Electromagnetic energy is the basis of what causes the amplitude of the Polyakov Action, in the manner that the Polyakov Action is what most directly reflects what physically happens so that Lorentz-Four-Contractions may occur in the manner that these do so that physical phenomena may differentiate in a Fourier manner relative to the said general phenomena known of as electromagnetic energy.
What I term of as the Bases of Light helps to determine, along with the light-cone-gauge, the positioning, the Ward Caucy conditions, and the delineation of superstirngs that the relalted massive strings will have in their subsequent iterations during instanton.
Light is the basis of a quantized group of harmonically vibrating bosons in Noether Flow being directed in a relatively transversal manner thru a relatively unitary Lagrangian over Fourier Transforms -- as a general concept -- going thru enough of a distribution so as to effect and be effected by alterior forms of E.M.. Enough for now! Sam Roach.
Showing posts with label Hilbert Lagrangian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hilbert Lagrangian. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Monday, April 30, 2012
An Aside As To The Light-Cone-Gauge
The flow here mentioned forms a Dirac-Based cone-like perturbation that has an increase in Hodge-Volume that is here an example of what I meant by a Clifford Expansion. (Reminder).
The said curves are non-trivially isometric if folded in the directoralization of the given Real-Reimmenian holomorphic Laplacian-Lagrangian, since inversely delineated hyperbollic curves bear assymptotic distributions that map-out an inverse chirality that thus does not overlap directly in terms of topological allignment -- in the course of the mentioned sub-Laplacian distribution frameworks that one would be dealing with here.
If, on the other hand, one were to map out the hyperbollic curves that appertain to the holonomic basis of the mentioned expanding sub-Fourier Clifford-field partial thru a Njenhuis norm-to-holomorphic topological-based sway, in such a manner so that the connection at the Fadeev-Popov-Trace is maintained as a conipoint of the associated coniaxial, then, the isomorphism of the said curves would be trivial in terms of the chirality of the mentioned 2-d superstring's light-cone-gauge. This is based on the Ward-Caucy delineations that may be determined by the corresponding proximal effects of the here given arbitrary Lorentz-Four-Contraction field index that acts upon the specific direct neighborhood of the said given 2-d superstring.
When one is dealing with the Clifford-expansion that relates to the sub-metrics that are similar but different during specific given examples that relate to the light-cone-gauge that is involved with 1-d superstrings, the main difference here is that one is then relating to a flat partial field that may be mapped out in this case in a purely Minkowski manner -- instead of dealing with a volume-based partial field that may be mapped out in the prior described case in a Hilbert manner.
I will get back to the session of Course 10 that I left out a while ago in one of my next posts.
I will continue with the suspence later! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
The said curves are non-trivially isometric if folded in the directoralization of the given Real-Reimmenian holomorphic Laplacian-Lagrangian, since inversely delineated hyperbollic curves bear assymptotic distributions that map-out an inverse chirality that thus does not overlap directly in terms of topological allignment -- in the course of the mentioned sub-Laplacian distribution frameworks that one would be dealing with here.
If, on the other hand, one were to map out the hyperbollic curves that appertain to the holonomic basis of the mentioned expanding sub-Fourier Clifford-field partial thru a Njenhuis norm-to-holomorphic topological-based sway, in such a manner so that the connection at the Fadeev-Popov-Trace is maintained as a conipoint of the associated coniaxial, then, the isomorphism of the said curves would be trivial in terms of the chirality of the mentioned 2-d superstring's light-cone-gauge. This is based on the Ward-Caucy delineations that may be determined by the corresponding proximal effects of the here given arbitrary Lorentz-Four-Contraction field index that acts upon the specific direct neighborhood of the said given 2-d superstring.
When one is dealing with the Clifford-expansion that relates to the sub-metrics that are similar but different during specific given examples that relate to the light-cone-gauge that is involved with 1-d superstrings, the main difference here is that one is then relating to a flat partial field that may be mapped out in this case in a purely Minkowski manner -- instead of dealing with a volume-based partial field that may be mapped out in the prior described case in a Hilbert manner.
I will get back to the session of Course 10 that I left out a while ago in one of my next posts.
I will continue with the suspence later! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Some More About The Light-Cone-Gauge
As to the discussion about two sets of superstrings that differentiate covariantly over a given arbitrary Fourier Transformation: The discribed activity here repeats its mentioned mode in a manner so that it involves a reiterated sequential series of corresponding instantons that strays in a general spot in such a manner so as to not go as a group through a discrete unitary and/or tree-amplitude-based unitized directoral. The more that a Wilson-Line develops in terms of having more of a basis of unitization among the superstrings that form the said two mentioned substringular groups taken individually -- and especially when such unitization combines the two said groups -- that potentially causes these to form a syncronization that will pull these into a motion that involves a discrete Lagrangian. Then, such a unitization may spontaneously allign the parity between these related superstrings in such a manner that these would thence converge the arbitrarily related holonomic discharge of substringular field (mini-strings of which form the physical entity of the said field) which, if the Noether-Based flow of the prior mentioned substringular group catches up with what was earlier the prior mentioned arbitrary tachyonic-based substringular group, this would then need to be on account of what would appertain to a minor spuriousness in the tachyonic scattering of both substringular groups. An example of this, when photons scatter, these are initially tachyonic for relatively few instantons. Right after that, the said photons that just scattered slow down more than these initially sped up, as according to Snell's Law. These photons -- in the process -- catch up to the orbifolds in which these are to quantize with in such a manner that photons that travel outside of a vacuum always travel slower On Average than these would travel in a vacuum. Again, this happens as Snell's Law indicates. This will be much further discussed in future books that I wrote.
I will continue with the suspence later! Sincerley, Samuel Roach.
I will continue with the suspence later! Sincerley, Samuel Roach.
Saturday, March 24, 2012
About The Difference Between The Two General Types Of LCG
With a light-cone-gauge eigenstate that corresponds to a one-dimensional superstring of energy permittivity, the conical shape that may be mapped out during the activity of BRST is a planar or Minkowski partial field that bears two isomorphic hyperbolic ends that form a kinematic flowing of a surface area that is redistributed as the activity that happens during BRST is progressing. Yet, with a light-cone-gauge eigenstate that corresponds to a two-dimensional superstring of energy permittivity, the conical shape that may be mapped out during the activity of BRST is a volume-based or Hilbert partial field that bears a region of concentric hyperbolic ends that are relatively homeomorphic per frame -- although the kinematic flow forms a permutating shape that acts as a region that is locally Ward three-dimensional . So, as the field of a light-cone-gauge is the most important field appertaining to both the interaction of corresponding superstrings with other superstrings of energy permittivity and also to the initializing of the determination as to the succeeding delineation of the related superstrings, the constant variation of the respective Minkowski and Hilbert conical regions that flow in the general locus of the region that exists in-between a superstring and its corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Trace works to form a substrate for its interaction with its corresponding gauge-bosons so that the vibrations of the related light-cone-gauge eigenstates may harmonically in some cases -- or anharmonically in other cases -- cause the needed vibrations in Rarita Structure eigenstates so that both the Ricci Scalar will bear the necessary amplitude Hodge indices and also so that the appropriate norm projections may be able to interact with the correlative orbifolds and orbifold eigenstates in such a manner so that the Wick Action eigenstates may be able to indirectly cause that motion of Higgs Action eigenstates which causes the motion of Klein Bottle eigenstates to happen in such a manner so that Gaussian Transformaions may occur. The pattern of the cohomological flow of the fields of light-cone-gauge eigenstates works to signal where the spatial transference of superstrings is to be redistributed -- the motion of the prior mentioned fields are the initial basis that helps to determine where the related superstrings of energy permittivity are to go next. The manner of the mapping of the said conical relationships that I mentioned during BRST is based on the condition that exists once the related Polyakov Action eigenstates are well underway. So, as the cites of the fields of superstrings are progressing during the period in which the Imaginary of Exchange of Real Residue is kinematic upon the related superstrings, the volume of the field partial that may be described as the field of first-ordered-light-cone-gauge eigenstates increases until the Polyakov Action appertaining to one multiplicitly covariant instanton is completed. The effect of Lorentz-Four-Contractions is based on the condition that exists at metrical locus of the last frame of BRST. So, when considering the proximity of superstrings with their corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Traces, the amplitude of the apexing of the Laplacian-based mapping as to the amount of light-cone-gauge field that exists per region at the end of BRST is Dirac in the relatively forward holomorphic direction and Reverse-Dirac in the relatively reverse holomorphic direction. I will continue with the suspence later! Sincerely, Sam Roach.
