Point On A Paraboloid

Let us say that one were to have a physical point at a position, that is here to be stationed on the outer surface of a paraboloid.  This said physical point at a position, is here to be stationary -- at an internal reference-frame.  Let's next consider that the said paraboloid, is to initially be stationary as well -- at its own internal reference-frame.  The said paraboloid has a position, since it has a shape.  Anything that has a position has an angle, that is here to be directly associated with its respective shape.  Now -- let's say that the paraboloid mentioned here, is, subsequent to the initial conditions inferred here, to roll off of a table.  Its angle of position, at each increment of motion along the table, works to define its coexistence with its environment, -- when including its eminent association with the table, that the said paraboloid is here to be rolling off of.  The rolling of the object is like a spin.  The change of the object's norm conditions, as it is here to be rolling off of the table, is the physical Action of the Object, that is here to bring it to a new resultant set of positions, -- which is here to create the object's Motion.  The driving force of the object, in whatever direction that it is pressured into moving through, also works to cause Motion, by helping to allow for a positional drive of the object.  So, -- change in norm conditions, over time -- in both radial translation & in transversal positional drive, works together, to form the basic building blocks, of what may here be thought of as being regular kinematic motion.  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Yukawa Versus Gliosis To Kahler-Metric

Any given arbitrary superstring that is not frayed, is always going to be Yukawa to the Kahler-Metric, yet, only when such a so-eluded-to superstring is in the process of working to attain those fractals of discrete energy that these need -- in order to both persist and exist as discrete energy -- will such superstrings actually be Gliosis to the Kahler-Metric.  The metric of a superstring of discrete energy permittivity, is its dimensional-related pulsation.  Any superstring that is not being frayed, will always work to bear a dimensional-related pulsation over time.  Yet, such an eminent tendency of a superstring to work to bear any of such a tense of a dimensional-related pulsation -- works to bear a general condition, to where, since any given arbitrary respective superstring is not literally 100 percent efficient in the "real world," discrete energy must recurrently, over time, go through a "renovation-like" process of such a prior inferred re-attaing, of those fractals of discrete energy -- to where discrete energy is to thence to be put into such a condition-related "position," to then to be able to reattain the ability to work to bear one manner or another, of a dimensional-related pulsation over time.  This process of such a said "renovation-like" activity, is when discrete energy -- after a set of iterations of the ending segments of the contingent correlative group-related instantons, in which such discrete quanta of energy are to interact directly in a Gliosis-based manner, with a respective tense of an eigenstate of the holonomic substrate of the Klein Bottle, is to happen, in order to both modulate the morphology-related qualities of the said discrete quanta of energy, and also in so as to modulate the wave-tug-related qualities of the same said discrete quanta of energy -- so that the said stringular-like phenomenology that is here to thence to be made Gliosis to the Kahler-Metric, is to both reattain its efficiency and its "stamina," over time.  Furthermore, such a said process -- works to make it easier for abelian groups to latch-on, in an indistinguishably changing manner, to the externalized shell of the multiplicit topological proximal region, -- in so as to work to help at making the functioning of cohomological attainment to be able to be possible, over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.