomorphic (relatively "up") into the middle set of parallel universes.  The prior mentioned encoders then break down into point particles that retain a closely knit neighborhood relative to each other.                            
The forward time related encoder particles travel counterclockwise around the Ultimon and the backward time related encoder particles travel clockwise around the Ultimon in their respective world-tubes.  The same then happens as before, except that the (n-1) function as to the general locus where the tori-sector-ranges are pulled into the Main Heterotic String Fabric happens, in this case, in such a manner so as to pull phenomena into the relatively far set of parallel universes.  I will continue with the suspense later.  Sincerely, Sam.                                                                  

FTAAN, Session 10

A superstring has point particle cores that are 5*10^(-87) meters thick in the substringular and 1.5*10^(-78) meters thick in the globally distinguishable. The mini-strings in-between these are 5*10^(-87) meters long. So, above the top point particle of the first order of a one-dimensional superstring is an antenna-like profection of mini-string that is often non-abelian in and of itself per iteration, whether the given superstring is abelian on the whole or non-abelian on the whole. When a two-dimensional non-abelian superstring of a non-swivel nature iterates, the mini-strings in-between the given first-ordered point particles vibrate holomophically/antiholomorphically 60 times each without moving the given first-ordered point particles during the core of BRST. When a one-dimensional non-abelian superstring of a non-swivel nature iterates, the mini-strings in-between the given first-ordered point-particles vibrate norm to holomorphically and norm to the Lagrangian of the substance of the superstring/norm to antihlolomorphically and norm to the Lagrangian of the substance of the superstring 60 times each without moving the given first-ordered point particles during the core of BRST. When a one-dimensional abelian string iterates mini-string ripples through the first-ordered point particles causing the mini-string in-between these to begin to kink at their center states sixty times norm to the holomorphic yet also norm to the Lagrangian substance of the superstring and sixty times norm to the antiholomorphic yet also norm to the Lagrangian substance of the superstring without moving the given first-ordered point particles during the core of BRST because the given ripple of the mini-string of the first-ordered point particles provides phenomena to the mini-string. When a two-dimensional abelian superstring iterates, the same thing happens except that the mini-string vibration kinks the mini-string 60 times holomorphically and 60 times antiholomorphically. The vibration of non-abelian strings and the kinks of abelian strings happen holomorphically then antiholomorphically back and forth, or norm to these and the Lagrangian of their substringular substance back-and-forth. This happens without moving the core of the first-ordered point particles during BRST.