Thursday, March 8, 2012
What makes Gauge-Transformations So Special
Gauge-Transformations are an arbitrary example of Gaussian Transformations. Gauge-Transformations happen when electromagnetic energy scatters. Gauge-Transformations are what in general produces entropy. The physical activity that differentiates gauge-transformations from other Gaussian Transformations is that, during a gauge-transformation, not only do superstrings "shake" from within an eigenstate of the Klein Bottle, yet, the holonomic entity of the said Klein Bottle eigenstate here shakes through the Lagrangian of a bilateral coniaxial that may be mapped in a Laplacian manner at the center of the conipoint of the said holonomic entity of the said Klein Bottle eigenstate. Yet, with other Gaussian Transformations, as the superstrings that "skake", so as to reattain the permittivity that these need to be discrete energy, from within a here given arbitrary Klein Bottle eigenstate, the holonomic entity of the here mentioned Klein Bottle eigenstate remains covariantly stationary per each metric in which the correlative superstrings that are here reattaining permittivity are "shook" so as to regain the said permittivity that these need so that the related superstrings may remain as discrete units of energy permittivity. So, the individual eigenmetrics of Kaeler-Metric in gauge-transformations involve a bilateral wobble through a tightly-knit Lagrangian that may be mapped in the general locus of where the said Klein Bottle eigenstate is at during each of such described eigenmetrics, while the individual eigenmetrics of Kaeler-Metric in other Gaussian Transformations involve no covariantly viable shaking in the holonomic entity of the related Klein Bottle during the individual eigenmetrics that involve their respective Kaeler-Metric eigenstates. The shaking of the given Klein Bottle eigenstates that happens during gauge-transformations produces an anharmonic shift in loci of Rarita Structure eigenstates that causes enough lack of discrete order so as to allow for those perturbations that cause the potentially needed reorganizations of the related Campbell, Hausendorf, and Campbell-Hausendorf Projections that increase the expectation value as to the ability of substringular subspaces to be able to maximize their agility in terms of their ability to help handle any given arbitrary alterations in norm-conditons. These perturbations may spontaneously be needed so that the kinematic translations of norm-conditions, that may be necessary so that Fourier Transformations will not be bogged up, may be able to happen. Sincerely, Sam Roach.
Friday, March 11, 2011
More About On-Shell Mass
A two-dimensional superstring has a three-dimensional field associated with it. When
a relatively knit Fourier Transform that is highly Laplacian forms a torroidal structure
with an annulus at its central coniaxial, the whole Majorana-Weyl supercharge associated
with the operation of the associated superstring’s conformally invariant kinematism
is delineated, after the group metric that forms the basically Gliossi-Sherk-Olive field
described, at the outer shell general locus of that given M-field that is associated with
the described kinematic differentiation of the given two-dimensional superstring’s three-
dimensional field. This considers the fact that every superstring, whether it partakes
of mass or not, has a mass index. Such an on-shell supercharge as taken thru a Fourier
Transform that alters the spin-orbital and angular momentum distribution, delineation,
and directoralization of the associated three-dimensional field toroidal structure converts
the Yau-Exact indices transport in such a way as to form a discrete unit of mass as
to the M-field structure that I have conveyed. This is tantamount to that a spherical
shell with a physical charge in its center delineates all of the energy of its charge along
the topography of its associated shell. Likewise, the norm state Ward conditions of
the annulus of a toroidal 3-D field of a 2-D superstring delineates all of the angular
momentum and spin-orbital distribution indices at the outer shell of that given toroidal
3-D structure. Likewise, the “figure-eight” twisted toroidal structure created by certain
fermionic superstrings forms the point mass of electrons and neutrinos. This mass
of certain fermions is created by this: The norm state conditions when considering
the Ward conditions of the annuli of the two relatively Mobius ends of the “figure-
eight” described have angular momentum and spin-orbital momentum that transfers
their distribution and directoralization indices outward to the outer topology of the
given “figure-eight-like” structure. The kinematic differentiation of the Yau-Exact
indices of the “figure-eight” structure as a whole causes the given phenomenon to
translate, thru the Fourier Transform of the given M-field thru a Minkowski or Hilbert
Lagrangian, its mass indices into an integration of Hamiltonian eigenstates that allow
the Kaluza-Klein phenomena, as with 3-D fields of 2-D superstrings, to convert and/or
maintain as a mass. The abelian geometry of the light-cone-gauge of such Yau-Exact
structures causes the E(6)xE(6) gauge-bosons related to form Schwinger indices that
keep the M-fields oriented to coalesce their Noether indices into a conformally invariant
manner that has to be orientable per general locus in order to translate to a proceeding
general locus as long as the mass indices associated are limited. Since any M-field needs
a limited Lagrangian distribution in order to delineate its Majorana-Weyl indices over a
group metric that is based on a harmonics or anharmonics that may not coincide with a
group directoralization of Noether flow unless the associated superstring is unorientable,
Kaluza-Klein mass is always under light speed, per iteration, and mass must become
Yang-Mills as in a worm-hole or Yang-Mills also, if otherwise tachyonic, which is true
when mass bears unorientable yet finely directoralized motion via a Ward polarizable
dark matter holomorph. Unorientable superstrings may only be as such temporarily when
in a large group even if Reverse-Lorentz-Four-Contracted. Mass may become Yang-
Mills and tachyonic if its field delineation is majorized.
a relatively knit Fourier Transform that is highly Laplacian forms a torroidal structure
with an annulus at its central coniaxial, the whole Majorana-Weyl supercharge associated
with the operation of the associated superstring’s conformally invariant kinematism
is delineated, after the group metric that forms the basically Gliossi-Sherk-Olive field
described, at the outer shell general locus of that given M-field that is associated with
the described kinematic differentiation of the given two-dimensional superstring’s three-
dimensional field. This considers the fact that every superstring, whether it partakes
of mass or not, has a mass index. Such an on-shell supercharge as taken thru a Fourier
Transform that alters the spin-orbital and angular momentum distribution, delineation,
and directoralization of the associated three-dimensional field toroidal structure converts
the Yau-Exact indices transport in such a way as to form a discrete unit of mass as
to the M-field structure that I have conveyed. This is tantamount to that a spherical
shell with a physical charge in its center delineates all of the energy of its charge along
the topography of its associated shell. Likewise, the norm state Ward conditions of
the annulus of a toroidal 3-D field of a 2-D superstring delineates all of the angular
momentum and spin-orbital distribution indices at the outer shell of that given toroidal
3-D structure. Likewise, the “figure-eight” twisted toroidal structure created by certain
fermionic superstrings forms the point mass of electrons and neutrinos. This mass
of certain fermions is created by this: The norm state conditions when considering
the Ward conditions of the annuli of the two relatively Mobius ends of the “figure-
eight” described have angular momentum and spin-orbital momentum that transfers
their distribution and directoralization indices outward to the outer topology of the
given “figure-eight-like” structure. The kinematic differentiation of the Yau-Exact
indices of the “figure-eight” structure as a whole causes the given phenomenon to
translate, thru the Fourier Transform of the given M-field thru a Minkowski or Hilbert
Lagrangian, its mass indices into an integration of Hamiltonian eigenstates that allow
the Kaluza-Klein phenomena, as with 3-D fields of 2-D superstrings, to convert and/or
maintain as a mass. The abelian geometry of the light-cone-gauge of such Yau-Exact
structures causes the E(6)xE(6) gauge-bosons related to form Schwinger indices that
keep the M-fields oriented to coalesce their Noether indices into a conformally invariant
manner that has to be orientable per general locus in order to translate to a proceeding
general locus as long as the mass indices associated are limited. Since any M-field needs
a limited Lagrangian distribution in order to delineate its Majorana-Weyl indices over a
group metric that is based on a harmonics or anharmonics that may not coincide with a
group directoralization of Noether flow unless the associated superstring is unorientable,
Kaluza-Klein mass is always under light speed, per iteration, and mass must become
Yang-Mills as in a worm-hole or Yang-Mills also, if otherwise tachyonic, which is true
when mass bears unorientable yet finely directoralized motion via a Ward polarizable
dark matter holomorph. Unorientable superstrings may only be as such temporarily when
in a large group even if Reverse-Lorentz-Four-Contracted. Mass may become Yang-
Mills and tachyonic if its field delineation is majorized.
