The Second Part Of The Fourth Session Of Course Ten

The orbital components of any given light-cone-gauge eigenstate acts as activated reigns that helt to push the said light-cone-gauge eigenstate via the activity of the said respective local reigns.  The overall forward momentum of light-cone-gauge eigenstates are equal in terms of the holomorphicity of the action that relates to its corresponding Clifford Expansion, except that the directoral permittivity of the corresponding momenta may vary by the type of superstrings that these light-cone-gauge eigenstates are attached to.  Light-Cone-Gauge eigenstates of an angular momentum guides its general transversal directoral permittivity.  Light-Cone-Gauge eigenstates attached to any given one or two-dimensional superstrings of what I term of as the "upper" half of the Royal Arc have more of a radial momentum that guides its directoral permittivity on account of the condition that the "upper" half of the Royal Arc appertains to the region in which positive moving time is kinematic per iteration of instanton.  Light-Cone-Gauge eigenstates that are attached to any given one or two-dimensional superstrings of the "lower" half of the Royal Arc have more of a sinusoidal push momentum that guides its directoral permittivity on account of the condition that what I term of as the lower half of the Royal Arc appertains to the arena in which backward moving time is kinematic per iteration of instanton.  I can only describe so much of the picture of the substringular at once. 
I will continue with the suspence later!  Sincerley, Samuel David Roach.     

Session One Of Course Ten On The Light-Cone-Gauge and Gravity

How do the units of spin, orbit, and transversal momentum of a light-cone-gauge eigenstate fit into the workings of the said light-cone-guage eigenstate?  Each light-cone-gauge quanta is divided into 44 discrete transversal "pieces."  Each of the mentioned light-cone-gauge quanta is divided into 84 discrete segments in terms of orbital momentum.  Each light-cone-gauge quanta is divided into 128 discrete segments in terms of spin-based momentum.  In light-cone-gauge eigenstates that are connected directly to one-dimensional superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, the transversal discrete segments have three times the momentum of the other discrete segments.  With light-cone-gauge eigenstates that are attached to two-dimensional superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that correspond to the norm-to-forward-holomorphic end of the binding that exists between a superstring of discrete energy permittivity and its corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Trace -- these loci that appertain more directly with the norm-to-forward-holomorphic related general section of the Royal Arc -- the spin-related discrete units appertaining to 2-d strings have 1.03125 times the momentum of the spin-related discrete units of light-cone-gauge eigenstates that respectively correspond to those that appertain to one-dimensional superstrings that exist as discrete units of energy permittivity.  During the same arbitrary duration in which BRST happens, the orbit-related discrete units that correspond to a light-cone-gauge eigenstate that is directly affiliated with a two-dimensional superstring have 1.5228095 times the momentum of the orbit-related units that respecitively correspond to a covariant light-cone-gauge eigenstate that is directly affiliated with a one-dimensional superstring.  During the same arbitrary metric that involves a single period of BRST, the transversal discrete units that are associated with the light-cone-gauge eigenstate that is related to a two-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity has 1.909090... times the momentum of the prior mentioned respectively related basis of 44 that I had recently mentioned that involves two-d superstrings in terms of its light-cone-gauge eigenstate, and, the larger of the two Hamiltonian-Based momentums that I have mentioned  earlier in this sentence has only .636363... times the momentum of the transversal discrete units of light-cone-gauge quanta that is attached to respective related one-dimensional superstrings that are simultaneoulsy covariant via a conipoint that is central between the two described arbitrary given superstrings.  With light-cone-gauge quanta that are attacherd to 2-d superstring of the relatively "lower" half of the Royal Arc, the orbit-based discrete units have ~ 1.5714285 times the orbit-related momentum of light-cone-gauge quanta that are attached to a corresponding one-d superstring that is undergoing the same simultaneous parity of Hamiltonian Operation within a shared general region.  The spin-related momentum of these respective quanta is base 128, or, as in the case of 1-d superstrings that are related in terms of their light-cone-gauge eigenstates --  the transversal momentum of these quanta is .636363... times what the said momentum has in the corelative light-cone-gauge eigenstates that are related to the same said respective two-dimensional superstrings.  Sam.  If I made a few mistakes, I am sorry.  I gotta run!  Sincerely, Sam.                    

Part Three of the Eighth Session of Course Nine

What I mean by relatively time-oriented and relatively timeless light-cone-gauge eigenstates is that only bosonic or closed superstrings may directly associate with a specific linearly directed time-frame.  Fermionic or open superstrings happen in time, yet, these do not have the capability to directly associate with a specific linearly directed time-frame.  This considers the condition that time moves forward and backward at the same time.  What I mean by a specific linearly directed time-frame takes into consideration that occasionally one-ten-thousandth of history changes.  What is cognitively imbued in the collective consciousness may not be changed in terms of history, yet, what is not cognitively imbued in the collective consciousness has more of a capability of changing in terms of history.
                       
