Part Four of the Fourteenth Session of Course Six

Well hello again world, this is Samuel David Roach here!  Happy to be back!  Here we go!

               
Superstring-related ground-states that are indistinguishably different through a successive series of iterations, when not considering alterations in metric-gauge quanta and exterialized filled permutations by the related Fourier Transformations that happen to the given ground-states in the delineatory translation of the given ground-states in the course of their redistribution through the multiplicit operand of space, are superstrings that are detectable as relating to light matter and light energy.  (These are the illuminated superstrings.)  Superstring-related ground-states that are distinguishably different, through a successive series of iterations, in terms of the permutations that are Gliossi to the holonomic structure of the described superstrings over the related Fourier Transformations, that happen to the ground-states in the delineatory translation of the given ground-states in the course of their redistribution through the multiplicit operands of space, are superstrings that are detectable as relating to dark matter and dark energy.  Exterialized field permutations here are alterations in the fields that surround superstrings, yet are not appertaining to the topological Laplacian mapping of the here mentioned superstrings themselves, while permutations that are Gliossi to the holonomic structure of the described superstrings are alterations in the topological Laplacian mapping of the here mentioned superstrings themselves -- whether the exterialized fields appertaining to the associated superstrings here may or may not be altered in terms of the mini-string interactions in a Fourier tense, or altered in terms of the mini-string relativistic delineations as taken in a Laplacian tense.  Because I love the Human Race!
Sincerely, Sam Roach.                                                                                                          

A Description Of Campbell Ghosts, Part Two

Now, I will continue with the suspense. A discrete homeomorphic set of such a redistribution and re delineation of point commutators, that are inexact and non linearly based, on account of the motion of Campbell states, forms a physical memory of where and how such Campbell norm-states differentiated kinematically over a certain given Fourier Transformation. Over the course of one discrete instanton, such a discrete field of physical memory as considered over the Laplacian metrical delineation that is used to consider the differential geometry of the composition of such a discrete ghost defines a ghost anomaly of a Campbell norm-state. The covariantly related Laplacian Field that defines the cohomology of inter related adjacent Campbell ghosts is used to consider and classify the eigenbasis of a Campbell norm-state ghost region. So, the partial differentiation that is used to determine one Campbell norm-state discrete ghost field may be integrated in certain cohomological point commutator Fock regions to determine the Laplacian eigenbasis of such related fields as well as to determine the Fourier Transform eigenbasis of such a prior named field when considering such a field's kinematic operation when taken over a sequential series of instantons. The aberration of the homeomorphic topology of such an eigenbasis forms pseudo-real permutations of such an integrative multiplicit ghost field on account of other gauge-metrics that occur over a transient period. Please study what I have just written, and e-mail to me your thoughts about this!
Sincerely,
Sam.

A Description Of Campbell Ghosts, Part One

A norm-state that is comprised of one first-ordered point particle that is supplementally norm to a set of first-ordered point particles that form a plane of surface area that is norm to reverse holomorphic relative to the originally stated first-ordered point particle is called a Campbell norm-state. Campbell norm-states that travel in positive time that are considered positive travel in a holomorphically-based directoralization. Campbell norm-states that travel in negative time that are considered positive travel in an antiholomorphically-based directoralization. Campbell norm-states that travel in positive time that are considered negative travel in an antiholomorphically-based directoralization. Campbell norm-states that travel in negative time that are considered negative travel in a holomorphically-based directoralization. As Campbell states move per sequential series of instantons, these scatter adjacent first-ordered point particles that are loose in certain regions. Such first-ordered point particles that are loose do not exist in a norm-state as is. The scattering of loose first-ordered point particles is a redistribution of anomalous Fock Space that exists along the Ward bounds of general homotopy. I will continue with the suspence later!
Sincerely,
Sam.

Course 5 On Compactification And Yakawa Coupllings, Session Four, Part One

Yarn. A bunch of string that is used to make fabric. A ball of yarn. A bunch of yarn that is rolled up into a closely knit whole. I am using an analogy to help describe certain concepts in string theory. What happens when you untie the yarn and toss it? Not only does the yarn scatter, yet it also spreads out and becomes disorganized (implied by scatter). Compact. Do you remember what I said it means? Squished. (Implied). Which is more compact, a ball of yarn, or a scattered quantity of yarn? A ball of yarn is. Take the end of a ball of yarn. Move it in a direction away from the ball. What happens? The ball of yarn gets smaller and the yarn from the ball is taken to a place where if you think about it, it could be shared with more yarn. If you remember, this type of movement is called a distribution or a redistribution. What if you had many balls of yarn that were placed in a region. These balls were near each other. One end of each ball was moved away from each respective ball. Each of these ends of yarn were to interact (touch, rub, and curl around) with other ends of yarn that were recently moved away from their respective balls. Each ball of yarn mentioned moves in a common general direction. (There may be slight changes in direction of balls of yarn relative to each other, yet each ball of yarn ends up moving in what ends up being the same whole direction). The balls of yarn go together in a circle as a unit. After the set of balls of yarn complete going in a group rotation, (What I mean here by rotation is like a group of cars going all around a racetrack), each ball of yarn ends up interacting (touching, rubbing, and curling around) with each other ball of yarn in terms of the ends of yarn that were loosened from the given balls of yarn as was described earlier. This shows in words metaphorically that after one complete cycle of balls of yarn going around a hoop of curvature, each ball of yarn has in effect interacted (touched, rubbed, and curled around, here, in terms of the ends of yarn from each ball of yarn brought outward from the balls) with each each of the other balls of yarn existent in the hoop that I just mentioned. (Existent means here that each ball of yarn mentioned is in the hoop.). As the balls of yarn rotate as a group around the given hoop (as cars rotate around a racetrack), the balls of yarn also spin and roll. What is spin? Place a small ball on your finger and twist it. The twisting action you see is called spin. What is roll? Toss a bowling ball down a bowling alley. The twisting action you see is called roll. I will continue with the suspense of this session later. I hope that you are learning from my ideas on string theory. Please be patient with my analogies. I am trying to use metaphors and similes to bring my concepts down to earth for the average reader. When I get a router that works, I will be on the Internet often enough to answer the comments that are given to me. Until later, you have a phenomenal day!
Sincerely,
Sam.