Saturday, March 5, 2011
Part Two of Session 5 of Course Six of Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge
Initially, I would like to make a mild refinement on what I described in Part one of this session.
Unless a superstring is tachyonic, it spacially differentiates per instanton either by one Planck Length and/or by one Planck Radius. Yet again, a superstring is only traveling at the speed of light in a vacuum if a group of one or more superstrings travels through a discretely directoralized Lagrangian that is thereby not in static equilibrium over the course of a sequential series of instantons. Ultimon Flow is referring to motion that happens in-between the duration of individual instantons. Ultimon Flow is indiscernable to life forms in general, since such activity involves relatively unorganized metrics. Therefore, for every second, there is one Real second comprised of 10^43 instantons and one Imaginary yet not fake second that is comprised of 10^43 circuits of Ultimon Flow. Mass, since it has a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology as well as having singularities between the superstrings that comprise these that are completely Yau-Exact, is energy in static equilibrium. A discretely directoralized Lagrangian-based progagation that bears a consistancy as a kinematic group of one or more superstringular units cannot exist in a cohesive state of static equilibrium through an untorsioned space operator or else it would need to have all of the mass in the universe, and there is no infinite mass.
Again, mass that is translated through a worm-hole is initially converted from having a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology to having a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology just as such a phenomenon that initially acted as a mass is technically not a mass while in a worm-hole. Upon exiting a given worm-hole, the so-called mass that was translated mainly by the torsioning of space reconverts back to having a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology -- which converts the electromotive-based entity that was in the said worm-hole back into a mass as the described phenomenon exits the associated worm-hole.
Even when a Planck-Related phenomenon merely vibrates the Planck-Radius per cetain arbitrary sets of instantons, it always wobbles back-and-forth during instanton by ~1.104745878*10^(-81) Imaginary degree. Why specifically this? Take 32piI degrees. This is the overall degrees of freedom that exist exclusively to one set of parallel universes. Divide that number by the number of universes that exist in a set of parallely universes, which is 91*10^81 universes. You will get the number
~1.104735878*10^(-81) I degrees. So, a "perfectly standstill" superstring is not perfectly standstill. Such a superstring will vary in its posisition so that, when it is detected, it appears as to have a toroidal shape. Such a toroidal appearance may have two different main reasons. -- 1) One may be noticing the Gliossi-Shirk-Olive field of the static equilibrium region where a superstring has kinematically differentiated over a set of instantons. Most of such a field that is extrapolated here is the detection of ghost states. 2) One may notice to some extent the direct field inter-relation of a given superstring with its associated field over a relatively tight-knit Laplacian.
A one-dimensional superstring, when detected, will often appear as having a figure-eight shape that has a Minkowski-Based planar sub-volume -- with two annuli-based "orifaces." One of these annuli is near the relatively norm-to holomorphic position of the described "figure-eight", while one of these annuli is near the relatively norm-to-antiholomorphic position of the described "figure-eight."
A two-dimensional superstring, when detected over a relatively tightly-knit Laplacian often appears as having a doughnut-shaped configuration that has a small oriface in the middle section of the given morphological configuration. A significantly spacewise and Fourier Translated differentiating superstring will not be detected if it is not in at least some sort of covariantly determined condition of static equilibrium. Yet, such a superstring may be extrapolated by the demonstrable extrapolation via an understanding of the said superstrings propagated environment. A string that comprises a loose photon is significantly spacially differentiating over time, and thus may not be detected until it is quantized with other EM energy. This is part of why, although a photon is a discrete unit of EM energy, when it quantizes with other EM energy, in a way, that whole discrete beam of the mentioned quantized light, in effect, acts as a "multiplicitly" unitarily directoralized ray that travels through a discrete Lagrangian as far as light-speed goes, given its medium that it travels in, to where the individual photons and the unitary beam that is comprised of these describe photons behave as fractor-based emulations of each other. I will continue with the suspense of the next part of this session later! God Bless You in the name of Yahweh! Sincerely, Sam.
Unless a superstring is tachyonic, it spacially differentiates per instanton either by one Planck Length and/or by one Planck Radius. Yet again, a superstring is only traveling at the speed of light in a vacuum if a group of one or more superstrings travels through a discretely directoralized Lagrangian that is thereby not in static equilibrium over the course of a sequential series of instantons. Ultimon Flow is referring to motion that happens in-between the duration of individual instantons. Ultimon Flow is indiscernable to life forms in general, since such activity involves relatively unorganized metrics. Therefore, for every second, there is one Real second comprised of 10^43 instantons and one Imaginary yet not fake second that is comprised of 10^43 circuits of Ultimon Flow. Mass, since it has a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology as well as having singularities between the superstrings that comprise these that are completely Yau-Exact, is energy in static equilibrium. A discretely directoralized Lagrangian-based progagation that bears a consistancy as a kinematic group of one or more superstringular units cannot exist in a cohesive state of static equilibrium through an untorsioned space operator or else it would need to have all of the mass in the universe, and there is no infinite mass.
Again, mass that is translated through a worm-hole is initially converted from having a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology to having a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology just as such a phenomenon that initially acted as a mass is technically not a mass while in a worm-hole. Upon exiting a given worm-hole, the so-called mass that was translated mainly by the torsioning of space reconverts back to having a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology -- which converts the electromotive-based entity that was in the said worm-hole back into a mass as the described phenomenon exits the associated worm-hole.
Even when a Planck-Related phenomenon merely vibrates the Planck-Radius per cetain arbitrary sets of instantons, it always wobbles back-and-forth during instanton by ~1.104745878*10^(-81) Imaginary degree. Why specifically this? Take 32piI degrees. This is the overall degrees of freedom that exist exclusively to one set of parallel universes. Divide that number by the number of universes that exist in a set of parallely universes, which is 91*10^81 universes. You will get the number
~1.104735878*10^(-81) I degrees. So, a "perfectly standstill" superstring is not perfectly standstill. Such a superstring will vary in its posisition so that, when it is detected, it appears as to have a toroidal shape. Such a toroidal appearance may have two different main reasons. -- 1) One may be noticing the Gliossi-Shirk-Olive field of the static equilibrium region where a superstring has kinematically differentiated over a set of instantons. Most of such a field that is extrapolated here is the detection of ghost states. 2) One may notice to some extent the direct field inter-relation of a given superstring with its associated field over a relatively tight-knit Laplacian.
A one-dimensional superstring, when detected, will often appear as having a figure-eight shape that has a Minkowski-Based planar sub-volume -- with two annuli-based "orifaces." One of these annuli is near the relatively norm-to holomorphic position of the described "figure-eight", while one of these annuli is near the relatively norm-to-antiholomorphic position of the described "figure-eight."
A two-dimensional superstring, when detected over a relatively tightly-knit Laplacian often appears as having a doughnut-shaped configuration that has a small oriface in the middle section of the given morphological configuration. A significantly spacewise and Fourier Translated differentiating superstring will not be detected if it is not in at least some sort of covariantly determined condition of static equilibrium. Yet, such a superstring may be extrapolated by the demonstrable extrapolation via an understanding of the said superstrings propagated environment. A string that comprises a loose photon is significantly spacially differentiating over time, and thus may not be detected until it is quantized with other EM energy. This is part of why, although a photon is a discrete unit of EM energy, when it quantizes with other EM energy, in a way, that whole discrete beam of the mentioned quantized light, in effect, acts as a "multiplicitly" unitarily directoralized ray that travels through a discrete Lagrangian as far as light-speed goes, given its medium that it travels in, to where the individual photons and the unitary beam that is comprised of these describe photons behave as fractor-based emulations of each other. I will continue with the suspense of the next part of this session later! God Bless You in the name of Yahweh! Sincerely, Sam.
