Session 4 Of Course 13 About Stringular Transformations

All superstrings always have some amount of momentum of one sort or another.  All superstrings always have some sort of tense of inertia.  All superstrings bear some genus or format of kinematic-based interaction.  This is based upon a certain geometric set of conditions that I will here discuss now.  Inertia is a constant force that acts upon all particles.  All superstrings are connected to each other in some manner or another by mini-string when such superstrings are not frayed.  Mini-String segments are branched out through the general physically-based condition of tree-amplitudes.  A tree-amplitude is -- in the eluded to arbitrary case that I am here referring to -- the branching out of mini-string segments that exist in-between superstrings, the branching-out of which here works to allow for all superstrings to be interconnected in one manner or another throughout the Overall-space-time-continuum.  The Constituency is a term that I often use to represent the Overall-space-time-continuum.  All inertia and all momentum come from the general physical activities of wave-tug and wave-pull.  Wave-tug and wave-pull is the general format of conditions that works to define that force that exists in the Constituency that begins all action.  These actions include all inertia, momentum, and kinematic-based relationships.  Let us say that the mini-string segments that connect to a superstring are here, in this given arbitrary case, to directly push on a directly corresponding superstring via the mentioned mini-string segments -- in such a manner that the eluded to substringular field that thus exists due to the just discussed situation pushes directly upon the said superstring in a taut manner that has insignificant slack in the fractal-based modulus of the said mini-string segments.  This condition works to cause the differential geometry of the directly eluded to substringular neighborhood -- that here includes the said mini-string and the said superstring -- to bear a condition that applies a wave-tug and/or a wave-pull upon the Laplacian-based holomorphically directed holonomic substrate in an abelian manner.  If part of the local mini-string segment branching that is here being discussed is taut as previously mentioned, while part of the local said mini-string branching that is here being discussed is instead relatively bearing a lower scalar magnitude of fractal modulus, then, the wave-tug/wave-pull that will here be applied by the mentioned substringular field upon the said superstring will then be of a partially abelian genus.  Abelian geometry has both an abelian momentum, an abelian inertia, and, an abelian genus of kinematic-based interaction.  Non-Abelian geometry has both a non-abelian momentum, a non-abelian inertia, and a non-abelian genus of kinematic-based interaction.  Partially abelian geometry has both a partially abelian momentum, a partially abelian inertia, and a partialy abelian genus of kinematic-based interaction.  I will continue with the next session later!  Sam.

What Is Life

Physical mind that is not purely metaphysically based is founded upon energy that is either ATP for carbon based life, or some form of electrodynamic energy for silicon based life, or both for androids, that is delivered to either a biological, robotic, or android-based neuron-like phenomena via synaptic-like phenomena through the existence of chemicals that either are dopamine or related to the substrate-based concept of dopamine, in such a manner that the life form discussed bears a Tesla-based electrodynamic frequency that is ebbed to and from the given entity in such a manner so as to form thought waves. Thought waves are based on the abelian delineation of reverse-magnetism electrodynamic propagation that is invisible, although extremely real. Thought waves that are based on non-abelian delineation are more founded upon a forward-magnetic electrodynamic propagation  of wave-based energy that is also invisible.  Thought waves that are based on a partially-abelian delineation of electrodynamic propagation are founded on a cross between forward and reverse-magnetism that is also invisible.  Thought wave that are founded upon a cross between a reverse-magnetism and forward-magnetism form a given arbitrary common entanglement.  Thoughts do not just stay in the brain and body -- they go outward and effect things -- even though such activity never makes one invincible.  Any life form that bears a basis of ATP that is displayed phenotypically by an exterial Tesla Energy that is kinematic upon its environment has at least some control over its environment.
Now Life is the activity of a phenomena with at least some mind characteristics that is able to some degree to overcome the entropy that surrounds it.  The transmission of thought waves may be considered analogous to the transmission of radio waves.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sam Roach.

