The Rarita Structure, is metaphorically like the water of the substringular.
Superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, are metaphorically like the flesh of the substringular.
Light-Cone-Gauge Eigenstates, are metaphorically like the blood of the substringular.
The gauge-bosons, are metaphorically like the nerve tissue of the substringlar.
Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates, are metaphorically like the electrolytes of the substringular.
The Ultimon, is metaphorically like the body of the substringular.
The Schwinger-Related Vibrations, are metaphorically like the ATP and the ADP of the substringular.
The Fourier-Related-Progression, is metaphorically like the bodily motion of the substrngular.
Homotopic Transfer, is metaphorically like the body-related flexibility of the substringular.
Homotopic Restraint, is metaphorically like the bodily strain of the substringlar.
Black-Holes, are metaphorically like the cancer cells of the substringular.
& the E(8)XE(8) superstring-related-oscillation-based-mode, is metaphorically like the soul of the substringular.
(Co)Homology-Based Topological Manifolds, are metaphorically like the cells of the substringular.
Neutrinos encode for the forces of nature, by the multiplicity of acting upon the region, proximal adjutant to the light-cone-gauge, in so as to help facilitate the initiation of the gauge-bosons’ induction, as to metaphorically pluck the stated light-cone-gauge (eigenstates) like a harp, in so as to facilitate the formation of kinematically propagated Schwinger-Related vibrational oscillations, that are to flow, as previously spontaneously induced, to interact with the panoply, of the multiplicity of physical phenomenology, in so as to facilitate the formation, of the forces of nature.
Neutrinos, are metaphorically like the genetic material of the substringular.
The “spatial frequency” as coupled with the angular frequency, in the substringular, is metaphorically analogous, in a way, to the general concept of thought frequency.
EDITORIAL: By the way: Let’s work at learning from each other. I’ve gotta work at that too! Surviving as a human race, is more important, than who’s right and who’s wrong!
When homotopic expansion is kept under restraint, by the withholding force of action, of a kinetic tense of discrete energy permittivity, that this type of a case, may at times, be eminently corroborative, to the likings of a viable genus, of the exemplification, of a Fourier-Related-Progression.
A homotopic expansion, that is inverse Euclidean, is to tend to bear a transversal inverse contortion, of its topological concavity, in the general process, of its eminently corroborative contortion-based symmetry. Whereas; A homotopic expansion, that is inverse Clifford, is to tend to bear a radial inverse contortion, of its topological concavity, in the general process, of its eminently corroborative contortion-based symmetry. When the particular Euler characterization, of the homotopic expansion, is to be reduced by a genus of Lagrangian-Based exemplification, in so as to thereby tend to work to bear a complex tensor-based physical attribute, to the bending of the eminently corroborative phenomenology, that this particular situation, will thereby tend to be one, in which the topological concavity is to invert.
Euclidean/Clifford Homotopic expansions, that are inextricably heuristic in nature, often tend to be light energy/light matter-based. Whereas; Euclidean/Clifford Homotopic expansions, that are inextricably inverse in nature, often tend to be dark energy/dark matter-based.