Part One of Sesson Five of Course Six on Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge
Superstrings generally vary in position in one fashion or another by the Planck Length -- although in such a static equilibrium that these described superstrings usually do not move through a discretely directoralized Lagrangian over a sequential series of instantons at the Planck Length per intanton so as to move at the speed of light -- unless the mentioned superstrings are of EM energy. Otherwise, such a phenomena is phenomena that involves the bending back and forth of space fabric via a worm-hole, in which the phenomena traveling within a given worm-hole, while in this "hole", only have a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology so as to be able to travel via their kinematically covariant locus up to the speed of light or faster. You see, anything that is generally considered to us to be a mass always has a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology that also has completely Yau-Exact singularities in-between the superstrings that comprise any given mass. Such a phenomenon cannot go at the speed of light. (There is no infinite mass). Yet, if one were to convert the mass' light-cone-gauge topology to Yang-Mills, which is part of what happens when one is translated into a worm-hole (although well over 99 percent of the speed in a worm-hole is due to the back-and-forth bending of space fabric), such of what was translated may travel at the speed of light or faster. A photon that has initially scattered over the course of relatively few instantons at first has its light-cone-gauge topology converted to Kaluza-Klein as it springs briefly tachyonically, yet a photon as a photon always has only partially Yau-Exact singularities involved directly with them. (The described singularities are hermitian, yet these singularities vary from on to off of the Real Reimmanian Plane during the course of each instanton. This is why such an initially scattered photon is not a mass -- yet alone the fact that such a photon does not have infinite mass. As stated before, after relatively few instantons after a photon has scattered, its light-cone-gauge topology converts back into a Yang-Millls topology at just under the speed of light as it attempts to requantize into one or more beams of EM energy. The general locus of the orbifold eigenbasis that appertains to any given photon as the described photon scatters is limited in its propagation due to the abelian geometry of the general relative locus, until correlative photons that have just scattered re-enter the mentioned eigenbasis of the associated p field. The reason for the initial reaction of the photon is based on a similiar concept -- the concept of how and why a shock-absorber works. The combined effect of the prior described knowledge works to more adequately explain Snell's Law. (This here would be the why and the how EM phenomena that travel through a medium other than a vacuum tend to travel at under the speed of light, while EM phenomena that travels through a vacuum travel right at the speed of light (unless the given phenomenon is Kirchoff Radiation). The interior of a worm-hole is not a vacuum, yet, anything that travels through something like a worm-hole -- that well over 99 percent of its velocity is due to the bending back-and-forth of space fabric -- can, given the conditions, accelerate via its kinematically covariant locus (its actual individual accelleration besides the speed of the bending of space) up to and beyond the speed of light. Kirchoff Radiation is EM energy that travels ~6 times light speed, although it does not, in itself, travel in a worm-hole. I will continue with the suspense later! God Bless You in the name of Yahweh! Sincerely, Sam Roach.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Part Two of the Second Session of Course Nine
Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here! Glad to converse with you. Here we go!
The duration that occurs during the "space-hole", which is also simultaneously occuring during the duration that happens when the "Bases of Light" activity is going on through its sub-metrical existence, is a duration in which there is a reorganizing of the Planck phenomenon related phenomena flow. Such a metrical activity limits the motions of dilatons and dilatinos that differentiate kinematically right before the instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode, which thereby weakens the excessive Ricci Scalar eigenstates that exist via the holonomic kinematically differentiating Rarita Structure eigenstates so as to ease the wave-tug pressures that are applied to both gravitons and gravitinos. Gravitons and gravitinos act upon Planck phenomenon related phenonemena -- as well as these gravitational particles acting upon superstrings. The molding metrical activity of the instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode that occurs right after the metrical activity of the simultaneous duration of the space-hole and the Bases of Llight, along with the "dance" of the superstrings (which act as the "dancers") in their respective world-tubes via those light-cone-gauge-eigenstates that help cause the mentioned "dancing" superstrings to motivate the successive series of the Planck phenomenon related phenomena to be the dance of the prior described superstrings, serves to restrict the wobbling of the Planck phenomenon related phenomena. The superstrings operate as discrete units of energy permittivity, while their related Planck phenonemon related phenomena act as discrete units of energy impedance.
The metrical activity of the light-cone-gauge, as will be described later, pulls the described superstrings and their reverse-holomorphic field-trajectory (Pprp) into a normalization effect that is pulled, as a consequence of the metrical activity that occurs during BRST, out of their Laplacian conditions at the said locus during BRST into what is here soon to be the Ultimon Flow that occurs in-between each instanton.
When Planck phenomenon related phenomena wobble by 1.104735878*10^(-81)i degrees during an instanton that does not involve the Kaeler Metric, then the mentioned phenomena will wobble 100,000 times back-and-forth during the BRST conditions that exist during the given arbitrary instanton. Such an angle is a radial ange that is subtended from the coniaxial of the center of the length of a given Planck-Like phenomenon outward toward the Laplacian outer width of the same described given Planck-Like phenomenon as a force that pulls the whole Planck-Like phenomenon to wobble in a third Laplacian dimension in the spin-orbital multiaxial that exists based on the topology of the Minkowski surface of the described Planck-Like phenomenon. The torque of the described central coniaxial moves along the surface-area of the outer Neumman perimeter of the said coniaxial (which is again centered throughout the length of the said phenomenon). The reason why the tendency is for a back-and-forth wobble that happens 100,000 times is because most superstrings are bosonic. (The basis of substringular nature is for these to aim toward a bosonic nature.) Bosonic superstrings are two-dimensional. In the simplest series of interactive orbifold Fourier differentiation, bosonic strings are supremumized. (This means that a minimum of triune Lagrangian interaction via a Fourier Transformation happens to any bosonic superstring as the orbifolds and/or the orbifold eigensets that these begin to interact with through any discrete kinematics that involves the necessity of infrared energy to be applied to these.) Two plus three is five. The simplest orbifold contains ten interacting superstrings along with their Pprp. 10^5 = 100,000. The factors that I described in the last part of this session, as well as the factors that I described in this part of this session are the reasons why the said Planck-Like phenomena wobble as these do, and this metrical activity works to keep superstrings unfrayed. Sincerely, Sam Roach. P.S.: Pprp means Plank phenomenon related phenomena.
The duration that occurs during the "space-hole", which is also simultaneously occuring during the duration that happens when the "Bases of Light" activity is going on through its sub-metrical existence, is a duration in which there is a reorganizing of the Planck phenomenon related phenomena flow. Such a metrical activity limits the motions of dilatons and dilatinos that differentiate kinematically right before the instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode, which thereby weakens the excessive Ricci Scalar eigenstates that exist via the holonomic kinematically differentiating Rarita Structure eigenstates so as to ease the wave-tug pressures that are applied to both gravitons and gravitinos. Gravitons and gravitinos act upon Planck phenomenon related phenonemena -- as well as these gravitational particles acting upon superstrings. The molding metrical activity of the instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse-mode that occurs right after the metrical activity of the simultaneous duration of the space-hole and the Bases of Llight, along with the "dance" of the superstrings (which act as the "dancers") in their respective world-tubes via those light-cone-gauge-eigenstates that help cause the mentioned "dancing" superstrings to motivate the successive series of the Planck phenomenon related phenomena to be the dance of the prior described superstrings, serves to restrict the wobbling of the Planck phenomenon related phenomena. The superstrings operate as discrete units of energy permittivity, while their related Planck phenonemon related phenomena act as discrete units of energy impedance.
The metrical activity of the light-cone-gauge, as will be described later, pulls the described superstrings and their reverse-holomorphic field-trajectory (Pprp) into a normalization effect that is pulled, as a consequence of the metrical activity that occurs during BRST, out of their Laplacian conditions at the said locus during BRST into what is here soon to be the Ultimon Flow that occurs in-between each instanton.
When Planck phenomenon related phenomena wobble by 1.104735878*10^(-81)i degrees during an instanton that does not involve the Kaeler Metric, then the mentioned phenomena will wobble 100,000 times back-and-forth during the BRST conditions that exist during the given arbitrary instanton. Such an angle is a radial ange that is subtended from the coniaxial of the center of the length of a given Planck-Like phenomenon outward toward the Laplacian outer width of the same described given Planck-Like phenomenon as a force that pulls the whole Planck-Like phenomenon to wobble in a third Laplacian dimension in the spin-orbital multiaxial that exists based on the topology of the Minkowski surface of the described Planck-Like phenomenon. The torque of the described central coniaxial moves along the surface-area of the outer Neumman perimeter of the said coniaxial (which is again centered throughout the length of the said phenomenon). The reason why the tendency is for a back-and-forth wobble that happens 100,000 times is because most superstrings are bosonic. (The basis of substringular nature is for these to aim toward a bosonic nature.) Bosonic superstrings are two-dimensional. In the simplest series of interactive orbifold Fourier differentiation, bosonic strings are supremumized. (This means that a minimum of triune Lagrangian interaction via a Fourier Transformation happens to any bosonic superstring as the orbifolds and/or the orbifold eigensets that these begin to interact with through any discrete kinematics that involves the necessity of infrared energy to be applied to these.) Two plus three is five. The simplest orbifold contains ten interacting superstrings along with their Pprp. 10^5 = 100,000. The factors that I described in the last part of this session, as well as the factors that I described in this part of this session are the reasons why the said Planck-Like phenomena wobble as these do, and this metrical activity works to keep superstrings unfrayed. Sincerely, Sam Roach. P.S.: Pprp means Plank phenomenon related phenomena.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Part Two of the Fourteenth Session of Course Six
Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here! Here is the next part of Session 14.