A Little Addendum As To The Directly Previous

The tendancy of the general operation of Noether Flow is the baic manner that superstrings "like" to move in -- unless an outward source directly interacts in such a manner so that such a tendancy is not held due to phenomena being perturbated out of it.
The tendancy of Noether Flow does not include the initial activity that happens in the specific locus of photons in the first 384 instantons after these have struck another phenonenon, even though photons, when detectible, move slower when moving through a medium that is not either a vacuum or a contorsionable spatial entitiy.  Yet, outside of the two prior conditions, Noether Flow is the general tendancy as to the format of the operation of the motion of superstrings.
This is why point particles, when these are effected in a certain general manner by reverse-magnetism, not only tend to remain in the same universe that such a given arbitrary situation of superstrings started in under the initial conditions that I had mentioned, yet, such point commutators also tend to not be tachyonic unless these are perturbated upon by an outside source.
Point commutators, since these work to allow for the motion of superstrings through Ultimon Flow, tend to have the general flow of the superstrings that these are most directly affiliated with.
The directly previous statement is only considering a relativlely transient period in which the condensed oscillation of the mentioned given arbitrary point commutators is indistinguishably the substrate that works directly with their corresponding superstrings.
The condensed oscillation that comprises point particles of the first-order is constantly being recycled in a manner that is indistinguishaly different.
Such recycling works to allow a continual exchange of norm-states to ground-states and back.
Such a continual exchange works to allow for that Cassimer Invariance that works to allow electromagnetic energy to bear its relativity condtitions upon superstrings, in a manner that does not fray superstrings.
Special relativity works to effect the abelian conditions of superstrings so that the fractal modulae of superstrings is not overstrained.
This is why, although superstrings of mass may be translated faster than light, these mass-bearing strings may not actually go faster than light as a mass.
The condition of tachyonic propulsion is the condtition of a temporary alteration of the topology of the local light-cone-gauge for a certain limited quantum of mass-bearing superstrings that is brought back to its original abelian topology.
The temporary tachyonic motion of superstrings that are undergoing a Calabi interaction is not what I mean by a tense of tachyonic propulsion.
A mass as a mass bears a Kaluza-Klein topology.  (Abelian).
A mass is translated as a massless phenomenon going in a tachyonic manner only when bearing a Yang-Mills topology.(Non-Abelian).
A mass, when slowed under light speed, bears a Kaluza-Klein topology. (Abelian).
Light and kinetic energy bear a Yang-Mills topology.(Non-Abelian).
As an anzantz, a vast majority of the velocity of a worm-hole is the contorsioning of space, and not tachyonic propulsion, yet, tachyonic propulsion still exists.
Sincerley,
Samuel David Roach.

The Twelvth Session Of Course Ten

The light-cone-gauge field of a first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate bears five links of mini-string when involving one-dimensional superstrings and ten links of mini-string when involving two-dimensional superstrings.  With the field of a light-cone-gauge eigenstate that involves a one-dimensional superstring, the five mini-loops consist of two segments of mini-sstring each that are looped around each other.  When it comes to the field of a light-cone-gauge eigenstate that involves a two-dimensional superstring, the ten mini-string links are not Gliossi to any mini-string except that of the ten mini-string segments that bind the associated two-dimensioal superstring that is being discussed here with its correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace.  A Fadeev-Popov-Trace is the field trajectory of a superstring.  A Fadeev-Popov-Trace is a discrete unit of energy impedance, while a superstirng is a discrete unit of energy permittivity.  A superstirng consequently may be viewed of as a field trajectory of a Fadeev-Popov-Trace, yet, in the opposite tense of holomorphicity as the other way around.  Light-Cone-Gauge eigenstates may either be abelian in geometric nature, or, these mentioned general types of eigenstates may be non-abelian in geometric nature.  An abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstate has a supplemental wave-tug in-between a related arbitrary given superstring and its correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace.  The light-cone-gauge topology of an abelian geometric nature is known of as a Kaluza-Klein topology.  Light-Cone-Gauge eigenstates that bear a sinusoidal interconnection between the arbitrary given superstring and its correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace are said to be non-abelian.  A non-abelian light-cone-gauge topology is known of as a Yang-Mills topology.  
I will continue with the suspence later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

