About The Difference Between The Two General Types Of LCG

With a light-cone-gauge eigenstate that corresponds to a one-dimensional superstring of energy permittivity, the conical shape that may be mapped out during the activity of BRST is a planar or Minkowski partial field that bears two isomorphic hyperbolic ends that form a kinematic flowing of a surface area that is redistributed as the activity that happens during BRST is progressing.  Yet, with a light-cone-gauge eigenstate that corresponds to a two-dimensional superstring of energy permittivity, the conical shape that may be mapped out during the activity of BRST is a volume-based or Hilbert partial field that bears a region of concentric hyperbolic ends that are relatively homeomorphic per frame -- although the kinematic flow forms a permutating shape that acts as a region that is locally Ward three-dimensional .  So, as the field of a light-cone-gauge is the most important field appertaining to both the interaction of corresponding superstrings with other superstrings of energy permittivity and also to the initializing of the determination as to the succeeding delineation of the related superstrings, the constant variation of the respective Minkowski and Hilbert conical regions that flow in the general locus of the region that exists in-between a superstring and its corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Trace works to form a substrate for its interaction with its corresponding gauge-bosons so that the vibrations of the related light-cone-gauge eigenstates may harmonically in some cases -- or anharmonically in other cases -- cause the needed vibrations in Rarita Structure eigenstates so that both the Ricci Scalar will bear the necessary amplitude Hodge indices and also so that the appropriate norm projections may be able to interact with the correlative orbifolds and orbifold eigenstates in such a manner so that the Wick Action eigenstates may be able to indirectly cause that motion of Higgs Action eigenstates which causes the motion of Klein Bottle eigenstates to happen in such a manner so that Gaussian Transformaions may occur.  The pattern of the cohomological flow of the fields of light-cone-gauge eigenstates works to signal where the spatial transference of superstrings is to be redistributed -- the motion of the prior mentioned fields are the initial basis that helps to determine where the related superstrings of energy permittivity are to go next.  The manner of the mapping of the said conical relationships that I mentioned during BRST is based on the condition that exists once the related Polyakov Action eigenstates are well underway.  So, as the cites of the fields of superstrings are progressing during the period in which the Imaginary of Exchange of Real Residue is kinematic upon the related superstrings, the volume of the field partial that may be described as the field of first-ordered-light-cone-gauge eigenstates increases until the Polyakov Action appertaining to one multiplicitly covariant instanton is completed.  The effect of Lorentz-Four-Contractions is based on the condition that exists at metrical locus of the last frame of BRST.  So, when considering the proximity of superstrings with their corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Traces, the amplitude of the apexing of the Laplacian-based mapping as to the amount of light-cone-gauge field that exists per region at the end of BRST is Dirac in the relatively forward holomorphic direction and Reverse-Dirac in the relatively reverse holomorphic direction.  I will continue with the suspence later!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.