One of the reasons for the torroidal shape of the field of such a two-dimensional superstring is because two-dimensional strings bear one and two-dimensional discrepencies along with a three-dimensional basis of field delineation over the course of each individual substringular Laplacian taken individually. The extrapolated fields of one-dimensional superstrings bear two annuli given the condition that such fields are detected as a thin figure-eight-shape, yet such fields that are directly associated with one-dimensional strings are thinner during each individual Laplacian than those that are related to two-dimensional strings. This is because, both one and two-dimensional superstrings exist in world-tubes that bear 32 spacial dimensions that have a basis in three spacial dimensions. Yet one-dimensional strings generate primarily two-dimensional world-sheets. Such world-sheets are the Gliossi mapping of where a world-sheet had just kinematically differentiated over a successive series of instantons, and bears a holonomic structure that consists of an organization of scattered norm-states. Such "intertube" and "figure-eight" shapes ae examples of toroidal phenomena. All illuminated superstrings that are detected are perceived of as having a toroidal shape for that reason! Even though one-dimensional strings require being perceived of as toroidal, these fields are as such because the residue that these receive is acquired from within a general three-dimensional world-sheet as the assoiciated one-dimensional superstring is propagated through a Lagrangian. The fact that one-dimensional superstrings primarily have only two-dimensional discrepencies helps to explain also why one-dimensional stringular fields eigenstates per Laplacian condition at instanton are always thinner than the corresponding field eigenstates that are associated with two-dimensional strings per Laplacian. This is why superstrings are detected in the globally distinguishable as tori-related phenomena. An individual eigenstate of a substringular field is an example of a torus. (Such as similar in M-Theory.) Superstrings are actually vibrating strands and vibrating hoops. One-Dimensional superstrings are vibrating strands while two-dimensional superstrings are vibrating hoops, as you will remember from Course#2, yet, as detected from the surrounding fields of the superstrings, one-dimensional superstrings are detected as relatively thin propagated tori & two-dimensional strings are detected as relatively fatter propagated tori. (As is always the case as shown by illuminated superstrings that are detected.)
I will continue with the suspense later!
Have a phenomenal day!
Sincerely, Sam.
One of the reasons for the torroidal shape of the field of such a two-dimensional superstring is because two-dimensional strings bear one and two-dimensional discrepencies along with a three-dimensional basis of field delineation over the course of each individual substringular Laplacian taken individually. The extrapolated fields of one-dimensional superstrings bear two annuli given the condition that such fields are detected as a thin figure-eight-shape, yet such fields that are directly associated with one-dimensional strings are thinner during each individual Laplacian than those that are related to two-dimensional strings. This is because, both one and two-dimensional superstrings exist in world-tubes that bear 32 spacial dimensions that have a basis in three spacial dimensions. Yet one-dimensional strings generate primarily two-dimensional world-sheets. Such world-sheets are the Gliossi mapping of where a world-sheet had just kinematically differentiated over a successive series of instantons, and bears a holonomic structure that consists of an organization of scattered norm-states. Such "intertube" and "figure-eight" shapes ae examples of toroidal phenomena. All illuminated superstrings that are detected are perceived of as having a toroidal shape for that reason! Even though one-dimensional strings require being perceived of as toroidal, these fields are as such because the residue that these receive is acquired from within a general three-dimensional world-sheet as the assoiciated one-dimensional superstring is propagated through a Lagrangian. The fact that one-dimensional superstrings primarily have only two-dimensional discrepencies helps to explain also why one-dimensional stringular fields eigenstates per Laplacian condition at instanton are always thinner than the corresponding field eigenstates that are associated with two-dimensional strings per Laplacian. This is why superstrings are detected in the globally distinguishable as tori-related phenomena. An individual eigenstate of a substringular field is an example of a torus. (Such as similar in M-Theory.) Superstrings are actually vibrating strands and vibrating hoops. One-Dimensional superstrings are vibrating strands while two-dimensional superstrings are vibrating hoops, as you will remember from Course#2, yet, as detected from the surrounding fields of the superstrings, one-dimensional superstrings are detected as relatively thin propagated tori & two-dimensional strings are detected as relatively fatter propagated tori. (As is always the case as shown by illuminated superstrings that are detected.)
I will continue with the suspense later!
Have a phenomenal day!
Sincerely, Sam.
0
comments
Labels:
discrepencies,
Gliossi,
Hilbert Lagrangian,
instantons,
Laplacian,
M-theory,
tori,
torroidal,
world-sheets
Labels:
discrepencies,
Gliossi,
Hilbert Lagrangian,
instantons,
Laplacian,
M-theory,
tori,
torroidal,
world-sheets
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Part Two of the Second Test Of Course Six
5) When both limits of the Royal Arc are thus connected through recycling, the shape appears as a circle.
6) Such a majorized shape through the Lagrangian of one set of parallel universes of the Ultimon appears from the outside as a giant but relatively thin hoop. There are 12 of such general world-sheets that contain all of the superstrings that act as what we would determine as the kinematic region throughout all of the multiplicit sequential series of instantons.
7) Before each instanton, there must be an instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse in order to act as an equal and opposite reaction to the virtual break in homotopy during what I term of as the "space-hole." Such an impulse-mode molds the substringular encoders so as to form that pattern that is fitting for the relativley Laplacian condition of the ensuing instanton.
8) Tori-Sector-Ranges vary very little in flow rate (within a googleth of a variation in covariant metric), while yet coompensating for their corresponding approaches via the reversal in their associated multiplicitly covariant differences in flow rates. This is due to velocity being relative to the observation of a phenoman at the varying given positions, and such varying positions are here to be considered arbitrary.
I will continue with the suspense later! Until then, you have a wonderfull day and a wonderfull night.
Sincerely, Sam Roach.
6) Such a majorized shape through the Lagrangian of one set of parallel universes of the Ultimon appears from the outside as a giant but relatively thin hoop. There are 12 of such general world-sheets that contain all of the superstrings that act as what we would determine as the kinematic region throughout all of the multiplicit sequential series of instantons.
7) Before each instanton, there must be an instanton-quaternionic-field-impulse in order to act as an equal and opposite reaction to the virtual break in homotopy during what I term of as the "space-hole." Such an impulse-mode molds the substringular encoders so as to form that pattern that is fitting for the relativley Laplacian condition of the ensuing instanton.
8) Tori-Sector-Ranges vary very little in flow rate (within a googleth of a variation in covariant metric), while yet coompensating for their corresponding approaches via the reversal in their associated multiplicitly covariant differences in flow rates. This is due to velocity being relative to the observation of a phenoman at the varying given positions, and such varying positions are here to be considered arbitrary.
I will continue with the suspense later! Until then, you have a wonderfull day and a wonderfull night.
Sincerely, Sam Roach.
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
A Summary Of Part One Of Session Five Of Course Six
Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here! I am here today to explain a little bit more what I meant by "chords" in the first part of the fifth session of Course Six.