About Non Abelian Light-Cone-Gauge Nature

With a superstring that involves a Yang-Mills topology, the mini-string segments that most directly bind an arbitrary given superstring with its corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Trace bear a Laplacian-based sinusoidal differential delineation at the beginning of BRST.  A superstring that bears a Yang-Mills topology is said to have a non-abelian light-cone-gauge topology.  The manner in which the mentioned sinusoidal Laplacian-based delineation of the said mini-string segments that form a certain partial field between a given superstring and its corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Trace at the beginning frame of BRST will be further discussed during courses ten and twelve.  As BRST progresses during the ebbing action that I describe as the Imaginary Exchange of Real Residue (which happens throughout BRST -- and BRST involves virtually the whole duration of instanton), the differential arrangement of the initial said sinusoidal wave-pattern that corresponds with a here discussed non-abelian light-cone-gauge topology is altered in terms of its amplitude and its relatively standing frequency.  So, during the initial motion of the action of BRST in which the Imaginary Exchange of Real Residue begins to happen, the fractal modulus of the said sinusoidal delineation, that may be described as the most direct field partial that interconnects a given arbitrary superstring with its corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Trace, increases in its ability to keep unfrayed, while, simultaneously, the amplitude of the said relatively standing sinusoidal wave-patten delineation that forms the basis of the said given light-cone-gauge eigenstate decreases in terms of its scalar translation -- along with a decrease in the frequency of the vibration of the said first-ordered-light-cone-gauge eigenstate as the said eigenstate is beginning -- here -- to be plucked "like a harp" by the corresponding gauge-bosons that exist in the general local region where the mentioned light-cone-gauge eigenstate is differentiating during the BRST portion of a given arbitrary instanton.  I still have a lot more to say about this.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Some Stuff About Gauge-Bosons

Gauge-Bosons are essential in the field of a light-cone-gauge-eigenstate since, when

                
individual gauge-bosons "pluck" the second-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstates that

exist in the field of a first-ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstate, the resulting vibrations

are second-ordered Schwinger Indices (the summation of such vibrations per first-

ordered light-cone-gauge-eigenstate being a first-ordered Schwinger Index) that flow

through the Rarita Structure to allow for the Ricci Scalar to function so that gravity may

take effect. This is just in reference to the E(6)XE(6) type of gauge-bosons. Just as

adjacent electrons have to spin antisymmetrically, to give a reverse-fractored example,

in order to obey the Pauli Exclusion Principle, adjacent E(6)XE(6) strings must bear an

assymmetric spin-orbital tensorism in order to not infringe on each others' space. Such

an antisymmetric spin-orbital tensorism is caused by the spurious effect of the Chern-

Simmons field that exists between adjacent E(6)X(E(6) strings. Such a Chern-Simmons

field is due to the condition of such gauge-bosons differentiating per instanton in-between

a discrete energy unit of permittivity and a discrete energy unit of energy impedance. So,

whether a related light-cone-gauge topology is abelian or non-abelian, the substringular

field that binds these gauge-bosons to both sides of an associated first-ordered-light-

cone-gauge-eigenstate is primarily abelian so that the "plucking" of the second-ordered

light-cone-gauge-eigenstates will not shatter the given first-ordered light-cone-gauge-

eigenstate. The fabric of substringular field is what I call "mini-string." Mini-String is

the fabric of gauge-action that interconnects the topology of all unfrayed substringular

phenomena that forms the homotopic structure of the substringular. My website is http://

www.samsphysicsworld@blogspot.com.

