Cohomology Of Mass-Bearing Neutrinos

When one is here to be considering the Fourier-related motion of a set of mass-bearing neutrinos, -- the cohomology that such a said phenomenology is thus to tend to form, will bear a silicone-like shape.  Please bear with me.  Consequently -- such a cohomology of a set of mass-bearing neutrinos, will bear a toroidal-like disk shape, at the general locus that is relatively most proximal to the so-eluded-to core-field-density, that is of the  respective set of neutrinos that are here to perform one specific given arbitrary function, -- that is of this given arbitrary case scenario.  Furthermore -- if one were now to take a Laplacian-related "snapshot" of the said cohomology-related eigenstate, of such a respective case, -- as one is to progress at analyzing the said eigenstate, as one is to extrapolate what is here being mapped-out in the correlative forward-holomorphic direction -- that is to be of such a given case, the correlative cohomology is to then to bear a hermitian-related decrease in its cross-sectional diameter, -- until, over a relatively transient distance, such a cohomology is then to apex to the "point" of working to bear one first-order point particle at the said forward-holomorphic tip of the respective cohomology, that is of the said set of mass-bearing neutrinos, that are of this given arbitrary respective case scenario.  This would mean, then, that the set of mass-bearing neutrinos, may work to bear a cohomology that works to bear a conical shape, that may be thought of as being configured as a multidimensional silicone-related holonomic substrate, that is here to work to bear a net abelian geometry over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Laplacian-Based Cyclic Permutations

Cyclic permutations that are of a Laplacian-based genus, may be either Lagrangian-based cyclic permutations and/or Contour-based cyclic permutations.  Here is an example of a Laplacian-based cyclic permutation:  Let us say that one is to make a theoretical "snapshot" of one substringular "fret," that is to exist here in the substringular.  Let us next say that one is to examine one given arbitrary cohomological mappable-tracing -- when in terms of the here given arbitrary substringular pattern, over a set Lagrangian-based path.  Let us next say that the here just mentioned cohomological mappable-tracing, is to work to form an iterative pattern -- of which is to have a very minor change at the start of each increment of the so-stated iterative pattern.  This is non-time-oriented.  This is just as if you were to just observe the so-eluded-to "snapshot," as if time and kinematic motion were to have stood still -- as you were to trace the so-eluded-to cohomological mappable-tracing.  If the overall pattern that is to here be "mapped," is to reiterate at some less of a scalar magnitude of devulging, then, the so-eluded-to cyclic permutative mapped Lagrangian-based path -- is to be of a convergent nature.  Yet, if instead, the overall pattern that is to here be "mapped," is to not reiterate at some less of a scalar magnitude of devulging, then, the so-eluded-to cyclic permutative mapped  Lagrangian-based path -- is to be of a divergent nature.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Samuel David Roach.