Every first-ordered point particle is interconnected with other first-ordered point particles via mini-string. Mini-String is the phenomena based substance of substringular fields. Mini-String is comprised of second-ordered point particles that exist in bi-holomoriphic succession in such a way so as to form curved and straight lines of interconnection that interconnect the first-ordered point particles that form the substance of norm-states, relatively loose point commutators, superstrings, and the counterparts of norm-states and the counterparts of superstrings (not to mention heterotic strings, the Klein Bottle eigenstates, and the Higgs Action eigenstates. Second-Ordered point particles are comprised of third-orderd point particles. Third-Ordered point particles only exist in the loci where second-orderd point particles exist in. Second-Ordered point particles that are adjacent to one another are interconnected with each other via what I term as sub-mini-string. Sub-Mini-String is thread-like and not pointal in nature. Sub-Mini-String most directly interconnects third-ordered point particles that are interbound in the loci of second-ordered point particles. The sub-mini-string that interconnects point particles is more direct in wave-tug (tending here to imply a condition of conformal straightness or flushness), or, in other words, the sub-mini-string that interconnects point particles is more abelian in-between second-ordered point particles that are adjacent when the said successive point particles are of the same layer of reality. A layer of reality is a set of substringular phenomena of one whole space-time-framework of the same or of different universes that have the same ratio of Ying and the same ratio of Yang. Susbstringular phenomena that are of different layers of reality, when the said phenomena are relating to second-ordered point particles that are adjacent, do not tend to have as abelian of a wave interconnection as adjacent substringular phenomena that are adjacent that are of the same layer of reality. Here, what I mean by an abelian interconnection is a direct wave-tug that pushes or pulls in a uni-direcoralized Lagrangian. At the pointal level, such a wave-tug tends to be conformally straight or flush relative to the immediate surroundings of the associated point particles.
Every first-ordered point particle is interconnected with other first-ordered point particles via mini-string. Mini-String is the phenomena based substance of substringular fields. Mini-String is comprised of second-ordered point particles that exist in bi-holomoriphic succession in such a way so as to form curved and straight lines of interconnection that interconnect the first-ordered point particles that form the substance of norm-states, relatively loose point commutators, superstrings, and the counterparts of norm-states and the counterparts of superstrings (not to mention heterotic strings, the Klein Bottle eigenstates, and the Higgs Action eigenstates. Second-Ordered point particles are comprised of third-orderd point particles. Third-Ordered point particles only exist in the loci where second-orderd point particles exist in. Second-Ordered point particles that are adjacent to one another are interconnected with each other via what I term as sub-mini-string. Sub-Mini-String is thread-like and not pointal in nature. Sub-Mini-String most directly interconnects third-ordered point particles that are interbound in the loci of second-ordered point particles. The sub-mini-string that interconnects point particles is more direct in wave-tug (tending here to imply a condition of conformal straightness or flushness), or, in other words, the sub-mini-string that interconnects point particles is more abelian in-between second-ordered point particles that are adjacent when the said successive point particles are of the same layer of reality. A layer of reality is a set of substringular phenomena of one whole space-time-framework of the same or of different universes that have the same ratio of Ying and the same ratio of Yang. Susbstringular phenomena that are of different layers of reality, when the said phenomena are relating to second-ordered point particles that are adjacent, do not tend to have as abelian of a wave interconnection as adjacent substringular phenomena that are adjacent that are of the same layer of reality. Here, what I mean by an abelian interconnection is a direct wave-tug that pushes or pulls in a uni-direcoralized Lagrangian. At the pointal level, such a wave-tug tends to be conformally straight or flush relative to the immediate surroundings of the associated point particles.
Saturday, December 4, 2010
A Summary Of The Second Part Of The Fourth Session Of Course Six
Well hello once again, this is Sam Roach here! I am here today to further summarize the fourth session of Course Six.
Phenomena of one set of parallel universes may exist in anywhere from one to 32 dimensions, depending on the conformal dimensionality of a given phenomena, the locus of where it is differentiating, and the Lagrangian that it is differentiating in, both in terms of the Laplacian and/or the Fourier Transformations that a said phenomena is being redelineated and/or redistributed through operationally via the operand of space. Yet, when one gets right down to it, even though superstrings are either two-dimensional or one-dimensional -- depending on whether the said superstrings are bosonic or fermionic -- and point particles are considered as zero dimensional phenomena, the foundation of the existence of operational kinematic substance is based on the existence of three dimensions that interact on a fractored level when it comes to the very small phenomena that I described that has a conformal dimension of two, one, or zero, respectively.
So, a superstring that has a conformal dimension of one has a field that bears at least two spacial dimensions, and a superstring that has a conformal dimension of two has a field that bears at least three spacial dimensions. The condition of one-dimensional strings having a field that bears two spacial dimensions is based on the most fundamental Laplacian-based delineation of a one-dimensional superstring.
The condition of two-dimensional strings having a field that bears three dimensions is based on the most fundamental Laplacian-based delineation of two-dimensional superstrings.
A supersting moves through space over a Fourier Transformation that bears kinematic operation that is relative to the Fourier Transformations that appertains to the kinematic operation of the other superstrings that exist in physical space-time-fabric. The mapping of the transference of a superstring from its basis of field dimensionality into one or more dimensions that incorporate the kinematic operation of the said superstring over the course of instantons via a Fourier Transformation describes a multidimensional setting that is propagated through the operand of space into other dimensions that may be described by one or more axial directoralizations. Such a framework of dimensionality that is propagated through via the basis of one or more axials that allows for the kinematic operation of a superstring over the course of a relatively limited Fourier Transformation is what I mean in my writings as a Lagrangian. As you will learn in later courses, the norm conditions of corresponding Planck phenomenon related phenomena relative to one another is one of the main reasons why superstrings of one universe tend to operate kinematically through time in that universe as a general tendency unless such norm conditions are altered. You will learn more about what I mean by such norm conditions later in courses nine and ten -- and I wish to sell courses nine and ten before then.
I hope that I am building tremendous suspense for my readers, and I will continue the suspense later!
You have a phenomenal day! Sincerely, Sam Roach.
Phenomena of one set of parallel universes may exist in anywhere from one to 32 dimensions, depending on the conformal dimensionality of a given phenomena, the locus of where it is differentiating, and the Lagrangian that it is differentiating in, both in terms of the Laplacian and/or the Fourier Transformations that a said phenomena is being redelineated and/or redistributed through operationally via the operand of space. Yet, when one gets right down to it, even though superstrings are either two-dimensional or one-dimensional -- depending on whether the said superstrings are bosonic or fermionic -- and point particles are considered as zero dimensional phenomena, the foundation of the existence of operational kinematic substance is based on the existence of three dimensions that interact on a fractored level when it comes to the very small phenomena that I described that has a conformal dimension of two, one, or zero, respectively.
So, a superstring that has a conformal dimension of one has a field that bears at least two spacial dimensions, and a superstring that has a conformal dimension of two has a field that bears at least three spacial dimensions. The condition of one-dimensional strings having a field that bears two spacial dimensions is based on the most fundamental Laplacian-based delineation of a one-dimensional superstring.
The condition of two-dimensional strings having a field that bears three dimensions is based on the most fundamental Laplacian-based delineation of two-dimensional superstrings.
A supersting moves through space over a Fourier Transformation that bears kinematic operation that is relative to the Fourier Transformations that appertains to the kinematic operation of the other superstrings that exist in physical space-time-fabric. The mapping of the transference of a superstring from its basis of field dimensionality into one or more dimensions that incorporate the kinematic operation of the said superstring over the course of instantons via a Fourier Transformation describes a multidimensional setting that is propagated through the operand of space into other dimensions that may be described by one or more axial directoralizations. Such a framework of dimensionality that is propagated through via the basis of one or more axials that allows for the kinematic operation of a superstring over the course of a relatively limited Fourier Transformation is what I mean in my writings as a Lagrangian. As you will learn in later courses, the norm conditions of corresponding Planck phenomenon related phenomena relative to one another is one of the main reasons why superstrings of one universe tend to operate kinematically through time in that universe as a general tendency unless such norm conditions are altered. You will learn more about what I mean by such norm conditions later in courses nine and ten -- and I wish to sell courses nine and ten before then.
I hope that I am building tremendous suspense for my readers, and I will continue the suspense later!
You have a phenomenal day! Sincerely, Sam Roach.
Friday, November 12, 2010
Course 6, Session 7, The Toroidal Nature Of Superstrings
Well hello again world, this is Samuel Roach here! Here is the continuation of my string theory "saga."