Sincerely,

Samuel David Roach                                                                                 

Part One of the Twelveth Course of Session 6

How are the three semi-hoops (each "semi-hoop" consisting of four world-tubes) that comprise the three sets of parallel universes interconnected?  Draw a relatively thin hoop that bears phenomena that moves in general to the relative left.  At the bottom of the mentioned thin hoop on the relative right side of your paper draw another relatively thin hoop that bears phenomena that moves in general to the relative right.  At the bottom of this latter mentioned hoop draw another of such hoops that that exists corresponding to the interior of the hoop that I began to describe at the beginning of this sentence that also bears phenomena that generally travels to the relative right such as the direction of travel of the interial indices that were mentioned that travel in the hoop that is just interial to the initial hoop that I have mentioned in this sentence.  At an arbitrary distance below the initial hoop that I have      mentioned the prior sentence, draw an upside-down semicircle of the same size and similar shape of the semicircle that exists just above the two world-tubes that exist in the relative norm-to-holomorphic direction from the corresponding "bottom" hoops, except that the "upper" hoops are directly associated with a concave down semicircle while the "lower" hoops are directly associated with a concave up semicircle.  Both of the prior mentioned semicircles are majorized into the two respective halves of the Royal Arc of one set of parallel universes.  Have the relatively concave up semicircle conically parallel the relatively concave down semicircle in such a manner that both semicircles that have recently been described are majorized in such a manner that the respective Royal Arc halves are also conically parallel.  So, to the relative interior of the relatively most exterior world-tube bears a world-tube that also contains phenomena that generally travel to the relative left when one faces the exterior of physical space-time-fabric.  The general tendency of phenomena in a world-tube to move holomoriphically is a condition that corresponds to forward moving time.  The general tendency of phenomena in a world-tube to move antiholomorphically is a condition that corresponds to backward moving time.  Each of the three "rings" that comprise the three sets of parallel universes exists in the same general manner that I just described earlier in this paragraph.  The world-tubes of different sets of parallel universes as well as the three sets of the Royal Arc (two of such semicircular Arc eigenstates that are majorized into parabollic hoops) are interconnected via hermitian yet non-abelian critical cusps that lace the three sets of parallel universes at the bottom of what could be explained as the "troughs" of each of these Royal Arc halves -- the described troughs being at the relatively open end of each of the Royal Arc structures of concavity.  Substringular Fock residue is contained thereby by the Ward Neumman Conditions of the peaks of each Royal Arc half, when one considers the curl of the majorized plane of such curvatures to form a semihoop that has a compacified peak at the relatively norm-to-holomorphic end that relates to the phenomena of the forward moving time associated world-tubes of each set of parallel universes,and a semihoop that has a compacitfied peak at the relatively norm-to antiholomorphic end that relates to the phenomena of the backward moving time associated world-tubes of each set of parallel universes.  Such an interbinding of hermitian yet non-abelian topology involves a locally multiplicit mini-string interconnection between the Laplacian directed interialized Royal Arc semi-hoops that exist with the same concavity with the relatively exterior world-tubes (This exists, yet with opposite concavity, for the relatively exterior world-tubes involving forward moving time and the relatively exterior world-tubes involving backward moving time) to the relatively interial world-tubes that involve the more interior world-tube of the more interial set of parallel universes.  Such interconnection exists between the most exterior set of parallel universes with the next interial set, and between the central set of paralle universe with the most interial set of parallel universes.  I will continue with the suspense of the next two parts of this session later!  I have written enough for now.  You have a phenomenal day!
Sincerely, Sam.                                                                                               

A Summary Of Part Two Of Session Five Of Course Six

Hi there people, this is Samuel Roach here!  I hope that you are doing fantastic!  I am here now to ellaborate as to some of what I meant when I typed out the second part of the fith session of Course Six.
                    
Think of this metaphor that is based on a reverse fractored tense relative to what I mean by parallel universes verses layers of reality.  Let us say that each life consistency that bears a soul was allagorical to a universe.  The various frameworks of their state of thought (the sets of general thoughts that each soul consistency imbued into their thinking) would be analogous to different layers of reality.  So, when a person "changes" their mind, each discrete set of such changes would here be analogous to a different layer of reality.  Correspondingly, many people may experience basically the same reality at the same time -- which is analogous to the concept that every universe shares certain "layers" of reality.  Often, the thoughts of many individuals and or the thoughts of an individual living creature may have the same thought pattern.  This is analogous to the condition that each type of universe is mirrored 9.1 million times, and there is 150,000 net layers of reality that each universe shares in total.