There are five second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates that directly associate with one-dimensional superstrings taken individually.  The second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates comprise a first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate.  There are ten second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates that directly associate with two-dimensional superstrings taken individually.  Again, the second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates comprise a first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate.  The second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates directly associated with one-dimensional superstrings, taken individually, are comprised of two coiled chords -- either sinusoidal-based or flushly-directed-based -- of mini-strings that tie in-between a superstring and the Fadeev-Popov-Trace that is positioned directly in the reverse-holomorphic direction of the mentioned one-dimensional superstring.  The second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates directly associated with two-dimensional superstrings, taken individually, are comprised of a chord of mini-string -- either sinusoidal-based or flushly-directed-based -- that tie in-between a superstring and the Fadeev-Popov-Trace that is positioned directly in the reverse-holomorphic direction of the mentioned two-dimensional superstring.  Two-dimensional superstrings that are discrete units of energy permittivity bear two discrepencies in terms of the topologically pure hermicity that these would otherwise have -- yet, this condition is minor enough to allow for a two-dimenisional superstring to still have a conformal dimension of two.  This is because the discrepencies fit as locally hermitian cusps that help to allow for the field of an individual two-dimensional superstring to have a directly associated three-dimensional field.  These discrepencies exist to the holomorphic side and to the norm-to-holomorphic positioning at the  relative ninety-degree locus of a given two-dimensional superstring and to the reverse-holomorphic side and to the norm-to-reverse-holomorphic positioning at the relative 270 degree locus of the same given two-dimensional superstring.  Such two and three-dimensional discrepencies help to cause the potential instabillity, and thus, the potential entropy that is more associated with the kinematic translation of two-dimensional superstrings than with the kinematic translation of one-dimensional superstrings -- even though the end result of entropy itself is comrised of spurious plain kinetic energy, and, plain kinetic energy bears energy permittivity that is comprised of one-dimensional superstrings.  One-dimensional superstrings that are discrete units of energy permittivity bear one two-dimensional discepency at its relative center.  Such a discrepency deviates from th pure hermicity that these would otherwise have -- yet, this condition is minor enough to allow for a one-dimensional superstring to still have a conformal dimension of one.  This is because the discrepency mentioned fits as a locally hermitian cusp that helps to allow for the field of an individual one-dimensional superstring to have a directly associated two-dimensional field.  Such a discrepency here exists in the norm-to-norm-to-reverse-holomorphic side of any given arbitrary one-dimensional superstring.  I actually have at least a couple more parts to this one session about Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge, and I do not want to bore my reader's with too much information at once.  So, I will continue to ellaborate furter as to the conditions that work to allow for relatively timeless and relatively time-oriented light-cone-gauge eigenstates later.  Until then, I will continue with the suspense later!  God Bless You!
Sincerely, Sam Roach.                                                                                                                                                     

Part Two of Session 8 of Course Nine

Each individual light-cone-gauge eigenstate has 44 angular momentum components, 84 orbital components, and 128 spin components.  This is due to the condition that, for relatively time-oriented supertrings, it is most basic for a light-cone-gauge eigenstate to rotate along its axial plane over the course of sequential instantons, while it is a little less basic for a light-cone-gauge eigenstate to rotate along a radial Lagrangian while yet maintaining a directly covariant association with a specific conipoint of the coniaxial that is related to an arbitrary superstring when it is undergoing a state of conformal invariance, while it is less basic, yet essential, for a superstring to undergo a perturbation in the locus of its coniaxial.  (Although Gaussian Transformation happen all of the time, because of intertia, it takes an outward force to transversally move a supersting out of conformal invariane in such a manner so as to allow for the continued flow of the countless Fourier Transformations that are associated with the kinematic interplay that allows space-time-fabric to spontaneously continue to exist.)  In one-dimensional strings, the 44 angular momentum components are excentuated beyond the other components, do to the condition that one-dimensional superstrings comprise the existence of plain kinetic energy.  In two-dimensional superstrings associated with the upper Royal Arc section, spin-related components are excentuated beyond the other components.  One-Dimensional superstrings have relatively timeless light-cone-gauge eigenstates -- partially on account of the condition that a one-dimensional superstring has a purely Minkowsk field that is directly associated with it.  (A one-dimensional superstring directly associates with a two-dimensional field.)  Two-Dimensional superstrings have relatively time-oriented light-cone-gauge eigenstates, partially on account that the three-dimensional fields that directly accomedate the respective two-dimensional superstrings, at least, bear some basis with a Hilbert-like field.  (Hilbert-based fields may have as little as three spatial dimensions associated with these.)  Yes, Minkowski space may have up to 26 spatial dimensions under the conditions of an arbitrary Laplacian setting, yet, the foundation of Minkowski space is two-dimensional space -- the basis of flat space is a planar two-diimensional field.  Hilbert space is volume-oriented space.  Hilbert space may be comprised of as little as three spatial dimensions under certain conditions.  Time-Oriented light-cone-gauge eigenstates, which, are of two-dimensional superstrings,  have ten second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates that comprise the initially mentioned first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates of the described two-dimensional superstrings.  Relatively timeless light-cone-gauge eigenstates exist in the field of one-Dimensional superstrings, these of which have five second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates that comprise the initially mentioned first-ordered light cone-gauge eigenstates that are associated with the described one-dimensional superstrings.  Two-Dimensional superstrings are closed, while one-dimensional superstrings are open.  Most superstrings have bear light-cone-gauge eigenstates that are relatively time oriented, so, most superstrings are closed , or, in other words, most superstrings are bosonic.  Yet, fermionic or open superstrings must exist.  If open superstrings did not exist, a photon would implode as it was formed, yet, thank goodness for the fact that their is plain kinetic energy (it is a fact of reality), so as long as there is a Continuum, there will be a certain arbitrary amount of one-dimensional (fermionic) or open superstrings.  I will continue with the suspense later!    I have a couple more posts to do on this session to ellaborate further as to the meaning of what I have been describing here.Until then, move closer and closer to your goals, and you will move in the direction of which you think!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.