So, allow me to ellaborate on what I mean by the "Royal Arc.": As described in earlier courses, the overall world-sheets (the Main Ones) of the Continuum exist as three sets of four hoop-like world-sheets Plus an arrangement that allows these sets to communicate in a sense. The arrangement here consists of three main phenomena.: The fields central to the overall "hoops", the Main Heterotic String Fabric, and, an integral half-hoop which I describe as a "Royal Arc." A half-circle that is majorized through a relatively large Lagrangian, in terms of circumference, is an arbitrary example of an arc. An integrated half-circumference of a circle that bends around into a circular connection is a half-hoop. The ways of Main-World-Sheets plus the Main Heterotic String Fabric plus the Royal Arc, as taken from a distance, appears as a circle. This is because the thickness of those phenomena is so much smaller than the diameter of the Ultimon. What I am describing here is in the substringular, since one can not detect the general propagation of light in the globally distinguishable as well as one may extrapolate such phenomena in the substringular. Light usually travels in the half-hoops of the Ultimon. These "half-hoops" are the basis of the "infinite-world-toroid." Light, since it usually travels in these half-hoops, usually has residue that is being recycled in the Royal Arc. From where is light generally detected? Light is generally detected in the substringualr at each stringular mapping that may be extrapolated in the globally distinguishable, or, a set of strings in the substringular for each of the four Main-World-sheets for each of the three sets of parallel universes per tori-sector-range may be at least a tad detected via mathematical calculations that may be completed from an extrapolation of substringular activity. Besides the one-fifteenth of phenomena that we can see from earth, all of the rest of the superstrings of the Main-World-Sheets of the given tori-sector-ranges are relatively uniluminated, due to the condition of Ward Polorization. This means that most physical phenomena is redistribution-based holonomic entity that is not simultaneously integrated directly with the predominant Basis of Light (the layer of reality that corresponds to the predominant layer that we tend to view in our universe. All sentient beings have perspective based on the Fourier differentiation of light.
I will continue with the suspense of session eight soon. In the meanwhile, as my dad used to say, "Think enthouseastic, and you will be enthouseastic!" Please enjoy my blog. I am more willing to review comments now that the "spam comments" have decreased. Please, have a phenomenal day! Sincerely, Sam.
So, allow me to ellaborate on what I mean by the "Royal Arc.": As described in earlier courses, the overall world-sheets (the Main Ones) of the Continuum exist as three sets of four hoop-like world-sheets Plus an arrangement that allows these sets to communicate in a sense. The arrangement here consists of three main phenomena.: The fields central to the overall "hoops", the Main Heterotic String Fabric, and, an integral half-hoop which I describe as a "Royal Arc." A half-circle that is majorized through a relatively large Lagrangian, in terms of circumference, is an arbitrary example of an arc. An integrated half-circumference of a circle that bends around into a circular connection is a half-hoop. The ways of Main-World-Sheets plus the Main Heterotic String Fabric plus the Royal Arc, as taken from a distance, appears as a circle. This is because the thickness of those phenomena is so much smaller than the diameter of the Ultimon. What I am describing here is in the substringular, since one can not detect the general propagation of light in the globally distinguishable as well as one may extrapolate such phenomena in the substringular. Light usually travels in the half-hoops of the Ultimon. These "half-hoops" are the basis of the "infinite-world-toroid." Light, since it usually travels in these half-hoops, usually has residue that is being recycled in the Royal Arc. From where is light generally detected? Light is generally detected in the substringualr at each stringular mapping that may be extrapolated in the globally distinguishable, or, a set of strings in the substringular for each of the four Main-World-sheets for each of the three sets of parallel universes per tori-sector-range may be at least a tad detected via mathematical calculations that may be completed from an extrapolation of substringular activity. Besides the one-fifteenth of phenomena that we can see from earth, all of the rest of the superstrings of the Main-World-Sheets of the given tori-sector-ranges are relatively uniluminated, due to the condition of Ward Polorization. This means that most physical phenomena is redistribution-based holonomic entity that is not simultaneously integrated directly with the predominant Basis of Light (the layer of reality that corresponds to the predominant layer that we tend to view in our universe. All sentient beings have perspective based on the Fourier differentiation of light.
I will continue with the suspense of session eight soon. In the meanwhile, as my dad used to say, "Think enthouseastic, and you will be enthouseastic!" Please enjoy my blog. I am more willing to review comments now that the "spam comments" have decreased. Please, have a phenomenal day! Sincerely, Sam.
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Solutions To Test #1 Of Course #6
Well hello again world, this is Samuel Roach here! I am about to provide test solutions to the first 5 questions of the 10 test questions of the first test of course 6, which is on the toroidal nature of superstrings.
1) A "home" tori-sector-range in a specific universe is the layer of reality in that universe where a substringular phenomena tends to iterate within.
2) The "infintie"-world-tori is not literally infinite. It is called "infinite" because the covariant codifferentiation of this space-time relationship forms the basis of kinematic space-time-fabric.
3) Tori-Sector-Ranges form in a "circle" or a "hoop" because this condition fascilitates the operation of Ultimon Flow in-between instantons. The general name for the prior described hoop-like structure is the phenomena called world-tubes.
4) The word that describes what keeps superstrings on the go is permittivity.
5) Adjacent tori-sector-ranges have "cosmetic" differences because their corresponding Basis' of Light have minor but descriptive differences in their Laplacian concavity's topological surface as taken through the Lagrangian mapping out of their holonomic surfaces.
1) A "home" tori-sector-range in a specific universe is the layer of reality in that universe where a substringular phenomena tends to iterate within.
2) The "infintie"-world-tori is not literally infinite. It is called "infinite" because the covariant codifferentiation of this space-time relationship forms the basis of kinematic space-time-fabric.
3) Tori-Sector-Ranges form in a "circle" or a "hoop" because this condition fascilitates the operation of Ultimon Flow in-between instantons. The general name for the prior described hoop-like structure is the phenomena called world-tubes.
4) The word that describes what keeps superstrings on the go is permittivity.
5) Adjacent tori-sector-ranges have "cosmetic" differences because their corresponding Basis' of Light have minor but descriptive differences in their Laplacian concavity's topological surface as taken through the Lagrangian mapping out of their holonomic surfaces.
Friday, August 27, 2010
A Description Of Rham Ghosts
Superstrings may kinematically differentiate through a Lagrangian in a relatively covariant manner or in a relatively conformally invariant manner over the course of a limited Fourier Transformation which describes the motion of superstrings through space over a limited amount of time. The motion of superstrings through a sequential series of instantons is the metrical operand of the operation of superstrings in the substringular. If a superstring moves transversely in a Noether fashion that is in a relatively linear delineation that describes a ray of phenomena that bears a topological geometric curve of its trajectory that is smooth in all of the derivaties equal to the number of dimensions that it travels in (the described superstring goes through a hermitian plane of curvature), then the described superstring, when its direct field projection intersects the direct field projection of another superstring that is colinear with relatively minimal perturbative permutations in the supplementally norm wave-pull that interconnects the said field of the two associated superstrings, and/or if such a relatively linearity involves more than two substringular fields that multiplicitly pull a group projection whose abelian wave-tug is hermitianly unitary in terms of the partially integrative Hamiltonian Operation that defines the motion of this flow, then the said flow is a Rham Cohomology whose physical memory in terms of one norm state projection of the redistributed point particles that move on account of the delineation of such a unitized field of interbound superstrings is known as an eigenstate of a Rham ghost anomaly.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
About On-Shell Mass Structure
A two-dimensional superstring has a three-dimensional field associated with it. When a relatively knit Fourier Transform that is highly Laplacian forms a toroidal structure with an annulus at its central coniaxial, the whole Majorana-Weyl supercharge associated with the operation of the associated superstring’s conformally invariant kinematism is delineated, after the group metric that forms the basically Gliossi-Sherk-Olive field described, at the outer shell general locus of that given M-field that is associated with the described kinematic differentiation of the given two-dimensional superstring’s three-dimensional field. This considers the fact that every superstring, whether it partakes of mass or not, has a mass index. Such an on-shell supercharge as taken thru a Fourier Transform that alters the spin-orbital and angular momentum distribution, delineation, and directoralization of the associated three-dimensional field toroidal structure converts the Yau-Exact indices transport in such a way as to form a discrete unit of mass as to the M-field structure that I have conveyed. This is tantamount to that a spherical shell with a physical charge in its center delineates all of the energy of its charge along the topography of its associated shell. Likewise, the norm state Ward conditions of the annulus of a toroidal 3-D field of a 2-D superstring delineates all of the angular momentum and spin-orbital distribution indices at the outer shell of that given toroidal