When multiple adjacent second-ordered point particles that are adjacet belong to the same layer of reality, then the sub-mini-string interconnections between these second-ordered point particles is going to tend to be tend to be based on a Semi-Laplacian-Based abelian differential geometry.  What I mean by an abelian differential geometry is that the interconnections between the said second-ordered point particles here bears a direct wave-tug that pushes and/or pulls the phenomena that it is covariantly interacting with through a unitary-based directoralized Lagrangian over the course of two consecutive instantons.
When multiple adjacent second-ordered point particles that are adjacent belong to a different layer of reality, then the sub-mini-string interconnecgtions between these second-ordered point particles is going to tend to be based on a Semi-Laplacian-Based non-abelian differential geometry.  What I mean by a non-abelian differential geometry is that the interconnections between the said second-ordered point particles here bears an indirect wave-tug that pushes and/or pulls the phenomena that it is covariantly interacting with through a multiplicitly-based directoralized Lagrangian over the course of two consecutive instantons.  The condition of the torsion that is applied to sub-mini-string, which is one level below discrete substringular field, works to define the condition as to whether such chord-like material is relatively jointal in nature (which is more relevant to abelian conditions), or as to whether such chord-like material is relatively smooth-curved in nature (which is more relevant to non-abelian conditios).
The other manner in which one may reffer to a "chord-like" phenomena in the substringular is that Planck phenoman related phenomena that are adjacent and of the same universe, since these bear more of an unborne tangency relative to one another, tend to bear more of an abelian interconnection with the other associated Planck phenomena related phenomena that I am here describing in this paragraph.
Such mini-string interconnection here that tends to be relatively abelian bears a direct wave-tug, even though the Lagrangian that is pulled through here does not necessarily bear a unitary directoralization in terms of the Lagrangian that the said phenomena pushes through.  Likewise, Planck-Like phenomena that are of different universes bear mini-string interconnection that tends to not bear as much direct wave-tug upon each other, and the said norm-conditions here do not have as much of an unborne tangency.
I will continue the suspense later!  Sincerely, Sam.    

Post One of More About Orbifolds

An orbifold may act as a toroidal-disc shell, an orbifold may act as a toroidal-spherical-shell, an orbifold may act as a Hilbert-toroidal-disc, or an orbifold may act as a Hilbert-Toroidal sphere. An orbifold toroidal disc shell is an orbifold that consists of one-dimensional superstrings that involve one universe within its Ward boundaries. Such an orbifold has a gauge-field Njenhuity that is directoralized of cohomological mini-strings that "yarn" together between opposite subtended relative poles based on a translation of theta to Phi multidimensional polar radial delineations, so that the associated orbifold bears an incomplete mobiaty. A complete mobiaty here would undo space-time-fabric, and is impossible here because the given interialized directoralization of these substringular gauge-fields here will always bear an abelian eigenstates no matter whether the associated superstrings along the periphery of this orbifold have a non-abelian or an abelian light-cone-gauge topology in and of themselves. A non-abelian gauge-field eigenbasis at geometrically euler positioning taken Laplacianly, with a partially abelian geometry "welding" the abelian and nonabelian eigenbasis of such to form a stratum that may be interacted upon via the Ricci Scalar with the proper Ante-De-Sitter/De-Sitter mode of operations. This webbing is a translational group operator of gauge-action that hyperbollically transfers point-fill to the operand of the Fourier Series that defines the refurbishment of the space-time-fabric of the periphery of such a toroidal-disc-shell, taken as a regulation group action of the only intertwining that an Imaginary charge under the given Ward conditions may effect to allow for such a Conformally Invariant Series commutation. Such activity also happens with toroidal spherical shells, yet only non-abelianly with toroidal discs and toroidal spheres of the kind that define their respective orbifolds.

Glossary for FTAAN

1) Njenhuis Tensor -- An added tensor that operates off of the given Real Reimmanian plane.


2) Neilson-Collosh-Ghosts -- Ghost anomalies of gravitational particles.


3) Fadeev-Popov-Ghosts -- Ghost anomalies of Planck phenomenon related phenomena.


4) Positive-Norm-States -- Forward holomorphically based ghost anomalic annihilating loci that begin as point particles of the first-order that are supplementally norm to a relatively small number of other first-ordered point particles.


5) Negative-Norm-States -- Reverse holomorphically based ghost anomalic forming loci that begin as point particles of the first-order that are supplementally norm to a relatively small number of other first-ordered point particles. Negative-Norm-States form the Gaussian topology of Fadeev-Popov-Ghosts and other ghost anomalies.


6) Substringular-Resolution -- To be able to resolve down to (3and1/3)*10^(-37) meters. You may do this via a procedure of antigravity.


7) Antigravity -- A synergy of antigravitational particles that makes the given gauge-symmetry partially abelian. It is thus a Yau-Exact translation of Chern-Simmons directorals. Antigravity is a reversal in the directoralization of the Ricci-Scalar via the Rarita-Structure.


8) Reverse Gravity -- Gravitational particle kinematism that reverses the flow of gravity and does not change the given light-cone-gauge nature in and of itself. Reverse gravity, in and of itself, maintains the directoralization of the Ricci-Scalar.


9) Abelian Topology -- Jointal topology that has a direct wave-tug at its holonomic end through a Lagrangian.


10) Non-Abelian Topology -- Sinusoidal or smooth-curved topology that bears no direct wave-tug at its holonomic end though a Lagrangian.


11) Yang-Mills Topology -- Light-Cone-Gauge topology that is nonabelian.


12) Kaluza-Klein Topology -- Light-Cone-Gauge topology that is abelian.


13) Abelian-Gauge Topology -- Light-Cone-Gauge topology that is supplemental.


14) Non-Abelian Topology -- Light-Cone-Gauge topology that is sinusoidal.


15) Partially-Abelian Topology -- In terms of the light-cone-gauge, a partially-abelian topology is a topology of a gauge-symmetry that is based on the light-cone-gauge being Yang-Mills at one locus and Kaluza-Kleing at another location. In terms of an anomalous alterior topology besides the prior mentioned situation, a partially-abelian topology is a topology that goes from a jointal structure with a direct wave-tug at its holonomic end through a Lagrangian to a sinusoidal or smooth-curved topology that bears no direct wave-tug at its holonomic end through a Lagrangian.


16) Chern-Simmons Differentiation -- Differentiation that is either non-hermitian and/or perturbative.

FTAAN, Session 11

When a light-cone-gauge eigenstate is abelian, its corresponding superstring and counterstring are generally non-abelian. When a light-cone-gauge eigenstate is non-abelian, its corresponding superstring and counterstring are generally abelian. When a light-cone-gauge eigenstate is abelian, the mini-strings in-between the corresponding superstrings and its counterpart are also abelian. When a light-cone-gauge eigenstate is non-abelian, the mini-strings in-between the corresponding superstring and its counterstring are also non-abelian. When a light-cone-gauge eigenstate is abelian, the surrounding connective mini-strings are partially abelian with a tendency towards non-abelian. When a light-cone-gauge eigenstate is non-abelian, the surrounding connective mini-strings are partially abelian with a tendency towards abelian. The mini-strings that interconnect certain superstrings with certain other supersrings always have a tension, yet always have a slack in the line. Abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstates have relatively more slack in the connective mini-strings that connect their corresponding superstring, although abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstates themselves have no slack in the line in and of themselves. Non-Abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstates in and of themselves have slack in the line although their corresponding mini-strings that bind their corresponding superstrings have relatively less slack than the mini-strings that bind the corresponding superstring of abelian light-cone-gauge eigenstates. In other words, the peripheral mini-strings that associate with a light-cone-gauge eigenstate within a Gaussian eigenbasis have a virtually opposite abelian geometry to the abelian geometry of the given light-cone-gauge eigenstate itself. The abelian geometry of strings and counterstring themselves is generally opposite to that of the mini-strings that bind these. The abelian geometry of the mini-strings in-between strings and counterstrings is the same as that of the light-cone-gauge. A light-cone-gauge eigenstate is the same mini-string behavior in-between a Planck phenomena related phenomenon and its corresponding superstring. The light-cone-gauge is the integration of all of the light-cone-gauge eigenstates.

FTAAN, Session 10

A superstring has point particle cores that are 5*10^(-87) meters thick in the substringular and 1.5*10^(-78) meters thick in the globally distinguishable. The mini-strings in-between these are 5*10^(-87) meters long. So, above the top point particle of the first order of a one-dimensional superstring is an antenna-like profection of mini-string that is often non-abelian in and of itself per iteration, whether the given superstring is abelian on the whole or non-abelian on the whole. When a two-dimensional non-abelian superstring of a non-swivel nature iterates, the mini-strings in-between the given first-ordered point particles vibrate holomophically/antiholomorphically 60 times each without moving the given first-ordered point particles during the core of BRST. When a one-dimensional non-abelian superstring of a non-swivel nature iterates, the mini-strings in-between the given first-ordered point-particles vibrate norm to holomorphically and norm to the Lagrangian of the substance of the superstring/norm to antihlolomorphically and norm to the Lagrangian of the substance of the superstring 60 times each without moving the given first-ordered point particles during the core of BRST. When a one-dimensional abelian string iterates mini-string ripples through the first-ordered point particles causing the mini-string in-between these to begin to kink at their center states sixty times norm to the holomorphic yet also norm to the Lagrangian substance of the superstring and sixty times norm to the antiholomorphic yet also norm to the Lagrangian substance of the superstring without moving the given first-ordered point particles during the core of BRST because the given ripple of the mini-string of the first-ordered point particles provides phenomena to the mini-string. When a two-dimensional abelian superstring iterates, the same thing happens except that the mini-string vibration kinks the mini-string 60 times holomorphically and 60 times antiholomorphically. The vibration of non-abelian strings and the kinks of abelian strings happen holomorphically then antiholomorphically back and forth, or norm to these and the Lagrangian of their substringular substance back-and-forth. This happens without moving the core of the first-ordered point particles during BRST.