3-D structure. Likewise, the “figure-eight” twisted toroidal structure created by certain fermionic superstrings forms the point mass of electrons and neutrinos. This mass of certain fermions is created by this: The norm state conditions when considering the Ward conditions of the annuli of the two relatively Mobius ends of the “figure-eight” described have angular momentum and spin-orbital momentum that transfers their distribution and directoralization indices outward to the outer topology of the given “figure-eight-like” structure. The kinematic differentiation of the Yau-Exact indices of the “figure-eight” structure as a whole causes the given phenomenon to translate, thru the Fourier Transform of the given M-field thru a Minkowski or Hilbert Lagrangian, its mass indices into an integration of Hamiltonian eigenstates that allow the Kaluza-Klein phenomena, as with 3-D fields of 2-D superstrings, to convert and/or maintain as a mass. The abelian geometry of the light-cone-gauge of such Yau-Exact structures causes the E(6)xE(6) gauge-bosons related to form Schwinger indices that keep the M-fields oriented to coalesce their Noether indices into a conformally invariant manner that has to be orientable per general locus in order to translate to a proceeding general locus as long as the mass indices associated are limited. Since any M-field needs a limited Lagrangian distribution in order to delineate its Majorana-Weyl indices over a group metric that is based on a harmonics or anharmonics that may not coincide with a group directoralization of Noether flow unless the associated superstring is unorientable, Kaluza-Klein mass is always under light speed, per iteration, and mass must become Yang-Mills as in a worm-hole or Yang-Mills also, if otherwise tachyonic, which is true when mass bears unorientable yet finely directoralized motion via a Ward polarizable dark matter holomorph. Unorientable superstrings may only be as such temporarily when in a large group even if Reverse-Lorentz-Four-Contracted. Mass may become Yang-Mills and tachyonic if its field delineation is majorized.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
More About Orbifolds & Gauge Fields
An orbifold exists as a set of superstrings that exist as an organized unit with a first-ordered magnetic eigenstate associated with it. The spin-orbital field delineation of the superstrings of an orbifold act as second-ordered magnetic eigenstates of the substringular condition. The orbifolds of an orbifold eigenstate integrate through first-ordered magnetic eigenstates to form the magnetism of an orbifold eigenstate. This magnetism bears a gauge-field that induces an electrodynamic group gauge-action of Majorana-Weyl covariance between D-fields and F-fields in the environment of P-fields. The shell-like structure of an orbifold bears a periphery of substringular fields and gauge-fields that bear a norm Ward relationship in terms of the unborne tangency of Fadeev Popov Traces, along with the Yakawa and Heisendorf cohomological and nonabelian interactions that allow the superstrings of the correlative Fadeev Popov Traces to bear a tense of group harmonics, which via gravitational interaction included, draws among and upon the associated superstrings a set of Klein-Kaeler-Higgs impulses that allow the substringular forces to bear an interactive relationship with each other that is global yet discrete. The interior of the interactive stratum shell of an orbifold often has an interactive shell that is Chern-Simmons bound to the stratum of one parallel universe eigenbasis as another stratum of parallel universe. This causes all mass index shells to have a core density that integrates all of the interior of such a potential shell when there are interactive parallel universes in an orbifold. The Fadeev Popov Traces, as said before, are norm relative to one another if these are of the same universe with a wobble of ~1.104735878*10^(-81)i degrees. The more remote a universe is relative to a given universe, the more off the unborne tangency of the respective Fadeev Popov Traces are in terms of the cross-sectional geometric Laplacian taken at BRST. The gauge-fields of these discrete substringular Planck related phenomena of different universes relative to one another in certain orbifolds are interbound with a tendency to bear some field cohomology. The differing norm conditions of these associated gauge-fields causes the correlative second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates to remain abelianly for Kaluza-Klein topology and non-abelianly for Yang-Mills topology unscaffed yet interactive via the Yakawa-bound norm state fields that, are commutative via the Cassimer Invariance that indistinguishably differently recycle the norm states to ground states, and the ground states to norm states, after a successive set of iterations that are based on a Fourier sequential series that transforms the substringular and gauge-fields one eigenlocus at a time into a fresh substringular and light-cone-gauge eigenstate field. The case of an orbifold region that is completely of one univerese will be Laplacianly conditioned as a majorized stratum that bears an internal charge density, and is of a Hilbert structure that bears multiplicit eigenstates of Minkowski based Majorana-Weyl magnetic eigenstates.
Monday, November 9, 2009
Hogde Indices
Sometimes, the determination of the effect of one substringular phenomenon upon another is not the multiplicitly Minkowski or Hilbert volume itself, yet the number of indices or the number of commutators associated with the construction or framework of the discussed phenomenon upon another. When what determines the direction of gauge-metric in terms of not just directoralization and the ability of motion, yet also helping to determine the velocity, acceleration, and jerking of two or more substringular phenomena over a Fourier Series integration that involves a sequence of iteration within a set region or locus, then the condition of relative distribution of first-ordered point particles is often what helps to determine the prior stated Fourier operations that help indicate the kinematic hermitian or perturbative phenomena translation of a set of gauge-actions and/or superstrings through a certain locus or region over a set of iterations that are defined by a given group metric. When such a scenario involves the addition of the first-ordered point particles as compared in two different phenomena regions, then a first-ordered point particle would be one Hodge Index basis, and the Hodge Index of the two respective phenomena would be the total sum of how many first-ordered point particles could fit in each of the two respective phenomena individually that are interacting within a locus or region. This correlation of relative Hodge Index will define an attribute of relative substringular or gauge-action sway, pulse, or motion via the Hamiltonian basis that describes the general momentum of the phenomena of a region or locus. When the Hodge Index basis is defined by the relative amount of second-ordered point particles that could fit in two respective phenomena that will interact with a momentum in a given direction, the dual Hodge Indices that thus correspond will help define the relative sway, pulse, motion, and directoralization of the interaction of these given phenomena through a described locus or region. A Hodge Index as one point particle fill or a basis is a volume determined operator. Yet, the integration of Hodge Indices though a locus or region that helps to define the relative thrust of a subspace or of a phenomenon is a Laplacian operation. This is Laplacin here because it does not happen in time, it is a timeless occurrence, or, in other words, it is description of a phenomena that already is in one set iteration of time. If the Hodge Index basis involves a counting of third-ordered point particles from within a phenomena that exists in a locus or region, then the respective Hodge Index Laplacian operation will be based on the number of third-ordered point particles that could fit in that given locus or region of phenomena if these were theoretically all flushly integrated together in that region of space. In either case, a Hodge Index basis never includes the kernels in-between where the fit-in point particles would set within a stratum. It (the Hodge Index as a Laplacian operation) only describes the number of theoretical points that could fit in a given stratum if these points were to roll into it as spheres with a separation of their basic actual field impedance. This, by helping to determine relative substringlar thrust in a direction, helps to determine the unfolding of activities in the substringular.
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
FTAAN, Session 10
A superstring has point particle cores that are 5*10^(-87) meters thick in the substringular and 1.5*10^(-78) meters thick in the globally distinguishable. The mini-strings in-between these are 5*10^(-87) meters long. So, above the top point particle of the first order of a one-dimensional superstring is an antenna-like profection of mini-string that is often non-abelian in and of itself per iteration, whether the given superstring is abelian on the whole or non-abelian on the whole. When a two-dimensional non-abelian superstring of a non-swivel nature iterates, the mini-strings in-between the given first-ordered point particles vibrate holomophically/antiholomorphically 60 times each without moving the given first-ordered point particles during the core of BRST. When a one-dimensional non-abelian superstring of a non-swivel nature iterates, the mini-strings in-between the given first-ordered point-particles vibrate norm to holomorphically and norm to the Lagrangian of the substance of the superstring/norm to antihlolomorphically and norm to the Lagrangian of the substance of the superstring 60 times each without moving the given first-ordered point particles during the core of BRST. When a one-dimensional abelian string iterates mini-string ripples through the first-ordered point particles causing the mini-string in-between these to begin to kink at their center states sixty times norm to the holomorphic yet also norm to the Lagrangian substance of the superstring and sixty times norm to the antiholomorphic yet also norm to the Lagrangian substance of the superstring without moving the given first-ordered point particles during the core of BRST because the given ripple of the mini-string of the first-ordered point particles provides phenomena to the mini-string. When a two-dimensional abelian superstring iterates, the same thing happens except that the mini-string vibration kinks the mini-string 60 times holomorphically and 60 times antiholomorphically. The vibration of non-abelian strings and the kinks of abelian strings happen holomorphically then antiholomorphically back and forth, or norm to these and the Lagrangian of their substringular substance back-and-forth. This happens without moving the core of the first-ordered point particles during BRST.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)