FTAAN, Session 9

A point particle as it exists in a superstring has a core diameter of 5*10^(-87) meters. The mini-string that connects to these is 5*10^(-87) meters long. A mini-string has a thickness of 10^(-129) meters. These are taken in the substringular. In the globally distinguishable, these phenomena are 10^8*3 times thicker, since the Lorentz-Four-Contraction works to a factor of 3*10^8. So, in the substringular, the Lorentz-Four-Contractions are maximized for optimal core detection possible. Thus, in the substringular, one has minimal to no increased Lorentz-Four-Contraction. As a point particle of the first-order travels through ultimon flow the given point particle has mini-string taken away by means of it being pulled out of the bundle to where the given point particle has then 10,000 times less volume during the core of ultimon flow, since the associated bundle has less mini-string, although the bundle has the same diameter. The compactified condition of a point particle is densely configured. This densely volumed point during the core of ultimon flow differentiation by a factor of 10,000 to exist at the whole volume of its neighborhood by a certain number of times since the loose bundle discussed is relatively thinned out here. It does this by molding into different morphologies that total to its total volume of a first-ordered point particle a certain number of times within the core of ultimon flow. The volume normally taken up by a first-ordered point particle is known as a point particle neighborhood. A point particle of norm state during the ultimon flow has the volume of a first-ordered point particle of a string during the core of ultimon flow. A point particle of a norm state during BRST is just 50 times smaller in volume to a supersting's point particle during BRST. Point particles of superstrings of non-abelian superstrings are more loose than those of abelian supertrings.

FTAAN, Session 7

Superstrings may be hermitian or Chern-Simmons. Superstrings may be abelian or non-abelian. One-dimensional superstrings may be hermitian or Chern-Simmons. One-dimensional superstrings may be abelian or non-abelian. Two-dimensional superstrings may be hermitian or Cher-Simmons. Two-dimensional superstrings may be abelian or non-abelian. One-dimensional tachyonic supersrings and two-dimensional tachyonic superstrings are Mobiusly hermitian yet euclideanly Chern-Simmons. One-dimensional tachyonic superstrings are completely non-abelian as superstrings, even though this does not condsider the gauge conditions of the given superstrings. When eletromagnetic energy initially scatters upon a surface, the individual two-dimensional bosons that have just struck the given surface will temporarily become tachyonic. These tachyonic superstrings will be completely non-abelian while their gauge structure will be completely abelian. The two-dimensional superstrings will become completely non-abelian as the result of a spring-like action happening to the given superstrings that jiggles the superstrings not to shatter the topology of these superstrings. This jiggling acts as a "shock-absorber" that straightens the non-abelian nature of the gauge structure of the given electromagnetic energy to make the given gauge structure temporarily abelian. This happens because the inertia of the light-cone-gauge eigenstates when a ray of electromagnetic energy strikes a surface pulls into the given two-dimensional superstrings and Planck phenomenon related phenomena on account of the strong metric-gauge and gauge-metric that the light-cone-gauge has relative to the given two-dimensional superstrings and their Planck phenomenon related phenomena. This pull Mobiusly winds the two-dimensional superstrings to make these jiggle to prevent the Planck phenomenon related phenomena from breaking temporarily while also jiggling to help straighten the light-cone-gauge so that the gauge structure will become abelian. Whenever a one or a two-dimensional superstring becomes freshly tachyonic, or whenever a one or a two-dimensional freshly non tachyonic, the superstring given has Cevita conditions. Whenever a supersting remains topologically invariant between two consecutive iterations, the given superstring has Wess-Zumino conditions. Superstrings may be abelian or non-abelian due to the considered wave-tug upon the superstrings via mini-strings. A hermitian superstring tends to be abelian, while a swivel-shaped superstring tends to be non-abelian.